Literature DB >> 32657973

Extended Thromboprophylaxis With Betrixaban or Rivaroxaban for Acutely Ill Hospitalized Medical Patients: Meta-Analysis of Prespecified Subgroups.

Adeel Jamil1, Umer Jamil1, Kamaldeep Singh2, Faris Khan3, Gerald Chi4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Betrixaban and rivaroxaban are the direct anticoagulants approved in the United States for extended venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis among acutely ill medical patients. The efficacy and safety in specific subgroups remain unclear.
METHODS: A meta-analysis of 3 randomized trials involving extended thromboprophylaxis with betrixaban or rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for medically ill patients was performed to compare VTE (composite of asymptomatic proximal and symptomatic deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or VTE-related death) and major bleeding in subgroups by baseline D-dimer, age, sex, and major medical illness on hospitalization. Risk difference (RD) was computed with the Mantel-Haenszel method by fitting a fixed-effect model. Heterogeneity of treatment effect across subgroups was examined using the nominal thresholds of P < 0.05 and I2 > 75%.
RESULTS: Compared with enoxaparin, extended betrixaban or rivaroxaban reduced VTE (RD = -1.51% [95% CI, -2.32% to -0.69%]; P = 0.0003) without excess major bleeding (RD = 0.12% [-0.05% to 0.29%]; P = 0.16). A significant effect modification was observed in the subgroups by D-dimer (P = 0.004) and age (P = 0.04). Patients with D-dimer >2× upper limit of normal (ULN) experienced a greater VTE reduction (RD = -2.39% [-3.57% to -1.21%]; P < 0.0001) than those with ≤2×ULN (RD = -0.26% [-1.08% to 0.56%]; P = 0.53). Similarly, patients aged ≥75 years had a greater VTE reduction (RD = -2.29% [-3.49% to -1.09%]; P = 0.0002) than those aged <75 years (RD = -0.63% [-1.70% to 0.44%]; P = 0.25). Treatment effect was consistent across the remaining subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS: A more favorable efficacy and comparable safety outcome associated with extended betrixaban or rivaroxaban were observed among medical inpatients with D-dimer >2×ULN or aged ≥75 years. D-dimer and advanced age may assist in decision-making on pharmacological thromboprophylaxis for hospitalized medical patients.
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 32657973     DOI: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Pathw Cardiol        ISSN: 1535-2811


  2 in total

Review 1.  Current Opinion on the use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants for the Prophylaxis of Venous Thromboembolism among Medical Inpatients.

Authors:  Jane J Lee; Sahar Memar Montazerin; Fahimehalsadat Shojaei; Gerald Chi
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 2.423

2.  Independent and incremental prognostic value of D-dimer in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Gerald Chi; Sahar Memar Montazerin; Jane J Lee
Journal:  Future Virol       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 1.831

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.