Literature DB >> 32661820

Validation of Pictorial Mood Assessment with Ottawa Mood Scales and the Positive and Negative Affect Scale for Young Adults.

Mei-Yi Wong1, Paul E Croarkin2, Chen Kang Lee3, Poh Foong Lee4.   

Abstract

Pictorial mood assessments reduce the barriers of age, culture, gender and language fluency in the course of psychiatric assessments. This study sought to validate the Ottawa Mood Scales, a pictorial form of mood assessment questionnaire among non-native English speaking young adults in Malaysia. Since the Ottawa Mood Scales has not been previously validated, the convergent validity of the Ottawa Mood Scales was measured against the Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS), an established mood assessment instrument. A total of 129 young adults (aged 18-34) were recruited and completed an online survey with the Ottawa Mood Scales and PANAS questionnaires. Exploratory factor analysis indicated that the Ottawa Mood Scales has a one-dimensional structure and that a four-item model demonstrated higher reliability than the original 5-item model. Scores on the Ottawa Mood Scales items positively and significantly correlated with scores on the negative PANAS subscale, which supports the validity of the Ottawa Mood Scales in measuring the negative effect. The Cronbach's α was .793 for the four-item model of the Ottawa Mood Scales indicating acceptable reliability in this Malaysian young adult sample. It was concluded that the Ottawa Mood Scales could have utility in assessing mood disorder symptoms in young adults.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Emotion; Mood assessment; Psychological affect; Scale validation; Young adults

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32661820     DOI: 10.1007/s10597-020-00679-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Community Ment Health J        ISSN: 0010-3853


  18 in total

Review 1.  Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire.

Authors:  Petra M Boynton; Trisha Greenhalgh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-05-29

2.  Structural validity and reliability of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): evidence from a large Brazilian community sample.

Authors:  Hudson W de Carvalho; Sérgio B Andreoli; Diogo R Lara; Christopher J Patrick; Maria Inês Quintana; Rodrigo A Bressan; Marcelo F de Melo; Jair de J Mari; Miguel R Jorge
Journal:  Braz J Psychiatry       Date:  2013 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.697

3.  A bifactor model of negative affectivity: fear and distress components among younger and older youth.

Authors:  Chad Ebesutani; Ashley Smith; Adam Bernstein; Bruce F Chorpita; Charmaine Higa-McMillan; Brad Nakamura
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2011-09

4.  Treating ordinal scales as interval scales: an attempt to resolve the controversy.

Authors:  T R Knapp
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  A pilot study into a possible relationship between diet and stuttering.

Authors:  Jean Hum; Toni Rietveld; Piet Wiedijk; Pascal van Lieshout
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 2.538

6.  Does mood state change risk taking tendency in older adults?

Authors:  Kee-Lee Chou; Tatia M C Lee; Andy H Y Ho
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2007-06

7.  Perioperative Anxiety and Stress in Children Undergoing Congenital Cardiac Surgery and Their Parents: Effect of Brief Intervention-A Randomized Control Trial.

Authors:  Ashok Kumar; Sambhunath Das; Sandeep Chauhan; Usha Kiran; Sujata Satapathy
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 2.628

8.  Development and validation of the short version of the Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWB-S).

Authors:  Enzo Grossi; Nicola Groth; Paola Mosconi; Renata Cerutti; Fabio Pace; Angelo Compare; Giovanni Apolone
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 9.  Cultural differences in emotion: differences in emotional arousal level between the East and the West.

Authors:  Nangyeon Lim
Journal:  Integr Med Res       Date:  2016-03-21

10.  Development of a pictorial scale for assessing functional interference with chronic pain: the Pictorial Pain Interference Questionnaire.

Authors:  Andrew J Cook; David A Roberts; Karen C Nelson; Brian R Clark; B Eugene Parker
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.133

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.