Literature DB >> 32659719

Adult-Onset Myopathy with Constitutive Activation of Akt following the Loss of hnRNP-U.

Debalina Bagchi1, Benjamin D Mason2, Kodilichi Baldino3, Bin Li3, Eun-Joo Lee1, Yuteng Zhang3, Linh Khanh Chu2, Sherif El Raheb2, Indranil Sinha3, Ronald L Neppl4.   

Abstract

Skeletal muscle has the remarkable ability to modulate its mass in response to changes in nutritional input, functional utilization, systemic disease, and age. This is achieved by the coordination of transcriptional and post-transcriptional networks and the signaling cascades balancing anabolic and catabolic processes with energy and nutrient availability. The extent to which alternative splicing regulates these signaling networks is uncertain. Here we investigate the role of the RNA-binding protein hnRNP-U on the expression and splicing of genes and the signaling processes regulating skeletal muscle hypertrophic growth. Muscle-specific Hnrnpu knockout (mKO) mice develop an adult-onset myopathy characterized by the selective atrophy of glycolytic muscle, the constitutive activation of Akt, increases in cellular and metabolic stress gene expression, and changes in the expression and splicing of metabolic and signal transduction genes. These findings link Hnrnpu with the balance between anabolic signaling, cellular and metabolic stress, and physiological growth.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cellular Physiology; Molecular Genetics; Molecular Physiology

Year:  2020        PMID: 32659719      PMCID: PMC7358745          DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  iScience        ISSN: 2589-0042


Introduction

Skeletal muscle has the remarkable ability to modulate its mass in response to the physiological changes associated with functional use, nutrient availability, systemic disease, and age. Under normal physiological conditions, skeletal muscle maintains its mass through a complex balance of anabolic and catabolic signaling (Glass, 2005). However, cachexia, metabolic dysfunction, muscular dystrophy, and advanced age lead to a disequilibrium between anabolic and catabolic signaling resulting in muscle dysfunction and atrophy (Cohen et al., 2015; Emery, 2002; Ernste and Reed, 2013; Marcell, 2003; Petruzzelli and Wagner, 2016). IGF-1/PI3K/Akt signaling has emerged as a key regulator of skeletal muscle hypertrophic growth and metabolism through its activation of mTOR-dependent anabolic processes while simultaneously inhibiting Foxo1/3-dependent catabolic processes (Manning and Toker, 2017). Transgenic overexpression of Akt1 in skeletal muscle promotes muscle hypertrophy (Lai et al., 2004), and its selective expression in glycolytic muscles promotes insulin sensitivity in aged mice that display impaired Akt activation (Akasaki et al., 2014). mTOR signals through two complexes, the mTOR containing complex 1 (mTORC1), which both activates anabolic processes while inhibiting autophagy, and the mTOR containing complex 2 (mTORC2), which is the primary Akt1 Ser473 kinase (Manning and Toker, 2017). Although the molecular regulation is complex, changes in Akt and mTOR signaling contribute to metabolic derangements and muscle wasting (Castets et al., 2013; Risson et al., 2009; Saxton and Sabatini, 2017). Alternative splicing is a key gene regulatory mechanism whereby the differential inclusion of exons results in multiple mRNA isoforms from a single genomic locus. This process plays a crucial role in the post-transcriptional regulation of gene and protein isoform expression (Lee and Rio, 2015) and is differentially regulated in response to cellular stress (Biamonti and Caceres, 2009; Dutertre et al., 2011). Current analyses indicate that >95% of human multi-exon genes are subject to alternative splicing (Pan et al., 2008). Brain, heart, and skeletal muscle have the highest levels of evolutionary conserved alternatively spliced transcripts (Merkin et al., 2012) and are subject to multiple disorders due to mis-splicing events (Faustino and Cooper, 2003; Scotti and Swanson, 2016). Alternative splicing in skeletal muscle plays a crucial role in muscle development, and genetic mutations in both splice sites and the RNA binding proteins that modulate splicing play causal roles in the pathogenesis of neuromuscular disorders (Ho et al., 2005; Lin et al., 2006; Philips et al., 1998; Runfola et al., 2015). In addition, dysregulated splicing is increasingly recognized as a causal factor promoting cellular dysfunction through changes in the binding properties, enzymatic activities, and intracellular localization of a large percentage of the proteome (Tress et al., 2007). However, our understanding of how alternative splicing modulates the activity of IGF-1/PI3K/Akt signaling in skeletal muscle physiology is limited. The functionally diverse heteronuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP) family of RNA-binding proteins play key roles in RNA metabolism including mRNA stabilization and the regulation of alternative splicing (Geuens et al., 2016; Martinez-Contreras et al., 2007). Genetic mutations and dysregulated expression of hnRNPs A1, E1/2 (PCBP1/2), I (PTBP1), P2 (FUS), and Q (SYNCRIP) are implicated in the molecular pathogenesis of neuromuscular disorders including myotonic and limb girdle muscular dystrophy, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and spinal muscle atrophy (Geuens et al., 2016; Li et al., 2020; Vance et al., 2009). HnRNP family member U (hnRNP-U) is the largest member of the hnRNP family, ubiquitously expressed, and known to modulate both mRNA stability and alternative splicing (Huelga et al., 2012; Xiao et al., 2012; Yugami et al., 2007). Clinically, heterozygous loss-of-function mutations in the Hnrnpu gene are associated with craniofacial anomalies, developmental delays, and seizures (Yates et al., 2017). In mice, genetic deletion of Hnrnpu specifically within cardiomyocytes leads to a dilated cardiomyopathy phenotype around postnatal day 14 (Ye et al., 2015). Here, we identify hnRNP-U as being essential for skeletal muscle hypertrophic growth, in part, through modulating the balance between Akt1-dependent anabolic signaling and the energy and nutrient availability to support hypertrophic growth. hnRNP-U expression is repressed with age and necessary for the proper expression and splicing of genes critical for metabolic and growth processes.

Results

The Development and Early Postnatal Growth of Skeletal Muscle Is Phenotypically Normal in the Absence of Hnrnpu

The hnRNP-U protein is expressed in nearly all tissues examined in the adult mouse (Figure 1A). However, the expression of hnRNP-U in skeletal muscle decreases abruptly in aged mice (Figure 1B). To study the role of hnRNP-U in skeletal muscle growth and function, we crossed Hnrnpufl/fl mice (Ye et al., 2015) with a mouse line expressing the Cre recombinase under the control of the human skeletal actin promoter (HSA-Cre). HSA-Cre expression starts at E8.5 and continues into adulthood (Miniou et al., 1999). Consistent with a prior report in which Hnrnpu was deleted in both cardiac and skeletal muscle during development (Ye et al., 2015), Hnrnpufl/fl;HSA-Cre (mKO) mice are born in normal Mendelian ratios with no observable abnormalities (Figure S1). However, in contrast with this prior report, Hnrnpu mKO mice continue to develop normally past postnatal day 14 (P14). Western blot analysis indicates ~50% reduction in hnRNP-U expression in Hnrnpu mutants at P21 (Figure 1C). Laminin stained sections of P21 Hnrnpu mutant gastrocnemius (GSN, Figure 1D) and soleus (Figure 1G) are morphologically indistinguishable from littermate controls. Although subtle differences are observed in the myofiber size distribution curves of the gastrocnemius (Figure 1E) and soleus (Figure 1H), there are no statistically significant differences in the average myofiber cross-sectional areas (Figures 1F and 1I). Furthermore, we observe no differences in the morphology, myofiber size distribution, or the average myofiber cross-sectional area of the tibialis anterior (TA) of Hnrnpu mKO mice at P21 (Figure S2). Collectively, these data indicate embryonic deletion of Hnrnpu does not measurably impact the development or post-natal growth of skeletal muscle up to ~P21.
Figure 1

Hnrnpu mKO Mice Are Born Phenotypically Normal

(A) Representative western blots of relative hnRNP-U expression in adult mouse tissues. Data are from n = 2 biological replicates.

(B) Representative western blot and quantification of hnRNP-U expression in the gastrocnemius with advancing age. Data are from n = 3 WT male mice at 3 and 12 months of age, and n = 2 WT male mice at 24 months of age.

(C) Western blot of hnRNP-U expression in gastrocnemius muscle at P21.

(D–I) Data are from n = 3 control and n = 3 mKO male mice at P21. (D–F) Immunohistological analyses of gastrocnemius muscle. (G–I) Immunohistological analyses of soleus muscle. (D and G) Laminin staining of muscle transverse sections. The scale bar is 50 μm. (E and H) Myofiber size distribution curves. (F and I) Average myofiber cross-sectional areas. Data are mean ± standard deviation. Significance (∗) was set at p < 0.05. p Values were calculated using the Student's two-tailed t test assuming unequal variances.

Hnrnpu mKO Mice Are Born Phenotypically Normal (A) Representative western blots of relative hnRNP-U expression in adult mouse tissues. Data are from n = 2 biological replicates. (B) Representative western blot and quantification of hnRNP-U expression in the gastrocnemius with advancing age. Data are from n = 3 WT male mice at 3 and 12 months of age, and n = 2 WT male mice at 24 months of age. (C) Western blot of hnRNP-U expression in gastrocnemius muscle at P21. (D–I) Data are from n = 3 control and n = 3 mKO male mice at P21. (D–F) Immunohistological analyses of gastrocnemius muscle. (G–I) Immunohistological analyses of soleus muscle. (D and G) Laminin staining of muscle transverse sections. The scale bar is 50 μm. (E and H) Myofiber size distribution curves. (F and I) Average myofiber cross-sectional areas. Data are mean ± standard deviation. Significance (∗) was set at p < 0.05. p Values were calculated using the Student's two-tailed t test assuming unequal variances.

Hnrnpu mKO Mice Develop a Severe Adult-Onset Myopathy

To explore the role of Hnrnpu on skeletal muscle and whole-body growth, we performed longitudinal body weight analyses starting at P21. Consistent with our analyses of mice at P21 (Figure 1), male and female mKO mice are indistinguishable by weight from littermate controls up to approximately 4 weeks of age (Figure 2A). Growth curve analyses indicate that Hnrnpu mKO mice reach a body weight plateau at approximately 11–13 weeks of age, with statistically significant reductions in the body weights of males and females by 6- and 12-weeks of age, respectively. Male and female Hnrnpu mutants become visually distinguishable from control littermates by 10–12 weeks and 16–18 weeks, respectively. Functional assessments at 3 months of age indicate that Hnrnpu mutants have significant reductions in grip strength (Figure 2B) and maximal running speed (Figure 2C). Consistent with these analyses, the normalized muscle mass of Hnrnpu mutants is observed to be significantly reduced with respect to littermate controls (Figure 2D).
Figure 2

Hnrnpu mKO Mice Develop Adult-Onset Myopathy

(A) Growth curves of male and female mice. Data are mean ± SEM from 25–40 mice per genotype, depending on age and gender.

(B) Grip strength.

(C) Maximum running speed.

(D) Normalized muscle wet weight.

(B–D) Data are mean ± standard deviation from n = 8 control and n = 8 mKO male mice. Significance (∗) was set a p < 0.05.

(E–I) Histological analyses of Hnrnpu mutant and control littermates at 3 months of age.

(E) H&E staining of Hnrnpu mutant gastrocnemius muscle. The scale bar is 50 μm.

(F) H&E staining of tibialis anterior. The scale bar is 50 μm.

(G) Quantification of central nuclei in tibialis anterior. Data are from n = 9,785 control and n = 9,921 mutant myofibers from n = 7 male mice per group. Data are mean ± standard deviation. Significance (∗) was set at p < 0.05.

(H) Masson's Trichrome staining of tibialis anterior and gastrocnemius. The scale bar is 50 μm.

(I) Quantification of percent fibrotic area. Data are mean ± standard deviation from n = 3 control and n = 3 male mKO mice. Significance (∗) was set at p < 0.05. p Values were calculated using the Student's two-tailed t test assuming unequal variances.

Hnrnpu mKO Mice Develop Adult-Onset Myopathy (A) Growth curves of male and female mice. Data are mean ± SEM from 25–40 mice per genotype, depending on age and gender. (B) Grip strength. (C) Maximum running speed. (D) Normalized muscle wet weight. (B–D) Data are mean ± standard deviation from n = 8 control and n = 8 mKO male mice. Significance (∗) was set a p < 0.05. (E–I) Histological analyses of Hnrnpu mutant and control littermates at 3 months of age. (E) H&E staining of Hnrnpu mutant gastrocnemius muscle. The scale bar is 50 μm. (F) H&E staining of tibialis anterior. The scale bar is 50 μm. (G) Quantification of central nuclei in tibialis anterior. Data are from n = 9,785 control and n = 9,921 mutant myofibers from n = 7 male mice per group. Data are mean ± standard deviation. Significance (∗) was set at p < 0.05. (H) Masson's Trichrome staining of tibialis anterior and gastrocnemius. The scale bar is 50 μm. (I) Quantification of percent fibrotic area. Data are mean ± standard deviation from n = 3 control and n = 3 male mKO mice. Significance (∗) was set at p < 0.05. p Values were calculated using the Student's two-tailed t test assuming unequal variances. Histological examination of muscles from Hnrnpu mutants at 3 months of age reveals central nuclei, myofiber degeneration and necrosis, intracellular inclusions, and extensive fibrosis (Figures 2E–2I). H&E staining of Hnrnpu mutant gastrocnemius muscles reveals the accumulation of mononuclear cells and intracellular inclusions (Figure 2E). In the TA we observe myofiber degeneration, intracellular inclusions, and abundant central nuclei (Figure 2F). Quantification of H&E images indicate that 6.45 ± 1.88% of TA myofibers in Hunrnpu mutants contain central nuclei as compared with 0.19 ± 0.24% of control myofibers (Figure 2G). Masson's Trichrome staining of both the TA and gastrocnemius muscles indicate that Hnrnpu mutants have extensive fibrosis (Figure 2H). Quantification of Masson's staining indicate that the fibrotic area of TA and gastrocnemius muscles increase from 4.0 ± 0.67% and 3.4 ± 0.89% in controls to 11.8 ± 2.13% and 20.3 ± 4.78% in Hnrnpu mutants (Figure 2I), respectively. As Hnrnpu mutants age, female mice present with pronounced kyphosis by 5 months, whereas males develop a less severe form by 7 months (Figure S3). To further characterize the muscle architecture of Hnrnpu mutants, we next performed quantitative analyses of myofiber cross-sectional areas. Immunofluorescence labeling of laminin and quantification of gastrocnemius myofiber cross-sectional areas indicate myofiber atrophy in mutant mice, as indicated by an elevated leftward shift of the myofiber size distribution curve (Figures 3A and 3B). Quantitatively, data indicate a significant 21.2% decrease (1479 ± 29 versus 1878 ± 150 μm2, p = 0.011, mKO versus control) in the average gastrocnemius myofiber cross-sectional area of individual mice (Figure 3C). In contrast, the tibialis anterior has only a subtle leftward shift of the myofiber size distribution curve (Figures 3D and 3E), whereas the soleus is virtually indistinguishable (Figures 3G and 3H) between mKO and littermate controls. Although we observe decreases of 7.9% (1,541 ± 76 versus 1,674 ± 114 μm2, p = 0.058, mKO versus control) and 3.3% (725 ± 94 versus 701 ± 98 μm2, p = 0.537, mKO versus control) in the tibialis anterior (Figure 3F) and soleus (Figure 3I), respectively, these differences fail to reach statistical significance. Consistent with these observations, NMR body composition analyses indicate a significant decrease in the lean muscle mass of Hnrnpu mutants as compared with littermate controls (Table 1). Collectively, these observations indicate that the loss of Hnrnpu results in a multifaceted myopathy characterized by histological features of myofiber necrosis and inclusions, central nuclei, extensive fibrosis, and muscle wasting.
Figure 3

Selective Muscle Wasting in Hnrnpu Mutants

(A–C) Immunohistological analyses of gastrocnemius muscle.

(D–F) Immunohistological analyses of tibialis anterior muscle.

(F–I) Immunohistological analyses of soleus muscle.

(A, D, and G) Laminin staining of muscle transverse sections. The scale bar is 50 μm.

(B, E, and H) Myofiber size distribution curves.

(C, F, and I) Average myofiber cross-sectional areas.

(A–I) Data are from n = 4 control and n = 4 mKO male mice at 3 months of age. Data are mean ± standard deviation. Significance (∗) was set at p < 0.05. p Values were calculated using the Student's two-tailed t test assuming unequal variances.

Table 1

NMR Body Composition Parameters of Hnrnpu mKO Mice at 3 Months of Age

WT (n = 7)mKO (n = 7)p Value
Body weight (g)28.61 ± 1.4625.70 ± 1.390.014
Fat (g)3.45 ± 0.523.44 ± 0.570.995
Lean (g)24.26 ± 1.5021.33 ± 1.510.019
Free water (g)0.17 ± 0.100.14 ± 0.080.604
Total water (g)18.31 ± 1.0314.94 ± 1.140.003

Related to Figure 2. Data are mean ± standard deviation from n = 7 mice per group. p Values were calculated using the Student's two-tailed t test assuming unequal variances.

Selective Muscle Wasting in Hnrnpu Mutants (A–C) Immunohistological analyses of gastrocnemius muscle. (D–F) Immunohistological analyses of tibialis anterior muscle. (F–I) Immunohistological analyses of soleus muscle. (A, D, and G) Laminin staining of muscle transverse sections. The scale bar is 50 μm. (B, E, and H) Myofiber size distribution curves. (C, F, and I) Average myofiber cross-sectional areas. (A–I) Data are from n = 4 control and n = 4 mKO male mice at 3 months of age. Data are mean ± standard deviation. Significance (∗) was set at p < 0.05. p Values were calculated using the Student's two-tailed t test assuming unequal variances. NMR Body Composition Parameters of Hnrnpu mKO Mice at 3 Months of Age Related to Figure 2. Data are mean ± standard deviation from n = 7 mice per group. p Values were calculated using the Student's two-tailed t test assuming unequal variances.

Hnrnpu Mutant Mice Have an Impaired Regenerative Response

The decreased lean muscle mass and leftward shift of myofiber size distribution, in conjunction with an increase in myofibers with centrally located nuclei, prompted us to evaluate the capacity for myofiber regeneration following injury in Hnrnpu mutant mice. Morphometric analysis of wild-type (WT) control mice 10 days post injury (DPI) depicts robust regeneration characterized by large well-organized myofibers. In contrast, mKO mice exhibit an impaired regenerative response as indicated by numerous small poorly organized myofibers (Figure 4A). Quantitative analyses of histological sections indicate a leftward shift in the myofiber size distribution curve of newly regenerated myofibers in mKO mice relative to controls (Figure 4B). To explore whether the age-associated loss of hnRNP-U (Figure 1B) contributes to the regenerative deficits of aged muscles (Demontis et al., 2013), we performed the cryoinjury model on young (3 months) and old (24–26 months) C57BL/6 WT mice. Morphometric analyses of H&E-stained sections obtained from young mice exhibit a robust regenerative response at 10 DPI as evidenced by large well-organized regenerated myofibers, whereas old mice exhibit a weak regenerative response characterized by small, poorly organized myofibers (Figure 4C). Quantitative analyses of histological sections indicate a leftward shift in the myofiber size distribution curve of newly regenerated myofibers in aged mice relative to young controls (Figure 4D). Overall, the newly regenerated myofibers of young mKO mice are 32% smaller (903 ± 261 versus 1,339 ± 174, mKO versus control) than littermate controls, whereas the newly regenerated myofibers of old C57BL/6 WT mice are 35% smaller (833 ± 44 versus 1,298 ± 168 μm2, old versus young) than young C57BL/6 controls (Figure 4E). Collectively, these observations indicate that Hnrnpu mutants have a regenerative response with many similarities to that of aged mice, suggesting that the loss of hnRNP-U in advanced age may contribute to regenerative impairments.
Figure 4

Young Hnrnpu mKO Mice Phenocopy the Regenerative Response of Old Mice

(A) H&E-stained transverse sections of young (3 months) control and mKO tibialis anterior muscle 10 days post injury. The scale bar is 50 μm.

(C) H&E-stained transverse sections of young (3 months) and old (26 months) tibialis anterior muscles 10 days post injury. The scale bar is 50 μm.

(B) Myofiber size distribution curve of regenerating myofibers from (A).

(D) Myofiber size distribution curve of regenerating myofibers from (C).

(E) Dot plot of average regenerated myofiber cross-sectional area from n = 7 young Hnrnpu control (black diamond), n = 7 young male Hnrnpu mKO (red diamond), n = 6 young C57BL/6 (blue diamond), and n = 6 old male C57BL/6 mice (green diamond). Bars are mean ± standard deviation. Significance (∗) was set at p < 0.05. p Values were calculated using the Student's two-tailed t test assuming unequal variances.

Young Hnrnpu mKO Mice Phenocopy the Regenerative Response of Old Mice (A) H&E-stained transverse sections of young (3 months) control and mKO tibialis anterior muscle 10 days post injury. The scale bar is 50 μm. (C) H&E-stained transverse sections of young (3 months) and old (26 months) tibialis anterior muscles 10 days post injury. The scale bar is 50 μm. (B) Myofiber size distribution curve of regenerating myofibers from (A). (D) Myofiber size distribution curve of regenerating myofibers from (C). (E) Dot plot of average regenerated myofiber cross-sectional area from n = 7 young Hnrnpu control (black diamond), n = 7 young male Hnrnpu mKO (red diamond), n = 6 young C57BL/6 (blue diamond), and n = 6 old male C57BL/6 mice (green diamond). Bars are mean ± standard deviation. Significance (∗) was set at p < 0.05. p Values were calculated using the Student's two-tailed t test assuming unequal variances.

Loss of Hnrnpu Leads to Dysregulated Expression and Splicing of Metabolic Genes

To better understand the molecular processes underlying our observations, we performed whole transcriptome gene and splice variant expression analyses on the gastrocnemius muscles of mice at 3 months of age. We obtained >60 million strand-specific 150-bp paired-end reads per sample with at least 91% of reads mapping to the mouse genome. Differential gene expression (log2FoldChange ±1.0, padj <0.01) analysis indicate 1,171 and 786 genes are increased and decreased in expression (mKO versus control), respectively (Figure 5A). Quantitative PCR validation of RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) analyses (data not shown) indicate a marked reduction in the expression of Myostatin, as well as a general repression of the E3 ubiquitin ligases and accessory proteins known to promote muscle atrophy (Bodine et al., 2001; Nowak et al., 2019; Sartori et al., 2013). In addition, genes associated with increased energy expenditures and metabolic stress, including Sln, Asns, Fgf21, Gdf15, Psat1, and Mthfd2 (Balasubramanian et al., 2013; Chung et al., 2017; Fisher and Maratos-Flier, 2016; Maurya et al., 2018; Nilsson et al., 2014), are robustly induced in the muscles of Hnrnpu mutants (Figure 5B). Interestingly, the induction of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) appears to portend muscle atrophy and/or metabolic dysfunction, as we observe >3-fold more lncRNAs to be induced (Log2FoldChange >2, padj <0.01), rather than repressed. To better understand the cellular and molecular processes impacted by the changes in gene expression we performed Gene Ontology enrichment analysis. Our analysis indicates that up-regulated genes are highly associated with inflammatory signaling (Figure S4A), whereas downregulated genes are associated with energy production and metabolic processes (Figure S4B). Specifically, we note the marked repression of Mss51 (Zmynd17), which acts as an inhibitor of oxidative metabolism (Rovira Gonzalez et al., 2019), multiple solute transporters with roles in amino acid and anion/cation (Slc15a5, Slc30a2, Slc40a1, Slc4a10) homeostasis (Lin et al., 2015), as well as multiple enzymes involved in the biogenesis of triacylglycerol (Dgat2l6) (Yen et al., 2008), amino acids (Gadl1, Padi2, Amd1/2), and glycogen (Gys2) (Figure 5C). The top induced and repressed genes in the gastrocnemius of mKO mice are listed in Table S1.
Figure 5

Gene Expression and Alternative Splicing Are Dysregulated in Hnrnpu mKO Mice

(A) Whole-genome expression profile of male Hnrnpu mutant gastrocnemius. Red and blue dots depict increased and decreased gene expression (mKO versus control, padj <0.01), respectively. Decreased (blue) and increased (red) expression of genes in Hnrnpu mutant gastrocnemius associated with (B) muscle atrophy and metabolic stress, and (C) energy production and nutrient transport.

(B and C) Data are Log2(FoldChange) ± standard error. Significance (∗) was set at p < 0.0001. p Values were calculated using the Wald test corrected for multiple testing using the Benjamini-Hochberg method.

(D) Summary of significant differential splicing events between genotypes. |ΔPSI| > 0.1, FDR < 0.01.

(E) Whole-genome expression profiling of mis-spliced differentially expressed genes in (A). Dots represent individual splicing events occurring on differentially expressed genes. Statistically significant splicing events (FDR < 0.01) occurring on statistically significant differentially expressed genes (padj <0.01) are highlighted in red. p Values were calculated using a likelihood-ratio test.

(F–J) Examples of differential splicing regulated by hnRNP-U: Senp1 (F), Setd3 (G), Mff (H), Sorbs1 (I), and Inpp4a (J). SE, Skipped Exon; RI, Retained Intron; MXE, Mutually Exclusive Exon; A3SS, Alternative 3′ Splice Site; A5SS, Alternative 5′ Splice Site.

Gene Expression and Alternative Splicing Are Dysregulated in Hnrnpu mKO Mice (A) Whole-genome expression profile of male Hnrnpu mutant gastrocnemius. Red and blue dots depict increased and decreased gene expression (mKO versus control, padj <0.01), respectively. Decreased (blue) and increased (red) expression of genes in Hnrnpu mutant gastrocnemius associated with (B) muscle atrophy and metabolic stress, and (C) energy production and nutrient transport. (B and C) Data are Log2(FoldChange) ± standard error. Significance (∗) was set at p < 0.0001. p Values were calculated using the Wald test corrected for multiple testing using the Benjamini-Hochberg method. (D) Summary of significant differential splicing events between genotypes. |ΔPSI| > 0.1, FDR < 0.01. (E) Whole-genome expression profiling of mis-spliced differentially expressed genes in (A). Dots represent individual splicing events occurring on differentially expressed genes. Statistically significant splicing events (FDR < 0.01) occurring on statistically significant differentially expressed genes (padj <0.01) are highlighted in red. p Values were calculated using a likelihood-ratio test. (F–J) Examples of differential splicing regulated by hnRNP-U: Senp1 (F), Setd3 (G), Mff (H), Sorbs1 (I), and Inpp4a (J). SE, Skipped Exon; RI, Retained Intron; MXE, Mutually Exclusive Exon; A3SS, Alternative 3′ Splice Site; A5SS, Alternative 5′ Splice Site. We next examined the impact of Hnrnpu deletion on alternative splicing from the strand-specific paired-end RNA-seq data. Using the rMATS program for splicing analysis (Shen et al., 2014), we identified 2,909 significant alternative splicing events (|ΔPSI| > 0.1, false discovery rate [FDR] < 0.01; Table S2). The distribution of these events, which include skipped exons (SEs), retained introns (RIs), mutually exclusive exons (MXEs), and the use of alternative 5’ (A5SS) and 3’ (A3SS) splice sites, is shown in Figure 5D. These data show that loss of hnRNP-U leads to extensive dysregulation of exon utilization in which SE (74.2%) and MXE (11.7%) events far exceed the utilization of alternative exons (A5SS and A3SS), suggesting that hnRNP-U may be involved in defining intron/exon boundaries. This is in contrast with a prior study in the developing heart, in which RI events were the largest share of alternative splicing events following the loss of hnRNP-U (Ye et al., 2015), thus suggesting that the role of hnRNP-U in pre-mRNA splicing modulation is differentially regulated in a cell type- and context-dependent manner. Coupled with the differential gene expression analysis, we observe 1,296 mis-splicing events (FDR < 0.01) across 710 genes whose expression is significantly altered (padj <0.01) in the absence of Hnrnpu (Figure 5E). The majority of these events occur on genes whose expression is decreased (985 events across 529 genes) as compared with those that are increased (311 events across 181 genes). Splicing events in mKO mice are biased toward exclusion (ΔPSI, quadrant I: 228 events across 150 genes, quadrant IV: 653 events across 388 genes) rather than inclusion (-ΔPSI, quadrant II: 83 events across 56 genes, quadrant III: 332 events across 218 genes). To better understand the cellular and molecular processes impacted by the changes in alternative splicing, we again performed Gene Ontology enrichment analysis. Our analysis indicates that genes with the differential inclusion/exclusion of exons (|ΔPSI| > 0.1, FDR < 0.01) are highly associated with metabolic and signal transduction processes (Figure S4C). In addition, Gene Ontology enrichment analysis of genes that are both downregulated and mis-spliced (Figure 5E) similarly indicate that this subset of genes is highly associated with metabolic and signal transduction processes (Figure S4D). A more detailed examination of altered splicing events revealed that hnRNP-U is necessary for normal exon utilization in multiple genes, including Senp1 (Figure 5F), Setd3 (Figure 5G), Mff (Figure 5H), Sorbs1 (Figure 5I), and Inpp4a (Figure 5J). The Sentrin/SUMO-specific protease 1 (Senp1) has been previously shown to be involved in regulating mitochondrial biogenesis through enhancing PGC-1α activity (Cai et al., 2012), whereas mitochondrial fission factor (Mff) is a critical regulator of mitochondrial dynamics (Otera et al., 2010). Expression of SET domain containing methyltransferase 3 (Setd3) is positively correlated with skeletal muscle hypertrophy (Seaborne et al., 2018) and involved in muscle differentiation via promoting the expression of the myogenic regulatory factors MyoG and Myf6 (Eom et al., 2011). Sorbin and SH3 domain containing protein 1 (Sorbs1) is required for PI3K-independent, insulin-stimulated glucose uptake (Baumann et al., 2000), whereas the inositol polyphosphate-4-phosphatase 1A (Inpp4a) is a PIP2 phosphatase impairing Akt activation (Ivetac et al., 2009). Collectively, these data indicate that Hnrnpu is required for the expression and splicing of genes involved in the signal transduction and metabolic processes crucial for normal skeletal muscle growth.

Akt Signaling Is Constitutively Active in Hnrnpu Mutants

To further explore the impact of Hnrnpu deletion on the signal transduction and metabolic processes underlying the muscle wasting in Hnrnpu mutants, we examined IGF-1/PI3K/Akt signaling. To begin, we injected either saline or recombinant IGF-1 into the gastrocnemius muscles of control and mutant mice at ~4 months of age. Quantitative western blot analyses indicate that IGF-1 receptor (IGF-1R) autophosphorylation in response to IGF-1 administration is similar between Hnrnpu mutant and control mice (Figures 6A and 6B), suggesting that initiation of the IGF-1/PI3K/Akt1 signaling cascade is intact in the absence of Hnrnpu. Upon examination of Akt1 phospho-activation, we observe that IGF-1 stimulation induces a robust induction in Akt1 phosphorylation at Ser473 in control mice (Figures 6A and 6C), indicating that IGF-1 stimulation results in the phospho-activation of Akt1. In contrast, we observe that the level of Akt1 Ser473 phosphorylation in vehicle-treated Hnrnpu mutant mice is comparable with that of IGF-1-stimulated controls (Figure 6A). In addition, IGF-1 stimulation is unable to induce further Akt1 Ser473 phosphorylation (Figure 6A) suggesting that Akt1 is maximumly activated under normal physiological conditions at this time point. Quantification of the phospho-Ser473 to total Akt1 ratio confirms this observation (Figure 6C), although the decreased magnitude of the phospho:total Akt1 ratio relative to IGF-1 stimulated controls is due to the increased expression of Akt1 in Hnrnpu mutant mice (Figure 6D). Collectively, these observations indicate that, in the absence of Hnrnpu, Akt1 becomes constitutively activated and thus desensitized to IGF-1/PI3Ksignaling.
Figure 6

Constitutive Activation of Akt1 and Impaired Autophagic Flux in Hnrnpu mKO Mice

(A) Representative western blots of gastrocnemius muscle lysates 1 h following injection of IGF-1.

(B–D) Quantification of (A). Data are mean ± standard deviation from n = 3 independent experiments and are normalized to WT vehicle controls. Significance (∗) was set at p < 0.05. p Values were calculated using the Student's two-tailed t test assuming unequal variances.

(E and G) Representative western blots of unstimulated gastrocnemius muscles at 3 months of age.

(F and H) Quantification of (E) and (G), respectively. Data are mean ± standard deviation from n = 3 biological samples per genotype and are normalized to WT controls. Significance (∗) was set at p < 0.05. p Values were calculated using the Student's two-tailed t test assuming unequal variances.

(I) Representative western blots of unstimulated gastrocnemius muscles at P21. Male mice were used for all analyses.

Constitutive Activation of Akt1 and Impaired Autophagic Flux in Hnrnpu mKO Mice (A) Representative western blots of gastrocnemius muscle lysates 1 h following injection of IGF-1. (B–D) Quantification of (A). Data are mean ± standard deviation from n = 3 independent experiments and are normalized to WT vehicle controls. Significance (∗) was set at p < 0.05. p Values were calculated using the Student's two-tailed t test assuming unequal variances. (E and G) Representative western blots of unstimulated gastrocnemius muscles at 3 months of age. (F and H) Quantification of (E) and (G), respectively. Data are mean ± standard deviation from n = 3 biological samples per genotype and are normalized to WT controls. Significance (∗) was set at p < 0.05. p Values were calculated using the Student's two-tailed t test assuming unequal variances. (I) Representative western blots of unstimulated gastrocnemius muscles at P21. Male mice were used for all analyses. Following up on these observations, we asked whether the signaling downstream of IGF-1R was biased toward Akt1 activation. First, we examined the expression of the PI3K p110 catalytic subunit. Quantitative western blot analyses indicate that Hnrnpu mutant mice express ~70% more p110 than WT controls (Figures 6E and 6F). We next examined PTEN, as it is well established to oppose the Akt1 activating actions of PI3K (Laplante and Sabatini, 2012; Saxton and Sabatini, 2017). Counterintuitively, we observe the expression of PTEN to be increased >4-fold in the gastrocnemius of Hnrnpu mutant mice as compared with controls (Figures 6E and 6F). These observations and the accompanying reductions in body weight (Figure 2C) are consistent with a prior report indicating that increases in PTEN protein expression induce postnatal growth impairments through increases in energy expenditure (Garcia-Cao et al., 2012). Interestingly, the increases in both IGF-1R and Akt1 protein expression are positively correlated with increases in Igf1r (Log2FC = 0.70 ± 0.14, padj = 9.93 × 10−6, mKO versus WT) and Akt1 (Log2FC 0.40 ± 0.16, padj = 0.03, mKO versus WT), whereas the increase in PTEN protein is negatively correlated with Pten (Log2FC −0.65 ± 0.13, p = 9.67 × 10−9, mKO versus WT) expression. Together, these observations suggest that the increase in IGF-1R and Akt1 protein expression contribute to the observed dysregulation of Akt1 activation and that post-transcriptional gene regulation of mature mRNA may also be altered in the absence of Hnrnpu. Hnrnpu mKO mice share many similarities with the phenotypes of mice in which Tsc1 (Castets et al., 2013) and Atg7 (Masiero et al., 2009) were selectively deleted in skeletal muscle, prompting us to evaluate the downstream effects of Akt signaling on autophagy. Initiated by the essential positive regulator ULK1, and negatively regulated by Akt/mTORC1 signaling, autophagy plays crucial roles in both the maintenance of cellular metabolic homeostasis and the cellular response to stress (Rabinowitz and White, 2010). We observe a nearly 4-fold induction of ULK1 phosphorylation at Ser757 (Figures 6G and 6H) indicating an inhibition of autophagy initiation through mTORC1-dependent mechanism (Kim et al., 2011; Manning and Toker, 2017). To further corroborate this observation, we assayed for the autophagy-specific substrate and cargo receptor SQSTM1/p62, the accumulation of which is used as an indicator of autophagy impairment (Klionsky et al., 2012). Consistent with this, we observe a marked increase in the expression of SQSTM1/p62 (Figure 6G) in Hnrnpu mutants as compared with controls, further corroborating our observations of autophagy impairment in the absence of Hnrnpu. Together, these data indicate that the constitutive activation of Akt leads to an increase in mTORC1-mediated inhibition of autophagy. The postnatal growth of skeletal muscle up to ~P21 is primarily due to the satellite cell contributions to myofiber volume and myonuclei content, after which myonuclear and satellite cell content stabilizes and hypertrophic signaling begins to dominate (White et al., 2010). As such, we sought to determine whether the satellite cell contributions to muscle growth at this time point masked PI3K/Akt signaling derangements. Quantitative western blot analyses of gastrocnemius muscles of control and mKO mice at P21 indicate no significant differences in the expression or activation of IGF-1R, PI3K p110, Akt1, and PTEN (Figure 6I), indicating the IGF-1/PI3K/Akt signaling is unaltered in Hnrnpu mutants at this time point. In addition, the SQSTM1/p62 protein expression in WT and Hnrnpu mutants at P21 (Figure 6I) is comparable with that of Hnrnpu mutants at 3 months of age (Figures 6G and S5). Collectively, these data indicate that Hnrnpu is essential for the normal physiological activation of Akt signaling and its responsiveness to IGF-1 stimulation.

Discussion

The dysregulation of IGF-1/PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling is associated with a diverse array of pathological conditions including cancer, cardiovascular disease, inflammatory and autoimmune disorders, and insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes (Manning and Toker, 2017; Saxton and Sabatini, 2017). In skeletal muscle, Akt signaling is a key regulator of glycolytic muscle homeostasis, hypertrophic growth, and metabolism through its activation of mTOR-dependent anabolic processes and simultaneous inhibition of catabolic processes. Alternative splicing plays a crucial role in muscle development, as genetic mutations in both splice sites and RNA-binding proteins involved in splicing regulation playing causal roles in the pathogenesis of neuromuscular disorders (Ho et al., 2005; Lin et al., 2006; Philips et al., 1998; Runfola et al., 2015). We demonstrate that skeletal muscle-specific deletion of Hnrnpu leads to an adult-onset myopathy with selective muscle wasting, fibrosis, and broad changes in both the expression and splicing of genes. In addition, dysregulated splicing is increasingly recognized as a causal factor promoting cellular dysfunction through changes in the binding properties, enzymatic activities, and intracellular localization of a large percentage of the proteome (Tress et al., 2007). Accordingly, our data in the muscles of Hnrnpu mutants demonstrate the constitutive activation of Akt signaling and its desensitization to IGF-1 stimulation. Of the individual muscles analyzed, the soleus was the only muscle without changes in myofiber cross-sectional area. This is in contrast with the non-significant trend and the significantly marked reduction in myofiber cross-sectional areas observed in the tibialis anterior and gastrocnemius, respectively. Although the cellular adaptations underlying the distinct growth responses to Hnrnpu deletion in each of these muscles are unclear, differences in functional utilization (e.g., ankle extensor versus ankle flexor) as well as metabolic adaptations specific to each individual muscle likely contribute. In mice, both the autophosphorylation of IGF-1R and the sensitivity of Akt1 to IGF-1 are decreased with age (Akasaki et al., 2014). Our results in young Hnrnpu mutants indicate that the autophosphorylation of IGF-1R in response to IGF-1 is unaltered, whereas the phospho-activation of Akt1 is desensitized to IGF-1. These observations indicate that hnRNP-U is essential for the normal signaling activities downstream of IGF-1R and suggest an hnRNP-U-independent mechanism modulates the age-associated changes in IGF-1R activation. In contrast with 1-year-old non-sarcopenic WT mice (Akasaki et al., 2014), we observe Akt1 to be constitutively active under normal physiological conditions in the atrophied muscles of Hnrnpu mutants, suggesting that other processes, in addition to Akt activation, are required for the hypertrophic growth of muscle. Short-term activation of Akt1 signaling induces changes in the expression of genes critical for the activity of pathways involved in the production and storage of energy and nutrients (Wu et al., 2017) in parallel with hypertrophic growth (Izumiya et al., 2008b; Wu et al., 2017). Autophagy is an essential process for the maintenance of cellular homeostasis that may be further induced in response to cellular stress to reduce organelles and macromolecules into amino acids, nucleosides, fatty acids, and sugars in support of cellular growth and survival (Rabinowitz and White, 2010). Although it is impaired by Akt/mTOR hypertrophic signaling (Manning and Toker, 2017), insufficient and excessive autophagy negatively impacts muscle (Mammucari et al., 2007; Masiero et al., 2009), suggesting an inflection point between an autophagic flux that supports muscle hypertrophy and that which promotes muscle wasting. The constitutive activation of Akt in Hnrnpu mutants coincides with both impaired autophagy and an increase in ULK1 inhibitory phosphorylation at S757 and is consistent with prior reports indicating that increased mTORC1 activity is responsible for the observed impairments in autophagy (Castets et al., 2013; Kim et al., 2011). Muscle energy production may be divided into anaerobic metabolism, which provides energy from glycolysis for rapid movements, and mitochondrial regulated aerobic metabolism for sustained exercise (Zierath and Hawley, 2004). The sensing of nutrient availability and the transport of extracellular nutrients into the cell are tightly regulated by a meshwork of interconnected signaling pathways that include Akt and mTORC1 (Broer and Broer, 2017; Efeyan et al., 2015). Dysregulation of energy metabolism and nutrient insufficiencies are associated with the muscle atrophy and dysfunction known to occur with advancing age, cachexia, and multiple myopathies (Cohen et al., 2015; Koopman et al., 2014; Marcell, 2003; Petruzzelli and Wagner, 2016). The transcriptional profile of Hnrnpu mutants indicates that genes involved in metabolic processes, including energy production, nutrient sensing and transport, and signal transduction are both repressed and mis-spliced, suggesting that their biochemical activities and/or intracellular localization is altered. The observations of constitutively active Akt, and a marked increase in PTEN expression, would suggest an increase in the demand for amino acids necessary to support hypertrophic growth (Wu et al., 2017), as well as an increase in energy expenditures (Garcia-Cao et al., 2012). The significant increases in Asns, Fgf21, and Gdf15 expression are consistent with a state of nutritional and metabolic stress (Broer and Broer, 2017; Fisher and Maratos-Flier, 2016; Patel et al., 2019) and are in agreement with prior analyses of gastrocnemius muscle expressing a constitutively active form of Akt (Wu et al., 2017). In addition, the marked increase in Sln would suggest an increase in mitochondrial biogenesis and oxidative metabolism (Maurya et al., 2018), whereas the increases in Mthfd2 and Psat1 are consistent with compensatory mechanisms to mitigate mitochondrial and oxidative stress (Nilsson et al., 2014; Tyynismaa et al., 2010; Yang and Vousden, 2016). Tissue-specific and ubiquitously expressed RNA-binding proteins cooperatively interact with the regulatory elements both within a nascent transcript and of the spliceosome for context-dependent tissue-specific mRNA splicing (Fu and Ares, 2014; Wang et al., 2008). Prior reports have demonstrated the importance of skeletal muscle enriched splicing factors Rbfox1/2 (Singh et al., 2018), RBM20 (Guo et al., 2012), and RBM24 (Yang et al., 2014) in the development, functionality, and growth of muscle. Skeletal muscle accounts for approximately 50% of the nearly 50-fold increase in body weight during murine post-natal development (Allen et al., 1979). During this time, a large percentage of the transcriptome undergoes extensive temporal-dependent changes in alternative splicing that occur largely independent of changes in gene expression (Brinegar et al., 2017), suggesting that the temporal changes in protein isoform expression are critical for the post-natal physiological growth of skeletal muscle. In addition, the increasing number of whole transcriptome analyses of physiologically normal, endurance trained, hypertrophic, and atrophying skeletal muscle (Ehmsen et al., 2019; Lindholm et al., 2016; Llano-Diez et al., 2019; Shavlakadze et al., 2019; Wu et al., 2017) provides unique molecular insights into its growth and adaptive responses. Our whole transcriptome analyses describe the changes in gene expression and splicing associated with the myopathy phenotype of Hnrnpu mutants, identifying considerable enrichment for the mis-expression/splicing of genes associated with signal transduction, metabolic processes, and inflammation. Although it may be tempting to draw conclusions based upon these observations given the seemingly ubiquitous enrichment for metabolic and inflammatory genes among these datasets, care must be taken with such interpretations given the differences in experimental models and the uncertainty of whether such transcriptome changes are the primary effect, or a compensatory effect due to changes in muscle physiology. In addition, hnRNP-U is known to enhance the transcript stability of a few select genes (Yugami et al., 2007), which may suggest that gene expression, as influenced by mRNA stability, may be similarly influenced by exon inclusion/exclusion. Although the relationship between mRNA stability and splicing is not well understood and likely regulated on a gene- and intron/exon-specific basis (Clement et al., 1999; Nott et al., 2003), the possibility that this may contribute to our observations is intriguing. Collectively, our studies link Hnrnpu to the proper expression and splicing of genes underlying the physiological growth of skeletal muscle. Our data would suggest that the muscles of Hnrnpu mutants are under cellular and metabolic stress due to dysregulation of the cellular feedback mechanisms limiting Akt/mTOR signaling in response to energy and/or nutrient insufficiency. Future detailed analyses dissecting the impact of alternative splicing dysregulation on the feedback mechanism limiting Akt/mTOR may provide novel insights to the pathogenesis of muscle wasting disorders.

Limitations of the Study

We demonstrate that loss of Hnrnpu in skeletal muscle causes impaired post-natal hypertrophic growth and changes in the expression and splicing of numerous genes involved in signal transduction and metabolic processes. Our data strongly suggest that impaired muscle growth due to the loss of hnRNP-U is biased toward muscles with a greater content of fast glycolytic, rather than slow oxidative, myofibers but cannot definitively confirm this observation at the level of the individual myofiber subtype. Given the temporal lag between in vivo Cre activation and the time point at which whole transcriptome analyses were performed, we are unable to discern between the primary and secondary effects on the transcriptome, and its impact on muscle physiology, owing to the loss of hnRNP-U. RNA-binding proteins play crucial roles in modulating the stability, structure, and splicing of transcripts (Hentze et al., 2018), making it difficult to discern between these functions as these processes are interrelated. In cell culture model systems, hnRNPU is known to bind a purine-rich consensus sequence (KGRGKRV) to modulate both the splicing of nascent transcripts (Huelga et al., 2012; Xiao et al., 2012) and the stability of mRNA (Yugami et al., 2007). Whether skeletal muscle hnRNP-U binds a similar set of nascent transcripts and enhances mRNA stability is unknown and warrants future investigations. Although our transcriptional data and signaling analyses are consistent with prior reports of cellular and metabolic stress in muscle (Izumiya et al., 2008a; Khan et al., 2017; Suomalainen et al., 2011; Tyynismaa et al., 2010), metabolic profiling and detailed molecular analyses of splice variant functional analyses will be needed to better understand the mechanistic linkages between splice variant expression and the regulation of Akt/mTOR signaling in muscle physiology.

Resource Availability

Lead Contact

Ronald L Neppl (rneppl@bwh.harvard.edu).

Materials Availability

Further information and requests for ressources and reagents should be directed to and will be fullfilled by the Lead Contact.

Data and Code Availability

The accession number for the RNA sequencing data reported in this paper is NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus: GSE145712. No new computational tools were developed in this project. The code for usage of existing tools as described is available upon request.

Methods

All methods can be found in the accompanying Transparent Methods supplemental file.
  87 in total

Review 1.  mTOR signaling in growth control and disease.

Authors:  Mathieu Laplante; David M Sabatini
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Histone methyltransferase SETD3 regulates muscle differentiation.

Authors:  Gwang Hyeon Eom; Kee-Beom Kim; Jin Hee Kim; Ji-Young Kim; Ju-Ryung Kim; Hae Jin Kee; Dong-Wook Kim; Nakwon Choe; Hye-Jeong Park; Hye-Ju Son; Seok-Yong Choi; Hyun Kook; Sang-Beom Seo
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  Cellular stress and RNA splicing.

Authors:  Giuseppe Biamonti; Javier F Caceres
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 13.807

4.  Deep surveying of alternative splicing complexity in the human transcriptome by high-throughput sequencing.

Authors:  Qun Pan; Ofer Shai; Leo J Lee; Brendan J Frey; Benjamin J Blencowe
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2008-11-02       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Extensive alternative splicing transitions during postnatal skeletal muscle development are required for calcium handling functions.

Authors:  Amy E Brinegar; Zheng Xia; James Anthony Loehr; Wei Li; George Gerald Rodney; Thomas A Cooper
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 6.  Autophagy and metabolism.

Authors:  Joshua D Rabinowitz; Eileen White
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Autophagy is required to maintain muscle mass.

Authors:  Eva Masiero; Lisa Agatea; Cristina Mammucari; Bert Blaauw; Emanuele Loro; Masaaki Komatsu; Daniel Metzger; Carlo Reggiani; Stefano Schiaffino; Marco Sandri
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 27.287

8.  Fast/Glycolytic muscle fiber growth reduces fat mass and improves metabolic parameters in obese mice.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Izumiya; Teresa Hopkins; Carl Morris; Kaori Sato; Ling Zeng; Jason Viereck; James A Hamilton; Noriyuki Ouchi; Nathan K LeBrasseur; Kenneth Walsh
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 27.287

9.  Integrative genome-wide analysis reveals cooperative regulation of alternative splicing by hnRNP proteins.

Authors:  Stephanie C Huelga; Anthony Q Vu; Justin D Arnold; Tiffany Y Liang; Patrick P Liu; Bernice Y Yan; John Paul Donohue; Lily Shiue; Shawn Hoon; Sydney Brenner; Manuel Ares; Gene W Yeo
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 9.423

10.  Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy.

Authors:  Daniel J Klionsky; Fabio C Abdalla; Hagai Abeliovich; Robert T Abraham; Abraham Acevedo-Arozena; Khosrow Adeli; Lotta Agholme; Maria Agnello; Patrizia Agostinis; Julio A Aguirre-Ghiso; Hyung Jun Ahn; Ouardia Ait-Mohamed; Slimane Ait-Si-Ali; Takahiko Akematsu; Shizuo Akira; Hesham M Al-Younes; Munir A Al-Zeer; Matthew L Albert; Roger L Albin; Javier Alegre-Abarrategui; Maria Francesca Aleo; Mehrdad Alirezaei; Alexandru Almasan; Maylin Almonte-Becerril; Atsuo Amano; Ravi Amaravadi; Shoba Amarnath; Amal O Amer; Nathalie Andrieu-Abadie; Vellareddy Anantharam; David K Ann; Shailendra Anoopkumar-Dukie; Hiroshi Aoki; Nadezda Apostolova; Giuseppe Arancia; John P Aris; Katsuhiko Asanuma; Nana Y O Asare; Hisashi Ashida; Valerie Askanas; David S Askew; Patrick Auberger; Misuzu Baba; Steven K Backues; Eric H Baehrecke; Ben A Bahr; Xue-Yuan Bai; Yannick Bailly; Robert Baiocchi; Giulia Baldini; Walter Balduini; Andrea Ballabio; Bruce A Bamber; Edward T W Bampton; Gábor Bánhegyi; Clinton R Bartholomew; Diane C Bassham; Robert C Bast; Henri Batoko; Boon-Huat Bay; Isabelle Beau; Daniel M Béchet; Thomas J Begley; Christian Behl; Christian Behrends; Soumeya Bekri; Bryan Bellaire; Linda J Bendall; Luca Benetti; Laura Berliocchi; Henri Bernardi; Francesca Bernassola; Sébastien Besteiro; Ingrid Bhatia-Kissova; Xiaoning Bi; Martine Biard-Piechaczyk; Janice S Blum; Lawrence H Boise; Paolo Bonaldo; David L Boone; Beat C Bornhauser; Karina R Bortoluci; Ioannis Bossis; Frédéric Bost; Jean-Pierre Bourquin; Patricia Boya; Michaël Boyer-Guittaut; Peter V Bozhkov; Nathan R Brady; Claudio Brancolini; Andreas Brech; Jay E Brenman; Ana Brennand; Emery H Bresnick; Patrick Brest; Dave Bridges; Molly L Bristol; Paul S Brookes; Eric J Brown; John H Brumell; Nicola Brunetti-Pierri; Ulf T Brunk; Dennis E Bulman; Scott J Bultman; Geert Bultynck; Lena F Burbulla; Wilfried Bursch; Jonathan P Butchar; Wanda Buzgariu; Sergio P Bydlowski; Ken Cadwell; Monika Cahová; Dongsheng Cai; Jiyang Cai; Qian Cai; Bruno Calabretta; Javier Calvo-Garrido; Nadine Camougrand; Michelangelo Campanella; Jenny Campos-Salinas; Eleonora Candi; Lizhi Cao; Allan B Caplan; Simon R Carding; Sandra M Cardoso; Jennifer S Carew; Cathleen R Carlin; Virginie Carmignac; Leticia A M Carneiro; Serena Carra; Rosario A Caruso; Giorgio Casari; Caty Casas; Roberta Castino; Eduardo Cebollero; Francesco Cecconi; Jean Celli; Hassan Chaachouay; Han-Jung Chae; Chee-Yin Chai; David C Chan; Edmond Y Chan; Raymond Chuen-Chung Chang; Chi-Ming Che; Ching-Chow Chen; Guang-Chao Chen; Guo-Qiang Chen; Min Chen; Quan Chen; Steve S-L Chen; WenLi Chen; Xi Chen; Xiangmei Chen; Xiequn Chen; Ye-Guang Chen; Yingyu Chen; Yongqiang Chen; Yu-Jen Chen; Zhixiang Chen; Alan Cheng; Christopher H K Cheng; Yan Cheng; Heesun Cheong; Jae-Ho Cheong; Sara Cherry; Russ Chess-Williams; Zelda H Cheung; Eric Chevet; Hui-Ling Chiang; Roberto Chiarelli; Tomoki Chiba; Lih-Shen Chin; Shih-Hwa Chiou; Francis V Chisari; Chi Hin Cho; Dong-Hyung Cho; Augustine M K Choi; DooSeok Choi; Kyeong Sook Choi; Mary E Choi; Salem Chouaib; Divaker Choubey; Vinay Choubey; Charleen T Chu; Tsung-Hsien Chuang; Sheau-Huei Chueh; Taehoon Chun; Yong-Joon Chwae; Mee-Len Chye; Roberto Ciarcia; Maria R Ciriolo; Michael J Clague; Robert S B Clark; Peter G H Clarke; Robert Clarke; Patrice Codogno; Hilary A Coller; María I Colombo; Sergio Comincini; Maria Condello; Fabrizio Condorelli; Mark R Cookson; Graham H Coombs; Isabelle Coppens; Ramon Corbalan; Pascale Cossart; Paola Costelli; Safia Costes; Ana Coto-Montes; Eduardo Couve; Fraser P Coxon; James M Cregg; José L Crespo; Marianne J Cronjé; Ana Maria Cuervo; Joseph J Cullen; Mark J Czaja; Marcello D'Amelio; Arlette Darfeuille-Michaud; Lester M Davids; Faith E Davies; Massimo De Felici; John F de Groot; Cornelis A M de Haan; Luisa De Martino; Angelo De Milito; Vincenzo De Tata; Jayanta Debnath; Alexei Degterev; Benjamin Dehay; Lea M D Delbridge; Francesca Demarchi; Yi Zhen Deng; Jörn Dengjel; Paul Dent; Donna Denton; Vojo Deretic; Shyamal D Desai; Rodney J Devenish; Mario Di Gioacchino; Gilbert Di Paolo; Chiara Di Pietro; Guillermo Díaz-Araya; Inés Díaz-Laviada; Maria T Diaz-Meco; Javier Diaz-Nido; Ivan Dikic; Savithramma P Dinesh-Kumar; Wen-Xing Ding; Clark W Distelhorst; Abhinav Diwan; Mojgan Djavaheri-Mergny; Svetlana Dokudovskaya; Zheng Dong; Frank C Dorsey; Victor Dosenko; James J Dowling; Stephen Doxsey; Marlène Dreux; Mark E Drew; Qiuhong Duan; Michel A Duchosal; Karen Duff; Isabelle Dugail; Madeleine Durbeej; Michael Duszenko; Charles L Edelstein; Aimee L Edinger; Gustavo Egea; Ludwig Eichinger; N Tony Eissa; Suhendan Ekmekcioglu; Wafik S El-Deiry; Zvulun Elazar; Mohamed Elgendy; Lisa M Ellerby; Kai Er Eng; Anna-Mart Engelbrecht; Simone Engelender; Jekaterina Erenpreisa; Ricardo Escalante; Audrey Esclatine; Eeva-Liisa Eskelinen; Lucile Espert; Virginia Espina; Huizhou Fan; Jia Fan; Qi-Wen Fan; Zhen Fan; Shengyun Fang; Yongqi Fang; Manolis Fanto; Alessandro Fanzani; Thomas Farkas; Jean-Claude Farré; Mathias Faure; Marcus Fechheimer; Carl G Feng; Jian Feng; Qili Feng; Youji Feng; László Fésüs; Ralph Feuer; Maria E Figueiredo-Pereira; Gian Maria Fimia; Diane C Fingar; Steven Finkbeiner; Toren Finkel; Kim D Finley; Filomena Fiorito; Edward A Fisher; Paul B Fisher; Marc Flajolet; Maria L Florez-McClure; Salvatore Florio; Edward A Fon; Francesco Fornai; Franco Fortunato; Rati Fotedar; Daniel H Fowler; Howard S Fox; Rodrigo Franco; Lisa B Frankel; Marc Fransen; José M Fuentes; Juan Fueyo; Jun Fujii; Kozo Fujisaki; Eriko Fujita; Mitsunori Fukuda; Ruth H Furukawa; Matthias Gaestel; Philippe Gailly; Malgorzata Gajewska; Brigitte Galliot; Vincent Galy; Subramaniam Ganesh; Barry Ganetzky; Ian G Ganley; Fen-Biao Gao; George F Gao; Jinming Gao; Lorena Garcia; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Mikel Garcia-Marcos; Marjan Garmyn; Andrei L Gartel; Evelina Gatti; Mathias Gautel; Thomas R Gawriluk; Matthew E Gegg; Jiefei Geng; Marc Germain; Jason E Gestwicki; David A Gewirtz; Saeid Ghavami; Pradipta Ghosh; Anna M Giammarioli; Alexandra N Giatromanolaki; Spencer B Gibson; Robert W Gilkerson; Michael L Ginger; Henry N Ginsberg; Jakub Golab; Michael S Goligorsky; Pierre Golstein; Candelaria Gomez-Manzano; Ebru Goncu; Céline Gongora; Claudio D Gonzalez; Ramon Gonzalez; Cristina González-Estévez; Rosa Ana González-Polo; Elena Gonzalez-Rey; Nikolai V Gorbunov; Sharon Gorski; Sandro Goruppi; Roberta A Gottlieb; Devrim Gozuacik; Giovanna Elvira Granato; Gary D Grant; Kim N Green; Aleš Gregorc; Frédéric Gros; Charles Grose; Thomas W Grunt; Philippe Gual; Jun-Lin Guan; Kun-Liang Guan; Sylvie M Guichard; Anna S Gukovskaya; Ilya Gukovsky; Jan Gunst; Asa B Gustafsson; Andrew J Halayko; Amber N Hale; Sandra K Halonen; Maho Hamasaki; Feng Han; Ting Han; Michael K Hancock; Malene Hansen; Hisashi Harada; Masaru Harada; Stefan E Hardt; J Wade Harper; Adrian L Harris; James Harris; Steven D Harris; Makoto Hashimoto; Jeffrey A Haspel; Shin-ichiro Hayashi; Lori A Hazelhurst; Congcong He; You-Wen He; Marie-Joseé Hébert; Kim A Heidenreich; Miep H Helfrich; Gudmundur V Helgason; Elizabeth P Henske; Brian Herman; Paul K Herman; Claudio Hetz; Sabine Hilfiker; Joseph A Hill; Lynne J Hocking; Paul Hofman; Thomas G Hofmann; Jörg Höhfeld; Tessa L Holyoake; Ming-Huang Hong; David A Hood; Gökhan S Hotamisligil; Ewout J Houwerzijl; Maria Høyer-Hansen; Bingren Hu; Chien-An A Hu; Hong-Ming Hu; Ya Hua; Canhua Huang; Ju Huang; Shengbing Huang; Wei-Pang Huang; Tobias B Huber; Won-Ki Huh; Tai-Ho Hung; Ted R Hupp; Gang Min Hur; James B Hurley; Sabah N A Hussain; Patrick J Hussey; Jung Jin Hwang; Seungmin Hwang; Atsuhiro Ichihara; Shirin Ilkhanizadeh; Ken Inoki; Takeshi Into; Valentina Iovane; Juan L Iovanna; Nancy Y Ip; Yoshitaka Isaka; Hiroyuki Ishida; Ciro Isidoro; Ken-ichi Isobe; Akiko Iwasaki; Marta Izquierdo; Yotaro Izumi; Panu M Jaakkola; Marja Jäättelä; George R Jackson; William T Jackson; Bassam Janji; Marina Jendrach; Ju-Hong Jeon; Eui-Bae Jeung; Hong Jiang; Hongchi Jiang; Jean X Jiang; Ming Jiang; Qing Jiang; Xuejun Jiang; Xuejun Jiang; Alberto Jiménez; Meiyan Jin; Shengkan Jin; Cheol O Joe; Terje Johansen; Daniel E Johnson; Gail V W Johnson; Nicola L Jones; Bertrand Joseph; Suresh K Joseph; Annie M Joubert; Gábor Juhász; Lucienne Juillerat-Jeanneret; Chang Hwa Jung; Yong-Keun Jung; Kai Kaarniranta; Allen Kaasik; Tomohiro Kabuta; Motoni Kadowaki; Katarina Kagedal; Yoshiaki Kamada; Vitaliy O Kaminskyy; Harm H Kampinga; Hiromitsu Kanamori; Chanhee Kang; Khong Bee Kang; Kwang Il Kang; Rui Kang; Yoon-A Kang; Tomotake Kanki; Thirumala-Devi Kanneganti; Haruo Kanno; Anumantha G Kanthasamy; Arthi Kanthasamy; Vassiliki Karantza; Gur P Kaushal; Susmita Kaushik; Yoshinori Kawazoe; Po-Yuan Ke; John H Kehrl; Ameeta Kelekar; Claus Kerkhoff; David H Kessel; Hany Khalil; Jan A K W Kiel; Amy A Kiger; Akio Kihara; Deok Ryong Kim; Do-Hyung Kim; Dong-Hou Kim; Eun-Kyoung Kim; Hyung-Ryong Kim; Jae-Sung Kim; Jeong Hun Kim; Jin Cheon Kim; John K Kim; Peter K Kim; Seong Who Kim; Yong-Sun Kim; Yonghyun Kim; Adi Kimchi; Alec C Kimmelman; Jason S King; Timothy J Kinsella; Vladimir Kirkin; Lorrie A Kirshenbaum; Katsuhiko Kitamoto; Kaio Kitazato; Ludger Klein; Walter T Klimecki; Jochen Klucken; Erwin Knecht; Ben C B Ko; Jan C Koch; Hiroshi Koga; Jae-Young Koh; Young Ho Koh; Masato Koike; Masaaki Komatsu; Eiki Kominami; Hee Jeong Kong; Wei-Jia Kong; Viktor I Korolchuk; Yaichiro Kotake; Michael I Koukourakis; Juan B Kouri Flores; Attila L Kovács; Claudine Kraft; Dimitri Krainc; Helmut Krämer; Carole Kretz-Remy; Anna M Krichevsky; Guido Kroemer; Rejko Krüger; Oleg Krut; Nicholas T Ktistakis; Chia-Yi Kuan; Roza Kucharczyk; Ashok Kumar; Raj Kumar; Sharad Kumar; Mondira Kundu; Hsing-Jien Kung; Tino Kurz; Ho Jeong Kwon; Albert R La Spada; Frank Lafont; Trond Lamark; Jacques Landry; Jon D Lane; Pierre Lapaquette; Jocelyn F Laporte; Lajos László; Sergio Lavandero; Josée N Lavoie; Robert Layfield; Pedro A Lazo; Weidong Le; Laurent Le Cam; Daniel J Ledbetter; Alvin J X Lee; Byung-Wan Lee; Gyun Min Lee; Jongdae Lee; Ju-Hyun Lee; Michael Lee; Myung-Shik Lee; Sug Hyung Lee; Christiaan Leeuwenburgh; Patrick Legembre; Renaud Legouis; Michael Lehmann; Huan-Yao Lei; Qun-Ying Lei; David A Leib; José Leiro; John J Lemasters; Antoinette Lemoine; Maciej S Lesniak; Dina Lev; Victor V Levenson; Beth Levine; Efrat Levy; Faqiang Li; Jun-Lin Li; Lian Li; Sheng Li; Weijie Li; Xue-Jun Li; Yan-bo Li; Yi-Ping Li; Chengyu Liang; Qiangrong Liang; Yung-Feng Liao; Pawel P Liberski; Andrew Lieberman; Hyunjung J Lim; Kah-Leong Lim; Kyu Lim; Chiou-Feng Lin; Fu-Cheng Lin; Jian Lin; Jiandie D Lin; Kui Lin; Wan-Wan Lin; Weei-Chin Lin; Yi-Ling Lin; Rafael Linden; Paul Lingor; Jennifer Lippincott-Schwartz; Michael P Lisanti; Paloma B Liton; Bo Liu; Chun-Feng Liu; Kaiyu Liu; Leyuan Liu; Qiong A Liu; Wei Liu; Young-Chau Liu; Yule Liu; Richard A Lockshin; Chun-Nam Lok; Sagar Lonial; Benjamin Loos; Gabriel Lopez-Berestein; Carlos López-Otín; Laura Lossi; Michael T Lotze; Peter Lőw; Binfeng Lu; Bingwei Lu; Bo Lu; Zhen Lu; Frédéric Luciano; Nicholas W Lukacs; Anders H Lund; Melinda A Lynch-Day; Yong Ma; Fernando Macian; Jeff P MacKeigan; Kay F Macleod; Frank Madeo; Luigi Maiuri; Maria Chiara Maiuri; Davide Malagoli; May Christine V Malicdan; Walter Malorni; Na Man; Eva-Maria Mandelkow; Stéphen Manon; Irena Manov; Kai Mao; Xiang Mao; Zixu Mao; Philippe Marambaud; Daniela Marazziti; Yves L Marcel; Katie Marchbank; Piero Marchetti; Stefan J Marciniak; Mateus Marcondes; Mohsen Mardi; Gabriella Marfe; Guillermo Mariño; Maria Markaki; Mark R Marten; Seamus J Martin; Camille Martinand-Mari; Wim Martinet; Marta Martinez-Vicente; Matilde Masini; Paola Matarrese; Saburo Matsuo; Raffaele Matteoni; Andreas Mayer; Nathalie M Mazure; David J McConkey; Melanie J McConnell; Catherine McDermott; Christine McDonald; Gerald M McInerney; Sharon L McKenna; BethAnn McLaughlin; Pamela J McLean; Christopher R McMaster; G Angus McQuibban; Alfred J Meijer; Miriam H Meisler; Alicia Meléndez; Thomas J Melia; Gerry Melino; Maria A Mena; Javier A Menendez; Rubem F S Menna-Barreto; Manoj B Menon; Fiona M Menzies; Carol A Mercer; Adalberto Merighi; Diane E Merry; Stefania Meschini; Christian G Meyer; Thomas F Meyer; Chao-Yu Miao; Jun-Ying Miao; Paul A M Michels; Carine Michiels; Dalibor Mijaljica; Ana Milojkovic; Saverio Minucci; Clelia Miracco; Cindy K Miranti; Ioannis Mitroulis; Keisuke Miyazawa; Noboru Mizushima; Baharia Mograbi; Simin Mohseni; Xavier Molero; Bertrand Mollereau; Faustino Mollinedo; Takashi Momoi; Iryna Monastyrska; Martha M Monick; Mervyn J Monteiro; Michael N Moore; Rodrigo Mora; Kevin Moreau; Paula I Moreira; Yuji Moriyasu; Jorge Moscat; Serge Mostowy; Jeremy C Mottram; Tomasz Motyl; Charbel E-H Moussa; Sylke Müller; Sylviane Muller; Karl Münger; Christian Münz; Leon O Murphy; Maureen E Murphy; Antonio Musarò; Indira Mysorekar; Eiichiro Nagata; Kazuhiro Nagata; Aimable Nahimana; Usha Nair; Toshiyuki Nakagawa; Kiichi Nakahira; Hiroyasu Nakano; Hitoshi Nakatogawa; Meera Nanjundan; Naweed I Naqvi; Derek P Narendra; Masashi Narita; Miguel Navarro; Steffan T Nawrocki; Taras Y Nazarko; Andriy Nemchenko; Mihai G Netea; Thomas P Neufeld; Paul A Ney; Ioannis P Nezis; Huu Phuc Nguyen; Daotai Nie; Ichizo Nishino; Corey Nislow; Ralph A Nixon; Takeshi Noda; Angelika A Noegel; Anna Nogalska; Satoru Noguchi; Lucia Notterpek; Ivana Novak; Tomoyoshi Nozaki; Nobuyuki Nukina; Thorsten Nürnberger; Beat Nyfeler; Keisuke Obara; Terry D Oberley; Salvatore Oddo; Michinaga Ogawa; Toya Ohashi; Koji Okamoto; Nancy L Oleinick; F Javier Oliver; Laura J Olsen; Stefan Olsson; Onya Opota; Timothy F Osborne; Gary K Ostrander; Kinya Otsu; Jing-hsiung James Ou; Mireille Ouimet; Michael Overholtzer; Bulent Ozpolat; Paolo Paganetti; Ugo Pagnini; Nicolas Pallet; Glen E Palmer; Camilla Palumbo; Tianhong Pan; Theocharis Panaretakis; Udai Bhan Pandey; Zuzana Papackova; Issidora Papassideri; Irmgard Paris; Junsoo Park; Ohkmae K Park; Jan B Parys; Katherine R Parzych; Susann Patschan; Cam Patterson; Sophie Pattingre; John M Pawelek; Jianxin Peng; David H Perlmutter; Ida Perrotta; George Perry; Shazib Pervaiz; Matthias Peter; Godefridus J Peters; Morten Petersen; Goran Petrovski; James M Phang; Mauro Piacentini; Philippe Pierre; Valérie Pierrefite-Carle; Gérard Pierron; Ronit Pinkas-Kramarski; Antonio Piras; Natik Piri; Leonidas C Platanias; Stefanie Pöggeler; Marc Poirot; Angelo Poletti; Christian Poüs; Mercedes Pozuelo-Rubio; Mette Prætorius-Ibba; Anil Prasad; Mark Prescott; Muriel Priault; Nathalie Produit-Zengaffinen; Ann Progulske-Fox; Tassula Proikas-Cezanne; Serge Przedborski; Karin Przyklenk; Rosa Puertollano; Julien Puyal; Shu-Bing Qian; Liang Qin; Zheng-Hong Qin; Susan E Quaggin; Nina Raben; Hannah Rabinowich; Simon W Rabkin; Irfan Rahman; Abdelhaq Rami; Georg Ramm; Glenn Randall; Felix Randow; V Ashutosh Rao; Jeffrey C Rathmell; Brinda Ravikumar; Swapan K Ray; Bruce H Reed; John C Reed; Fulvio Reggiori; Anne Régnier-Vigouroux; Andreas S Reichert; John J Reiners; Russel J Reiter; Jun Ren; José L Revuelta; Christopher J Rhodes; Konstantinos Ritis; Elizete Rizzo; Jeffrey Robbins; Michel Roberge; Hernan Roca; Maria C Roccheri; Stephane Rocchi; H Peter Rodemann; Santiago Rodríguez de Córdoba; Bärbel Rohrer; Igor B Roninson; Kirill Rosen; Magdalena M Rost-Roszkowska; Mustapha Rouis; Kasper M A Rouschop; Francesca Rovetta; Brian P Rubin; David C Rubinsztein; Klaus Ruckdeschel; Edmund B Rucker; Assaf Rudich; Emil Rudolf; Nelson Ruiz-Opazo; Rossella Russo; Tor Erik Rusten; Kevin M Ryan; Stefan W Ryter; David M Sabatini; Junichi Sadoshima; Tapas Saha; Tatsuya Saitoh; Hiroshi Sakagami; Yasuyoshi Sakai; Ghasem Hoseini Salekdeh; Paolo Salomoni; Paul M Salvaterra; Guy Salvesen; Rosa Salvioli; Anthony M J Sanchez; José A Sánchez-Alcázar; Ricardo Sánchez-Prieto; Marco Sandri; Uma Sankar; Poonam Sansanwal; Laura Santambrogio; Shweta Saran; Sovan Sarkar; Minnie Sarwal; Chihiro Sasakawa; Ausra Sasnauskiene; Miklós Sass; Ken Sato; Miyuki Sato; Anthony H V Schapira; Michael Scharl; Hermann M Schätzl; Wiep Scheper; Stefano Schiaffino; Claudio Schneider; Marion E Schneider; Regine Schneider-Stock; Patricia V Schoenlein; Daniel F Schorderet; Christoph Schüller; Gary K Schwartz; Luca Scorrano; Linda Sealy; Per O Seglen; Juan Segura-Aguilar; Iban Seiliez; Oleksandr Seleverstov; Christian Sell; Jong Bok Seo; Duska Separovic; Vijayasaradhi Setaluri; Takao Setoguchi; Carmine Settembre; John J Shacka; Mala Shanmugam; Irving M Shapiro; Eitan Shaulian; Reuben J Shaw; James H Shelhamer; Han-Ming Shen; Wei-Chiang Shen; Zu-Hang Sheng; Yang Shi; Kenichi Shibuya; Yoshihiro Shidoji; Jeng-Jer Shieh; Chwen-Ming Shih; Yohta Shimada; Shigeomi Shimizu; Takahiro Shintani; Orian S Shirihai; Gordon C Shore; Andriy A Sibirny; Stan B Sidhu; Beata Sikorska; Elaine C M Silva-Zacarin; Alison Simmons; Anna Katharina Simon; Hans-Uwe Simon; Cristiano Simone; Anne Simonsen; David A Sinclair; Rajat Singh; Debasish Sinha; Frank A Sinicrope; Agnieszka Sirko; Parco M Siu; Efthimios Sivridis; Vojtech Skop; Vladimir P Skulachev; Ruth S Slack; Soraya S Smaili; Duncan R Smith; Maria S Soengas; Thierry Soldati; Xueqin Song; Anil K Sood; Tuck Wah Soong; Federica Sotgia; Stephen A Spector; Claudia D Spies; Wolfdieter Springer; Srinivasa M Srinivasula; Leonidas Stefanis; Joan S Steffan; Ruediger Stendel; Harald Stenmark; Anastasis Stephanou; Stephan T Stern; Cinthya Sternberg; Björn Stork; Peter Strålfors; Carlos S Subauste; Xinbing Sui; David Sulzer; Jiaren Sun; Shi-Yong Sun; Zhi-Jun Sun; Joseph J Y Sung; Kuninori Suzuki; Toshihiko Suzuki; Michele S Swanson; Charles Swanton; Sean T Sweeney; Lai-King Sy; Gyorgy Szabadkai; Ira Tabas; Heinrich Taegtmeyer; Marco Tafani; Krisztina Takács-Vellai; Yoshitaka Takano; Kaoru Takegawa; Genzou Takemura; Fumihiko Takeshita; Nicholas J Talbot; Kevin S W Tan; Keiji Tanaka; Kozo Tanaka; Daolin Tang; Dingzhong Tang; Isei Tanida; Bakhos A Tannous; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Graham S Taylor; Gregory A Taylor; J Paul Taylor; Lance S Terada; Alexei Terman; Gianluca Tettamanti; Karin Thevissen; Craig B Thompson; Andrew Thorburn; Michael Thumm; FengFeng Tian; Yuan Tian; Glauco Tocchini-Valentini; Aviva M Tolkovsky; Yasuhiko Tomino; Lars Tönges; Sharon A Tooze; Cathy Tournier; John Tower; Roberto Towns; Vladimir Trajkovic; Leonardo H Travassos; Ting-Fen Tsai; Mario P Tschan; Takeshi Tsubata; Allan Tsung; Boris Turk; Lorianne S Turner; Suresh C Tyagi; Yasuo Uchiyama; Takashi Ueno; Midori Umekawa; Rika Umemiya-Shirafuji; Vivek K Unni; Maria I Vaccaro; Enza Maria Valente; Greet Van den Berghe; Ida J van der Klei; Wouter van Doorn; Linda F van Dyk; Marjolein van Egmond; Leo A van Grunsven; Peter Vandenabeele; Wim P Vandenberghe; Ilse Vanhorebeek; Eva C Vaquero; Guillermo Velasco; Tibor Vellai; Jose Miguel Vicencio; Richard D Vierstra; Miquel Vila; Cécile Vindis; Giampietro Viola; Maria Teresa Viscomi; Olga V Voitsekhovskaja; Clarissa von Haefen; Marcela Votruba; Keiji Wada; Richard Wade-Martins; Cheryl L Walker; Craig M Walsh; Jochen Walter; Xiang-Bo Wan; Aimin Wang; Chenguang Wang; Dawei Wang; Fan Wang; Fen Wang; Guanghui Wang; Haichao Wang; Hong-Gang Wang; Horng-Dar Wang; Jin Wang; Ke Wang; Mei Wang; Richard C Wang; Xinglong Wang; Xuejun Wang; Ying-Jan Wang; Yipeng Wang; Zhen Wang; Zhigang Charles Wang; Zhinong Wang; Derick G Wansink; Diane M Ward; Hirotaka Watada; Sarah L Waters; Paul Webster; Lixin Wei; Conrad C Weihl; William A Weiss; Scott M Welford; Long-Ping Wen; Caroline A Whitehouse; J Lindsay Whitton; Alexander J Whitworth; Tom Wileman; John W Wiley; Simon Wilkinson; Dieter Willbold; Roger L Williams; Peter R Williamson; Bradly G Wouters; Chenghan Wu; Dao-Cheng Wu; William K K Wu; Andreas Wyttenbach; Ramnik J Xavier; Zhijun Xi; Pu Xia; Gengfu Xiao; Zhiping Xie; Zhonglin Xie; Da-zhi Xu; Jianzhen Xu; Liang Xu; Xiaolei Xu; Ai Yamamoto; Akitsugu Yamamoto; Shunhei Yamashina; Michiaki Yamashita; Xianghua Yan; Mitsuhiro Yanagida; Dun-Sheng Yang; Elizabeth Yang; Jin-Ming Yang; Shi Yu Yang; Wannian Yang; Wei Yuan Yang; Zhifen Yang; Meng-Chao Yao; Tso-Pang Yao; Behzad Yeganeh; Wei-Lien Yen; Jia-jing Yin; Xiao-Ming Yin; Ook-Joon Yoo; Gyesoon Yoon; Seung-Yong Yoon; Tomohiro Yorimitsu; Yuko Yoshikawa; Tamotsu Yoshimori; Kohki Yoshimoto; Ho Jin You; Richard J Youle; Anas Younes; Li Yu; Long Yu; Seong-Woon Yu; Wai Haung Yu; Zhi-Min Yuan; Zhenyu Yue; Cheol-Heui Yun; Michisuke Yuzaki; Olga Zabirnyk; Elaine Silva-Zacarin; David Zacks; Eldad Zacksenhaus; Nadia Zaffaroni; Zahra Zakeri; Herbert J Zeh; Scott O Zeitlin; Hong Zhang; Hui-Ling Zhang; Jianhua Zhang; Jing-Pu Zhang; Lin Zhang; Long Zhang; Ming-Yong Zhang; Xu Dong Zhang; Mantong Zhao; Yi-Fang Zhao; Ying Zhao; Zhizhuang J Zhao; Xiaoxiang Zheng; Boris Zhivotovsky; Qing Zhong; Cong-Zhao Zhou; Changlian Zhu; Wei-Guo Zhu; Xiao-Feng Zhu; Xiongwei Zhu; Yuangang Zhu; Teresa Zoladek; Wei-Xing Zong; Antonio Zorzano; Jürgen Zschocke; Brian Zuckerbraun
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 16.016

View more
  2 in total

1.  Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein U (HNRNPU) safeguards the developing mouse cortex.

Authors:  Tamar Sapir; Aditya Kshirsagar; Anna Gorelik; Tsviya Olender; Ziv Porat; Ingrid E Scheffer; David B Goldstein; Orrin Devinsky; Orly Reiner
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 17.694

Review 2.  Influence of Age on Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy and Atrophy Signaling: Established Paradigms and Unexpected Links.

Authors:  Eun-Joo Lee; Ronald L Neppl
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 4.096

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.