Literature DB >> 32658785

Concept attribution: Explaining CNN decisions to physicians.

Graziani M1, Andrearczyk V2, Marchand-Maillet S3, Müller H4.   

Abstract

Deep learning explainability is often reached by gradient-based approaches that attribute the network output to perturbations of the input pixels. However, the relevance of input pixels may be difficult to relate to relevant image features in some applications, e.g. diagnostic measures in medical imaging. The framework described in this paper shifts the attribution focus from pixel values to user-defined concepts. By checking if certain diagnostic measures are present in the learned representations, experts can explain and entrust the network output. Being post-hoc, our method does not alter the network training and can be easily plugged into the latest state-of-the-art convolutional networks. This paper presents the main components of the framework for attribution to concepts, in addition to the introduction of a spatial pooling operation on top of the feature maps to obtain a solid interpretability analysis. Furthermore, regularized regression is analyzed as a solution to the regression overfitting in high-dimensionality latent spaces. The versatility of the proposed approach is shown by experiments on two medical applications, namely histopathology and retinopathy, and on one non-medical task, the task of handwritten digit classification. The obtained explanations are in line with clinicians' guidelines and complementary to widely used visualization tools such as saliency maps.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical imaging; Deep learning; Interpretability; Machine learning

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32658785     DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103865

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Biol Med        ISSN: 0010-4825            Impact factor:   4.589


  4 in total

1.  Validating Automatic Concept-Based Explanations for AI-Based Digital Histopathology.

Authors:  Daniel Sauter; Georg Lodde; Felix Nensa; Dirk Schadendorf; Elisabeth Livingstone; Markus Kukuk
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Deep learning can predict survival directly from histology in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Frederik Wessels; Max Schmitt; Eva Krieghoff-Henning; Jakob N Kather; Malin Nientiedt; Maximilian C Kriegmair; Thomas S Worst; Manuel Neuberger; Matthias Steeg; Zoran V Popovic; Timo Gaiser; Christof von Kalle; Jochen S Utikal; Stefan Fröhling; Maurice S Michel; Philipp Nuhn; Titus J Brinker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  A global taxonomy of interpretable AI: unifying the terminology for the technical and social sciences.

Authors:  Mara Graziani; Lidia Dutkiewicz; Davide Calvaresi; José Pereira Amorim; Katerina Yordanova; Mor Vered; Rahul Nair; Pedro Henriques Abreu; Tobias Blanke; Valeria Pulignano; John O Prior; Lode Lauwaert; Wessel Reijers; Adrien Depeursinge; Vincent Andrearczyk; Henning Müller
Journal:  Artif Intell Rev       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 9.588

4.  Conventional Machine Learning versus Deep Learning for Magnification Dependent Histopathological Breast Cancer Image Classification: A Comparative Study with Visual Explanation.

Authors:  Said Boumaraf; Xiabi Liu; Yuchai Wan; Zhongshu Zheng; Chokri Ferkous; Xiaohong Ma; Zhuo Li; Dalal Bardou
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.