Alison Savitz1, Bryan Fong2, Aaron Hochberg3, Gregory Rumore4, Cui Chen4, Juanita Yun5, Craig Sadur6. 1. Department of General Surgery, Kaiser Permanente, Walnut Creek, CA. 2. Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Kaiser Permanente, Walnut Creek, CA. 3. Department of Radiology, Kaiser Permanente, Walnut Creek, CA. 4. Department of Pathology, Kaiser Permanente, Walnut Creek, CA. 5. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Kaiser Permanente, Walnut Creek, CA. 6. Department of Endocrinology, Kaiser Permanente, Pleasanton, CA (retired).
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Advances in specialized medical areas and updated clinical guidelines show a need for a focused approach for patients with specific disorders. OBJECTIVE: To describe a multidisciplinary tumor board for patients with endocrine tumors. METHODS: We established an endocrine tumor board at a large health maintenance organization and studied cases presented between September 2007 and August 2017. To resolve diagnostic and/or therapeutic questions, a multidisciplinary team of specialists discussed patients' clinical presentations. Cases were broken down into diagnostic categories, demographic characteristics (age, sex), and need for repeated presentations to the board. RESULTS: We included 608 patients: 401 female (66%) and 207 male (34%). Ages ranged from teens to more than 90 years, with the peak decade 50 to 59 years (26%). Although most patients needed only 1 presentation to the board, 151 (25%) required representation, for a total of 853 presentations. The diagnoses reflected the workup status with tumor identification and localization at the initial case presentation. Diagnoses included thyroid cancer (234 patients, 38.4%), adrenal mass (165 patients, 27.1%), primary hyperparathyroidism (120 patients, 19.7%), thyroid nodule (95 patients, 15.6%), and extrathyroidal mass (23 patients, 3.8%). Other diagnoses composed the remaining 14.6%. Tumor board attendees overwhelmingly supported the meetings' benefits, with all clinicians reporting frequently changing patient management because of the meetings. CONCLUSION: Patients with endocrine tumors may benefit from a specialized approach to care. A multidisciplinary tumor board can focus discussions efficiently, provide a forum to advance care, apply endocrine-related clinical guidelines, and lead to recommendations that clinicians often employed.
INTRODUCTION: Advances in specialized medical areas and updated clinical guidelines show a need for a focused approach for patients with specific disorders. OBJECTIVE: To describe a multidisciplinary tumor board for patients with endocrine tumors. METHODS: We established an endocrine tumor board at a large health maintenance organization and studied cases presented between September 2007 and August 2017. To resolve diagnostic and/or therapeutic questions, a multidisciplinary team of specialists discussed patients' clinical presentations. Cases were broken down into diagnostic categories, demographic characteristics (age, sex), and need for repeated presentations to the board. RESULTS: We included 608 patients: 401 female (66%) and 207 male (34%). Ages ranged from teens to more than 90 years, with the peak decade 50 to 59 years (26%). Although most patients needed only 1 presentation to the board, 151 (25%) required representation, for a total of 853 presentations. The diagnoses reflected the workup status with tumor identification and localization at the initial case presentation. Diagnoses included thyroid cancer (234 patients, 38.4%), adrenal mass (165 patients, 27.1%), primary hyperparathyroidism (120 patients, 19.7%), thyroid nodule (95 patients, 15.6%), and extrathyroidal mass (23 patients, 3.8%). Other diagnoses composed the remaining 14.6%. Tumor board attendees overwhelmingly supported the meetings' benefits, with all clinicians reporting frequently changing patient management because of the meetings. CONCLUSION: Patients with endocrine tumors may benefit from a specialized approach to care. A multidisciplinary tumor board can focus discussions efficiently, provide a forum to advance care, apply endocrine-related clinical guidelines, and lead to recommendations that clinicians often employed.
Authors: Benjamin W Lamb; Nick Sevdalis; Sonal Arora; Anna Pinto; Charles Vincent; James S A Green Journal: World J Surg Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Laurence Katznelson; Edward R Laws; Shlomo Melmed; Mark E Molitch; Mohammad Hassan Murad; Andrea Utz; John A H Wass Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2014-10-30 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Lynnette K Nieman; Beverly M K Biller; James W Findling; M Hassan Murad; John Newell-Price; Martin O Savage; Antoine Tabarin Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2015-07-29 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: John W Funder; Robert M Carey; Franco Mantero; M Hassan Murad; Martin Reincke; Hirotaka Shibata; Michael Stowasser; William F Young Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2016-03-02 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: John P Bilezikian; Maria Luisa Brandi; Richard Eastell; Shonni J Silverberg; Robert Udelsman; Claudio Marcocci; John T Potts Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2014-08-27 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Jacques W M Lenders; Quan-Yang Duh; Graeme Eisenhofer; Anne-Paule Gimenez-Roqueplo; Stefan K G Grebe; Mohammad Hassan Murad; Mitsuhide Naruse; Karel Pacak; William F Young Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Pamela U Freda; Albert M Beckers; Laurence Katznelson; Mark E Molitch; Victor M Montori; Kalmon D Post; Mary Lee Vance Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 5.958