Literature DB >> 32659378

Anxiety persists after recovery from acquired COVID-19 in anaesthesiologists.

Jing Wu1, Xiangdong Chen1, Shanglong Yao1, Renyu Liu2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32659378      PMCID: PMC7340014          DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Anesth        ISSN: 0952-8180            Impact factor:   9.452


× No keyword cloud information.
During the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic medical providers may develop psychosocial problems, especially these who stand at the frontline battling this contagious disease [1,2]. It was reported that an Italian nurse with coronavirus committed suicide, fearing the possibility of infecting others [3]. Anaesthesiologists are the frontline medical providers taking care of COVID-19 patients in operating rooms and intensive care units, and they provide the necessary intubations for severe COVID-19 patients. They have a high risk of contracting the novel coronavirus as well as the anxiety that accompanies this. We hypothesized that anaesthesia providers who contracted COVID-19 might have a high prevalence of elevated anxiety, and that this anxiety would persist after their physical recovery. Following approval from the institutional review board of Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, we sent an inquiry to 138 anaesthesia department leaders in 138 hospitals in Hubei Province, the epicenter of COVID-19 in China, to identify anaesthesiologists who might have contracted COVID-19. Eighteen anaesthesiologists with possible hospital acquired COVID-19 from 8 hospitals were identified. A subsequent survey (Appendix A) was sent to these 18 anaesthesiologists to investigate their wellbeing, outcome, and anxiety level. According to registration information from the Anaesthesia Quality Control Center of Hubei, the number of registered anaesthesiologists in these 138 hospitals is 1427; thus, the rate of acquired COVID-19 for all anaesthesiologists is estimated to be about 1.26% (18/1427). Only one of the responding anaesthesiologists might have contracted the infection from providing service for labor and delivery. Thus, the rate of infection for anaesthesiologists related to labor and delivery service is approximately 1 out of 1427 (0.07%). Fourteen (77.8%, 14/18) valid questionnaires were received from the 18 anaesthesiologists who contracted COVID-19. The other four of those who received questionnaires were unwilling to provide information. Table 1 shows the results from the 14 respondents. Half (50.0%, 7/14) had clear connections with COVID-19 patients while the other half were unclear of the source of their infection. Three anaesthesiologists (21.4%, 3/14) had severe symptoms; the rest had mild to moderate symptoms. The average length of hospitalization was 12.1 ± 8.7 days and the course of the disease was 21.4 ± 14.4 days. Providers were out of clinical service for an average of 44.7 ± 13.5 days and were quarantined at a centralized isolation facility for an average of 16.4 ± 5.9 days. Most had a full physical recovery at the conclusion of this investigation. However, most of them (92.9%, 13/14) reported that they had mild to severe anxiety along with fear during the course of their disease, and this anxiety and fear persisted after their physical recovery. Anaesthesiologists have many opportunities to contract the disease from patients, colleagues, and from the community. Most of the anaesthesia care for labor and delivery that was identified in this study was neuraxial anaesthesia, and we identified only one anaesthesiologist who might have contracted the disease from patient care. It appears that providing anaesthesia service for labor and delivery did not have an increased risk of contracting COVID-19, as compared to providing service in other areas. The universal policy of requiring patients coming for labor and delivery wear masks during obstetric anaesthesia in Hubei province in China could have significantly reduced hospital acquired cross-infection. We recently recommended that a mask wearing policy for everyone in the hospital be mandated [4].
Table 1

Detailed information of the anaesthesiologists who contracted COVID-19.

Characteristics
Related loss and injuries
GenderAgeInitial symptom post-event (days)Diagnosis post exposureInitial symptomTypeHospital daysOutcomeSick daysPost-discharge isolation daysDays out of clinical servicesFamily member infectionAnxiety/fear severity during sick daysAnxiety/fear severity after recovery
Female20s33FatigueMild0Full recovery31530NoMildMild
Female40s33FatigueMild0Full recovery31515NoMildMild
Male30sNot sureNot sureFever, fatigueMild0Full recovery1614502MildNone
Female40sNone6NoneMild6Full recovery82845NoMildMild
Male40s1826Dry coughMild12Full recovery181446NoModerateMild
Female30s310FeverModerate7Full recovery503260NoNoneModerate
Femalea40s66Fever, fatigueModerate12Full recovery101448NoMildMild
Male30sNone15NoneModerate14Full recovery151442NoMildMild
Male20sNot sureNot sureFeverModerate17Full recovery301459NoMildMild
Male30s17FeverModerate18Full recovery261450NoModerateMild
Male40s1023Fever, cough, fatigueModerate20Recovering201333NoMildMild
Female30s517Cough, fever, fatigueSevere12Full recovery401458NoMildMild
Female30s310Fever, cough, fatigueSevere25Recovering201430NoSevereSevere
Male60sNot sureNot sureFever, fatigueSevere26Recovering401460NoModerateMild

The anaesthesiologist with COVID-19 after providing services for labor and delivery. The average age is 39 ± 10 with a range of 24–63. Among identified 18 cases, only 14 of them are willing to provide related information presented above.

During the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic medical providers may develop psychosocial problems, especially these who stand at the frontline battling this contagious disease [1,2]. It was reported that an Italian nurse with coronavirus committed suicide, fearing the possibility of infecting others [3]. Anaesthesiologists are the frontline medical providers taking care of COVID-19 patients in operating rooms and intensive care units, and they provide the necessary intubations for severe COVID-19 patients. They have a high risk of contracting the novel coronavirus as well as the anxiety that accompanies this. We hypothesized that anaesthesia providers who contracted COVID-19 might have a high prevalence of elevated anxiety, and that this anxiety would persist after their physical recovery. Following approval from the institutional review board of Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, we sent an inquiry to 138 anaesthesia department leaders in 138 hospitals in Hubei Province, the epicenter of COVID-19 in China, to identify anaesthesiologists who might have contracted COVID-19. Eighteen anaesthesiologists with possible hospital acquired COVID-19 from 8 hospitals were identified. A subsequent survey (Appendix A) was sent to these 18 anaesthesiologists to investigate their wellbeing, outcome, and anxiety level. According to registration information from the Anaesthesia Quality Control Center of Hubei, the number of registered anaesthesiologists in these 138 hospitals is 1427; thus, the rate of acquired COVID-19 for all anaesthesiologists is estimated to be about 1.26% (18/1427). Only one of the responding anaesthesiologists might have contracted the infection from providing service for labor and delivery. Thus, the rate of infection for anaesthesiologists related to labor and delivery service is approximately 1 out of 1427 (0.07%). Fourteen (77.8%, 14/18) valid questionnaires were received from the 18 anaesthesiologists who contracted COVID-19. The other four of those who received questionnaires were unwilling to provide information. Table 1 shows the results from the 14 respondents. Half (50.0%, 7/14) had clear connections with COVID-19 patients while the other half were unclear of the source of their infection. Three anaesthesiologists (21.4%, 3/14) had severe symptoms; the rest had mild to moderate symptoms. The average length of hospitalization was 12.1 ± 8.7 days and the course of the disease was 21.4 ± 14.4 days. Providers were out of clinical service for an average of 44.7 ± 13.5 days and were quarantined at a centralized isolation facility for an average of 16.4 ± 5.9 days. Most had a full physical recovery at the conclusion of this investigation. However, most of them (92.9%, 13/14) reported that they had mild to severe anxiety along with fear during the course of their disease, and this anxiety and fear persisted after their physical recovery. Anaesthesiologists have many opportunities to contract the disease from patients, colleagues, and from the community. Most of the anaesthesia care for labor and delivery that was identified in this study was neuraxial anaesthesia, and we identified only one anaesthesiologist who might have contracted the disease from patient care. It appears that providing anaesthesia service for labor and delivery did not have an increased risk of contracting COVID-19, as compared to providing service in other areas. The universal policy of requiring patients coming for labor and delivery wear masks during obstetric anaesthesia in Hubei province in China could have significantly reduced hospital acquired cross-infection. We recently recommended that a mask wearing policy for everyone in the hospital be mandated [4]. Despite vigorous precautions, there is still the possibility that an anaesthesiologist may contract the disease, as indicated in this report. Half of the responding anaesthesiologists were unable to recall precisely where they contracted the disease. Careful self-monitoring of potential symptoms is needed, since symptoms can occur as early as one day after providing care for COVID-19 patients. If potential contamination is suspected, proper reporting and testing must be performed, duo to the fact that some cases may show no significant symptoms. Fortunately, most of the anaesthesiologists who contracted the disease had only mild to moderate symptom, as well as a very good prognosis. However, they lost a large number of clinical service days, putting additional stress on the already overwhelmed medical system and their colleagues fighting the outbreak. Those infected by the disease should be offered proper psychological support and care. As seen in this study, all of the respondents experienced various levels of anxiety and fear both during and after the disease. Proper social and psychological support and consultation are vital. Detailed information of the anaesthesiologists who contracted COVID-19. The anaesthesiologist with COVID-19 after providing services for labor and delivery. The average age is 39 ± 10 with a range of 24–63. Among identified 18 cases, only 14 of them are willing to provide related information presented above. This was a retrospective survey, so it is possible that significant bias could potentially be introduced to the results. Some people may not be willing to disclose certain sensitive information. Thus, the infection rate could potentially be under-estimated. Strategies to prevent and manage psychological issues related to COVID-19 for anaesthesia providers can be developed using a systematic approach consisting of individual, departmental, and institutional efforts. Dr. Shanglong Yao, a senior author of this letter contracted COVID-19 at the end of January of 2020 along with two of his family members. He stayed very positive and encouraged others by sharing his perspective of the importance of a personal positive attitude in many online educational efforts, and became a great role model for those coping with anxiety at an individual level. It's important to know that there are free online resources, such as this website (https://psychhub.com/covid-19/covid-individuals/covid-individual-resources/). Based on our personal communication, there are many anaesthesia departments that have initiated various programs to help departmental members cope with anxiety by providing useful information and free access to programs to help with. As an example, one academic anaesthesia department offered free access to Headspace (https://www.headspace.com/), an App that helps people relax and practice meditation. At the University of Pennsylvania, a specific website was established to assist anyone in the community who may need help for psychological issues during the pandemic (https://www.penncobalt.com/). Anyone can sign in anonymously to seek for help for him/herself, family members, or co-workers. Available time slots of psychologists are listed for those who want to make an appointment. Individuals can connect with peers, resilience coaches, therapists, psychiatrists, and others who are ready to help. The following is the supplementary data related to this article.

Appendix

Questionnaire about anxiety in anaesthesiologists with acquired COVID-19. Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109984.

Details of authors' contributions

JW and XDC: Data collection and analysis, write and edited the paper; SLY and RYL: Study design, data analysis, interpretation, and write and edited the paper.

Declaration of competing interest

We declare that we have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
  3 in total

1.  Getting to a New Normal: Mandating That Patients Wear Masks as Hospitals Fully Reopen during the Coronavirus Pandemic.

Authors:  Renyu Liu; Lee A Fleisher
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Psychological status of medical workforce during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Wen Lu; Hang Wang; Yuxing Lin; Li Li
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2020-04-04       Impact factor: 3.222

3.  Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Nanshan Chen; Min Zhou; Xuan Dong; Jieming Qu; Fengyun Gong; Yang Han; Yang Qiu; Jingli Wang; Ying Liu; Yuan Wei; Jia'an Xia; Ting Yu; Xinxin Zhang; Li Zhang
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 79.321

  3 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Experiences and management of physician psychological symptoms during infectious disease outbreaks: a rapid review.

Authors:  Kirsten M Fiest; Jeanna Parsons Leigh; Karla D Krewulak; Kara M Plotnikoff; Laryssa G Kemp; Joshua Ng-Kamstra; Henry T Stelfox
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 3.630

2.  Exploring COVID-19 patients' experiences of psychological distress during the disease course: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Tahereh Toulabi; Fatemeh Jafari Pour; Atefeh Veiskramian; Heshmatolah Heydari
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 3.630

3.  Behavioral problems of pediatric patients recovered from COVID-19 in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Han Xiao; Qi Liu; Hong Mei; Qi Xue; Xiaonan Cai; Xinyan Xie; Zhiguo Xia; Yu Zhou; Hui Li; Kaiheng Zhu; Zihao Wan; Ranran Song; Zhisheng Liu
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2022-03-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.