Literature DB >> 32654039

Pilot Feasibility Study of a Video Intervention to Educate Patients with Breast Cancer About Clinical Trials.

Katherine A Yeager1,2, Jinbing Bai3,4, Keerthi Gogineni4,5, Jane Lowe Meisel4,5, Jaime Kweon3, Deborah W Bruner3,4, Drenna Waldrop-Valverde3.   

Abstract

The purpose of this project was to develop and test the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a video about cancer clinical trials (CCTs) developed for breast cancer patients. We developed 2 brief 7-min videos that focused on breast cancer patients describing their experiences participating in CCTs, supplemented with doctors and research staff explaining key research concepts. One video was culturally tailored to Black patients and the other to White patients. To assess feasibility study, participants and their care providers completed a survey to evaluate their satisfaction with the video. Eligibility criteria for the study included ≥ 21 years of age, English-speaking, no prior experience participating in a CCT, and being potentially eligible for breast CCT enrollment. Preliminary efficacy was evaluated with a pretest-posttest design using a single item asking about intent to enroll in a clinical trial. The mean age of the patient sample (n = 50) was 53.0 years, and 50.0% were Black. Participants reported that the video was in the right length, useful, and easy to understand. Providers' evaluation (n = 5) revealed that viewing the video helped prepare patients for further CCT discussion. Preliminary efficacy showed no statistically significant difference in participant interest in CCT enrollment pre- and post-video. Changes in patients' intent in enrollment were associated with age and education. Culturally adapted video interventions can be helpful in supporting both patients and providers throughout the CCT education process but additional work is needed to improve enrollment into clinical trials.
© 2020. American Association for Cancer Education.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Clinical trial; Education; Video intervention

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 32654039     DOI: 10.1007/s13187-020-01826-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  15 in total

1.  Effects of untreated syphilis in the negro male, 1932 to 1972: a closure comes to the Tuskegee study, 2004.

Authors:  Shamim M Baker; Otis W Brawley; Leonard S Marks
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Using narrative communication as a tool for health behavior change: a conceptual, theoretical, and empirical overview.

Authors:  Leslie J Hinyard; Matthew W Kreuter
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2006-12-15

3.  The Role of Clinical Trial Participation in Cancer Research: Barriers, Evidence, and Strategies.

Authors:  Joseph M Unger; Elise Cook; Eric Tai; Archie Bleyer
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2016

4.  Barriers to Clinical Trial Enrollment in Racial and Ethnic Minority Patients With Cancer.

Authors:  Lauren M Hamel; Louis A Penner; Terrance L Albrecht; Elisabeth Heath; Clement K Gwede; Susan Eggly
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.302

5.  Randomized clinical trials in oncology: understanding and attitudes predict willingness to participate.

Authors:  P M Ellis; P N Butow; M H Tattersall; S M Dunn; N Houssami
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  A sense of urgency: Evaluating the link between clinical trial development time and the accrual performance of cancer therapy evaluation program (NCI-CTEP) sponsored studies.

Authors:  Steven K Cheng; Mary S Dietrich; David M Dilts
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 7.  Strategies for increasing recruitment to randomised controlled trials: systematic review.

Authors:  Patrina H Y Caldwell; Sana Hamilton; Alvin Tan; Jonathan C Craig
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 8.  Inclusion of minorities and women in cancer clinical trials, a decade later: Have we improved?

Authors:  Kat Kwiatkowski; Kathryn Coe; John C Bailar; G Marie Swanson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 9.  Comparison of outcomes in cancer patients treated within and outside clinical trials: conceptual framework and structured review.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Peppercorn; Jane C Weeks; E Francis Cook; Steven Joffe
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-01-24       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Analysis of Racial/Ethnic Representation in Select Basic and Applied Cancer Research Studies.

Authors:  Santiago Guerrero; Andrés López-Cortés; Alberto Indacochea; Jennyfer M García-Cárdenas; Ana Karina Zambrano; Alejandro Cabrera-Andrade; Patricia Guevara-Ramírez; Diana Abigail González; Paola E Leone; César Paz-Y-Miño
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.