Literature DB >> 32654076

Impact of insurance on hospital course and readmission after resection of benign meningioma.

Blake M Hauser, Saksham Gupta1,2, Edward Xu2, Kyle Wu1, Joshua D Bernstock1, Melissa Chua1, Ayaz M Khawaja2, Timothy R Smith1,2, Ian F Dunn3, Regan W Bergmark1,4,5, Wenya Linda Bi6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Surgical outcomes and healthcare utilization have been shown to vary based on patient insurance status. We analyzed whether patients' insurance affects case urgency for and readmission after craniotomy for meningioma resection, using benign meningioma as a model system to minimize confounding from the disease-related characteristics of other neurosurgical pathologies.
METHODS: We analyzed 90-day readmission for patients who underwent resection of a benign meningioma in the Nationwide Readmission Database from 2014-2015.
RESULTS: A total of 9783 meningioma patients with private insurance (46%), Medicare (39%), Medicaid (10%), self-pay (2%), or another scheme (3%) were analyzed. 72% of all cases were elective; with 78% of cases in privately insured patients being elective compared to 71% of Medicare (p > 0.05), 59% of Medicaid patients (OR 2.3, p < 0.001), and 49% of self-pay patients (OR 3.4, p < 0.001). Medicare (OR 1.5, p = 0.002) and Medicaid (OR 1.4, p = 0.035) were both associated with higher likelihood of 90-day readmission compared to private insurance. In comparison, 30-day analyses did not unveil this discrepancy between Medicaid and privately insured, highlighting the merit for longer-term outcomes analyses in value-based care. Patients readmitted within 30 days versus those with later readmissions possessed different characteristics.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to patients with private insurance coverage, Medicaid and self-pay patients were significantly more likely to undergo non-elective resection of benign meningioma. Medicaid and Medicare insurance were associated with a higher likelihood of 90-day readmission; only Medicare was significant at 30 days. Both 30 and 90-day outcomes merit consideration given differences in readmitted populations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health policy; Insurance; Meningioma; Readmission; Reoperation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32654076      PMCID: PMC7484429          DOI: 10.1007/s11060-020-03581-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  35 in total

1.  Disparities in oncologic surgery.

Authors:  Caprice C Greenberg; Jane C Weeks; Steven C Stain
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Meningiomas: knowledge base, treatment outcomes, and uncertainties. A RANO review.

Authors:  Leland Rogers; Igor Barani; Marc Chamberlain; Thomas J Kaley; Michael McDermott; Jeffrey Raizer; David Schiff; Damien C Weber; Patrick Y Wen; Michael A Vogelbaum
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  Race, socioeconomic status, and health: complexities, ongoing challenges, and research opportunities.

Authors:  David R Williams; Selina A Mohammed; Jacinta Leavell; Chiquita Collins
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Insurance status and inequalities in outcomes after neurosurgery.

Authors:  Abdulrahman M El-Sayed; John E Ziewacz; Matthew C Davis; Darryl Lau; Hasan K Siddiqi; Grettel J Zamora-Berridi; Stephen E Sullivan
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.104

5.  Racial and socioeconomic disparities in outcomes following pediatric cerebrospinal fluid shunt procedures.

Authors:  Frank J Attenello; Alvin Ng; Timothy Wen; Steven Y Cen; Nerses Sanossian; Arun P Amar; Gabriel Zada; Mark D Krieger; J Gordon McComb; William J Mack
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Atypical and malignant meningioma: outcome and prognostic factors in 119 irradiated patients. A multicenter, retrospective study of the Rare Cancer Network.

Authors:  David Pasquier; Stefan Bijmolt; Theo Veninga; Nicolas Rezvoy; Salvador Villa; Marco Krengli; Damien C Weber; Brigitta G Baumert; Emine Canyilmaz; Deniz Yalman; Ewa Szutowicz; Tzahala Tzuk-Shina; René O Mirimanoff
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Insurance status predicts access to care and outcomes of vascular disease.

Authors:  Jeannine K Giacovelli; Natalia Egorova; Roman Nowygrod; Annetine Gelijns; K Craig Kent; Nicholas J Morrissey
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 4.268

8.  The impact of race, income, drug abuse and dependence on health insurance coverage among US adults.

Authors:  Nianyang Wang; Xin Xie
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2016-05-04

9.  Racial and socioeconomic disparities in incidence of hospital-acquired complications following cerebrovascular procedures.

Authors:  Timothy Wen; Frank J Attenello; Shuhan He; Yong Cen; May A Kim-Tenser; Nerses Sanossian; Arun P Amar; William J Mack
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  A Multi-institutional Analysis of Insurance Status as a Predictor of Morbidity Following Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Brittany L Vieira; Steven T Lanier; Alexei S Mlodinow; Kevin P Bethke; Robert X Murphy; Keith M Hume; Karol A Gutowski; Neil A Fine; John Y S Kim
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2014-12-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.