Literature DB >> 32654091

An evaluation of live porcine simulation training for robotic surgery.

Nicholas Raison1, Johan Poulsen2, Takashige Abe3, Abdullatif Aydin3, Kamran Ahmed3, Prokar Dasgupta3.   

Abstract

To assess the role of live porcine simulation in robotic surgical skills training. A qualitative and quantitative survey was conducted of participants of a live porcine robotic simulation course undertaken in a regional training centre. Data on participants' experience, robotic surgical ability, the educational impact and outcomes from the course were collected. Thirty-nine participants from four different countries completed the survey. Clinical experience varied; however, prior robotic surgical experience (median 0 cases, range 0-100) and technical ability were low. The perceived usefulness, effectiveness and realism of the training course were all highly scored. Participants rated the most useful course components as port placement and docking, basic robotic skills training and repair of a bladder injury. Training resulted in significant increases in technical ability (p < 0.0001). Following the course, 49% of participants continued to either train or perform robotic surgery. This survey demonstrates that live porcine simulation for robotic surgery is a highly valued, acceptable and feasible form of training. The majority of participants were relatively inexperienced but nonetheless significant improvements in technical ability were reported. The results of this survey support the use of live porcine training for robotic surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Live porcine simulation; Robotic surgery; Simulation; Surgical training; Survey

Year:  2020        PMID: 32654091     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-020-01113-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  8 in total

1.  Cadaveric versus porcine models in urological laparoscopic training.

Authors:  Ran Katz; András Hoznek; Patrick Antiphon; Roland Van Velthoven; Vincent Delmas; Clément-Claude Abbou
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Resident perceptions of advanced laparoscopic skills training.

Authors:  Vanessa N Palter; Neil Orzech; Rajesh Aggarwal; Allan Okrainec; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Simulation, safety and surgery.

Authors:  Roger Kneebone
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2010-10

4.  How to set up a microsurgical laboratory on small animal models: organization, techniques, and impact on residency training.

Authors:  A Pichierri; A Frati; A Santoro; J Lenzi; R Delfini; L Pannarale; E Gaudio; G D'Andrea; G P Cantore
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Cadavers versus pigs: which are better for procedural training of surgery residents outside the OR?

Authors:  Dimitrios Stefanidis; Thomas C Yonce; John M Green; Aikaterini P Coker
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Perceptions, training experiences, and preferences of surgical residents toward laparoscopic simulation training: a resident survey.

Authors:  Shohan Shetty; Boris Zevin; Teodor P Grantcharov; Kurt E Roberts; Andrew J Duffy
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 2.891

7.  Implementation of a novel portfolio of structured, curriculum-aligned, simulation-based, cardiothoracic surgery training courses: Evolving the delivery of surgical education.

Authors:  Narain Moorjani; Michael Lewis; Rajesh Shah; Sion Barnard; Tim Graham; Sridhar Rathinam
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  The anatomy of complications workshop: an educational strategy to improve the training and performance of fellows in gynecologic oncology.

Authors:  Ian Hammond; John Taylor; Andreas Obermair; Paul McMenamin
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.482

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Implementation of a standardized robotic assistant surgical training curriculum.

Authors:  Jill M Collins; Danielle S Walsh; John Hudson; Shakira Henderson; Julie Thompson; Michael Zychowicz
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-08-26

Review 2.  A review of simulation training and new 3D computer-generated synthetic organs for robotic surgery education.

Authors:  Daniel M Costello; Isabel Huntington; Grace Burke; Brooke Farrugia; Andrea J O'Connor; Anthony J Costello; Benjamin C Thomas; Philip Dundee; Ahmed Ghazi; Niall Corcoran
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-09-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.