Literature DB >> 32660238

Predicting the Shapes of Protein Complexes through Collision Cross Section Measurements and Database Searches.

Michael Landreh1, Cagla Sahin1,2, Joseph Gault3, Samira Sadeghi4, Chester L Drum4, Povilas Uzdavinys5, David Drew5, Timothy M Allison6, Matteo T Degiacomi7, Erik G Marklund8.   

Abstract

In structural biology, collision cross sections (CCSs) from ion mobility mass spectrometry (IM-MS) measurements are routinely compared to computationally or experimentally derived protein structures. Here, we investigate whether CCS data can inform about the shape of a protein in the absence of specific reference structures. Analysis of the proteins in the CCS database shows that protein complexes with low apparent densities are structurally more diverse than those with a high apparent density. Although assigning protein shapes purely on CCS data is not possible, we find that we can distinguish oblate- and prolate-shaped protein complexes by using the CCS, molecular weight, and oligomeric states to mine the Protein Data Bank (PDB) for potentially similar protein structures. Furthermore, comparing the CCS of a ferritin cage to the solution structures in the PDB reveals significant deviations caused by structural collapse in the gas phase. We then apply the strategy to an integral membrane protein by comparing the shapes of a prokaryotic and a eukaryotic sodium/proton antiporter homologue. We conclude that mining the PDB with IM-MS data is a time-effective way to derive low-resolution structural models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32660238     DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c01940

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  7 in total

1.  First-Principles Collision Cross Section Measurements of Large Proteins and Protein Complexes.

Authors:  Jacob W McCabe; Christopher S Mallis; Klaudia I Kocurek; Michael L Poltash; Mehdi Shirzadeh; Michael J Hebert; Liqi Fan; Thomas E Walker; Xueyun Zheng; Ting Jiang; Shiyu Dong; Cheng-Wei Lin; Arthur Laganowsky; David H Russell
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Collision Cross Sections for Native Proteomics: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Brandon T Ruotolo
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 3.  THE IMS PARADOX: A PERSPECTIVE ON STRUCTURAL ION MOBILITY-MASS SPECTROMETRY.

Authors:  Jacob W McCabe; Michael J Hebert; Mehdi Shirzadeh; Christopher S Mallis; Joanna K Denton; Thomas E Walker; David H Russell
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 10.946

4.  Electrospray ionization of native membrane proteins proceeds via a charge equilibration step.

Authors:  Hsin-Yung Yen; Mia L Abramsson; Mark T Agasid; Dilraj Lama; Joseph Gault; Idlir Liko; Margit Kaldmäe; Mihkel Saluri; Abdul Aziz Qureshi; Albert Suades; David Drew; Matteo T Degiacomi; Erik G Marklund; Timothy M Allison; Carol V Robinson; Michael Landreh
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.361

5.  Bioorthogonal Catalysis for Treatment of Solid Tumors Using Thermostable, Self-Assembling, Single Enzyme Nanoparticles and Natural Product Conversion with Indole-3-acetic Acid.

Authors:  Samira Sadeghi; Nihar D Masurkar; Girish Vallerinteavide Mavelli; Siddharth Deshpande; Warren Kok Yong Tan; Sherman Yee; Shin-Ae Kang; Yoon-Pin Lim; Edward Kai-Hua Chow; Chester L Drum
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 18.027

6.  Protein shape sampled by ion mobility mass spectrometry consistently improves protein structure prediction.

Authors:  S M Bargeen Alam Turzo; Justin T Seffernick; Amber D Rolland; Micah T Donor; Sten Heinze; James S Prell; Vicki H Wysocki; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 17.694

7.  Gastrointestinal Tract Stabilized Protein Delivery Using Disulfide Thermostable Exoshell System.

Authors:  Samira Sadeghi; Girish Vallerinteavide Mavelli; Siddhesh Sujit Vaidya; Chester Lee Drum
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 6.208

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.