| Literature DB >> 32660545 |
Jae-Yun Sung1, Min-Woo Lee2, Yeo-Kyoung Won3, Hyung-Bin Lim3, Jung-Yeul Kim4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although many studies have reported clinical features, surgical outcomes of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD), studies focusing on total RRD are rare. In this study, we investigate the clinical characteristics, risk factors, and prognosis of total RRD.Entities:
Keywords: Ocular trauma; Proliferative vitreoretonotaphy; Risk factors; Total rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32660545 PMCID: PMC7359495 DOI: 10.1186/s12886-020-01560-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Ophthalmol ISSN: 1471-2415 Impact factor: 2.209
Clinical characteristics of patients in total rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) group and partial RRD group
| Total RRD | Partial RRD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Right:Left (n) | 20:24 | 43:45 | 0.712a |
| Premedical history (n, %) | |||
| Hypertension | 11 (25.0%) | 25 (28.4%) | 0.678a |
| Diabetes mellitus | 0 (0.0%) | 6 (6.8%) | 0.178b |
| Trauma history (n, %) | 9 (20.5%) | 3 (3.4%) | |
| Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (n, %) | 16 (36.4%) | 6 (6.8%) | |
| Pseudophakic eye (n, %) | 18 (40.9%) | 14 (15.9%) | |
| High myopia (≥ 26 mm) (n, %) | 12 (27.3%) | 24 (27.3%) | 0.784a |
| Duration of symptom (days, mean ± SD) | 34.06 ± 46.87 | 9.03 ± 11.46 | |
SD standard deviation
Significant P values are expressed in bold characters
achi-square test
bfisher’s exact test
cindependent t test
Characteristics of retinal breaks in total rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) group and partial RRD group
| Total RRD | Partial RRD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of retinal break (n, %) | 0.250a | ||
| Single | 25 (56.8%) | 59 (67.1%) | |
| Multiple | 19 (43.2%) | 29 (32.9%) | |
| Location of retinal break (n, %) | |||
| Superior | 25 (56.8%) | 57 (64.8%) | |
| Inferior | 7 (15.9%) | 24 (27.3%) | |
| Both superior and inferior | 12 (27.3%) | 7 (7.95%) | |
| Type of retinal break (n, %) | |||
| Macular hole | 6 (13.6%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Atropic hole | 2 (4.5%) | 24 (27.3%) | |
| Retinal tear | 24 (54.5%) | 61 (69.3%) | |
| Giant retinal tear | 6 (13.6%) | 2 (2.3%) | |
| Mixed type | 6 (13.6%) | 1 (1.1%) |
Significant P values are expressed in bold characters
achi-square test
bfisher’s exact test
Surgical results in total rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) group and partial RRD group
| Total RRD | Partial RRD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Preoperative BCVA (log MAR) | 2.23 ± 0.45 | 0.82 ± 0.83 | |
| Final BCVA (log MAR) | 1.88 ± 0.96 | 0.35 ± 0.52 | |
| Retinal re-detachment after surgery (n) | 11/44 | 3/88 | |
| Success rate (%) | 75.0 | 96.6 | |
| Re-operation (n) | 9/11 | 3/3 | |
Mean time of re-detachment after primary surgery (months) | 52.00 ± 61.95 | 45.33 ± 11.68 | 0.859a |
logMAR logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution; BCVA best-corrected visual acuity
Significant P values are expressed in bold characters
aindependent t test
Characteristics of re-detached patients in total rhegmatogenous retinal detachment group
| Initial surgery | Second surgery | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type of surgery | Type of tamponade | Type of retinal break | Type of surgery | Type of retinal break | Type of tamponade | Final status | |
| PPV | SO | Macular hole | – | – | – | – | |
| PPV | SO | Macular hole | – | – | – | – | |
| PPV | C3F8 | Macular hole | PPV | Macular hole | SO | Attached | |
| PPV | C3F8 | Retinal tear | PPV | Retinal tear | SO | Attached | |
| PPV | C3F8 | Retinal tear | PPV | Retinal tear | SO | Attached | |
| PPV | SO | Macular hole | PPV | Macular hole | C3F8 | Detached | |
| PPV | C3F8 | Macular hole | PPV | Retinal tear | SO | Attached | |
| PPV | SF6 | Retinal tear | PPV | Macular hole | SO | Attached | |
| PPV | SO | Retinal tear PVR | PPV | PVR (C1) | SO | Detached | |
| PPV with SB | SF6 | Retinal tear | PPV | Retinal tear | SO | Attached | |
| PPV | C3F8 | Retinal tear PVR | PPV | Macular hole | SO | Detached | |
PPV pars plana virectomy; SO silicone oil; CF, Octafluoropropane; SF Sulfur hexafluoride; PVR Proliferative vitreoretinopathy; SB scleral buckle
Analysis of the factors predicting anatomic success in total rhegmatogenous retinal detachment group
| Attatched | Redetached | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yr) | 47.82 | 63.45 | |
| Lens status (n, %) | |||
| Phakia | 23 (69.7%) | 2 (18.2%) | |
| Pseudophakia | 10 (33.3%) | 9 (81.8%) | |
| High myopia (n, %) | 0.263c | ||
| No | 25 (75.8%) | 6 (54.5%) | |
| Yes | 8 (24.2%) | 5 (45.5%) | |
| PVR (n, %) | 1.000c | ||
| No | 21 (63.6%) | 7 (63.6%) | |
| Yes | 12 (36.4%) | 4 (36.4%) | |
| Trauma (n, %) | 0.412b | ||
| No | 25 (75.8%) | 10 (90.9%) | |
| Yes | 8 (24.2%) | 1 (0.9%) | |
| Macular hole (n, %) | |||
| No | 32 (97.0%) | 6 (54.5%) | |
| Yes | 1 (3%) | 5 (45.5%) | |
| Number of break (n, %) | 0.741c | ||
| Single | 20 (60.6%) | 6 (54.5%) | |
| Multiple | 13 (39.4%) | 5 (45.5%) | |
| Break location (n, %) | 0.343b | ||
| Superior | 18 (54.5%) | 8 (72.7%) | |
| Inferior | 7 (21.2%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| Both superior and inferior | 8 (24.2%) | 3 (27.3%) | |
| Type of surgery (n, %) | 0.981b | ||
| Vitrectomy only | 28 (84.8%) | 10 (90.9%) | |
| Vitrectomy with SB | 5 (15.2%) | 1 (9.1%) | |
| Tamponade (n, %) | |||
| Gas (SF6, C3F8) | 16 (48.5%) | 7 (63.6%) | 0.381c |
| Silicone oil | 17 (51.5%) | 4 (36.4%) | |
CF Perfluoropropane; SF Sulfur hexafluoride; PVR Proliferative vitreoretinopathy; SB scleral buckling
Significant P values are expressed in bold characters
aindependent t test
bfisher’s exact test
cchi-square test