OBJECTIVE: To analyze the management of iatrogenic nerve injuries (iNI) in 42 patients. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the charts. RESULTS: The iNI occurred mostly during a surgical procedure (n = 39), either on a nerve or plexus (n = 13), on bone, joint, vessel or soft tissue (n = 24) or because of malpositioning (n = 2). The most commonly injured nerves were the brachial plexus, radial, sciatic, femoral, or peroneal nerves. 42.9% of the patients were referred later than 6 months. A neurological deficit was present in 37 patients and neuropathic pain in 17. Two patients were lost to follow-up. Conservative treatment was applied in 23 patients because of good spontaneous recovery or compensation or because of expected bad prognosis whatever the treatment. Surgical treatment was performed in 17 patients because of known nerve section (n = 2), persistent neurological deficit (n = 12) or invalidating neuropathic pain (n = 3); nerve reconstruction with grafts (n = 8) and neurolysis (n = 8) were the most common procedures. Outcome was satisfactory in 50%. Potential reasons of poor outcome were a very proximal injury, placement of very long grafts, delayed referral and predominance of neuropathic pain. According to the literature delayed referral of iNI for treatment is frequent. We provide an illustrative case of a young girl operated on at 6.5 months for femoral nerve reconstruction with grafts while nerve section was obvious from the operative note and pathological tissue analysis. Litigation claims (n = 10) resulted in malpractice (n = 2) or therapeutic alea (n = 5) (3 unavailable conclusions). i CONCLUSIONS: NI can result in considerable disability, pain and litigation. Optimal management is required.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the management of iatrogenic nerve injuries (iNI) in 42 patients. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the charts. RESULTS: The iNI occurred mostly during a surgical procedure (n = 39), either on a nerve or plexus (n = 13), on bone, joint, vessel or soft tissue (n = 24) or because of malpositioning (n = 2). The most commonly injured nerves were the brachial plexus, radial, sciatic, femoral, or peroneal nerves. 42.9% of the patients were referred later than 6 months. A neurological deficit was present in 37 patients and neuropathic pain in 17. Two patients were lost to follow-up. Conservative treatment was applied in 23 patients because of good spontaneous recovery or compensation or because of expected bad prognosis whatever the treatment. Surgical treatment was performed in 17 patients because of known nerve section (n = 2), persistent neurological deficit (n = 12) or invalidating neuropathic pain (n = 3); nerve reconstruction with grafts (n = 8) and neurolysis (n = 8) were the most common procedures. Outcome was satisfactory in 50%. Potential reasons of poor outcome were a very proximal injury, placement of very long grafts, delayed referral and predominance of neuropathic pain. According to the literature delayed referral of iNI for treatment is frequent. We provide an illustrative case of a young girl operated on at 6.5 months for femoral nerve reconstruction with grafts while nerve section was obvious from the operative note and pathological tissue analysis. Litigation claims (n = 10) resulted in malpractice (n = 2) or therapeutic alea (n = 5) (3 unavailable conclusions). i CONCLUSIONS: NI can result in considerable disability, pain and litigation. Optimal management is required.
Entities:
Keywords:
Iatrogenic injury; Nerve repair; Peripheral nerve; Timing of surgery
Authors: Gregor Antoniadis; Thomas Kretschmer; Maria Teresa Pedro; Ralph W König; Christian P G Heinen; Hans-Peter Richter Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2014-04-18 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: James W Suliburk; Quentin M Buck; Chris J Pirko; Nader N Massarweh; Neal R Barshes; Hardeep Singh; Todd K Rosengart Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2019-07-03