Literature DB >> 32660987

Adding Insult to Injury: Mechanistic Basis for How AmpC Mutations Allow Pseudomonas aeruginosa To Accelerate Cephalosporin Hydrolysis and Evade Avibactam.

Cole L Slater1, Judith Winogrodzki1, Pablo A Fraile-Ribot2,3, Antonio Oliver2,3, Mazdak Khajehpour4, Brian L Mark5.   

Abstract

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a leading cause of nosocomial infections worldwide and notorious for its broad-spectrum resistance to antibiotics. A key mechanism that provides extensive resistance to β-lactam antibiotics is the inducible expression of AmpC β-lactamase. Recently, a number of clinical isolates expressing mutated forms of AmpC have been found to be clinically resistant to the antipseudomonal β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) combinations ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam. Here, we compare the enzymatic activity of wild-type (WT) AmpC from PAO1 to those of four of these reported AmpC mutants, bearing mutations E247K (a change of E to K at position 247), G183D, T96I, and ΔG229-E247 (a deletion from position 229 to 247), to gain detailed insights into how these mutations allow the circumvention of these clinically vital antibiotic-inhibitor combinations. We found that these mutations exert a 2-fold effect on the catalytic cycle of AmpC. First, they reduce the stability of the enzyme, thereby increasing its flexibility. This appears to increase the rate of deacylation of the enzyme-bound β-lactam, resulting in greater catalytic efficiencies toward ceftolozane and ceftazidime. Second, these mutations reduce the affinity of avibactam for AmpC by increasing the apparent activation barrier of the enzyme acylation step. This does not influence the catalytic turnover of ceftolozane and ceftazidime significantly, as deacylation is the rate-limiting step for the breakdown of these antibiotic substrates. It is remarkable that these mutations enhance the catalytic efficiency of AmpC toward ceftolozane and ceftazidime while simultaneously reducing susceptibility to inhibition by avibactam. Knowledge gained from the molecular analysis of these and other AmpC resistance mutants will, we believe, aid in the design of β-lactams and BLIs with reduced susceptibility to mutational resistance.
Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AmpC; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; antibiotic resistance; avibactam; ceftazidime; ceftolozane; β-lactamase

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32660987      PMCID: PMC7449160          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00894-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  53 in total

1.  Selection and molecular characterization of ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant mutants in Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains containing derepressed AmpC.

Authors:  Sushmita D Lahiri; Grant K Walkup; James D Whiteaker; Tiffany Palmer; Kathy McCormack; M Angela Tanudra; Tory J Nash; Jason Thresher; Michele R Johnstone; Laurie Hajec; Stephania Livchak; Robert E McLaughlin; Richard A Alm
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Structural insight into potent broad-spectrum inhibition with reversible recyclization mechanism: avibactam in complex with CTX-M-15 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa AmpC β-lactamases.

Authors:  Sushmita D Lahiri; Stefano Mangani; Thomas Durand-Reville; Manuela Benvenuti; Filomena De Luca; Gautam Sanyal; Jean-Denis Docquier
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Mechanisms leading to in vivo ceftolozane/tazobactam resistance development during the treatment of infections caused by MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Pablo A Fraile-Ribot; Gabriel Cabot; Xavier Mulet; Leonor Periañez; M Luisa Martín-Pena; Carlos Juan; José L Pérez; Antonio Oliver
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  Molecular mechanisms of beta-lactam resistance mediated by AmpC hyperproduction in Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical strains.

Authors:  Carlos Juan; María D Maciá; Olivia Gutiérrez; Carmen Vidal; José L Pérez; Antonio Oliver
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Interaction of azthreonam and related monobactams with beta-lactamases from gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  K Bush; J S Freudenberger; R B Sykes
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  An ultrahigh resolution structure of TEM-1 beta-lactamase suggests a role for Glu166 as the general base in acylation.

Authors:  George Minasov; Xiaojun Wang; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Inhibitor resistance in the KPC-2 beta-lactamase, a preeminent property of this class A beta-lactamase.

Authors:  Krisztina M Papp-Wallace; Christopher R Bethel; Anne M Distler; Courtney Kasuboski; Magdalena Taracila; Robert A Bonomo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  AmpC beta-lactamases.

Authors:  George A Jacoby
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 26.132

9.  Pharmacokinetics and Tissue Penetration of Ceftolozane-Tazobactam in Diabetic Patients with Lower Limb Infections and Healthy Adult Volunteers.

Authors:  Marguerite L Monogue; Sean M Stainton; Arlinda Baummer-Carr; Ashley K Shepard; James F Nugent; Joseph L Kuti; David P Nicolau
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Deciphering the Evolution of Cephalosporin Resistance to Ceftolozane-Tazobactam in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Melissa D Barnes; Magdalena A Taracila; Joseph D Rutter; Christopher R Bethel; Ioannis Galdadas; Andrea M Hujer; Emilia Caselli; Fabio Prati; John P Dekker; Krisztina M Papp-Wallace; Shozeb Haider; Robert A Bonomo
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 7.867

View more
  11 in total

1.  Selection of AmpC β-Lactamase Variants and Metallo-β-Lactamases Leading to Ceftolozane/Tazobactam and Ceftazidime/Avibactam Resistance during Treatment of MDR/XDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections.

Authors:  Alba Ruedas-López; Isaac Alonso-García; Cristina Lasarte-Monterrubio; Paula Guijarro-Sánchez; Eva Gato; Juan Carlos Vázquez-Ucha; Juan Andrés Vallejo; Pablo Arturo Fraile-Ribot; Begoña Fernández-Pérez; David Velasco; José María Gutiérrez-Urbón; Marina Oviaño; Alejandro Beceiro; Concepción González-Bello; Antonio Oliver; Jorge Arca-Suárez; Germán Bou
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 5.938

2.  In Vitro Activity of Ceftolozane-Tazobactam, Imipenem-Relebactam, Ceftazidime-Avibactam, and Comparators against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates Collected in United States Hospitals According to Results from the SMART Surveillance Program, 2018 to 2020.

Authors:  James A Karlowsky; Sibylle H Lob; C Andrew DeRyke; David W Hilbert; Michael T Wong; Katherine Young; Fakhar Siddiqui; Mary R Motyl; Daniel F Sahm
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 5.938

3.  Emergence of Resistance to Ceftazidime-Avibactam in a Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolate Producing Derepressed bla PDC in a Hollow-Fiber Infection Model.

Authors:  G L Drusano; Robert A Bonomo; Steven M Marshall; Laura J Rojas; Mark D Adams; Maria F Mojica; Barry N Kreiswirth; Liang Chen; Nino Mtchedlidze; Meredith Bacci; Michael Vicchiarelli; Jürgen B Bulitta; Arnold Louie
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  In Vitro Susceptibility of Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa following Treatment-Emergent Resistance to Ceftolozane-Tazobactam.

Authors:  Abigail M Rubio; Ellen G Kline; Chelsea E Jones; Liang Chen; Barry N Kreiswirth; M Hong Nguyen; Cornelius J Clancy; Vaughn S Cooper; Ghady Haidar; Daria Van Tyne; Ryan K Shields
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Emergence of Resistance to Novel Cephalosporin-β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations through the Modification of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa MexCD-OprJ Efflux Pump.

Authors:  María A Gomis-Font; Cristina Pitart; Ester Del Barrio-Tofiño; Yuliya Zboromyrska; Sara Cortes-Lara; Xavier Mulet; Francesc Marco; Jordi Vila; Carla López-Causapé; Antonio Oliver
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  New Carbapenemase Inhibitors: Clearing the Way for the β-Lactams.

Authors:  Juan C Vázquez-Ucha; Jorge Arca-Suárez; Germán Bou; Alejandro Beceiro
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-12-06       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  In Vivo Evolution of GES β-Lactamases Driven by Ceftazidime/Avibactam Treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections.

Authors:  Pablo A Fraile-Ribot; Javier Fernández; María A Gomis-Font; Lorena Forcelledo; Xavier Mulet; Carla López-Causapé; Antonio Oliver
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Molecular Basis of AmpC β-Lactamase Induction by Avibactam in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: PBP Occupancy, Live Cell Binding Dynamics and Impact on Resistant Clinical Isolates Harboring PDC-X Variants.

Authors:  Silvia López-Argüello; María Montaner; Antonio Oliver; Bartolome Moya
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  β-lactam Resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Current Status, Future Prospects.

Authors:  Karl A Glen; Iain L Lamont
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2021-12-18

10.  Cefiderocol Activity Against Clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates Exhibiting Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Resistance.

Authors:  Patricia J Simner; Stephan Beisken; Yehudit Bergman; Andreas E Posch; Sara E Cosgrove; Pranita D Tamma
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 3.835

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.