Literature DB >> 32662761

Predicting PET Cerebrovascular Reserve with Deep Learning by Using Baseline MRI: A Pilot Investigation of a Drug-Free Brain Stress Test.

David Y T Chen1, Yosuke Ishii1, Audrey P Fan1, Jia Guo1, Moss Y Zhao1, Gary K Steinberg1, Greg Zaharchuk1.   

Abstract

Background Cerebrovascular reserve (CVR) may be measured by using an acetazolamide test to clinically evaluate patients with cerebrovascular disease. However, acetazolamide use may be contraindicated and/or undesirable in certain clinical settings. Purpose To predict CVR images generated from acetazolamide vasodilation with a deep learning network by using only images before acetazolamide administration. Materials and Methods Simultaneous oxygen 15 (15O)-labeled water PET/MRI before and after acetazolamide injection were retrospectively analyzed for patients with Moyamoya disease and healthy control participants from April 2017 to May 2019. Inputs to deep learning models were perfusion-based images (arterial spin labeling [ASL]), structural scans (T2 fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery, T1), and brain location. Two models, that is, 15O-labeled water PET cerebral blood flow (CBF) and MRI (PET-plus-MRI model) before acetazolamide administration and only MRI (MRI-only model) before acetazolamide administration, were trained and tested with sixfold cross-validation. The models learned to predict a voxelwise relative CBF change (rΔCBF) map by using rΔCBF measured with PET due to acetazolamide as ground truth. Quantitative analysis included image quality metrics (peak signal-to-noise ratio, root mean square error, and structural similarity index), as well as comparison between the various methods by using correlation and Bland-Altman analyses. Identification of vascular territories with impaired rΔCBF was evaluated by using receiver operating characteristic metrics. Results Thirty-six participants were included: 24 patients with Moyamoya disease (mean age ± standard deviation, 41 years ± 12; 17 women) and 12 age-matched healthy control participants (mean age, 39 years ± 16; nine women). The rΔCBF maps predicted by both deep learning models demonstrated better image quality metrics than did ASL (all P < .001 in patients) and higher correlation coefficient with PET than with ASL (PET-plus-MRI model, 0.704; MRI-only model, 0.690 vs ASL, 0.432; both P < .001 in patients). Both models also achieved high diagnostic performance in identifying territories with impaired rΔCBF (area under receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.95 for PET-plus-MRI model [95% confidence interval: 0.90, 0.99] and 0.95 for MRI-only model [95% confidence interval: 0.91, 0.98]). Conclusion By using only images before acetazolamide administration, PET-plus-MRI and MRI-only deep learning models predicted cerebrovascular reserve images without the need for vasodilator injection. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32662761      PMCID: PMC7457949          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020192793

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  33 in total

1.  Which CT perfusion parameter best reflects cerebrovascular reserve?: correlation of acetazolamide-challenged CT perfusion with single-photon emission CT in Moyamoya patients.

Authors:  N-J Rim; H S Kim; Y S Shin; S Y Kim
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Impact of vessel wall lesions and vascular stenoses on cerebrovascular reactivity in patients with intracranial stenotic disease.

Authors:  Petrice M Cogswell; Taylor L Davis; Megan K Strother; Carlos C Faraco; Allison O Scott; Lori C Jordan; Matthew R Fusco; Blaise deB Frederick; Jeroen Hendrikse; Manus J Donahue
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Validity and reliability of a quantitative computed tomography score in predicting outcome of hyperacute stroke before thrombolytic therapy. ASPECTS Study Group. Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score.

Authors:  P A Barber; A M Demchuk; J Zhang; A M Buchan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-05-13       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Random-effects models for longitudinal data.

Authors:  N M Laird; J H Ware
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Volumetric measurement of perfusion and arterial transit delay using hadamard encoded continuous arterial spin labeling.

Authors:  Weiying Dai; Ajit Shankaranarayanan; David C Alsop
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 6.  Cerebral hemodynamic impairment: methods of measurement and association with stroke risk.

Authors:  C P Derdeyn; R L Grubb; W J Powers
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1999-07-22       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Monitoring Cerebrovascular Reactivity through the Use of Arterial Spin Labeling in Patients with Moyamoya Disease.

Authors:  Tae Jin Yun; Jin Chul Paeng; Chul-Ho Sohn; Jeong Eun Kim; Hyun-Seung Kang; Byung-Woo Yoon; Seung Hong Choi; Ji-hoon Kim; Ho-Young Lee; Moon Hee Han; Greg Zaharchuk
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Moyamoya disease and moyamoya syndrome.

Authors:  R Michael Scott; Edward R Smith
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Arterial spin-label imaging in patients with normal bolus perfusion-weighted MR imaging findings: pilot identification of the borderzone sign.

Authors:  Greg Zaharchuk; Roland Bammer; Matus Straka; Ajit Shankaranarayan; David C Alsop; Nancy J Fischbein; Scott W Atlas; Michael E Moseley
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Recommended implementation of arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI for clinical applications: A consensus of the ISMRM perfusion study group and the European consortium for ASL in dementia.

Authors:  David C Alsop; John A Detre; Xavier Golay; Matthias Günther; Jeroen Hendrikse; Luis Hernandez-Garcia; Hanzhang Lu; Bradley J MacIntosh; Laura M Parkes; Marion Smits; Matthias J P van Osch; Danny J J Wang; Eric C Wong; Greg Zaharchuk
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  A review on AI in PET imaging.

Authors:  Keisuke Matsubara; Masanobu Ibaraki; Mitsutaka Nemoto; Hiroshi Watabe; Yuichi Kimura
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 2.668

2.  Prediction of an oxygen extraction fraction map by convolutional neural network: validation of input data among MR and PET images.

Authors:  Keisuke Matsubara; Masanobu Ibaraki; Yuki Shinohara; Noriyuki Takahashi; Hideto Toyoshima; Toshibumi Kinoshita
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 3.  Progression in Moyamoya Disease: Clinical Features, Neuroimaging Evaluation, and Treatment.

Authors:  Xin Zhang; Weiping Xiao; Qing Zhang; Ding Xia; Peng Gao; Jiabin Su; Heng Yang; Xinjie Gao; Wei Ni; Yu Lei; Yuxiang Gu
Journal:  Curr Neuropharmacol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 7.708

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.