Literature DB >> 32653492

Biology of keratorefractive surgery- PRK, PTK, LASIK, SMILE, inlays and other refractive procedures.

Steven E Wilson1.   

Abstract

The outcomes of refractive surgical procedures to improve uncorrected vision in patients-including photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK), Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) and corneal inlay procedures-is in large part determined by the corneal wound healing response after surgery. The wound healing response varies depending on the type of surgery, the level of intended correction of refractive error, the post-operative inflammatory response, generation of opacity producing myofibroblasts and likely poorly understood genetic factors. This article details what is known about these specific wound healing responses that include apoptosis of keratocytes and myofibroblasts, mitosis of corneal fibroblasts and myofibroblast precursors, the development of myofibroblasts from keratocyte-derived corneal fibroblasts and bone marrow-derived fibrocytes, deposition of disordered extracellular matrix by corneal fibroblasts and myofibroblasts, healing of the epithelial injury, and regeneration of the epithelial basement membrane. Problems with epithelial and stromal cellular viability and function that are altered by corneal inlays are also discussed. A better understanding of the wound healing response in refractive surgical procedures is likely to lead to better treatments to improve outcomes, limit complications of keratorefractive surgical procedures, and improve the safety and efficiency of refractive surgical procedures.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apoptosis; Cornea; Corneal fibroblasts; Corneal haze; Corneal inlays; Corneal scar; LASIK; Laser thermal keratoplasty (LTK); Mitomycin C; Myofibroblasts; PRK; PTK; Radial keratotomy; Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE); Thermal conductive keratoplasty (CK); Wound healing

Year:  2020        PMID: 32653492      PMCID: PMC7508965          DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2020.108136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Eye Res        ISSN: 0014-4835            Impact factor:   3.467


  5 in total

1.  Factors affecting single-step transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy outcome in the treatment of mild, moderate, and high myopia: a cohort study.

Authors:  Mansour M Al-Mohaimeed
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 1.645

2.  Temporal evolution of the biological response to laser-induced refractive index change (LIRIC) in rabbit corneas.

Authors:  Kaitlin T Wozniak; Sam C Butler; Xu He; Jonathan D Ellis; Wayne H Knox; Krystel R Huxlin
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 3.770

3.  Multimodal imaging for refractive surgery: Quo vadis?

Authors:  Renato Ambrósio
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.848

4.  Comparison of transepithelial and conventional photorefractive keratectomy in myopic and myopic astigmatism patients: a randomized contralateral trial.

Authors:  Hassan Hashemi; Azam Alvani; Mohammadreza Aghamirsalim; Mohammad Miraftab; Soheila Asgari
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 2.209

Review 5.  Novel insights into gene therapy in the cornea.

Authors:  Rajiv R Mohan; Lynn M Martin; Nishant R Sinha
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 3.770

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.