| Literature DB >> 32658985 |
Shu-Nan Qi1, Yong Yang1, Yu-Qin Song2, Ying Wang3, Xia He4, Chen Hu5, Li-Ling Zhang6, Gang Wu6, Bao-Lin Qu7, Li-Ting Qian8, Xiao-Rong Hou9, Fu-Quan Zhang9, Xue-Ying Qiao10, Hua Wang11, Gao-Feng Li12, Hui-Qiang Huang13, Yu-Jing Zhang13, Yuan Zhu14, Jian-Zhong Cao15, Jun-Xin Wu16, Tao Wu17, Su-Yu Zhu18, Mei Shi19, Li-Ming Xu20, Zhi-Yong Yuan20, Hang Su21, Jun Zhu2, Ye-Xiong Li1.
Abstract
The present study investigated the survival benefit of non-anthracycline (ANT)-based vs ANT-based regimens in a large-scale, real-world cohort of patients with extranodal natural killer (NK)/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type (ENKTCL). Within the China Lymphoma Collaborative Group (CLCG) database (2000-2015), we identified 2560 newly diagnosed patients who received chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) and multivariable analyses were used to compare overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between the 2 chemotherapy regimens. We explored the survival benefit of non-ANT-based regimens in patients with different treatments in early-stage disease and in risk-stratified subgroups. Non-ANT-based regimens significantly improved survivals compared with ANT-based regimens. The 5-year OS and PFS were 68.9% and 59.5% for non-ANT-based regimens compared with 57.5% and 44.5% for ANT-based regimens in the entire cohort. The clinical advantage of non-ANT-based regimens was substantial across the subgroups examined, regardless of stage and risk-stratified subgroup, and remained significant in early-stage patients who received radiotherapy. The survival benefits of non-ANT-based regimens were consistent after adjustment using multivariable and PSM analyses. These findings provide additional evidence supporting non-ANT-based regimens as a first-line treatment of patients with ENKTCL.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32658985 PMCID: PMC7362384 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001852
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Blood Adv ISSN: 2473-9529