Literature DB >> 32659508

Correlations between COVID-19 and burden of dementia: An ecological study and review of literature.

M Reza Azarpazhooh1, Amin Amiri2, Negar Morovatdar3, Sandy Steinwender4, Amir Rezaei Ardani5, Nawaf Yassi6, Jose Biller7, Saverio Stranges8, Masoud Tokazebani Belasi9, Sepideh Kazemi Neya10, Bita Khorram11, Mohammad Sobhan Sheikh Andalibi12, Shahram Arsang-Jang13, Naghmeh Mokhber14, Mario Di Napoli15.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Current evidence on the association between COVID-19 and dementia is sparse. This study aims to investigate the associations between COVID-19 caseload and the burden of dementia.
METHODS: We gathered data regarding burden of dementia (disability-adjusted life years [DALYs] per 100,000), life expectancy, and healthy life expectancy (HALE) from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2017 study. We obtained COVID-19 data from Our World in Data database. We analyzed the association of COVID-19 cases and deaths with the burden of dementia using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.
RESULTS: Globally, we found significant positive (p < .001) correlations between life expectancy (r = 0.60), HALE (r = 0.58), and dementia DALYs (r = 0.46) with COVID-19 caseloads. Likewise, we found similar correlations between life expectancy (r = 0.60), HALE (r = 0.58) and dementia DALYs (r = 0.54) with COVID-19 mortality.
CONCLUSION: Health policymakers should clarify a targeted model of disease surveillance in order to reduce the dual burden of dementia and COVID-19.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Dementia; Global burden of disease; Mortality

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32659508      PMCID: PMC7334961          DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2020.117013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Sci        ISSN: 0022-510X            Impact factor:   3.181


Introduction

With the emergence of COVID-19 pandemic, it is crucial to identify those at increased risk of infection and death. The worldwide prevalence of dementia has increased dramatically over the past three decades, mainly due to an ageing population [1]. Patients with dementia are among the most vulnerable populations due to ageing, frailty [2], chronic immune dysregulation [3] and comorbidity of other chronic diseases, particularly vascular disorders [4]. Individuals with dementia are faced with a “double burden”, as the pandemic exacerbates both their vulnerability due to increased morbidity and mortality and breakdown of their social supports and access to their healthcare system due to lockdown and social distancing measures [5]. Epidemiological evidence has shown a significant association between communicable diseases and dementia [[6], [7], [8], [9]]. Those with dementia had poor clinical outcomes and increased hospitalization rate after respiratory syncytial virus disease [6], severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus (SARS-CoV) [7], and influenza A infections [[8], [9], [10]]. Recent evidence showed that there is a high prevalence of dementia among COVID-19 patients [11,12]. In addition, case fatality of COVID-19 is significantly higher in the elderly with dementia [13,14]. However, the nature of this association has not yet been clearly evaluated on a global perspective and it may take several months to gather enough epidemiological and clinical data to address this issue. In a recent study, using the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2017 database [15], we observed a significant yet weak correlation between all non-communicable diseases, including ischemic stroke and ischemic heart diseases with COVID-19 confirmed cases and deaths. Furthermore, life expectancy and healthy life expectancy (HALE) had independent positive associations with COVID-19 caseload and mortality. The purpose of this study is to assess the association between the national and global burden of dementia and COVID-19 confirmed cases and death. We will also provide a brief review of the literature regarding the association between COVID-19 and dementia and summarize available recommendations to reduce the dual burden of dementia and COVID-19.

Materials and methods

We gathered data regarding regional and national mortality of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (later regarded as dementia) from the GBD 2017 study database [16]. We used disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) per 100,000 (with 95% uncertainty intervals [UIs]) to measure the burden of dementia. Using the GBD 2017 database, we also collected data regarding national and regional HALE and life expectancy with their 95% UIs. Data regarding the COVID-19 confirmed cases, and deaths per million population, and the percentage of population aged ≥65 and aged ≥70 years was retrieved using Our World in Data. We categorized all countries into a) seven GBD super regions, including 1. South Asia, 2. Southeast Asia, East Asia & Oceania, 3. Central Europe, Eastern Europe & Central Asia, 4. North Africa & Middle East, 5. Sub-Saharan Africa, 6. Latin America & Caribbean, and 7. high-income; b) world Bank income levels, including (1. Low-income countries, 2. lower middle-income countries, 3. upper middle-income countries, and 4. high-income countries [17]. We calculated COVID-19 confirmed cases and deaths per million population with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by each region. We used Spearman's rank correlation coefficient with Bonferroni correction to analyse the association of COVID-19 caseload and deaths with the burden and mortality of dementia. We also assessed correlations between national and global life expectancy and HALE with COVID-19 cases and death using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. We used STATA software (version 13) for all statistical analysis. Data reported in this paper are publicly available with no personal identifiers.

Results

Table 1 summarizes regional and national data regarding COVID-19 confirmed cases, deaths, and the burden of dementia. According to the GBD 2017 data, 4% and 1% of mortality and burden of all disease, respectively, were attributed to dementia. The highest rate of dementia DALYs per 100,000 was observed in the high-income region (955.65), followed by Central Europe, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia (670.18), and Southeast Asia, East, East Asia, and Oceania (438.06) (Table 1.A). The greatest rate of dementia deaths were also observed in the high-income GBD region (93.74), followed by Central Europe, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia (56.12), and Latin America and the Caribbean (30.27) (Table 1.A). Likewise, using the World Bank classification, we found higher dementia DALYs and deaths in high-income countries compared to low- and middle-income countries (Table 1.B). In 2017, HALE were significantly higher in high-income countries as compared to low-income countries (69.4 [66.15 to 72.18] vs. 55.66 [53.17 to 57.97]). We found similar findings regarding life expectancy. Likewise, the highest percentage of the population aged ≥65 and aged ≥70 years was seen in the high-income region and high-income countries.
Table 1

Global burden and mortality of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias, population age structure, and COVID-19: Results classified according to the A) Global burden of disease super region classification and B) World Bank classification.

A. Global Burden of Disease Study super regions
Super regionsCOVID-19
Alzheimer's disease and other dementias
Population age structure
Cases per million (95% CI)Deaths per million (95% CI)DALY per 100,000Death per 100,000Age, median (IQR)Population aged ≥ 65 years (%)Population age d ≥ 70 years (%)
Central Europe, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia region1747.25 (1743.21–1751.30)30.94 (30.40–31.48)670.18 (625.90–716.85)56.12 (55.11–56.93)40.75 (36.65–43.15)13.498.81
High-income region3453.27 (3449.78–3456.77)269.23 (268.25–270.2)955.65 (894.67–1020.10)93.74 (91.84–95.25)41.60 (37.9–43.3)18.3112.24
Latin America and Caribbean region2128.03 (2124.28–2131.78)113.82 (112.95–114.69)367.79 (344.97–391.97)30.27 (29.74–30.85)29.35 (26.9–32.85)7.614.62
North Africa and Middle East region1320.08 (1317.01–1323.14)32.55 (32.07–33.03)241.49 (225.20–258.43)17.42 (16.85–17.94)30.7 (23.2–32.4)5.383.21
South Asia region265.78 (265.03–266.53)6.20 (6.08–6.31)176.06 (161.4–193.27)12.57 (11.72–13.87)26.25 (23.5–28.2)5.653.27
Southeast Asia, East Asia, and Oceania region72.65 (72.29–73.01)3.60 (3.52–3.68)438.06 (406.77–472.66)31.22 (30.29–32.09)29.3 (25.2–34.1)9.215.19
Sub-Saharan Africa133.004 (132.33–133.67)2.96 (2.86–3.06)124.36 (110.22–140.48)9.22 (8.06–10.47)19.25 (17.9–21.75)3.111.78



Global burden and mortality of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias, population age structure, and COVID-19: Results classified according to the A) Global burden of disease super region classification and B) World Bank classification. As of June 10, 2020, the highest number of COVID-19 confirmed cases (3453.27) and deaths (269.23) were reported in high-income regions (Table 1.A). Globally, we found significant moderate positive correlations between life expectancy (r = 0.60, p < .001), HALE (r = 0.58, P < .001), and dementia DALYs (r = 0.46, p < .001) with COVID-19 caseloads (Fig. 1 .A). Likewise, there were significant correlations between COVID-19 mortality with life expectancy (r = 0.60; p < .001) HALE (r = 0.58; P < .001), and dementia DALYs (r = 0.54; P < .001) (Fig. 1.B).
Fig. 1

A. Correlation between Alzheimer's disease and other dementias DALYs rate and: A. Total number of COVID-19 cases per million. B. Total number of COVID-19 deaths per million.

A. Correlation between Alzheimer's disease and other dementias DALYs rate and: A. Total number of COVID-19 cases per million. B. Total number of COVID-19 deaths per million.

Discussion

The results of this study have major public health implications. Using available GBD 2017 data regarding dementia and COVID-19 in 185 countries, we found a significant correlation between the burden of dementia and COVID-19 cases and deaths. There were also positive correlations between life expectancy and HALE with COVID-19 cases and deaths. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study reporting a correlation between COVID-19 and dementia on a global scale. The world is facing an ageing population [18]. Among age-related health conditions, dementia is one of the most burdensome in the world with significant health and social well-being implications [19]. In 2016, about 43.8 million people were reported to be living with dementia [1] with huge social and personal costs [20]. Older adults with underlying health issues are known to be at increased risk of severe COVID-19 and mortality [3]. Therefore, access to accurate data regarding dementia and ageing population is a research priority worldwide, particularly in the era of COVID-19 pandemic. We found that life expectancy and HALE had significant correlations with COVID-19 case numbers and deaths. As reported earlier [21,22], HALE and life expectancy were higher in high-income countries than those of low- and middle-income countries. In addition, the highest percentage of citizens aged ≥65 and ≥ 70 years were seen in high-income countries followed by upper middle-income countries. These findings may partially explain a higher rate and rapid spread of COVID-19 pandemic in many high-income countries [23,24]. Older adults have slower and less efficient immune responses, making them more vulnerable to COVID-19 consequences [3]. Additionally, a substantial number of COVID-19 cases and deaths occured in the elderly residing in long-term care facilities and assisted living [13,25,26] often available in high-income countries. Data from the National Survey of Residential Care Facilities in the United States showed that seven out of ten individuals in assisted living had some cognitive impairment, ranging from mild (29%) to severe cognitive impairment (19%) [27]. A combination of ageing, frailty and comorbidities make these individuals more susceptible to COVID-19 severe consequences. Our results also suggest a significant correlation between dementia DALYs and COVID-19 cases. The rate of dementia in hospitalized cases COVID-19 varied from 6.8% [11] to 13.1% [12]. A higher rate of COVID-19 among patients with dementia might be partially explained by problems with appropriate safeguard, self-quarantine procedures, less adherence to social distancing, and living in long-term care facilities [28]. Dementia is a strong predictor of COVID-19 mortality [29]. In our study, we found a significant correlation between dementia DALYs and COVID-19 mortality. In the UK Biobank study, a large community-based cohort (n = 274,356 participants aged 65+, including 448 hospitalized COVID-19 patients) pre-existing dementia was associated with COVID-19 severity (odds ratio = 3.07, 95% CI: 1.71 to 5.50) [29] and increased mortality rate. Likewise, among 627 Italian patients with COVID-19, the mortality rate increased significantly (p < .001) in those with dementia (62.2%) as compared to those without (26.2%). Among 20,133 cases with COVID-19 admitted in 208 hospitals in the UK, chronic non-communicable diseases including dementia increased hospital mortality [30]. Case fatality rate in long-term care facilities is high, ranging from 20% [14] to 33.7% [13]. Increased risk of adverse outcomes and patient safety in hospitalized cases with dementia has been a challenging condition even prior ot COVID-19 pandemic [31]. A high mortality rate of COVID-19 among demented patients could be partially explained by ageing and chronic comorbidities, particularly cardio or cerebr-vascular diseases [32,33]. In addition, using the UK Biobank databasebase and after adjusting for pre-existing dementia, cardiovascular diseases, and type-2 diabetes, Kuo et al. showed that the ApoE e4e4 allele is associated with severe COVID-19 infection [34]. There is no silver bullet solution to reduce the dual burden of dementia and COVID-19. However, it is still possible to reduce the burden of COVID-19 among patients with dementia and their caregivers [5]. Prevention of COVID-9 in the elderly, particularly those with dementia, or residents of long-term care facilities requires a coordinated approach with a close collaboration between family members and health professionals. Strict environmental clearance, hand hygiene, safe distance between residents to reduce droplet contamination can prevent COVID-19 spread [35]. Those with cognitive impairment may need additional support in order to adequately practice infection control procedures during the COVID-19 era. These procedures are also crucial for caregivers of patients with dementia who may be at risk of COVID-19 [13]. Active surveillance/testing of patients, caregivers, and staff in long-term care facilities, are highly recommended to reduce the chance of COVID-19. Older adults with COVID-19 may be afebrile with atypical symptoms [36]. In addition, patients with dementia who develop COVID-19 may present with non-respiratory symptoms such as delirium (particularly the hypoactive form) or isolated functional decline in the absence of any obvious physical symptoms [36]. These atypical presentations of COVID-19 may reduce early recognition of disease, increase COVID-19 spread and mortality among patients and caregivers. Moreover, fear of presenting to hospitals and medical facilities for patients and their caregiver may increase the rate of spread and mortality of COVID-19 among the elderly. Hospital administration and public health officials should encourage patients/caregivers to seek medical attention, reassure them that hospitals are safe and they will ensure patient safety while in hospital. Compared to the pre-COVID-19 era, residents of long-term care facilities and patients with dementia should have a higher frequency of vital signs monitoring and observations for any changes in clinical status [36]. Long-term care facilities and caregivers should implement frequent check ups using simple questionnaires or checklists regarding activity level, potential exposure, change in appetite, generalized weakness, change in temperature or pulse rate to identify suspected cases with COVID-19. These screening approaches may be linked to national and local public health screening tools (if available) to provide an active surveillance model for the elderly. Furthermore, staff that work in residential care facilities are often poorly trained, unregulated and overworked [37], which creates further risk for COVID-19 transmission. Thus, there is a need to dedicate funds and regulate training for staff at residential and long term care facilities. While social distancing and safeguard procedures are still the most effective approaches to prevent COVID-19 infection, these approaches should not endanger the safety of patients with dementia [38]. Older individuals with cognitive impairment are among the most vulnerable persons and often need help in their activities of daily living, medication adherence, social and leisure activities [39]. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, family, friends, or professional caregivers may self isolate themselves due to fear of infection, and may refrain from visiting due to changes in their lifestyle due to COVID-19. The lack of adequate and previously established formal and informal support in these patients may further endanger their lives due to risk of falls [40], aspiration pneumonia [41] and even suicide [42]. In addition, lack of in-person support, face-to-face visits with friends and family members, group activities, and exercise with peers may increase the sense of loneliness [43], isolation and depression particularly in the elderly [44]. These conditions may increase the chance of delirium [45] and aggressive behaviors leading to self injuries [46]. Whenever possible, individuals with dementia should be encouraged to participate in their daily routine, remain physically active, maintain proper sleep hygiene, and engage in leisure activities [47]. Telehealth home support during COVID-19 may assist those with milder cognitive impairment due to its recreational component and intellectual activity [47]. For individuals with milder forms of cognitive impairment, activities such as relaxation, meditation, group exercise, and social interactions using cross-platform mobile applications and video-call technology may prevent a sense of loneliness and maintain mental and physical health [48]. However, barriers to technology use including fear and lack of familiarity, in addition to hearing/vision loss may reduce the effectiveness of these approaches. This study has some limitations. The data for COVID-19 is dynamic and some of the most readily accessible data is publicly available aggregate population level data. Given the ecological design of the study, the results need to be interpreted as correlational and not causal, due to the potential for ecological fallacy [49]. There is an observed difference between the number of COVID-19 cases and deaths reported in low- and middle-income countries vs. high-income countries. This under-reporting may be due to decreased capacity for testing and active surveillance in the low and middle-income countries. Another limitation is the fact that we did not adjust for potential confounders that may be contributing to the correlation. There is a concern that confounding may further distort or create misleading results when comparing COVID-19 rates in rich versus poorer countries [50]. Adjusting for multiple potential confounders may create instability in adjusted models. The major strength of our study is based on combining multiple available databases regarding COVID-19 pandemic and GBD 2017 study. This information provides the opportunity to assess the correlations between dementia and COVID-19 at a global scale to inform policy makers, researchers, and clinicians about global differences in dementia trends.

Conclusions

In the current study, we found significant correlations between global and national burden of dementia and COVID-19 cases and death. In this critical stage of the pandemic when countries are planning to end their national lockdown and begin to open their borders, health policy makers must have comprehensive plans to identify those at risk (including older people) and reduce the chance of infection while maintaining appropriate attention to medical and psychosocial wellbeing. If a vaccination becomes available, such patients could also be prioritized given their risk status.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest to disclose.
  28 in total

1.  Clinical course and risk factors of fatal adverse outcomes in COVID-19 patients in Korea: a nationwide retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Juhyun Song; Dae Won Park; Jae-Hyung Cha; Hyeri Seok; Joo Yeong Kim; Jonghak Park; Hanjin Cho
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  The prognostic role of functional dependency in older inpatients with COVID-19.

Authors:  Galina Plotnikov; Efraim Waizman; Irma Tzur; Alexander Yusupov; Yonatan Shapira; Oleg Gorelik
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 3.921

3.  COVID-19 and community-based care services: Experiences of people living with dementia and their informal carers in Italy.

Authors:  Ilaria Chirico; Giovanni Ottoboni; Clarissa Giebel; Alessandro Pappadà; Marco Valente; Valentina Degli Esposti; Mark Gabbay; Rabih Chattat
Journal:  Health Soc Care Community       Date:  2022-02-20

4.  Using Twitter to Examine Stigma Against People With Dementia During COVID-19: Infodemiology Study.

Authors:  Juanita-Dawne Bacsu; Sarah Fraser; Alison L Chasteen; Allison Cammer; Karl S Grewal; Lauren E Bechard; Jennifer Bethell; Shoshana Green; Katherine S McGilton; Debra Morgan; Hannah M O'Rourke; Lisa Poole; Raymond J Spiteri; Megan E O'Connell
Journal:  JMIR Aging       Date:  2022-03-31

5.  Perceptions, Experiences, and Challenges of Physicians Involved in Dementia Care During the COVID-19 Lockdown in India: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Debanjan Banerjee; Bhavika Vajawat; Prateek Varshney; Ts Sathyanarayana Rao
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 4.157

Review 6.  Lockdown-Related Disparities Experienced by People with Disabilities during the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review with Thematic Analysis.

Authors:  Tiago S Jesus; Sutanuka Bhattacharjya; Christina Papadimitriou; Yelena Bogdanova; Jacob Bentley; Juan Carlos Arango-Lasprilla; Sureshkumar Kamalakannan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Investigation of CD26, a potential SARS-CoV-2 receptor, as a biomarker of age and pathology.

Authors:  Animesh Alexander Raha; Subhojit Chakraborty; James Henderson; Elizabeta Mukaetova-Ladinska; Shahid Zaman; John Trowsdale; Ruma Raha-Chowdhury
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 3.840

8.  Clinical Characteristics and Survival Analysis in a Small Sample of Older COVID-19 Patients with Defined 60-Day Outcome.

Authors:  Agnieszka Neumann-Podczaska; Michal Chojnicki; Lukasz M Karbowski; Salwan R Al-Saad; Abbas A Hashmi; Jerzy Chudek; Slawomir Tobis; Sylwia Kropinska; Iwona Mozer-Lisewska; Aleksandra Suwalska; Andrzej Tykarski; Katarzyna Wieczorowska-Tobis
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Psychosocial Impact of COVID-19 Nursing Home Restrictions on Visitors of Residents With Cognitive Impairment: A Cross-Sectional Study as Part of the Engaging Remotely in Care (ERiC) Project.

Authors:  Rónán O'Caoimh; Mark R O'Donovan; Margaret P Monahan; Caroline Dalton O'Connor; Catherine Buckley; Caroline Kilty; Serena Fitzgerald; Irene Hartigan; Nicola Cornally
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 4.157

10.  Caring for Persons Living With Dementia During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Advocacy Perspectives From India.

Authors:  Migita D'Cruz; Debanjan Banerjee
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 4.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.