Literature DB >> 32656371

MRI based analysis of grade of spinal canal stenosis and grade of compression of nerve root by lumbar disc herniation as tools to predict probability to need surgical treatment.

Markus Rafael Konieczny1, Jeremia Reinhardt1, Christoph Schleich2, Max Prost1, Rüdiger Krauspe1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with a lumbar disc herniation (LDH) without high-grade neurological deficit (PWN) are usually treated non-operatively. If non-operative treatment is not successful, a postponed surgical treatment is performed. Postponed surgery is reported to show later improvement of pain and health-related quality of life and later return to work than early surgery. There are presently no objective parameters to predict if non-operative treatment may be successful in PWN, or if an early surgical treatment could be performed.
METHODS: To analyze if high-grade spinal canal stenosis lead to a higher rate of surgical treatment in PWN, we conducted a retrospective single-center cohort study and included PWN with acute onset of severe radicular pain (VAS ≥8). We excluded patients with workers' compensation involvement, chronic pain syndrome, motor deficit <3/5, malignancy and history of prior spinal surgery. All patients were initially treated by the same standardized non-operative treatment. It was monitored if patients eventually choose an operative treatment or not. After a power analysis (aiming at >0.8), 1,053 consecutive patients (02.2008 to 12.2017) were identified by diagnostic code. One hundred and eight patients were enrolled in our investigation. Thirty-nine patients were treated non-operatively (Group 1), 69 were treated by operation (Group 2).
RESULTS: Percent (%) spinal canal compromise based on cross-sectional area of LDH was 26.3% in Group 1, 33.7% in Group 2. The difference was significant (P<0.025).
CONCLUSIONS: The investigated group of PWN had a significantly higher probability to need surgical treatment if they had a high-grade stenosis of the spinal canal. However, these results do not constitute a general indication for surgical treatment of PWN. The results of this study merely provide information for patients, and spine specialists, to be implemented in an individual decision-process that leads to a recommendation for type of treatment. 2020 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lumbar disc herniation (LDH); MRI; indication; outcome; surgery; treatment; volume of lumbar disc herniation (volume of LDH)

Year:  2020        PMID: 32656371      PMCID: PMC7340832          DOI: 10.21037/jss-19-424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2414-4630


  16 in total

1.  A prospective analysis of magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with sciatica and lumbar disc herniation. Correlation of outcomes with disc fragment and canal morphology.

Authors:  E J Carragee; D H Kim
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Albert-Georg Lang; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-05

3.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Axel Buchner; Albert-Georg Lang
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-11

4.  Percent spinal canal compromise on MRI utilized for predicting the need for surgical treatment in single-level lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.

Authors:  Elliot Carlisle; Mario Luna; Paul M Tsou; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.166

5.  The predictive factors for the resorption of a lumbar disc herniation on plain MRI.

Authors:  Masumi Iwabuchi; Kazuya Murakami; Fumihiro Ara; Koji Otani; Shin-Ichi Kikuchi
Journal:  Fukushima J Med Sci       Date:  2010-12

6.  Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation.

Authors:  S D Boden; D O Davis; T S Dina; N J Patronas; S W Wiesel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: eight-year results for the spine patient outcomes research trial.

Authors:  Jon D Lurie; Tor D Tosteson; Anna N A Tosteson; Wenyan Zhao; Tamara S Morgan; William A Abdu; Harry Herkowitz; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Immediate Versus Delayed Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation for Acute Motor Deficits: The Impact of Surgical Timing on Functional Outcome.

Authors:  Ondra Petr; Bernhard Glodny; Konstantin Brawanski; Johannes Kerschbaumer; Christian Freyschlag; Daniel Pinggera; Rafael Rehwald; Sebastian Hartmann; Martin Ortler; Claudius Thomé
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Reoperations after lumbar disc surgery: a population-based study of regional and interspecialty variations.

Authors:  I Keskimäki; S Seitsalo; H Osterman; P Rissanen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Surgery for herniation of a lumbar disc in Sweden between 1987 and 1999. An analysis of 27,576 operations.

Authors:  K A Jansson; G Németh; F Granath; P Blomqvist
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-08
View more
  1 in total

1.  Prognosis Evaluation of MRI Combined with Magnetic Resonance Myelography on Lumbar Disc Herniation after Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy.

Authors:  Yi Jiang; Rujun Zuo; Shuai Yuan; Jian Li; Chang Liu; Jiexun Zhang; Ming Ma; Dasheng Li; Yong Hai
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 2.238

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.