Literature DB >> 32652221

Multi-protease analysis of Pleistocene bone proteomes.

Liam T Lanigan1, Meaghan Mackie2, Susanne Feine3, Jean-Jacques Hublin4, Ralf W Schmitz3, Arndt Wilcke5, Matthew J Collins6, Enrico Cappellini1, Jesper V Olsen7, Alberto J Taurozzi8, Frido Welker9.   

Abstract

Ancient protein analysis is providing new insights into the evolutionary relationships between hominin fossils across the Pleistocene. Protein identification commonly relies on the proteolysis of a protein extract using a single protease, trypsin. As with modern proteome studies, alternative or additional proteases have the potential to increase both proteome size and protein sequence recovery. This could enhance the recovery of phylogenetic information from ancient proteomes. Here we identify 18 novel hominin bone specimens from the Kleine Feldhofer Grotte using MALDI-TOF MS peptide mass fingerprinting of collagen type I. Next, we use one of these hominin bone specimens and three Late Pleistocene Equidae specimens identified in a similar manner and present a comparison of the bone proteome size and protein sequence recovery obtained after using nanoLC-MS/MS and parallel proteolysis using six different proteases, including trypsin. We observe that the majority of the preserved bone proteome is inaccessible to trypsin. We also observe that for proteins recovered consistently across several proteases, protein sequence coverage can be increased significantly by combining peptide identifications from two or more proteases. Our results thereby demonstrate that the proteolysis of Pleistocene proteomes by several proteases has clear advantages when addressing evolutionary questions in palaeoproteomics. SIGNIFICANCE: Maximizing proteome and protein sequence recovery of ancient skeletal proteomes is important when analyzing unique hominin fossils. As with modern proteome studies, palaeoproteomic analysis of Pleistocene bone and dentine samples has almost exclusively used trypsin as its only protease, despite the demonstrated advantages of alternative proteases to increase proteome recovery in modern proteome studies. We demonstrate that Pleistocene bone proteomes can be significantly expanded by using additional proteases beside trypsin, and that this also improves sequence coverage of individual proteins. The use of several alternative proteases beside trypsin therefore has major benefits to maximize the phylogenetic information retrieved from ancient skeletal proteomes.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32652221     DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2020.103889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteomics        ISSN: 1874-3919            Impact factor:   4.044


  2 in total

Review 1.  Paleoproteomics.

Authors:  Christina Warinner; Kristine Korzow Richter; Matthew J Collins
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 72.087

2.  Molecular signatures written in bone proteins of 79 AD victims from Herculaneum and Pompeii.

Authors:  Georgia Ntasi; Ismael Rodriguez Palomo; Gennaro Marino; Fabrizio Dal Piaz; Enrico Cappellini; Leila Birolo; Pierpaolo Petrone
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 4.996

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.