Literature DB >> 32656373

Degree of satisfaction following full-endoscopic cervical foraminotomy.

Juichi Tonosu1,2, Yasushi Oshima3, Yuichi Takano2,4, Hirohiko Inanami2,4, Hiroki Iwai2,4,5, Hisashi Koga2,4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Foraminotomy has been reported to be effective for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy (CR). Foraminotomy has been performed by an open approach or minimally invasive approach using a microscope or endoscope. A review of the literature has revealed that both the open and minimally invasive approach provide good clinical results. Since the introduction of full-endoscopic cervical foraminotomy (FECF) followed by microendoscopic cervical foraminotomy, we adopted FECF in 2016. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the degree of satisfaction following FECF for CR.
METHODS: A total of 109 consecutive patients underwent FECF for CR. All operations were performed at Iwai Orthopaedic Medical Hospital. Patient background information and operative data were collected. The numerical rating scale (NRS) score for the arm was assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at the time of discharge from the hospital. The satisfaction score was also recorded at discharge and the 3 months after the operation.
RESULTS: In total 109 patients, the mean age was 51.3 years; 22.9% were female and 77.1% were male. The cervical level most frequently operated on was C6/7, followed by C5/6. The mean hospital stay was 4.7 days. The mean operation time was 61.7 minutes. The estimated blood loss was 0 to 10 mg in all cases. One patient exhibited temporary postoperative muscle weakness, although he recovered within 1 year. There was one case of dural tear, and no cases of nerve root injury or surgical site infection. There was one case of reoperation by microendoscopic surgery in 3 months due to insufficient improvement. Preoperative NRS scores for the arm was 4.6 and it improved significantly postoperatively to 2.1 for the entire study group. The mean satisfaction score at discharge was 7.5. The mean score at 3 months after the operations was 7.4.
CONCLUSIONS: Degree of satisfaction following FECF for CR was high 3 months after the operation. 2020 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical radiculopathy (CR); full-endoscopic cervical foraminotomy (FECF); satisfaction

Year:  2020        PMID: 32656373      PMCID: PMC7340834          DOI: 10.21037/jss.2020.01.02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2414-4630


  18 in total

1.  Minimally invasive cervical microendoscopic foraminotomy: an initial clinical experience.

Authors:  Richard G Fessler; Larry T Khoo
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 2.  Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy: Indications, Technique, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Shah-Jahan M Dodwad; Shah-Nawaz M Dodwad; Mark L Prasarn; Jason W Savage; Alpesh A Patel; Wellington K Hsu
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.876

3.  Nonoperative management of herniated cervical intervertebral disc with radiculopathy.

Authors:  J S Saal; J A Saal; E F Yurth
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  A meta-analysis of cervical foraminotomy: open versus minimally-invasive techniques.

Authors:  Steven J McAnany; Jun S Kim; Samuel C Overley; Evan O Baird; Paul A Anderson; Sheeraz A Qureshi
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 4.166

5.  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus posterior cervical foraminotomy in the treatment of brachialgia: the Leeds spinal unit experience (2008-2013).

Authors:  Senthil K Selvanathan; Chris Beagrie; Simon Thomson; Rob Corns; Kenan Deniz; Chris Derham; Gerry Towns; Jake Timothy; Deb Pal
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 2.216

6.  Outcome in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Prospective, multicenter study with independent clinical review.

Authors:  P Sampath; M Bendebba; J D Davis; T Ducker
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  Cervical radiculopathy: epidemiology, etiology, diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors:  Barrett I Woods; Alan S Hilibrand
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2015-06

8.  Epidemiology of cervical radiculopathy. A population-based study from Rochester, Minnesota, 1976 through 1990.

Authors:  K Radhakrishnan; W J Litchy; W M O'Fallon; L T Kurland
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 9.  Cervical radiculopathy.

Authors:  John M Rhee; Tim Yoon; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.020

10.  Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article.

Authors:  Scott L Parker; Saniya S Godil; David N Shau; Stephen K Mendenhall; Matthew J McGirt
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2012-11-23
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Fully endoscopic cervical spine surgery: What does the future hold?

Authors:  R Misra; N K Rath
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-09-24

2.  A Comparative Study on the Minimal Invasiveness of Full-Endoscopic and Microendoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy Using Intraoperative Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring.

Authors:  Masahiro Hirahata; Tomoaki Kitagawa; Muneyoshi Fujita; Ryutaro Shiboi; Hirotaka Kawano; Hiroki Iwai; Hirohiko Inanami; Hisashi Koga
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 2.430

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.