Literature DB >> 32652759

The Impact of Leaving Group Anomericity on the Structure of Glycosyl Cations of Protected Galactosides.

Kim Greis1,2, Eike Mucha2, Maike Lettow1,2, Daniel A Thomas2, Carla Kirschbaum1,2, Sooyeon Moon1,3, Alonso Pardo-Vargas1,3, Gert von Helden2, Gerard Meijer2, Kerry Gilmore3, Peter H Seeberger1,3, Kevin Pagel1,2.   

Abstract

It has been reported that fragments produced by glycosidic bond breakage in mass spectrometry-based experiments can retain a memory of their anomeric configuration, which has major implications for glycan sequencing. Herein, we use cryogenic vibrational spectroscopy and ion mobility-mass spectrometry to study the structure of B-type fragments of protected galactosides. Cationic fragments were generated from glycosyl donors carrying trichloroacetimidate or thioethyl leaving groups of different anomeric configuration. The obtained infrared signatures indicate that the investigated fragments exhibit an identical structure, which suggests that there is no anomeric memory in B-type ions of fully protected monosaccharides.
© 2020 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IR spectroscopy; anomeric memory; glycosyl cation; glycosylation; mass spectrometry

Year:  2020        PMID: 32652759      PMCID: PMC7540451          DOI: 10.1002/cphc.202000473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemphyschem        ISSN: 1439-4235            Impact factor:   3.102


Glycans are responsible for crucial processes in living organisms.1 As a result, there is an increasing interest in using oligosaccharides as novel pharmaceuticals.2 In contrast to oligonucleotides and proteins, however, glycans are structurally highly diverse, with a complex branching, regio‐ and stereochemistry. This complexity represents the major challenge for glycan analysis and there is currently no gold standard method to comprehensively characterise complex oligosaccharides from the minute sample amounts that are commonly found in biology. Gas‐phase infrared (IR) action spectroscopy and ion mobility‐mass spectrometry (IM‐MS) are useful to probe glycan structures and unravel mechanisms of chemical glycosylation reactions.3 Isomeric carbohydrates exhibiting minute structural variations can be distinguished based on their IR fingerprint or their IM‐MS derived collision cross section (CCS).4 Likewise, it recently became possible for the first time to comprehensively characterize the key intermediate in glycan synthesis, the short‐lived glycosyl cation, using infrared multiple photon dissociation (IRMPD) and cryogenic vibrational IR spectroscopy.5 Direct evidence for neighbouring and remote protecting group participation in glycosylation reactions was obtained. However, the impact of the leaving group and its anomericity (configuration) on the structure of glycosyl cations has not been fully elucidated yet. Albeit discussed in a different context, it has furthermore been reported recently that certain fragment ions produced in MS experiments can retain stereochemical information of the glycosidic bond from which they originate. This effect, called anomeric memory, is based on the observation that the IRMPD spectra and/or the IM‐MS arrival time distributions of glycosidic B‐ and C‐fragments (Scheme 1) differ depending on the anomericity of the underlying glycosidic bond. For C‐fragments, the origin of the effect can be explained by the configuration of the anomeric carbon that is retained after fragmentation.6 In B‐type ions on the other hand, this observation is rather surprising at first glance, as the stereocentre at the anomeric carbon vanishes upon removal of a substituent. However, depending on the anomericity of the precursor, the fragments might adopt a distinct structure, which in turn would explain the reported differences.7
Scheme 1

Schematic representation of the Domon and Costello nomenclature8 for glycan fragmentation in mass spectrometry. Oligosaccharides can fragment into various smaller ions. B‐type fragments correspond to glycosyl cations, which play an important role in glycosynthesis. Cross‐ring A‐ and X‐fragments have been omitted for clarity.

Schematic representation of the Domon and Costello nomenclature8 for glycan fragmentation in mass spectrometry. Oligosaccharides can fragment into various smaller ions. B‐type fragments correspond to glycosyl cations, which play an important role in glycosynthesis. Cross‐ring A‐ and X‐fragments have been omitted for clarity. Glycosidic B‐type fragment ions are in many ways similar to the glycosyl cations in the above‐mentioned mechanistic studies. The released leaving group resembles the corresponding Y‐type fragment at the non‐reducing end. In both synthesis and MS‐based sequencing it is crucial to understand if and in how far the leaving group anomericity influences the structure of the resulting fragment/glycosyl cation. To address this issue, we here analysed a series of B‐fragments from protected monosaccharide precursors that differ in the type and anomericity of the leaving group using cryogenic vibrational spectroscopy and IM‐MS using experimental setups described previously.9 Briefly, glycosyl cations are generated by nanoelectrospray ionisation (nESI) and subsequent in‐source fragmentation of monosaccharide precursors bearing thioethyl (SEt) or trichloroacetimidate (TCAI) leaving groups of defined stereochemistry (see the Supporting Information for MS spectra). After m/z‐selection, the ions are collected in a hexapole ion trap that allows for buffer gas cooling of the ions to 90 K. Next, superfluid helium nanodroplets traverse the ion trap, picking up analyte ions that are rapidly cooled to 0.4 K in the superfluid helium matrix. The captured ions are guided to a detection region, where the beam of helium droplets overlaps with IR radiation (1000–1800 cm−1), produced by the Fritz Haber Institute free‐electron laser (FHI FEL).10 The subsequent absorption of resonant IR photons leads to the release of bare intact ions from the nanodroplet. The ion yield is measured with a time‐of‐flight detector and plotted against the wavenumber, leading to highly resolved IR spectra of the investigated ions. Ion mobility measurements to explore the overall shape of the ions were carried out using a home‐built drift‐tube (DT) instrument.11 The measured drift times in helium buffer gas were converted into collision cross sections (DTCCSHe)12 using the Mason‐Schamp equation.13 Initially, the influence of the leaving group on the structure of glycosyl cations was probed. Cryogenic IR signatures and CCSs of B‐type fragments of 4,6‐di‐O‐acetyl‐2,3‐di‐O‐benzyl‐d‐galactopyranoside precursors with β‐SEt (1, Figure 1a) and β‐TCAI (2, Figure 1b) leaving groups were recorded. The spectra show six well‐resolved absorption bands. Features below 1300 cm−1 are attributed to complex C−O and CC stretching vibrations and depict a fingerprint, which is unique for structurally distinct analytes.4b The bands above 1300 cm−1 are usually diagnostic for functional groups. Here, they result from the symmetric and the antisymmetric dioxolenium stretch ν(COO+) as well as the carbonyl stretch ν(C=O).5a
Figure 1

Impact of the leaving group on the structure of B‐type ions. Infrared spectra of glycosyl cations generated from a) β‐thioethyl (1, SEt), b) β‐ (2) and c) α‐trichloroacetimidate (3, TCAI) precursors of 4,6‐di‐O‐acetyl‐2,3‐di‐O‐benzyl‐d‐galactopyranoside. Regardless of the chemical type and anomericity of the leaving group, similar IR signatures are obtained. Ac: acetyl; Bn: benzyl; LG: leaving group, DTCCSHe: Drift‐tube collision cross section in He.

Impact of the leaving group on the structure of B‐type ions. Infrared spectra of glycosyl cations generated from a) β‐thioethyl (1, SEt), b) β‐ (2) and c) α‐trichloroacetimidate (3, TCAI) precursors of 4,6‐di‐O‐acetyl‐2,3‐di‐O‐benzyl‐d‐galactopyranoside. Regardless of the chemical type and anomericity of the leaving group, similar IR signatures are obtained. Ac: acetyl; Bn: benzyl; LG: leaving group, DTCCSHe: Drift‐tube collision cross section in He. Generally, the signatures are identical. However, the spectra of B‐fragments from β‐SEt precursors exhibit a slightly lower signal‐to‐noise ratio than the β‐TCAI counterpart. The similarities of the obtained IR spectra indicate that the ions generated from both precursors exhibit an identical structure. If the B‐fragments were structurally different, then at least variations in the fingerprint region (ca. 1000–1150 cm−1) are expected, as even subtle changes in the chemical environment are known to cause a shift of the absorption bands.4b A structural similarity is further supported by the CCSs of the probed glycosyl cations. We conclude that the chemical structure of the leaving group has no influence on the structure of the analysed fragments. Next, the influence of the leaving group anomericity was studied. The CCSs and IR signatures of B‐fragments generated from the intact precursor monosaccharide bearing β‐TCAI (2, Figure 1b) and α‐TCAI (3, Figure 1c) leaving groups were recorded. The CCSs show minute variations that are within the error of the method, and the vibrational spectra are identical. These results clearly show that the structure of the investigated B‐type ions is not dependent on the leaving group anomericity. As a consequence, these ions do not exhibit an anomeric memory. To further verify these findings, we applied our methodology to B‐fragments generated from 4‐O‐acetyl‐2,3,6‐tri‐O‐benzyl‐d‐galactopyranoside (4 and 5) and 6‐O‐acetyl‐2,3,4‐tri‐O‐benzyl‐d‐galactopyranoside (6 and 7) precursors. In addition to differences in the leaving group and its anomericity, these building blocks also differ in the position of the acetyl protecting group, which is located either at C4 or C6. CCSs and IR spectra of B‐fragments of precursors bearing β‐SEt (4 and 6, Figure 2a and 2c) and α‐TCAI (5 and 7, Figure 2b and 2d) leaving groups were recorded. Within each set, the CCSs are almost identical. Also, the IR signatures of the B‐type fragments exhibit identical absorption bands for each individual set, whereas there are considerable differences between the spectra originating from structurally different glycosyl cations. This result demonstrates that the method is highly diagnostic to structural differences, for example in protecting group regiochemistry. It can therefore be concluded that the structures of B‐type ions of each individual set (i. e. 1, 2, and 3) are virtually identical and independent of the leaving group and its underlying anomericity.
Figure 2

Influence of the leaving group anomericity on the structure of B‐type ions. Infrared spectra of glycosyl cations from a) β‐thioethyl (4), b) α‐trichloroacetimidate (5) precursors of 4‐O‐acetyl‐2,3,6‐tri‐O‐benzyl‐d‐galactopyranoside and c) β‐thioethyl (6), d) α‐trichloroacetimidate (7) precursors of 6‐O‐acetyl‐2,3,4‐tri‐O‐benzyl‐d‐galactopyranoside. The IR signature of the respective B‐type fragment is not dependent on the leaving group of the precursor. Ac: acetyl; Bn: benzyl; LG: leaving group, DTCCSHe: Drift‐tube collision cross section in He.

Influence of the leaving group anomericity on the structure of B‐type ions. Infrared spectra of glycosyl cations from a) β‐thioethyl (4), b) α‐trichloroacetimidate (5) precursors of 4‐O‐acetyl‐2,3,6‐tri‐O‐benzyl‐d‐galactopyranoside and c) β‐thioethyl (6), d) α‐trichloroacetimidate (7) precursors of 6‐O‐acetyl‐2,3,4‐tri‐O‐benzyl‐d‐galactopyranoside. The IR signature of the respective B‐type fragment is not dependent on the leaving group of the precursor. Ac: acetyl; Bn: benzyl; LG: leaving group, DTCCSHe: Drift‐tube collision cross section in He. In conclusion, our data show that the chemical nature of the leaving group as well as the stereochemistry of their linkage do not have an impact on the conformation of the resulting glycosyl cation. This implies that regardless of the type and anomericity of the leaving group, reactive intermediates of similar structure are formed. At the same time, our data also indicate that glycosidic B‐type fragments do not exhibit an anomeric memory that was previously shown for C‐type fragments.6 It is important to point out that all monosaccharides studied here are fully protected and do not contain free hydroxyl groups. As these groups are crucial for the three‐dimensional structure of glycan fragments, an anomeric memory in unprotected B‐type fragments cannot be ruled out based on the present data. Our data confirm previous studies7 on permethylated glycans, which have suggested that hydroxyl groups may play an important role in the anomeric memory effect.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors. Supplementary Click here for additional data file.
  19 in total

1.  Analyzing the higher order structure of proteins with conformer-selective ultraviolet photodissociation.

Authors:  Stephan Warnke; Gert von Helden; Kevin Pagel
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 2.  Carbohydrate vaccines: developing sweet solutions to sticky situations?

Authors:  Rena D Astronomo; Dennis R Burton
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 3.  Altered N-glycosylation profiles as potential biomarkers and drug targets in diabetes.

Authors:  Najda Rudman; Olga Gornik; Gordan Lauc
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 4.124

4.  How General Is Anomeric Retention during Collision-Induced Dissociation of Glycans?

Authors:  Robert P Pellegrinelli; Lei Yue; Eduardo Carrascosa; Stephan Warnke; Ahmed Ben Faleh; Thomas R Rizzo
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Identification of carbohydrate anomers using ion mobility-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  J Hofmann; H S Hahm; P H Seeberger; K Pagel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  In-depth structural analysis of glycans in the gas phase.

Authors:  Eike Mucha; Alexandra Stuckmann; Mateusz Marianski; Weston B Struwe; Gerard Meijer; Kevin Pagel
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 9.825

7.  Characterization of glycosyl dioxolenium ions and their role in glycosylation reactions.

Authors:  Thomas Hansen; Hidde Elferink; Jacob M A van Hengst; Kas J Houthuijs; Wouter A Remmerswaal; Alexandra Kromm; Giel Berden; Stefan van der Vorm; Anouk M Rijs; Hermen S Overkleeft; Dmitri V Filippov; Floris P J T Rutjes; Gijsbert A van der Marel; Jonathan Martens; Jos Oomens; Jeroen D C Codée; Thomas J Boltje
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Charge-Induced Unzipping of Isolated Proteins to a Defined Secondary Structure.

Authors:  Ana Isabel González Flórez; Eike Mucha; Doo-Sik Ahn; Sandy Gewinner; Wieland Schöllkopf; Kevin Pagel; Gert von Helden
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 15.336

9.  Unravelling the structure of glycosyl cations via cold-ion infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Eike Mucha; Mateusz Marianski; Fei-Fei Xu; Daniel A Thomas; Gerard Meijer; Gert von Helden; Peter H Seeberger; Kevin Pagel
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Remote Participation during Glycosylation Reactions of Galactose Building Blocks: Direct Evidence from Cryogenic Vibrational Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Mateusz Marianski; Eike Mucha; Kim Greis; Sooyeon Moon; Alonso Pardo; Carla Kirschbaum; Daniel A Thomas; Gerard Meijer; Gert von Helden; Kerry Gilmore; Peter H Seeberger; Kevin Pagel
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 15.336

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Mass Spectrometry-Based Techniques to Elucidate the Sugar Code.

Authors:  Márkó Grabarics; Maike Lettow; Carla Kirschbaum; Kim Greis; Christian Manz; Kevin Pagel
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 72.087

2.  Glycosyl Oxocarbenium Ions: Structure, Conformation, Reactivity, and Interactions.

Authors:  Antonio Franconetti; Ana Ardá; Juan Luis Asensio; Yves Blériot; Sébastien Thibaudeau; Jesús Jiménez-Barbero
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 22.384

3.  Neighboring Group Participation of Benzoyl Protecting Groups in C3- and C6-Fluorinated Glucose.

Authors:  Kim Greis; Carla Kirschbaum; Giulio Fittolani; Eike Mucha; Rayoon Chang; Gert von Helden; Gerard Meijer; Martina Delbianco; Peter H Seeberger; Kevin Pagel
Journal:  European J Org Chem       Date:  2022-04-13

4.  Characterization of Cyclic N-Acyliminium Ions by Infrared Ion Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Jona Merx; Kas J Houthuijs; Hidde Elferink; Eva Witlox; Jasmin Mecinović; Jos Oomens; Jonathan Martens; Thomas J Boltje; Floris P J T Rutjes
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 5.020

5.  Predicting glycosylation stereoselectivity using machine learning.

Authors:  Sooyeon Moon; Sourav Chatterjee; Peter H Seeberger; Kerry Gilmore
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2020-12-26       Impact factor: 9.825

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.