| Literature DB >> 32660487 |
María José García-Iglesias1,2, Jose Luis Cuevas-Higuera1, Ana Bastida-Sáenz1, María Gracia de Garnica-García3, Laura Polledo3, Paula Perero1, Jorge González-Fernández3, Beatriz Fernández-Martínez3, Claudia Pérez-Martínez4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: p53 protein is essential for the regulation of cell proliferation. Aberrant accumulation of it usually occurs in cutaneous malignancies. Mutant p53 is detected by immunohistochemistry because it is more stable than the wild-type p53. However, post-translational modifications of p53 in response to ultraviolet radiation are important mechanisms of wild-type p53 stabilization, leading to positive staining in the absence of mutation. The aims were: 1) to analyze the immunohistochemical expression of p53 and phospho-p53 Serine392 in canine skin endothelial tumours; and 2) to determine if any relationship exists between p53 and phospho-p53 Serine392 overexpression and cell proliferation.Entities:
Keywords: Cell proliferation; Dog; Hemangiomas; Hemangiosarcomas; Ki-67; Phospho-p53 Serine392; Skin; p53
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32660487 PMCID: PMC7359283 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-020-02457-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Location within the skin, actinic changes and tumor size of canine cutaneous hemangiomas and hemangiosarcomas
| Cutaneous endothelial tumors | Location within the skin a | Actinic changes b | Tumor size c | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of tumors/total tumors (percentage) | Number of tumors/total tumors (percentage) | Number of tumors/total tumors (percentage) | |||||||
| Dermal | Hypodermal | No | Yes | ≤5 cm | > 5 cm | ||||
| .008 | .001 | .491 | |||||||
| Hemangioma | 0/13 (0%) | 13/13 (100%) | 11/12 (91.67%) | 1/12 (8.33%) | 10/11 (90.91%) | 1/11 (9.09%) | |||
| Hemangiosarcoma | 10/25 (40.0%) | 15/25 (60.0%) | 0/17 (0%) | 17/17 (100%) | 20/24 (83.33%) | 4/24 (16.67%) | |||
| .667 | – | 1.000 | |||||||
| Well-differentiated | 4/8 (50.0%) | 4/8 (50.0%) | 0/6 (0%) | 6/6 (100%) | 8/9 (88.89%) | 1/9 (11.11%) | |||
| Moderately differentiated | 6/17 (35.29%) | 11/17 (64.71%) | 0/11 (0%) | 11/11 (100%) | 12/15 (80.0%) | 3/15 (20.0%) | |||
Non-included in inferential statistical study the poorly differentiated hemangiosarcoma (case No. 40)
a Unavailable data in 1 hemangiosarcoma (case No. 22)
b Unavailable data in 1 hemangioma (case No. 2) and 9 hemangiosarcomas (cases Nos. 14, 16, 17, 24, 28, 31, 32, 36, and 37)
c Unavailable data in 2 hemangiomas (cases Nos. 6 and 7) and 2 hemangiosarcomas (cases Nos. 28 and 29)
d Fisher’s exact test
Fig. 1Box plots of median and interquartile range (IQR) mitotic count. a Hemangioma (median = 0%; IQR = 0%) versus hemangiosarcoma (HSA) (median = 14.50%; IQR = 8.75–33.0%). b Hemangiomas versus well-differentiated HSAs (median = 8.0%; IQR = 5.50–11.0%) versus moderately differentiated HSAs (median = 24.0%; IQR = 13.50–44.0%). c HSA stage I (median = 11.50%; IQR = 6.0–23.25%) versus HSA stage II (median = 22.0%; IQR = 13.0–33.0%). d HSA size ≤5 cm (median = 13.0%; IQR = 8.25–22.50%) versus HSA > 5 cm (median = 24.0%; IQR = 11.50–41.75%). Mann-Whitney U test (a, c, d) and Mann-Whitney pairwise comparisons (b) were applied for statistical analysis
Fig. 2Box plots of median and interquartile range (IQR) Ki67 index. a Hemangioma (median = 0.50%; IQR = 0–2.80%) versus hemangiosarcoma (HSA) (median = 34.85%; IQR = 23.88–42.33%). b Hemangioma versus well-differentiated HSAs (median = 24.60%; IQR = 15.45–39.35%) versus moderately differentiated HSAs (median = 35.60%; IQR = 26.50–43.10%). c Stage I HSAs (median = 31.40%; IQR = 21.73–50.03%) versus stage II HSAs (median = 35.60%; IQR = 27.90–42.10%). d HSA size ≤5 cm (median = 34.20%; IQR = 20.58–42.93%) versus HSA > 5 cm (median = 34.85%; IQR = 32.45–38.75%). Mann-Whitney U test a, Mann-Whitney pairwise comparisons (b) and Student t test (c, d) were applied for statistical analysis
Fig. 3Immunohistochemical expression of proliferative and cell cycle regulatory markers. a Hemangioma. Presence of few Ki-67-positive tumour nuclei. Inset: Positive nuclear expression (arrows). b Well-differentiated hemangiosarcoma. Numerous Ki-67-positive neoplastic nuclei. c Hemangioma. No labeling for p53. d Well-differentiated hemangiosarcoma. Note a high number of neoplastic cells showing strong nuclear expression for p53. e Hemangioma. No labeling for pp53 Ser392. f Moderately differentiated hemangiosarcoma. Strong nuclear pp53 Ser392 reaction in numerous neoplastic cells. Peroxidase-DAB revelation system, Harris Haematoxylin counterstain. 200x
Fig. 4Box plots of median and interquartile range (IQR) p53 index. a Hemangioma (median = 0%; IQR = 0–20.91%) versus hemangiosarcoma (HSA) (median = 74.61%; IQR = 66.97–82.98%). b Hemangiomas versus well-differentiated HSAs (median = 82.40%; IQR = 66.49–83.17%) versus moderately differentiated HSAs (median = 73.06%; IQR = 67.11–84.32%). c Cutaneous vascular tumours without actinic changes (median = 0%; IQR = 0–11.17%) versus with actinic changes in the skin (median = 73.94%; IQR = 66.05–82.83%). d Stage I HSAs (median = 82.33%; IQR = 66.97–86.77%) versus stage II HSAs (median = 73.06%; IQR = 67.53–82.40%). e HSA size ≤5 cm (median = 74.61%; IQR = 66.11–82.54%) versus HSA > 5 cm (median = 77.93%; IQR = 68.91–91.39%). Mann-Whitney U test (a, c,e), Mann-Whitney pairwise comparisons(b) and Student t test (d) were applied for statistical analysis
Fig. 5Box plots of median and interquartile range (IQR) pp53 Ser392 index. a Hemangioma (median = 0%; IQR =0%) versus hemangiosarcoma (HSA) (median = 53.80%; IQR = 0–69.50%). b Hemangiomas versus well-differentiated HSAs (median = 0%; IQR = 0–53.65%) versus moderately differentiated HSAs (median = 66.90%; IQR = 23.35–70.50%). c Cutaneous vascular tumours without actinic changes (median = 0%; IQR = 0%) versus with actinic changes in the skin (median = 58.70%; IQR = 0–70.30%). d Stage I HSAs (median = 65.15%; IQR = 52.78–79.65%) versus stage II HSAs (median = 12.80%; IQR = 0–67.90%). e HSA size≤5 cm (median = 53.80%; IQR = 0–69.33%) versus HSA > 5 cm (median = 23.35%; IQR = 0–65.30%). Mann-Whitney U test (a, c, d, e) and Mann-Whitney pairwise comparisons (b) were applied for statistical analysis
Fig. 6Box plots of median and interquartile range (IQR) p53 and pp53 Ser392 indexes in relation to body location of HSAs. a p53 index. Cutaneous HSAs (median = 74.61%; IQR = 66.97–83.98%) versus visceral HSAs (median = 41.59%; IQR = 26.89–64.87%). b pp53 Ser392 index. Cutaneous HSAs (median = 53.80%; IQR = 0–69.50%) versus visceral HSAs (median = 0%; IQR = 0–22.53%). c p53 index. Visceral HSAs versus stage I/dermal HSAs (median = 82.33%; IQR = 66.97–86.77%) versus stage II/hypodermal (median = 73.06%; IQR = 67.53–82.40%). d pp53 Ser392 index. Visceral HSAs versus stage I/dermal HSAs (median = 65.15%; IQR = 52.78–79.65%) versus stage II/hypodermal HSAs (median = 12.80%; IQR = 0–67.90%). Mann-Whitney U test (a, b), Tukey test (c) and Mann-Whitney pairwise comparisons (d) were applied for statistical analysis
Antibodies used in immunohistochemical analysis
| Antigen | Clone | Source | Dilution | Type of Antibody | Detection System/Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD31 | JC/70A | DAKO, Copenhagen, Denmark | 1:100 | Mouse MAb | Vectastain Elite, ABC Kit; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, California, USA |
| Ki67 | MIB-1 | DAKO, Copenhagen, Denmark | 1:100 | Mouse MAb | Vectastain Elite, ABC Kit; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, California, USA |
| p53 | CM1 | Signet Laboratories, Dedham, MA | 1:200 | Rabbit PAb | EnVision+ System Labelled Polymer-HRP anti-rabbit (Dako, Copenhagen, Denmark) |
| pp53 Ser392 | sc-56,173 | Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, CA | 1:100 | Mouse MAb | Vectastain Elite, ABC Kit; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, California, USA |
MAb monoclonal antibody, PAb polyclonal antibody