Brett M Tracy1, Benjamin J Hazen2, Carson R Ward2, Joshua H Winer2, Barbara J Pettitt2. 1. Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia. Electronic address: brett.m.tracy@emory.edu. 2. Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine if longitudinal, excellent clinical performance reflected in subjective evaluations during a surgery clerkship would be associated with a greater likelihood of National Board of Medical Examiners Surgery Shelf Exam ("shelf exam") success. DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed medical students' surgical clerkship performance from 2014 to 2019. Clinical evaluations for each rotation were abstracted and students were stratified by performance: excellent performers and non-excellent performers. The rotation performance grades were then combined to classify overall clerkship performance: sustained excellent performers, improved performers, worsened performers, and sustained non-excellent performers. We compared the shelf exam scores between performer class for each clinical rotation and the overall clerkship. Using logistic regression, we also sought to determine if clinical performance predicted passing the shelf exam. SETTING: Emory University School of Medicine in Atlanta, Georgia. PARTICIPANTS: Third-year medical students (N = 674) who completed a surgery clerkship. RESULTS: Excellent performers scored higher than non-excellent performers on the shelf exam during both clinical rotations (all p < 0.01). Sustained excellent performers had the highest exam scores out of all the clerkship performance groups (p < 0.0001). Excellent performers for both rotations were associated with increased odds of passing the shelf exam. Sustained excellent performers had the greatest odds (OR 3, 95% confidence interval 1.5-6.3, p = 0.003) of passing the exam. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical performance during the surgical clerkship and individual rotations correlates with shelf exam scores. Students should be encouraged to excel on the wards to maximize the educational experience and improve their odds of passing the exam.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if longitudinal, excellent clinical performance reflected in subjective evaluations during a surgery clerkship would be associated with a greater likelihood of National Board of Medical Examiners Surgery Shelf Exam ("shelf exam") success. DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed medical students' surgical clerkship performance from 2014 to 2019. Clinical evaluations for each rotation were abstracted and students were stratified by performance: excellent performers and non-excellent performers. The rotation performance grades were then combined to classify overall clerkship performance: sustained excellent performers, improved performers, worsened performers, and sustained non-excellent performers. We compared the shelf exam scores between performer class for each clinical rotation and the overall clerkship. Using logistic regression, we also sought to determine if clinical performance predicted passing the shelf exam. SETTING: Emory University School of Medicine in Atlanta, Georgia. PARTICIPANTS: Third-year medical students (N = 674) who completed a surgery clerkship. RESULTS: Excellent performers scored higher than non-excellent performers on the shelf exam during both clinical rotations (all p < 0.01). Sustained excellent performers had the highest exam scores out of all the clerkship performance groups (p < 0.0001). Excellent performers for both rotations were associated with increased odds of passing the shelf exam. Sustained excellent performers had the greatest odds (OR 3, 95% confidence interval 1.5-6.3, p = 0.003) of passing the exam. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical performance during the surgical clerkship and individual rotations correlates with shelf exam scores. Students should be encouraged to excel on the wards to maximize the educational experience and improve their odds of passing the exam.
Keywords:
Interpersonal and Communication Skills; Medical Knowledge; NBME; Practice-Based Learning and Improvement; clinical evaluation; excellent performance; longitudinal; surgery shelf exam