Literature DB >> 32650920

Radiotherapy in Patients With a Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device.

Ardalan Sharifzadehgan1, Marc Laurans2, Marine Thuillot3, Andres Huertas4, Pierre Baudinaud1, Kumar Narayanan5, Mariana Mirabel6, Jean-Emmanuel Bibault4, Pierre Frey7, Victor Waldmann1, Emilie Varlet3, Denis Amet3, Christophe Juin3, Thomas Lavergne1, Xavier Jouven1, Philippe Giraud4, Catherine Durdux4, Eloi Marijon8.   

Abstract

Recently, the Heart Rhythm Society published recommendations on management of patients with cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) who require radiotherapy (RT). We aimed to report the experience of a teaching hospital, and discuss our practice in the context of recently published guidelines. We identified all consecutive CIED recipients (12,736 patients) who underwent RT between March 2006 and June 2017. Among them, 90 (1%) patients (78.2 ± 10 years, 73% male) had a CIED: 82 pacemakers and 8 implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Two patients required CIED extraction prior to RT for ipsilateral breast cancer (no device replacement in 1 patient). Four patients (5%) were considered at high-risk, 35 (39%) at intermediate-risk, and the remaining 50 (56%) at low-risk for CIED dysfunction. Overall, only a minority of patients followed recommended local protocol during RT delivery (31%) and during follow-up (56%). CIED malfunction was detected in 5 patients (6%), mainly back-up mode resetting (80%), with 4 (including 3 pelvic cancer location) patients initially classified as being at intermediate-risk and 1 at low-risk. Four out of the 5 patients with CEID malfunction had received neutron producing beams. In conclusion, our findings underline the lack of rigorous monitoring of patients undergoing RT (though CIED malfunction appears to be rare and relatively benign in nature), and emphasize the interest of considering neutron producing beam for risk stratification as recommended in recent guidelines. Optimization of patient's management requires a close collaboration between both CIED clinicians and radiation oncologists, and more systematic remote CIED monitoring may be helpful.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32650920     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.04.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  2 in total

Review 1.  Perioperative Management of Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices and Utility of Magnet Application.

Authors:  Tardu Özkartal; Andrea Demarchi; Maria Luce Caputo; Enrico Baldi; Giulio Conte; Angelo Auricchio
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.241

2.  Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Undergoing Radiation Therapy: Insights from a Ten-Year Tertiary Center Experience.

Authors:  Simone Gulletta; Giulio Falasconi; Lorenzo Cianfanelli; Alice Centola; Gabriele Paglino; Manuela Cireddu; Andrea Radinovic; Giuseppe D'Angelo; Alessandra Marzi; Simone Sala; Nicolai Fierro; Caterina Bisceglia; Giovanni Peretto; Nadia Di Muzio; Paolo Della Bella; Pasquale Vergara; Italo Dell'Oca
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 4.964

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.