Literature DB >> 32660314

Interventions to Reduce Aerosolized Microbes in Dental Practice: A Systematic Review with Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

D Koletsi1, G N Belibasakis2, T Eliades1.   

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review and network meta-analysis was to identify and rank the effectiveness of different interventions used in dental practice to reduce microbial load in aerosolized compounds. Seven electronic databases were searched to April 6, 2020, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or nonrandomized prospective studies in the field. Study selection, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment were performed for all included studies, while the outcome of interest pertained to differences in bacterial load quantification through the use of different interventions prior to aerosol-generating procedures in dental practices. Random effects frequentist network meta-analysis was performed, with mean difference (MD) and 95% CI as the effect measure. Confidence in the documented evidence was assessed through the newly fueled CINeMA framework (Confidence in Network Meta-analysis) based on the GRADE approach (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Twenty-nine clinical trials were deemed eligible, 21 RCTs and 8 nonrandomized studies, while 11 RCTs contributed to the network meta-analysis, comprising 10 competing interventions. Tempered chlorhexidine (CHX) 0.2% as compared with nonactive control mouth rinse, prior to routine ultrasonic scaling, was most effective toward reduced postprocedural bacterial load with an MD of -0.92 (95% CI, -1.54 to -0.29) in log10 bacterial CFUs (colony-forming units). For CHX 0.2%, an MD of -0.74 (95% CI, -1.07 to -0.40) was observed as compared with control. Tempered CHX 0.2% presented the highest probabilities of being ranked the most effective treatment (31.2%). Level of confidence varied from very low to moderate across all formulated comparisons. These findings summarize the current state of research evidence in the field of aerosolized bacteria in dentistry. Instigated by the era of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the stipulation of a broader evaluation of the aerosolized microbes, including viruses, potentially coupled with disinfectant-based prevention schemes should be prioritized.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SARS-CoV-2; aerosol; bacteria; debonding; mouth rinse; ultrasonic scaling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32660314     DOI: 10.1177/0022034520943574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  21 in total

Review 1.  Preprocedural mouth rinses for preventing transmission of infectious diseases through aerosols in dental healthcare providers.

Authors:  Sumanth Kumbargere Nagraj; Prashanti Eachempati; Martha Paisi; Mona Nasser; Gowri Sivaramakrishnan; Tony Francis; Jos H Verbeek
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-08-22

Review 2.  Sailing through the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond: An Evidence-Based Analysis for Dental Healthcare and Practice.

Authors:  Harpreet Singh; Shabina Sachdeva; Dhirendra Srivastava; Pranav Kapoor; Poonam Sharma; Raj Kumar Maurya; Pinaki Roy
Journal:  Front Dent       Date:  2022-03-07

3.  Interventions to reduce contaminated aerosols produced during dental procedures for preventing infectious diseases.

Authors:  Sumanth Kumbargere Nagraj; Prashanti Eachempati; Martha Paisi; Mona Nasser; Gowri Sivaramakrishnan; Jos H Verbeek
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-10-12

4.  COVID-19: What do we know?

Authors:  Steve Marshall; Michael Duryea; Greg Huang; Onur Kadioglu; James Mah; Juan Martin Palomo; Emile Rossouw; Dina Stappert; Kelton Stewart; Eser Tufekci
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Differential effects of antiseptic mouth rinses on SARS-CoV-2 infectivity in vitro.

Authors:  Chuan Xu; Annie Wang; Eileen R Hoskin; Carla Cugini; Kenneth Markowitz; Theresa L Chang; Daniel H Fine
Journal:  bioRxiv       Date:  2020-12-01

Review 6.  Innovative diagnostic approach and investigation trends in COVID19-A systematic review.

Authors:  J Beryl Rachel; N Gururaj; T Smitha; T Divyna Daniel; B S Harishini; Adlin Saroja Rosaian
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Pathol       Date:  2021-01-09

7.  Virucidal mouth rinses for patients during the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak.

Authors:  Harpreet Singh; Poonam Sharma; Pranav Kapoor; Raj Kumar Maurya
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Salivary SARS-CoV-2 load reduction with mouthwash use: A randomized pilot clinical trial.

Authors:  Fernanda de Paula Eduardo; Luciana Corrêa; Debora Heller; Carlo Amorin Daep; Carlos Benitez; Zilson Malheiros; Bernal Stewart; Maria Ryan; Clarisse Martins Machado; Nelson Hamerschlak; João Renato Rebello Pinho; Letícia Mello Bezinelli
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-06-18

9.  Effectiveness of Pre-procedural Mouth Rinses in Reducing Aerosol Contamination During Periodontal Prophylaxis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Shahida Mohd-Said; Tuti Ningseh Mohd-Dom; Nawal Suhaimi; Haslina Rani; Colman McGrath
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-06-10

10.  Differential Effects of Antiseptic Mouth Rinses on SARS-CoV-2 Infectivity In Vitro.

Authors:  Chuan Xu; Annie Wang; Eileen R Hoskin; Carla Cugini; Kenneth Markowitz; Theresa L Chang; Daniel H Fine
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2021-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.