Bianca De Blasi1,2, Lorenzo Caciagli3,4, Silvia Francesca Storti5, Marian Galovic3,4,6, Matthias Koepp3,4, Gloria Menegaz5, Anna Barnes7, Ilaria Boscolo Galazzo5. 1. Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom. 2. Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed. 3. Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, Inst. Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom. 4. MRI Unit, Epilepsy Society, Chalfont St. Peter, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom. 5. Department of Computer Science, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. 6. Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. 7. Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Blood-oxygenated-level dependent (BOLD)-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is a widely used non-invasive tool for mapping brain function and connectivity. However, the BOLD signal is highly affected by non-neuronal contributions arising from head motion, physiological noise and scanner artefacts. Therefore, it is necessary to recover the signal of interest from the other noise-related fluctuations to obtain reliable functional connectivity (FC) results. Several pre-processing pipelines have been developed, mainly based on nuisance regression and independent component analysis (ICA). The aim of this work was to investigate the impact of seven widely used denoising methods on both resting-state and task fMRI. APPROACH: Task fMRI can provide some ground truth given that the task administered has well established brain activations. The resulting cleaned data were compared using a wide range of measures: motion evaluation and data quality, resting-state networks and task activations, FC. MAIN RESULTS: Improved signal quality and reduced motion artefacts were obtained with all advanced pipelines, compared to the minimally pre-processed data. Larger variability was observed in the case of brain activation and FC estimates, with ICA-based pipelines generally achieving more reliable and accurate results. SIGNIFICANCE: This work provides an evidence-based reference for investigators to choose the most appropriate method for their study and data.
OBJECTIVE: Blood-oxygenated-level dependent (BOLD)-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is a widely used non-invasive tool for mapping brain function and connectivity. However, the BOLD signal is highly affected by non-neuronal contributions arising from head motion, physiological noise and scanner artefacts. Therefore, it is necessary to recover the signal of interest from the other noise-related fluctuations to obtain reliable functional connectivity (FC) results. Several pre-processing pipelines have been developed, mainly based on nuisance regression and independent component analysis (ICA). The aim of this work was to investigate the impact of seven widely used denoising methods on both resting-state and task fMRI. APPROACH: Task fMRI can provide some ground truth given that the task administered has well established brain activations. The resulting cleaned data were compared using a wide range of measures: motion evaluation and data quality, resting-state networks and task activations, FC. MAIN RESULTS: Improved signal quality and reduced motion artefacts were obtained with all advanced pipelines, compared to the minimally pre-processed data. Larger variability was observed in the case of brain activation and FC estimates, with ICA-based pipelines generally achieving more reliable and accurate results. SIGNIFICANCE: This work provides an evidence-based reference for investigators to choose the most appropriate method for their study and data.
Authors: Nicolò Pecco; Matteo Canini; Kelsey H H Mosser; Martina Caglioni; Paola Scifo; Antonella Castellano; Paolo Cavoretto; Massimo Candiani; Cristina Baldoli; Andrea Falini; Pasquale Anthony Della Rosa Journal: Neuroinformatics Date: 2022-07-14
Authors: Rory J Piper; Chayanin Tangwiriyasakul; Elhum A Shamshiri; Maria Centeno; Xiaosong He; Mark P Richardson; Martin M Tisdall; David W Carmichael Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2021-08-02 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Ozlem Korucuoglu; Michael P Harms; Serguei V Astafiev; Semyon Golosheykin; James T Kennedy; Deanna M Barch; Andrey P Anokhin Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2021-01-28 Impact factor: 4.677
Authors: Joset A Etzel; Rachel E Brough; Michael C Freund; Alexander Kizhner; Yanli Lin; Matthew F Singh; Rongxiang Tang; Allison Tay; Anxu Wang; Todd S Braver Journal: Sci Data Date: 2022-03-29 Impact factor: 6.444