Literature DB >> 32655298

Exosomal miR-1298 and lncRNA-RP11-583F2.2 Expression in Hepato-cellular Carcinoma.

Marwa Matboli1, Mariam E Labib1, Hanaa El-Tayeb Nasser1, Ahmed H F El-Tawdi1, Eman K Habib1, Randa Ali-Labib1.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study was to explore the expression of exosomal non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) in the sera of patients with HCC versus control.
METHODS: Firstly, Bioinformatics analysis was conducted to retrieve ncRNAs specific to HCC (hsa-miRNA-1298 and lncRNA-RP11-583F2.2). Afterwards, extraction and characterization of exosomes were performed. We measured the expression of the chosen exosomal RNAs by reverse transcriptase quantitative real-time PCR in sera of 60 patients with HCC, 42 patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) infection and 18 healthy normal volunteers.
RESULTS: The exosomal ncRNAs [hsa-miRNA-1298, lncRNA-RP11-583F2.2] had better sensitivity and specificity than alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) in HCC diagnosis.
CONCLUSION: The exosomal hsa-miRNA-1298, lncRNA-RP11-583F2.2 can be potential biomarkers for HCC diagnosis.
© 2020 Bentham Science Publishers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hepatocellular carcinoma; chronic hepatitis C; diagnosis; exosome; lncRNA; miRNA

Year:  2020        PMID: 32655298      PMCID: PMC7324892          DOI: 10.2174/1389202920666191210111849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Genomics        ISSN: 1389-2029            Impact factor:   2.236


INTRODUCTION

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancers in the world, with high morbidity and mortality [1]. According to the American Cancer Society, more than 700,000 people throughout the world are diagnosed with HCC each year and more than 600,000 deaths that occur each year are due to liver cancer [2]. In Egypt, cancer of the liver in males is the first most common cancer (33.63%) and is the second common cancer in females (13.5%). HCC represents the most common primary liver malignant tumor and it is the 2nd cause of mortality due to cancer in both sexes [3]. HCC occurs in a number of preexisting conditions, e.g. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV), alcoholic and nonalcoholic cirrhosis. This is highly related to the HCV epidemic that involved about 10-15% of the Egyptian population through the last three decades, and was stated as the highest HCV prevalence in the world [4]. Egypt has the highest prevalence of HCV infection in the world with 13.8% of the population infected and seven million have chronic HCV liver disease [5]. Most of the screening tools used for HCC diagnosis, either serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) or ultrasound lack adequate sensitivity and specificity [6]. Great efforts have been made towards the study of genomics and epigenomics to demonstrate the mechanisms of HCC and consequently identify novel therapeutic strategies and improve the clinical outcome of patients [7]. The development of cancer is a complex process in which exosomes have a major role. Exosomes are minute vesicles budded from the endosomal network in the form of vesicular bodies. The exosomes have a major role in the transport of important molecules between cells with concern in the targeted cells. The important molecules such as messenger RNAs (mRNAs), microRNAs (miRNAs), long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs), small-nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) and transfer RNAs(tRNAs) [8, 9]. The exosomes derived from tumor liberated into the circulation and locally to react with the diversity of target cells, such as other cancer cells, immune and endothelial cells [10]. As the content of exosomes like that of the original cell, they can be considered as potential biomarkers for diagnosis and therapeutic strategies of cancer [11]. Sohn et al., (2015) reported that exosomal microRNAs, such as miRNA-18a, miRNA-221, miRNA-222, and miRNA-224 are elevated in patients of hepatocellular carcinoma as compared to patients with chronic hepatitis B or cirrhosis of the liver. Meantime, the levels of serum exosomal miRNA-101, miRNA-106b, miRNA-122, and miRNA-195 were lower in patients of hepatocellular carcinoma as compared to chronic hepatitis B patients [12]. Moreover, Takahashi et al., (2014) reported that the revelation of hepatocellular carcinoma cells to different agents of anticancer such as camptothecin, induce the lncRNA-VLDLR expression in transformed liver cells in addition to recruitment of these cells into exosomes derived from it. This result elucidates that this lncRNA-VLDLR could involve in chemo-resistance in HCC cells. The same research group stated other lncRNA mediated in chemo-resistance of hepatocellular carcinoma is the regulator of reprogramming (ROR). LncRNA-ROR plays a role in inducing the maintenance of cancer stem cells and the advancement of HCC cells chemo-resistance, whereas knockdown of this lncRNA enhanced the chemo-sensitivity [13]. In the current study, ncRNAs specific to HCC were retrieved and the expression of the chosen ncRNAs in HCC was verified through in silico data analysis. Then the expression of serum exosomal ncRNAs was done to evaluate their usefulness as diagnostic biomarkers and the relationship between the selected RNA biomarkers and pathological changes of patients was explored.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients and Samples

In the current study, 60 HCC patients were diagnosed based on the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) practice guidelines. However, the clinical stage was determined by the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification, the clinical stages of HCC of patients classified as 54 (90%) early-stage (A and B) and 6 (C) (10%) late-stage HCC. All blood samples assembled before any surgical, chemotherapeutic or radiotherapeutic procedures. For each patient, complete follow-up data was available. Forty-two patients with chronic viral hepatitis C(CHC) were recruited at the tropical department Ain Shams University Hospital. As well as, blood samples were collected from 18 healthy normal volunteers during their routine medical checkup. Venous blood samples from each participant were collected in plain collection tubes without clot activator and centrifuged at 1300xg at 4°C for 20 min. to obtain the serum. Then all sera samples were stored at -80°C until assayed. From all the participants of this study, written informed consent was obtained. The study was performed according to the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Research Ethical Committee at the Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Egypt (ethical approval number; FWA 000017585). The clinical and demographic data of all the participants have been summarized (Table ).

Viral Markers and Serum AFP Detection

Serum anti-HCV antibodies and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) were investigated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using commercial kits. Serum AFP was measured using ELISA commercial kits (AbCam, Cambridge, MA).

Bioinformatics Based Selection of RNA Based Biomarker Network

The identification of the RNA based biomarker network was done in the following steps: (i). We used scanning algorithms to search miRNA specific to HCC through several miR public databases, namely, miRWalk database, and miR2Disease. The 2 databases confirmed the correlation between selected hsa-miR-1298 dysregulation and HCC development depending on, fold change ≥ 2.0, P-value < 0.05, higher ranking score and novelty. (ii). Pathway enrichment analysis revealed that hsa-miR-1298 has a high number of target genes related to carcinogenesis, for example, Mitogen Activated Kinase-Like Protein, exosomes secretion, apoptosis and cell adhesion through Diana database. (iii). We chose LncRNA-RP11-583F2.2 targeting hsa-miR-1298 through the database of lncRBA acting as competing endogenous RNA (inCeDB) (http://gyanxet-beta.com/lncedb/index.php. LncRNA-RP11-583F2.2 has a higher number of target genes linked to HCC by bioinformatics tools, namely; Database of Cancer Gene Networks from Public Gene Expression Data(TCNG) (Available at http://tcng.hgc.jp/index.html) and lncRNA Expression database NRED database (Available at http://nred.matticklab.com/cgi-bin/ncrnadb.pl/) (Supplementary Table ).

Exosomal RNA Extraction and Characterization of Exosomes

Exosomal RNA was extracted from sera samples of all participants using exoRNeasy Serum/Plasma MidiKit (Cat. no. 77044, Qiagen, USA) according to manufacturer's instructions, the exoRNeasy Serum/Plasma Kits use a membrane-based affinity binding step to isolate exosomes. Purified exosomes suspensions were examined by A JEOL 1010 transmission electron microscopy (TEM) at various magnifications (Fig. ). The extracted total RNA from exosomes was reverse transcribed into cDNA as soon as possible with a miScript II RT Kit (Cat. no. 218161, Qiagen, USA), following the manufacturer’s protocol for sera samples using Thermo Hybaid PCR express (Thermo Scientific, USA).

Real Time-PCR (qPCR) Quantification of RNA Based Biomarker

Exosomal hsa-miR-1298 expression in sera samples was assessed by mixing the total cDNAs with miScript SYBR Green PCR Kit (Cat. no. 218076, Qiagen, Helman Germany), according to the manufacturer’s protocol; along with the miScript Universal primer provided by the manufacturer and the forward primer specific to miRNA (Hs_miR-1298_1 miScript Primer Assay, MIMAT0005800, Cat. no. MS00014574). Exosomal LncRNA-RP11-583F2.2 expression in sera samples was estimated using RT2 SYBR Green ROX qPCR Master mix Kit (Cat. no. 330520, Qiagen, Germany) and RT2 lncRNA qPCR Primer Assay for Human RP11-583F2.2 (ENST00000583416, Cat. no. LPH24879A). All the PCR primers were purchased from Qiagen, (Hs_ACTB_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay, NM_001101, Cat. no. QT00095431) and both and small nucleolar RNA, C/D box 68 [SNORD-68]) were used as housekeeping genes to normalize our raw data for lncRNA and miRNA respectively. The PCR program for the Rotor gene 5Plex (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) based qPCR is as follow: firstly, denaturation at 95°C for 15 min; followed by 45 cycles of denaturation for 15 sec at 94°C; then annealing for 30 sec at 55°C. For relative lncRNA-RP11-583F2.2 quantification, the real-time cycler was programmed as follows: initial activation step for 10 min at 95ºC to activate HotStarTaq DNA Polymerase. Forty cycles of PCR performed under the following conditions; 15 sec at 95ºC, 30 sec at 55ºC and 30 sec at 72ºC for denaturation, annealing and extension, respectively. Each reaction was carried out in duplicate. Using the Leviak method, the relative quantification of RNA based biomarker panel expression was calculated, where the RQ= 2-ΔΔCt method [14]. We compared 2 snoRNAs to identify the best reference gene for relative miR quantification. SNORD-68 was detected in all cases, with higher and more stable expression than RNU-6. Using the Rotor-Gene 5Plex real-time PCR detection system, the threshold cycle (Ct) value of each sample was calculated. Any Ct value more than 36 is considered negative. The results were analyzed by the plot curve analysis of Rotor-Gene software.

Statistics

All statistical analyses were performed by Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS software version 20). Comparisons were performed using Krausakul-Wallis, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA test), and chi-square test, as appropriate. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated to explore the predictive value of selected RNA based biomarker network for HCC. The association between expressions of RNAs and clinicopathological data assessed with the Spearman rank correlation. Two-tailed P value of ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Description of the Study Population

There was no statistically significant difference as regard age, sex, smoking and HBVsAg among the three study groups (p>0.05), details of the clinical data are presented in Table .

TEM Canning of Serum Exosomes Among the Studied Groups

The isolated exosomes are intact small round shaped nanovesicles, morphologically homogeneous and of different sizes ranging from 30 to 100 nm in size, with a typical round or cup shape appearance (scale bar, 100 nm). TEM images in (Fig. and ) shows a low level of abundance of exosomes in healthy control samples compared with more abundance exosomes noted chronic hepatitis C (HCV) patient, as shown in the image in (Fig. ). However, the highest abundance of exosomes was found in the HCC patients as per images when compared with healthy control and chronic HCV induction patients (Fig. and ).

Expression of Serum Exosomal ncRNAs Among the Study Groups

The exosomal ncRNAs biomarker levels based on RQ values in serum have been summarized (Table ). The median (RQ) were, 2.77, 2.3, 0.411, for miRNA-1298 and 0.96, 0.643 and 29.9 for lncRNA-RP11-583F2.2 in healthy control, CHC group and malignant group (HCC) respectively. Compared with the non-malignant groups, the malignant group (HCC) had a higher expression of lncRNA-RP11-583F2.2 and lower expression of miRNA-1298 (p< 0.01) in the serum. The positivity rate of the serum exosomal (miRNA-1298 and lncRNA-RP11-583F2.2) was 95% and 96.7% respectively in the malignant group. However, they were 0% in normal individuals (p< 0.01), as shown in Table , Figs. (, and ).

Correlation of the Serum Exosomal with Demographic and Clinical Factors

There was no statistically significant difference between fold change (RQ) value of exosomal miRNA-1298 and lncRNA-RP11-583F2.2 and the different clinicopathological factors within the malignant group (HCC) (P >0.05) as shown in Table . There was no statistically significant correlation between fold change (RQ) value of exosomal miR-1298 and lncRNA-RP11-583F2.2 and the different laboratory parameters within the malignant group (HCC) (P>0.05) as shown in Table . Interestingly, there was a highly significant negative correlation between exosomal miR-1298 and lncRNA-RP11-583F2.2 based on fold change (RQ) among the three study groups. While, there was no significant correlation between exosomal miR-1298 and lncRNA-RP11-583F2.2 based on fold change (RQ) in malignant group as shown in Table .

Accuracy of Serum Parameters for Predicting HCC by ROC Analysis

The use of ROC curves analysis and values of the area under the curve (AUC) evaluate the ncRNAs diagnostic value as shown in Supplementary Figs. (). Regarding the HCC patients versus CHC patients and healthy control, the best discriminating cutoff values of miR-1298 and lncRNA-RP11-583F2.2 were ≤ 0.965 and ≥ 5.02 respectively. Accordingly, the sensitivities were 95% and 96.7% respectively and specificity were 98.3% and 91.7% respectively, which indicated that these threshold values could be used to distinguish malignant group (HCC) from non-malignant groups (CHC patients and healthy subjects) as shown in Supplementary Tables and .

DISCUSSION

The incidence of liver cancer has increased more than triple since 1980. Since 2000, liver cancer death rates have increased by almost 3% per year [2]. In Egypt, HCC represents an important public health problem, the estimated number of liver cancer cases in Egypt 2013 was 27,991 for both sexes and expected to be 85,471 for both sexes in 2050 due to population growth [15]. Therefore, the aim of bioinformatics in the cancer biomarker discovery is to give priority lists of marker candidates with the preferred sensitivity and specificity [16]. Currently, tumor-derived exosomes have shown potential in the field of cancer [17]. The contents of tumor-derived exosomes, such as miRNAs, lncRNAs and oncoproteins reflect pathophysiological status of their endosomal origin [18, 19]. Some studies reported that exchange of exosomal RNAs and proteins not only plays a major role in onset and progression of HCC but also it may be considered as potential noninvasive markers in addition to targets of therapy [20]. The cells of hepatocellular carcinoma excrete high amounts of exosomes whose participation in pathogenesis is actually under investigation. Though the use of HCC derived exosomes as potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers is still at the primary stage, but there are supporting observations that exosomes released from HCC cells are different in RNA and protein content that released from untransformed cells [21]. Tumor-derived exosomes are protected against degrading enzymes (e.g., RNAses), as they are enclosed in a lipid bilayer membrane [22]. Interestingly, these enriched mRNAs, miRNAs, lncRNAs and oncoproteins in tumor-derived exosomes are selected, suggesting that the exosomal content may provide novel serological biomarkers for various types of cancer [23-26]. In light of these findings, bioinformatics analysis was used to choose hsa-miR-1298 and lncRNA-RP11-583F2.2 as promising non-coding RNAs relevant to hepatocellular carcinoma based on previous microarray studies followed by clinical validation in HCC patients versus control. Fornari et al., (2015) stated the exosomal secretion of miRNA-21, miRNA-221a, miRNA-519d and miRNA-1228 from hepatocellular carcinoma patients and showed a relation between serum and tissue levels of miRNA-21, miRNA-494, and miRNA-519d [27]. Furthermore, Sugimachi et al. (2015) explored serum exosomal biomarkers that may predict HCC recurrence after surgery [28]. Kogure et al., (2013) reported that the certain miRNAs enriched in exosomes released from HCC cells in vitro e.g., miR-133b, miR142-5p, miR-215, miR-367, miR-376a, miR-378, miR-451, miR-517c, miR-518d, miR- 520f and miR-584 [29]. In addition, Liu et al., (2015) stated that miR-10b and miR-21 were enriched in exosomes released from HCC cells in vivo [30]. Wei et al., (2015) found miR-10b-5p and miR-486-5p were highly abundant in exosomes in the SMMC-7721 HCC cell line but less abundant in cellular RNAs. While, let-7b-5p, let-7d-5p, and let-7c-5p were highly abundant in cellular miRNAs, but occurred only in very low numbers in exosomal RNAs. These results revealed selective and specific enrichment of exosomes with specific miRNAs in HCC cells [31]. Zhou et al., (2016) stated that miR-1298 inhibits mutant KRAS-driven tumor growth by repressing tyrosine kinase FAK and the laminin subunit LAMB3 [32]. Hsa-miR-1298 is a microRNA gene, and is affiliated with undefined RNA class, located on the X chromosome (Xq23), (114,715,233bp - 114,715,344bp) with the length of 112 bases. Fornari et al., stated the excretion of circulating miRNA-21, miRNA-221a, miRNA-519d and miRNA-1228 from HCC patients [33]. The present study reports that exosomal miR-1298 expression down-regulated in patients of hepatocellular carcinoma compared with patients of hepatitis C virus and normal good health control. Increasing evidence also pointed out lncRNA’s role as transmissible molecules in hepatocellular carcinoma, in addition to use exosomes to carry them. Kogure et al., (2013) reported that the long noncoding RNA TUC339 was significantly up-regulated in HCC derived exosomes and this lncRNA TUC339 was mediated in the growth of the tumor, adhesion of cell and progression of cell cycle [28]. Liu et al., (2017) stated that lncRNA-RP11-62F24.2 was found significantly expressed in tissues of gastric cancer in comparison with normal gastric tissue (p< 0.05) and its expression level was significantly correlated with invasion and tumor size [34]. Meanwhile, Jingxu et al., (2015) reported that lncRNA-RP11-119F7.4 expression was down-regulated in gastric cancer [35]. Abd El Gwad et al., (2018) reported that the panel of 3 exosomal RNA-based biomarkers (lncRNA-RP11-513I15.6, miR-1262, and RAB11A) showed excellent sensitivity and specificity in discriminating HCC patients from CHC patients and healthy controls [36]. There was a statistically negative correlation between miR-1298 and lncRNA RP11-583F2.2, mRNA statistical significance (P<0.01). It seemed that lncRNA RP11-583F2.2 may act as a sponge for miR-1298 inhibiting its action suggesting the hypothesis of acting as competing endogenous RNA alongside possible participation in HCC pathogenesis [12]. These statistical associations agree with insilco data analysis for retrieval of ncRNAs specific to HCC. It is worth noting that the identification of the aforementioned statistical correlation where HCC cells can be targeted with knocking out lncRNA activity, to turn off specific target genes may have significant therapeutic potential in HCC. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to report that exosomal lncRNA-RP11-583F2.2 expression up-regulated in the serum of hepatocellular carcinoma patients as compared with hepatitis C virus patients and normal good health control so exosomal lncRNA-RP11-583F2.2 may be used as a potential novel biomarker in the diagnosis of HCC. Our results indicated that miR-1298 and lncRNA-RP11-583F2.2 were superior to the AFP in sensitivity and specificity (95%, 96.7%) and (98.3%, 91.7%) respectively as compared to AFP(90%,85%). The selected miR-1298 and lncRNA-RP11-583F2.2 reduce false negative results as compared to AFP. The findings of this study demonstrated that the estimation of serum exosomal miR-1298 and lncRNA-RP11-583F2.2 could have a potential diagnostic and therapeutic target in patients with HCC in the future especially when used in combination. The study limitations include a relatively small sample size. Therefore, larger multicenter studies are needed for validation. Although, this study addressed the statistical association of the lncRNA-RP11-583F2.2 by linking it to miR-1298 but more mechanistic studies are needed.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the presented strategy enables us to identify a significant differential exosomal miRNA-1298 and lncRNA-RP11-583F2.2 expression between HCC and control with high accuracy through in silico data analysis followed by clinical validation.
Table 1

Shows the clinicopathological factors in different groups of the study.

- Malignant (HCC) N (%) CHC (HCV) N (%) Healthy Control N (%) P χ2(a)
Age: ≥ 57.8 < 57.8 35 (58.3%)25 (41.7%)21 (50%)21 (50%)9 (50%)9 (50%).657 NS0.839
Sex: Male (88) Female (32) 43 (71.7%)17 (28.3%)33 (78.6%)9 (21.4%)12 (66.7%)6 (33.3%).582 NS1.084
Smoking: Smoker (53) Non-Smoker (67) 23 (38.3%)37 (61.7%)21 (50%)21 (50%)9 (50%)9 (50%).437 NS1.656
HCV-antibodies: Positive (94) Negative (26) 52 (86.7%)8 (13.3%)42 (100%)0 (0%)0 (0%)18 (100%).000**79.149
HBV-sAg: Positive(6) Negative(114) 6 (10%)54 (90%)0 (0%)42 (100%)0 (0%)18 (100%).043*6.316
Cirrhosis: Cirrhotic(70) Non-cirrhotic(50) 49(81.7%)11(18.3%)9(21.4%)33(78.6%)0(0%)18(100%).000**39.840
Table 2

Shows the median (RQ) and the positivity rate of serum exosomal RNA based biomarkers among the study groups.

- Malignant (HCC) CHC (HCV) Healthy Control P χ2(a)
RQ of miRNA-1298 0.412.32.77.000**81.344
RQ of Lnc-RNA-RP11-583F2.2 29.90.643.96.000**71.162
Positivity rate of miRNA-1298 57 (95%)1 (2.4%)0 (0%).000 **104.678
Positivity rate of Lnc-RNA-RP11-583F2.2 58 (96.7%)5 (11.9%)0 (0%).000 **86.022
Table 3A

Shows correlation of the serum level of RNA based biomarkers with different clinicopathological factors within the malignant group.

Clinicopathological Factors RQ of miR-1298 RQ of Lnc-RNA-RP11-583F2.2
Mean age: ≥57.8 years <57.8 years .33 .52 33.12 29.85
P, χ2(a) 133 NS, 2.256 .808 NS, .059
Sex: Male Female .40 .51 21.25 41.35
P, χ2(a) .131 NS, 2.285 .489 NS, .478
Smoking: Smoker Non-smoker .41 .40 29.85 30.06
P, χ2(a) .30 NS, 1.072 .257 NS, 1.286
HCV-Ab: Positive Negative .41 .46 29.96 26.82
P, χ2(a) .296 NS, 1.093 .573 NS, .318
HBV-sAg: Positive Negative .39 .41 41.09 28.76
P, χ2(a) .554 NS, .351 .632 NS, .230
Cirrhosis: Cirrhotic Non-cirrhotic .40 .42 27.66 35.01
P, χ2(a) .491 NS, .475 .496 NS, .464
Child-Pugh score: A2 A5 A6 B6 B7 B8 C10 .236 .524 .408 .459 .476 .414 .407 5.61 11.31 44.94 25.63 49.40 29.85 19.40
P, χ2(a) .575 NS, 4.762 .651NS, 4.19
BCLC stage: Early Late .41 .40 30.92 19.40
P, χ2(a) .167 NS, 1.91 .632 NS, .230
Average Tumor size: < 3 cm ≥ 3 cm .408 .903 28.76 57.81
P, χ2(a) .741NS, .109 .789 NS, .071
Table 3B

Shows correlation of RQ of miR-1298 and RQ of Lnc-RNA RP11-583F2.2 with different laboratory parameters within the malignant group.

Spearman's rho
--ASTASTAlbumintotal bilirubindirect bilirubinINRAFP
RQ (miR-1298)Correlation Coefficient-.017-.175-.127--.021-.155.107.021
Sig. (2-tailed).896.181.333.871.236.417.873
RQ (Lnc-RNA RP11-583F2.2)Correlation Coefficient-.117-.186-.005--.049--.115-.088-.244-
Sig. (2-tailed).373.154.967.710.380.503.060
Table 4

Shows the correlation between RQ of miR-1298 and RQ of Lnc-RNA RP11-583F2.2 among all the study group and malignant group.

Group Type-RQ (miR-1298)RQ (Lnc-RNA RP11-583F2.2)
All groups RQ (miR-1298) Correlation Coefficient1.000-.602**
Sig...000
RQ (Lnc-RNA RP11-583F2.2) Correlation Coefficient-.602**1.000
Sig..000.
RQ (miR-1298) Correlation Coefficient1.000.138
MalignantSig...293
RQ (Lnc-RNA RP11-583F2.2) Correlation Coefficient.1381.000
Sig..293
  32 in total

1.  Novel long non-coding RNA RP11-119F7.4 as a potential biomarker for the development and progression of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jingxu Sun; Yongxi Song; Xiaowan Chen; Junhua Zhao; Peng Gao; Xuanzhang Huang; Huimian Xu; Zhenning Wang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  In Hepatocellular Carcinoma miR-221 Modulates Sorafenib Resistance through Inhibition of Caspase-3-Mediated Apoptosis.

Authors:  Francesca Fornari; Daniela Pollutri; Clarissa Patrizi; Tiziana La Bella; Sara Marinelli; Andrea Casadei Gardini; Giorgia Marisi; Marco Baron Toaldo; Michele Baglioni; Veronica Salvatore; Elisa Callegari; Maurizio Baldassarre; Marzia Galassi; Catia Giovannini; Matteo Cescon; Matteo Ravaioli; Massimo Negrini; Luigi Bolondi; Laura Gramantieri
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Increased Expression of Long Noncoding RNA RP11-62F24.2 in Gastric Cancer and Its Clinical Significance.

Authors:  Cuixia Liu; Bole Cao; Ni Liu; Zhenping Zhou; Guifeng Yang; Peng Zhou
Journal:  Clin Lab       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 1.138

4.  Proteome profiling of exosomes derived from human primary and metastatic colorectal cancer cells reveal differential expression of key metastatic factors and signal transduction components.

Authors:  Hong Ji; David W Greening; Thomas W Barnes; Justin W Lim; Bow J Tauro; Alin Rai; Rong Xu; Christopher Adda; Suresh Mathivanan; Wei Zhao; Yanhong Xue; Tao Xu; Hong-Jian Zhu; Richard J Simpson
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 5.  Exosomes in cancer development, metastasis, and drug resistance: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Asfar S Azmi; Bin Bao; Fazlul H Sarkar
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 9.264

Review 6.  The role of exosomes in tumor progression and metastasis (Review).

Authors:  Wiktoria M Suchorska; Michal S Lach
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 3.906

7.  Hypoxia signals autophagy in tumor cells via AMPK activity, independent of HIF-1, BNIP3, and BNIP3L.

Authors:  I Papandreou; A L Lim; K Laderoute; N C Denko
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 15.828

8.  Cancer incidence in egypt: results of the national population-based cancer registry program.

Authors:  Amal S Ibrahim; Hussein M Khaled; Nabiel Nh Mikhail; Hoda Baraka; Hossam Kamel
Journal:  J Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2014-09-21

9.  Circulating microRNAs, miR-939, miR-595, miR-519d and miR-494, Identify Cirrhotic Patients with HCC.

Authors:  Francesca Fornari; Manuela Ferracin; Davide Trerè; Maddalena Milazzo; Sara Marinelli; Marzia Galassi; Laura Venerandi; Daniela Pollutri; Clarissa Patrizi; Alberto Borghi; Francesco G Foschi; Giuseppe F Stefanini; Massimo Negrini; Luigi Bolondi; Laura Gramantieri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Serum exosomal microRNAs as novel biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Won Sohn; Jonghwa Kim; So Hee Kang; Se Ra Yang; Ju-Yeon Cho; Hyun Chin Cho; Sang Goon Shim; Yong-Han Paik
Journal:  Exp Mol Med       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 8.718

View more
  8 in total

1.  Urinary exosomal microRNA-96-5p and microRNA-183-5p expression as potential biomarkers of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Amal S El-Shal; Sally M Shalaby; Safwat E Abouhashem; Eman H Abd Elbary; Samir Azazy; Nearmeen M Rashad; Walaa Sarhan
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  Abdominal ultrasound and alpha-foetoprotein for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Agostino Colli; Tin Nadarevic; Damir Miletic; Vanja Giljaca; Mirella Fraquelli; Davor Štimac; Giovanni Casazza
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-04-15

Review 3.  Circulating Long and Circular Noncoding RNA as Non-Invasive Diagnostic Tools of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Caecilia H C Sukowati; Loraine Kay D Cabral; Claudio Tiribelli; Devis Pascut
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2021-01-19

4.  Distinct small non-coding RNA landscape in the axons and released extracellular vesicles of developing primary cortical neurons and the axoplasm of adult nerves.

Authors:  Raquel Mesquita-Ribeiro; Rafael Sebastián Fort; Alex Rathbone; Joaquina Farias; Cristiano Lucci; Victoria James; Jose Sotelo-Silveira; Maria Ana Duhagon; Federico Dajas-Bailador
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 4.652

Review 5.  Roles and mechanisms of exosomal non-coding RNAs in human health and diseases.

Authors:  Chen Li; Yu-Qing Ni; Hui Xu; Qun-Yan Xiang; Yan Zhao; Jun-Kun Zhan; Jie-Yu He; Shuang Li; You-Shuo Liu
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2021-11-10

Review 6.  Exosomal Non-Coding RNAs: New Insights into the Biology of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Qian Zhang; Hanlin Li; Yang Liu; Jian Li; Chunling Wu; Hua Tang
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 3.109

7.  Exosomes as potential diagnosis and treatment for liver cancer.

Authors:  Xiao-Cui Wei; Li-Juan Liu; Fan Zhu
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2022-01-15

8.  Mapping Intellectual Structure for the Long Non-Coding RNA in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Development Research.

Authors:  Zhifeng Lin; Xiaohui Ji; Nana Tian; Yu Gan; Li Ke
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 4.599

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.