| Literature DB >> 32663307 |
Eric Goralnick1,2, Chibuike Ezeibe2, Muhammad Ali Chaudhary2, Justin McCarty2, Juan P Herrera-Escobar2, Tomas Andriotti2, Elzerie de Jager2, Daniel Ospina-Delgado3, Craig Goolsby4,5, Richard Hunt6, Joel S Weissman2, Adil Haider2,7, Lenworth Jacobs8, Erin Andrade9, Jeremy Brown10, Eileen M Bulger11, Frank K Butler12, David Callaway13, Edward J Caterson14, Niteesh K Choudhry15, Michael R Davis16, Alex Eastman17, Brian J Eastridge18, Jonathan L Epstein19, Conor L Evans20, Marianne Gausche-Hill21, Mark L Gestring22, Scott A Goldberg1, Dan Hanfling23, John Bradley Holcomb24, Carl-Oscar Jonson25,26, David R King27, Sean Kivlehan1, Russ S Kotwal28, Jon R Krohmer29, Nomi Levy-Carrick30, Matthew Levy31, Joan José Meléndez Lugo32, David P Mooney33, Matthew D Neal34, Robert Niskanen35, Patrick O'Neill36, Habeeba Park37, Peter T Pons38, Erik Prytz39, Todd E Rasmussen40, Michael A Remley28, Robert Riviello41, Ali Salim41, Stacy Shackelfold28, E Reed Smith10, Ronald M Stewart18, Mamta Swaroop42, Kevin Ward43,44, Tarsicio Uribe-Leitz41, Molly P Jarman41, Gezzer Ortega41.
Abstract
Importance: Trauma is the leading cause of death for US individuals younger than 45 years, and uncontrolled hemorrhage is a major cause of trauma mortality. The US military's medical advancements in the field of prehospital hemorrhage control have reduced battlefield mortality by 44%. However, despite support from many national health care organizations, no integrated approach to research has been made regarding implementation, epidemiology, education, and logistics of prehospital hemorrhage control by layperson immediate responders in the civilian sector. Objective: To create a national research agenda to help guide future work for prehospital hemorrhage control by laypersons. Evidence Review: The 2-day, in-person, National Stop the Bleed (STB) Research Consensus Conference was conducted on February 27 to 28, 2019, to identify and achieve consensus on research gaps. Participants included (1) subject matter experts, (2) professional society-designated leaders, (3) representatives from the federal government, and (4) representatives from private foundations. Before the conference, participants were provided a scoping review on layperson prehospital hemorrhage control. A 3-round modified Delphi consensus process was conducted to determine high-priority research questions. The top items, with median rating of 8 or more on a Likert scale of 1 to 9 points, were identified and became part of the national STB research agenda. Findings: Forty-five participants attended the conference. In round 1, participants submitted 487 research questions. After deduplication and sorting, 162 questions remained across 5 a priori-defined themes. Two subsequent rounds of rating generated consensus on 113 high-priority, 27 uncertain-priority, and 22 low-priority questions. The final prioritized research agenda included the top 24 questions, including 8 for epidemiology and effectiveness, 4 for materials, 9 for education, 2 for global health, and 1 for health policy. Conclusions and Relevance: The National STB Research Consensus Conference identified and prioritized a national research agenda to support laypersons in reducing preventable deaths due to life-threatening hemorrhage. Investigators and funding agencies can use this agenda to guide their future work and funding priorities.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32663307 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9393
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JAMA Netw Open ISSN: 2574-3805