Saranyah Ravindran1, Shaira Yoganathan2, Zoe F Cairncross1, Cindy-Lee Dennis3,4,5,6, Joanne Enders7, Lisa Graves8, Catriona Mill7,9, Deanna Telner10, Hilary K Brown11,12,13. 1. Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 2. Interdisciplinary Centre for Health & Society, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, ON, Canada. 3. Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada. 4. Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 5. Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, ON, Canada. 6. Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada. 7. Ontario Public Health Association, Toronto, ON, Canada. 8. Department of Family and Community Medicine, Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, MI, USA. 9. Toronto Public Health, Toronto, ON, Canada. 10. Department of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 11. Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. hk.brown@utoronto.ca. 12. Interdisciplinary Centre for Health & Society, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, ON, Canada. hk.brown@utoronto.ca. 13. Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada. hk.brown@utoronto.ca.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Preconception health impacts perinatal outcomes, but the difficulty in engaging reproductive-aged individuals in health promotion activities is a barrier to effective implementation of preconception interventions. Since most women have more than one pregnancy and many risk factors repeat across pregnancies, the time between pregnancies-the interconception period-may be an opportune time to improve health. Our objective was to examine the feasibility and acceptability of an interconception intervention delivered by public health nurses. METHODS: We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial in three small urban and rural public health units in Ontario, Canada, in 2017-2018 among women who were ≥ 18 years of age and between 2 and 12 months postpartum after a first birth. Women randomly allocated to the intervention group received a preconception risk assessment, tailored health education, and referral for clinical follow-up as needed, while those in the control group received standard care. Primary outcomes were intervention feasibility, adherence, and acceptability. RESULTS: Of 66 eligible women, 61% agreed to participate and were randomized to the intervention (n = 16) or control (n = 24) groups. The follow-up rate was 78% at 1 month and 71% at 3 months. Most women (83%) were satisfied with the intervention, including the number and length of sessions and content of recommendations. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: Results demonstrate the potential feasibility and acceptability of an interconception intervention delivered in a public health setting. The short- and long-term impacts of the intervention on knowledge, behavior, and health should be tested in a larger sample.
OBJECTIVES: Preconception health impacts perinatal outcomes, but the difficulty in engaging reproductive-aged individuals in health promotion activities is a barrier to effective implementation of preconception interventions. Since most women have more than one pregnancy and many risk factors repeat across pregnancies, the time between pregnancies-the interconception period-may be an opportune time to improve health. Our objective was to examine the feasibility and acceptability of an interconception intervention delivered by public health nurses. METHODS: We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial in three small urban and rural public health units in Ontario, Canada, in 2017-2018 among women who were ≥ 18 years of age and between 2 and 12 months postpartum after a first birth. Women randomly allocated to the intervention group received a preconception risk assessment, tailored health education, and referral for clinical follow-up as needed, while those in the control group received standard care. Primary outcomes were intervention feasibility, adherence, and acceptability. RESULTS: Of 66 eligible women, 61% agreed to participate and were randomized to the intervention (n = 16) or control (n = 24) groups. The follow-up rate was 78% at 1 month and 71% at 3 months. Most women (83%) were satisfied with the intervention, including the number and length of sessions and content of recommendations. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: Results demonstrate the potential feasibility and acceptability of an interconception intervention delivered in a public health setting. The short- and long-term impacts of the intervention on knowledge, behavior, and health should be tested in a larger sample.
Entities:
Keywords:
Postpartum period; Preconception care; Reproductive health; Women’s health
Authors: Hilary K Brown; Melissa Mueller; Sarah Edwards; Catriona Mill; Joanne Enders; Lisa Graves; Deanna Telner; Cindy-Lee Dennis Journal: Can J Public Health Date: 2017-11-09
Authors: Zoe F Cairncross; Saranyah Ravindran; Shaira Yoganathan; Cindy-Lee Dennis; Joanne Enders; Lisa Graves; Catriona Mill; Deanna Telner; Hilary K Brown Journal: Am J Health Promot Date: 2019-03-13
Authors: R Louise Floyd; Kay A Johnson; Jasmine R Owens; Sarah Verbiest; Cynthia A Moore; Coleen Boyle Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2013-08-14 Impact factor: 2.681