Literature DB >> 32652079

Virtual Screening of Human Class-A GPCRs Using Ligand Profiles Built on Multiple Ligand-Receptor Interactions.

Wallace K B Chan1, Yang Zhang2.   

Abstract

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a large family of integral membrane proteins responsible for cellular signal transductions. Identification of therapeutic compounds to regulate physiological processes is an important first step of drug discovery. We proposed MAGELLAN, a novel hierarchical virtual-screening (VS) pipeline, which starts with low-resolution protein structure prediction and structure-based binding-site identification, followed by homologous GPCR detections through structure and orthosteric binding-site comparisons. Ligand profiles constructed from the homologous ligand-GPCR complexes are then used to thread through compound databases for VS. The pipeline was first tested in a large-scale retrospective screening experiment against 224 human Class A GPCRs, where MAGELLAN achieved a median enrichment factor (EF) of 14.38, significantly higher than that using individual ligand profiles. Next, MAGELLAN was examined on 5 and 20 GPCRs from two public VS databases (DUD-E and GPCR-Bench) and resulted in an average EF of 9.75 and 13.70, respectively, which compare favorably with other state-of-the-art docking- and ligand-based methods, including AutoDock Vina (with EF = 1.48/3.16 in DUD-E and GPCR-Bench), DOCK 6 (2.12/3.47 in DUD-E and GPCR-Bench), PoLi (2.2 in DUD-E), and FINDSITECcomb2.0 (2.90 in DUD-E). Detailed data analyses show that the major advantage of MAGELLAN is attributed to the power of ligand profiling, which integrates complementary methods for ligand-GPCR interaction recognition and thus significantly improves the coverage and sensitivity of VS models. Finally, cases studies on opioid and motilin receptors show that new connections between functionally related GPCRs can be visualized in the minimum spanning tree built on the similarities of predicted ligand-binding ensembles, suggesting a novel use of MAGELLAN for GPCR deorphanization.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  G protein-coupled receptors; deorphanization; ligand docking; protein structure prediction; virtual screening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32652079      PMCID: PMC7415681          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2020.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  49 in total

1.  3D-Jury: a simple approach to improve protein structure predictions.

Authors:  Krzysztof Ginalski; Arne Elofsson; Daniel Fischer; Leszek Rychlewski
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-05-22       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Basic local alignment search tool.

Authors:  S F Altschul; W Gish; W Miller; E W Myers; D J Lipman
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1990-10-05       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading.

Authors:  Oleg Trott; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  Off-target networks derived from ligand set similarity.

Authors:  Michael J Keiser; Jérôme Hert
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2009

5.  LOMETS2: improved meta-threading server for fold-recognition and structure-based function annotation for distant-homology proteins.

Authors:  Wei Zheng; Chengxin Zhang; Qiqige Wuyun; Robin Pearce; Yang Li; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Relating protein pharmacology by ligand chemistry.

Authors:  Michael J Keiser; Bryan L Roth; Blaine N Armbruster; Paul Ernsberger; John J Irwin; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 7.  The emerging mutational landscape of G proteins and G-protein-coupled receptors in cancer.

Authors:  Morgan O'Hayre; José Vázquez-Prado; Irina Kufareva; Eric W Stawiski; Tracy M Handel; Somasekar Seshagiri; J Silvio Gutkind
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  Cytoscape 2.8: new features for data integration and network visualization.

Authors:  Michael E Smoot; Keiichiro Ono; Johannes Ruscheinski; Peng-Liang Wang; Trey Ideker
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-12-12       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  A comparative assessment and analysis of 20 representative sequence alignment methods for protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Renxiang Yan; Dong Xu; Jianyi Yang; Sara Walker; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  LOMETS: a local meta-threading-server for protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Sitao Wu; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  4 in total

1.  Chemogenomic approach to identifying nematode chemoreceptor drug targets in the entomopathogenic nematode Heterorhabditis bacteriophora.

Authors:  Reeham Motaher; Emilia Grill; Elise McKean; Eric Kenney; Ioannis Eleftherianos; John M Hawdon; Damien M O'Halloran
Journal:  Comput Biol Chem       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 3.737

2.  Binding site identification of G protein-coupled receptors through a 3D Zernike polynomials-based method: application to C. elegans olfactory receptors.

Authors:  Lorenzo Di Rienzo; Luca De Flaviis; Giancarlo Ruocco; Viola Folli; Edoardo Milanetti
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Folding non-homologous proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations.

Authors:  Wei Zheng; Chengxin Zhang; Yang Li; Robin Pearce; Eric W Bell; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Cell Rep Methods       Date:  2021-06-21

4.  Tropane alkaloids and terpenes synthase genes of Datura stramonium (Solanaceae).

Authors:  Sabina Velázquez-Márquez; Iván M De-la-Cruz; Rosalinda Tapia-López; Juan Núñez-Farfán
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 2.984

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.