| Literature DB >> 32655393 |
Chunyan Yu1, Weizhao Lu1, Jianfeng Qiu1, Feng Wang2, Jinglei Li3, Liru Wang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) is a common age-related vascular disease of the brain associated with slowly accumulating tissue damage. At present, total CSVD burden score is a commonly used method to evaluate the severity of the disease.Entities:
Keywords: MRI; arterial spin labeling; cerebral blood flow; cerebral small vessel disease; total CSVD burden score
Year: 2020 PMID: 32655393 PMCID: PMC7324936 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.00175
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Aging Neurosci ISSN: 1663-4365 Impact factor: 5.750
Show of total CSVD burden score.
| Lacunes | We identified a symptomatic lacunar infarct as circular or oval hyperintense lesions <20 mm on T2WI with corresponding hypointense lesions with a hyperintense rim on FLAIR or hyperintense on DWI | 0 | 0 | |
| ≥1 | 1 | |||
| WMH | Periventricular white matter hyperintensity (PVWMH) and deep white matter hyperintensity (DWMH) were rated on the Fazekas scale using FLAIR and T2WI sequences, periventricular WMH | (PVWMH) was graded as: 0 = absence, 1 = caps or pencil-thin lining, 2 = smooth halo, and 3 = irregular PVWMH extending into the deep white matter. (DWMH) were rated as: 0 = absence, 1 = punctate foci, 2 = beginning confluence of foci, and 3 = large confluent areas | <Fazekas score 3 for PVWMH or 2–3 for DWMH | 0 |
| ≥Fazekas score 3 for PVWMH or 2–3 for DWMH | 1 | |||
| CMBs | CMBs were defined as small areas (2–10 mm in diameter) of signal void with associated blooming in GRE or SWAN sequence | 0 | 0 | |
| ≥1 | 1 | |||
| EPVS | EPVS were defined as clear boundary, round, oval or linear sign, generally <3 mm in diameter, T2WI high signal, T1WI low signal and FLAIR low signal, similar to cerebrospinal fluid-like signal | Grade: 0 = no EPVS, 1 ≤ 10 EPVS, 2 = 11–20 EPVS, 3 = 21–40 EPVS, and 4 = more than 40 EPVS | Grade 0–1 | 0 |
| Grade 2–3 | 1 | |||
FIGURE 1MRI images of subjects with different CSVD total burden score. The subject with score of zero point was a 57-year-old man with no abnormal lesions in MRI images. The patient with score of one point was a 61-year-old female, the bilateral basal ganglia represented punctate and linear lesions with diameter less than 3 mm, hypointensity on T1WI, hyperintensity on T2WI and low signal intensity on T2-FLAIR. The DWI and SWAN sequences showed no abnormality. The bilateral basal ganglia region coincided with EPVS (grade 2–3). For the patient with score of two points, bilateral basal ganglia showed dotted, linear cerebrospinal fluid signal shadow (diameter < 3mm), T2WI showed high signal intensity, T1WI showed low signal intensity, T2-FLAIR showed low signal intensity, which was consistent with the characteristics of EPVS. SWAN sequence of the right parietal lobe showed low signal intensity with diameter ≤ 10 mm, which conformed to the characteristics of CMBs. This CSVD patient was consistent with two points according to the criteria of total CSVD burden score. The patient with score of three points was a 60-year-old female. MRI showed EPVS (grade 2–3) in the bilateral basal ganglia, large confluent areas WMH (Fazekas 3 for DWMH) and lacunar infarction in the center of bilateral semioval center. SWAN sequences showed no abnormality. The patient with CSVD score of four points was a 62-year-old male. There were EPVS (grade 2–3) in the bilateral basal ganglia, large fused WMH (Fazekas 3 for DWMH) in the center of the bilateral semiovale center, acute lacunar infarction with high signal intensity in the right basal ganglia region in DWI image, and CMBs in the right temporal lobe. All the four kinds of imaging markers appeared in this patient.
FIGURE 2Flow chart of imaging preprocessing, segmentation and CBF extraction.
Baseline clinical and demographic data.
| Age (mean ± SD) | 59.8 ± 8.1 | 63.1 ± 6.4 | 65.9 ± 9.3 | 65.8 ± 9.2 | 66.5 ± 7.2 | 0.016 |
| Female/Male | 18/15 | 20/19 | 10/14 | 12/12 | 5/5 | 0.915 |
| Hypertension (%) | 39.4 | 51.3 | 62.5 | 70.8 | 80.0 | 0.062 |
| Diabetes (%) | 15.2 | 17.9 | 33.3 | 33.3 | 30.0 | 0.319 |
| Hyperlipidemia (%) | 24.2 | 20.5 | 33.3 | 29.2 | 20.0 | 0.800 |
| Coronary heart disease (%) | 15.2 | 20.5 | 33.3 | 33.3 | 20.0 | 0.396 |
| Ever smoking⋇(%) | 12.1 | 15.4 | 20.8 | 45.8 | 50.0 | 0.006 |
| Ever alcohol⋇ (%) | 15.2 | 30.8 | 33.3 | 37.5 | 60.0 | 0.079 |
The result of logistic regression analysis.
| Age | 0.006 | 0.02 | 8.92 | 1.07 | 1.02 | 1.11 | |
| Female | 0.32 | 0.41 | 0.60 | 0.439 | 1.37 | 0.62 | 3.05 |
| Hypertension (Yes) | 0.63 | 0.37 | 2.89 | 0.089 | 1.88 | 0.91 | 3.88 |
| Diabetes (Yes) | 0.10 | 0.40 | 0.06 | 0.809 | 1.10 | 0.50 | 2.41 |
| Hyperlipidemia (Yes) | −0.11 | 0.38 | 0.09 | 0.762 | 0.89 | 0.43 | 1.87 |
| Coronary heart disease (Yes) | 0 | 0.40 | 0 | 0.994 | 1.00 | 0.46 | 2.19 |
| Ever smoking | 0.98 | 0.45 | 4.77 | 2.67 | 1.11 | 6.44 | |
| Ever alcohol | 0.51 | 0.47 | 1.14 | 0.286 | 1.66 | 0.65 | 4.20 |
Correlation between age and CBF in whole brain and regional brain.
| −0.44 | −0.35 | −0.44 | −0.39 | −0.41 | −0.34 | ||
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
| −0.41 | −0.39 | −0.33 | −0.43 | v0.37 | |||
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
| −0.28 | −0.40 | −0.43 | −0.42 | −0.42 | |||
| 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
Perfusion of whole brain and various brain regions.
| Frontal cortex | 59.71 ± 13.26 | 54.46 ± 10.51 | 52.21 ± 11.90 | 46.00 ± 9.18 | 44.50 ± 14.29 |
| Frontal WM⋇ | 56.36 ± 12.04 | 51.64 ± 10.37 | 50.65 ± 10.76 | 43.82 ± 8.80 | 42.57 ± 13.30 |
| Parietal cortex | 54.90 ± 15.70 | 48.89 ± 11.13 | 40.37 ± 12.02 | 40.37 ± 9.48 | 37.81 ± 12.50 |
| Parietal WM | 52.66 ± 14.35 | 47.21 ± 10.99 | 45.27 ± 11.68 | 39.43 ± 9.61 | 36.90 ± 11.85 |
| Temporal cortex | 62.87 ± 13.78 | 57.43 ± 11.77 | 53.31 ± 11.00 | 48.58 ± 8.75 | 46.25 ± 15.52 |
| Temporal WM | 58.14 ± 12.23 | 53.41 ± 10.94 | 51.10 ± 10.19 | 45.61 ± 8.66 | 43.86 ± 14.01 |
| Occipital cortex | 52.92 ± 16.56 | 45.91 ± 11.10 | 42.78 ± 12.48 | 38.42 ± 8.37 | 36.06 ± 12.99 |
| Occipital WM | 54.75 ± 17.22 | 47.73 ± 11.64 | 43.39 ± 13.03 | 38.41 ± 9.51 | 36.25 ± 14.54 |
| Insular lobe | 68.56 ± 13.26 | 64.64 ± 12.84 | 63.11 ± 12.11 | 55.10 ± 10.93 | 54.80 ± 14.71 |
| Whole cortex | 59.12 ± 13.67 | 53.69 ± 10.58 | 51.33 ± 11.04 | 45.43 ± 8.15 | 43.78 ± 13.43 |
| Whole WM | 54.99 ± 12.39 | 50.21 ± 10.18 | 48.71 ± 10.16 | 42.63 ± 7.95 | 41.18 ± 12.35 |
| Corpus callosum | 46.80 ± 12.82 | 43.67 ± 10.49 | 44.27 ± 9.23 | 37.68 ± 6.56 | 36.88 ± 8.72 |
| Basal ganglia* | 49.96 ± 9.41 | 47.10 ± 7.81 | 48.53 ± 9.76 | 42.67 ± 8.19 | 41.66 ± 9.61 |
| Thalamus | 65.60 ± 16.14 | 60.89 ± 12.19 | 58.55 ± 14.45 | 51.35 ± 10.00 | 48.48 ± 15.71 |
| Infratentorial** | 59.02 ± 16.43 | 52.67 ± 13.27 | 50.97 ± 12.03 | 45.46 ± 8.61 | 45.02 ± 14.35 |
| Whole brain | 56.10 ± 13.30 | 51.67 ± 10.47 | 49.82 ± 10.33 | 43.94 ± 7.77 | 42.61 ± 12.52 |
FIGURE 3(A–K) Demonstrates relationship between CSVD total burden score and CBF in the whole brain and several brain regions and CBF maps of subjects with different CSVD total burden scores. The horizontal axis on the picture represents CSVD total burden score and the vertical axis represents the CBF values (unit: ml/100 g/min) of the corresponding brain region. In (B), (D), (F), (H), and (J), red line represents CBF of the cortex and blue represents CBF of the white matter. Error bar represents mean and standard deviation. (L) shows CBF maps of five subjects with CSVD total burden from 0 to 4.
Correlation between total CSVD score and whole brain and regional brain.
| −0.33 | −0.33 | −0.34 | −0.32 | −0.36 | −0.34 | ||
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
| −0.33 | −0.36 | −0.30 | −0.34 | −0.33 | |||
| <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
| −0.22 | −0.31 | −0.21 | −0.26 | −0.33 | |||
| 0.013 | <0.001 | 0.016 | 0.003 | <0.001 | |||