| Literature DB >> 32652819 |
Emma Pomeroy1, Chris O Hunt2, Tim Reynolds3, Dlshad Abdulmutalb4, Eleni Asouti5, Paul Bennett6, Marjolein Bosch1, Ariane Burke7, Lucy Farr8, Robert Foley9, Charles French1, Amos Frumkin10, Paul Goldberg11,12, Evan Hill13, Ceren Kabukcu5, Marta Mirazón Lahr9, Ross Lane6, Curtis Marean14, Bruno Maureille15, Giuseppina Mutri16,17, Christopher E Miller18, Kaify Ali Mustafa19, Andreas Nymark3, Paul Pettitt20, Nohemi Sala21, Dennis Sandgathe22, Chris Stringer23, Emily Tilby1, Graeme Barker8.
Abstract
Mortuary behavior (activities concerning dead conspecifics) is one of many traits that were previously widely considered to have been uniquely human, but on which perspectives have changed markedly in recent years. Theoretical approaches to hominin mortuary activity and its evolution have undergone major revision, and advances in diverse archeological and paleoanthropological methods have brought new ways of identifying behaviors such as intentional burial. Despite these advances, debates concerning the nature of hominin mortuary activity, particularly among the Neanderthals, rely heavily on the rereading of old excavations as new finds are relatively rare, limiting the extent to which such debates can benefit from advances in the field. The recent discovery of in situ articulated Neanderthal remains at Shanidar Cave offers a rare opportunity to take full advantage of these methodological and theoretical developments to understand Neanderthal mortuary activity, making a review of these advances relevant and timely.Entities:
Keywords: Neanderthal; burial; funerary activity; mortuary activity; sediment micromorphology; taphonomy
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32652819 DOI: 10.1002/evan.21854
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evol Anthropol ISSN: 1060-1538