Literature DB >> 32652167

Fasting blood glucose predicts the occurrence of critical illness in COVID-19 patients: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Qin Liu1, Huai Chen1, Jianyu Li1, Xiaoyan Huang1, Lihua Lai1, Shenghao Li1, Qingsi Zeng2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32652167      PMCID: PMC7342033          DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect        ISSN: 0163-4453            Impact factor:   6.072


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear editors, We read the recent published article by Lin and colleagues in journal of infection with great interest, which reported that serum ferritin as an independent risk factor for severity in COVID-19 patients. Previous studies aimed to identification risk factors of critical or mortal condition of patients with COVID-19 from clinical, laboratory, and radiological characteristics at admission. Early warning of patients who are most likely to develop critical disease will enable informed decisions, and facilitate the provision of timely supportive treatment in advance and thus reduce mortality. In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, we aimed to explore the value of admission fasting blood glucose (FBG) in predicting the occurrence of critical illness among patients hospitalized for COVID-19. We enrolled a total of 123 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients from three designated hospitals of Wuhan and Guangzhou, China. We collected clinical and laboratory data at hospital admission from medical records. We defined the severity of COVID-19 according to the newest COVID-19 guidelines released by the National Health Commission of China and the guidelines of American Thoracic Society for community-acquired pneumonia. We defined critical illness as a composite of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation, septic shock during hospitalization, or death. The optimal cutoff of FBG for discriminating COVID-19 patients with non-critical and critical illness was determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and by maximizing the Youden index. To identify predictors for critical illness, baseline variables with p-value <0.10 in univariable analysis were entered into multivariate logistic regression. In addition, Pearson correlation coefficient was used to determine the correlation between FBG and other laboratory parameters. The retrospective study was approved by an ethics committee of our institution, with a waiver of informed consent. The proportion of critical patients was 31.7% (39/123). The relatively high critically ill rate seen in this study was related to the fact that the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University only admitted severe/critical cases transferred from other designated hospitals of Guangzhou. Table 1 illustrates the comparison of baseline characteristics between critical and non-critical COVID-19 patients using Mann-Whitney U or Chi-squared or Fisher's exact test. Approximately 17.1% of patients reported a previous diabetes, which was higher in the critical group (p = 0.025). 69 patients (56.1%) had hyperglycemia with FBG level >6.1 mmol/L. The critical patients had significantly higher fasting blood glucose (FBG) level than the non-critical patients (p<0.001) (Fig. 1 a). Multivariate logistic regression indicated that the FBG on admission was an independent risk factor for critical illness in patients with COVID-19 (Odds Ratio [OR] = 1.249, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.032–1.512). After adjusting for previous diabetes, the OR of FBG for predicting critical illness in COVID-19 patients was 1.245 (95% CI: 1.056–1.468). The optimal FBG level for predicting critical illness was ≥6.50 mmol/L, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.767 (95% CI: 0.677–0.857) (Fig. 1b). The FBG was positively correlated with white blood cells (WBC) (r = 0.300, p = 0.001), neutrophil (r = 0.360, p < 0.001), and lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) (r = 0.277, p = 0.002); while FBG was negatively correlated with lymphocyte (r = −0.310, p < 0.001), albumin (r = −0.265, p = 0.003), and indirect bilirubin (IBIL) (r = −0.193, p = 0.037) (Fig. 1c-h). After adjusting for WBC, neutrophil, LDH, lymphocyte, albumin and IBIL, the OR of FBG for predicting critical illness in COVID-19 patients was 1.307 (95% CI: 1.105–1.546).
Table 1

Comparison of baseline characteristics between critical and noncritical patients with COVID-19.

CharacteristicsNoncritical (n = 84)Critical (n = 39)p-value
Age (years)58.5 (49.3–66.0)68.0 (61.0–78.0)0.001
Sex, n (%)
 Male44 (52.4)26 (66.7)0.137
 Female40 (47.6)13 (33.3)
Comorbidities
 Hypertension, n(%)18 (21.4)15 (39.5)0.047
 Coronary heart disease, n(%)9 (10.7)5 (12.8)0.765
 Diabetes, n(%)10 (11.9)11 (28.2)0.025
 Chronic liver diseases, n(%)5 (6.0)00.178
 Chronic lung diseases, n(%)8 (9.5)4 (10.3)1.000
 Others, n(%)22 (26.2)12 (30.8)0.597
Laboratory findings
 WBC (× 109/L)5.6 (4.3–7.1)6.0 (4.4–9.4)0.127
 Neutrophil (× 109/L)3.7 (2.7–5.5)5.1 (3.2–8.7)0.010
 Lymphocyte (× 109/L)0.9 (0.7–1.4)0.7 (0.4–1.0)0.002
 LDH (U/L)205.5 (161.8–279.8)395.5 (271.8–538.8)<0.001
 Hemoglobin (g/L)127.0 (117.0–144.0)137.0 (122.0–146.0)0.245
 Platelet (g/L)190.0 (139.0–274.5)164.0 (124.0–206.0)0.047
 Albumin (g/L)36.7 (32.0–40.0)31.9 (29.3–36.2)0.001
 AST (U/L)25.5 (18.0–36.0)40.0 (27.0–59.0)<0.001
 ALT (U/L)23.0 (16.0–37.3)27.0 (20.0–41.0)0.186
 DBIL (μmol/L)3.6 (2.8–5.0)4.2 (3.2–6.9)0.071
 IBIL (μmol/L)7.2 (4.5–10.2)5.6 (4.5–7.4)0.126
 TBIL (μmol/L)11.2 (7.9–14.9)9.8 (8.0–15.3)0.755
 APTT (s)33.7 (31.2–36.6)35.4 (31.2–39.9)0.197
 PT (s)13.3 (12.5–14.3)13.9 (12.9–15.1)0.061
 d-dimer (μg/ml)0.3 (0.1–0.7)0.7 (0.2–7.2)0.003
 Creatinine (μmol/L)70.0 (57.3–82.0)80.0 (67.0–100.0)0.002
 hs-CRP (mg/L)12.0 (1.8–34.8)36.1 (32.1–36.9)<0.001
 Procalcitonin (ng/ml)0.08 (0.05–0.12)0.2 (0.1–0.4)<0.001
 FBG (mmol/L)5.7 (5.0–6.9)7.4 (6.5–11.9)<0.001
 NTproBNP (pg/mL)97.3 (31.0–213.3)497.4 (127.0–843.8)<0.001

Note: Data were number (percentage) or median (interquartile range).

Abbreviations: WBC, white blood cells; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; TBIL, Total Bilirubin; DBIL, Direct Bilirubin; IBIL, indirect bilirubin; APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; PT, prothrombin time; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; FBG, fasting blood glucose; NTproBNP, N-terminal portion of proBNP.

Fig. 1

Admission FBG of COVID-19 patients and its correlation with disease severity. (a) FBG level in noncritical and critical COVID-19 patients (p < 0.001). (b) ROC curve of FBG for discriminating COVID-19 patients with non-critical and critical illness. (c–h) correlation between FBG and WBC, neutrophil, LDH, lymphocyte, albumin and IBIL, respectively.

Abbreviations: FBG, fasting blood glucose; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; WBC, white blood cells; lactic dehydrogenase; indirect bilirubin. .

Comparison of baseline characteristics between critical and noncritical patients with COVID-19. Note: Data were number (percentage) or median (interquartile range). Abbreviations: WBC, white blood cells; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; TBIL, Total Bilirubin; DBIL, Direct Bilirubin; IBIL, indirect bilirubin; APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; PT, prothrombin time; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; FBG, fasting blood glucose; NTproBNP, N-terminal portion of proBNP. Risk factors associated with critical illness in univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis. Note: Baseline variables with p-value <0.10 in univariable analysis were entered into multivariate logistic regression. Abbreviations: OR, Odds Ratio; WBC, white blood cells; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; PT, prothrombin time; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; FBG, fasting blood glucose; NTproBNP, N-terminal portion of proBNP. Admission FBG of COVID-19 patients and its correlation with disease severity. (a) FBG level in noncritical and critical COVID-19 patients (p < 0.001). (b) ROC curve of FBG for discriminating COVID-19 patients with non-critical and critical illness. (c–h) correlation between FBG and WBC, neutrophil, LDH, lymphocyte, albumin and IBIL, respectively. Abbreviations: FBG, fasting blood glucose; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; WBC, white blood cells; lactic dehydrogenase; indirect bilirubin. . Our study suggested that elevated FBG at admission is a crucial risk factor for critical illness in COVID-19 patients, although most patients (82.9%) had no previous diabetes, which was consistent with previous studies. , After adjusting for previous diabetes, the OR of FBG level was not significantly changed. The proportion of hyperglycemia was higher than a previous report of 47.2%. which may be due to the higher rate of critically ill patients we included. Except for well-known diabetes, elevation of FBG level at admission could also due to stress hyperglycemia. Stress hyperglycemia has been often found in patients without diabetes, which is more concerning in clinical practice. Stress hyperglycemia may be induced by a decrease of both insulin secretion and the worsening of insulin resistance. it may produce organ damage by inducing endothelial dysfunction and thrombosis through the glycation process and oxidative stress generation. Evidences have showed that critical COVID-19 cases exhibit characteristics of severely impaired immune system, systemic inflammatory reactions and cytokine storm. Our study indicated that admission FBG level was positively correlated with inflammatory biomarkers, such as WBC and neutrophil and negatively correlated with immune state biomarker—lymphocyte. In conclusion, this present study demonstrated that a high level of admission FBG was an independent risk factor for developing critical illness of COVID-19 patients. Admission FBG was associated with systemic inflammatory reactions and immune state. As a convenient and easy-to-detect marker, blood glucose level can be obtained and monitored in clinical settings. Continuous glucose monitoring is particularly necessary in COVID-19 patients with elevated admission FBG. Glucose control helps prevent and control infections and their complications. Therefore, well-controlled blood glucose may lead to an improved outcomes of patients with COVID-19.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.
Table 2

Risk factors associated with critical illness in univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis.

UnivariableMultivariable
OR (95% CI)P valueOR (95% CI)P value
Age (years)1.047 (1.016–1.079)0.0031.029 (0.966–1.095)0.379
Comorbidities
 Hypertension, n(%)2.292 (1.000–5.252)0.0501.331 (0.291–6.097)0.713
 Diabetes, n(%)2.907 (1.113–7.596)0.0290.935 (0.151–5.782)0.942
Laboratory findings
 WBC (× 109/L)1.126 (0.998–1.270)0.0530.866 (0.095–7.911)0.899
 Neutrophil (× 109/L)1.168 (1.032–1.323)0.0141.253 (0.136–11.557)0.842
 Lymphocyte (× 109/L)0.252 (0.099–0.644)0.0040.698 (0.055–8.868)0.782
 LDH (U/L)1.007 (1.004–1.011)<0.0011.004 (0.997–1.010)0.265
 Platelet (g/L)0.994 (0.988–0.999)0.0250.994 (0.983–1.006)0.314
 Albumin (g/L)0.886 (0.820–0.957)0.0021.062 (0.862–1.308)0.571
 AST (U/L)1.036 (1.014–1.058)0.0011.022 (0.985–1.060)0.251
 PT (s)1.261 (1.041–1.528)0.0181.010 (0.697–1.466)0.956
 d-dimer (μg/ml)1.226 (1.057–1.423)0.0071.016 (0.704–1.464)0.934
 Creatinine (μmol/L)1.027 (1.009–1.045)0.0031.009 (0.975–1.045)0.601
 hs-CRP (mg/L)1.018 (1.001–1.035)0.0350.990 (0.968–1.013)0.410
 Procalcitonin (ng/ml)2.689 (1.016–7.118)0.0462.167 (0.289–16.253)0.452
 FBG (mmol/L)1.317 (1.134–1.529)<0.0011.249 (1.032–1.512)0.022
 NTproBNP (pg/mL)1.002 (1.001–1.003)0.0021.001 (1.000–1.002)0.211

Note: Baseline variables with p-value <0.10 in univariable analysis were entered into multivariate logistic regression.

Abbreviations: OR, Odds Ratio; WBC, white blood cells; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; PT, prothrombin time; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; FBG, fasting blood glucose; NTproBNP, N-terminal portion of proBNP.

  9 in total

1.  Data-driven identification of temporal glucose patterns in a large cohort of nondiabetic patients with COVID-19 using time-series clustering.

Authors:  Sejal Mistry; Ramkiran Gouripeddi; Julio C Facelli; Julio C Facelli
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2021-07-15

2.  Admission Blood Glucose Level and Its Association With Cardiovascular and Renal Complications in Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19.

Authors:  Tom Norris; Cameron Razieh; Thomas Yates; Francesco Zaccardi; Clare L Gillies; Yogini V Chudasama; Alex Rowlands; Melanie J Davies; Gerry P McCann; Amitava Banerjee; Annemarie B Docherty; Peter J M Openshaw; J Kenneth Baillie; Malcolm G Semple; Claire A Lawson; Kamlesh Khunti
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 17.152

3.  Admission Hyperglycemia in Non-diabetics Predicts Mortality and Disease Severity in COVID-19: a Pooled Analysis and Meta-summary of Literature.

Authors:  Sonali Sachdeva; Rupak Desai; Udita Gupta; Anupam Prakash; Abhinav Jain; Ankita Aggarwal
Journal:  SN Compr Clin Med       Date:  2020-10-12

4.  Hyperglycemia is Associated With Increased Mortality in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19.

Authors:  Alon Y Mazori; Ilana Ramer Bass; Lili Chan; Kusum S Mathews; Deena R Altman; Aparna Saha; Howard Soh; Huei Hsun Wen; Sonali Bose; Emily Leven; Jing Gennie Wang; Gohar Mosoyan; Pattharawin Pattharanitima; Giampaolo Greco; Emily J Gallagher
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 5.  COVID-19 and Diabetes: A Comprehensive Review of Angiotensin Converting Enzyme 2, Mutual Effects and Pharmacotherapy.

Authors:  Lingli Xie; Ziying Zhang; Qian Wang; Yangwen Chen; Dexue Lu; Weihua Wu
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 6.  Is diabetes mellitus a risk factor for COronaVIrus Disease 19 (COVID-19)?

Authors:  Giuseppe Pugliese; Martina Vitale; Veronica Resi; Emanuela Orsi
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 4.280

7.  Prevalence, clinical manifestations, and biochemical data of type 2 diabetes mellitus versus nondiabetic symptomatic patients with COVID-19: A comparative study.

Authors:  Ashraf T Soliman; Arun Prabhakaran Nair; Muna S Al Masalamani; Vincenzo De Sanctis; Mohamad A Abu Khattab; Arwa E Alsaud; Sreethish Sasi; Elrazi A Ali; Hassan Ola A; Fatima M Iqbal; Abdulqadir J Nashwan; Jesin Fahad; Ihab El Madhoun; Mohamed A Yassin
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2020-09-07

8.  Is creatinine an independent risk factor for predicting adverse outcomes in COVID-19 patients?

Authors:  Jian Wu; Li Shi; Peihua Zhang; Yadong Wang; Haiyan Yang
Journal:  Transpl Infect Dis       Date:  2020-12-12

Review 9.  Clinical Significance of COVID-19 and Diabetes: In the Pandemic Situation of SARS-CoV-2 Variants including Omicron (B.1.1.529).

Authors:  Akiko Yonekawa; Nobuyuki Shimono
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.