Literature DB >> 32650323

Feasibility of quasi-prompt PET-based range verification in proton therapy.

Ikechi Ozoemelam1, Emiel van der Graaf1, Marc-Jan van Goethem1, Maciej Kapusta2, Nan Zhang2, Sytze Brandenburg1, Peter Dendooven1.   

Abstract

Compared to photon therapy, proton therapy allows a better conformation of the dose to the tumor volume with reduced radiation dose to co-irradiated tissues. In vivo verification techniques including positron emission tomography (PET) have been proposed as quality assurance tools to mitigate proton range uncertainties. Detection of differences between planned and actual dose delivery on a short timescale provides a fast trigger for corrective actions. Conventional PET-based imaging of 15O (T1/2 = 2 min) and 11C (T1/2 = 20 min) distributions precludes such immediate feedback. We here present a demonstration of near real-time range verification by means of PET imaging of 12N (T1/2 = 11 ms). PMMA and graphite targets were irradiated with a 150 MeV proton pencil beam consisting of a series of pulses of 10 ms beam-on and 90 ms beam-off. Two modules of a modified Siemens Biograph mCT PET scanner (21 × 21 cm2 each), installed 25 cm apart, were used to image the beam-induced PET activity during the beam-off periods. The modifications enable the detectors to be switched off during the beam-on periods. 12N images were reconstructed using planar tomography. Using a 1D projection of the 2D reconstructed 12N image, the activity range was obtained from a fit of the activity profile with a sigmoid function. Range shifts due to modified target configurations were assessed for multiples of the clinically relevant 108 protons per pulse (approximately equal to the highest intensity spots in the pencil beam scanning delivery of a dose of 1 Gy over a cubic 1 l volume). The standard deviation of the activity range, determined from 30 datasets obtained from three irradiations on PMMA and graphite targets, was found to be 2.5 and 2.6 mm (1σ) with 108 protons per pulse and 0.9 and 0.8 mm (1σ) with 109 protons per pulse. Analytical extrapolation of the results from this study shows that using a scanner with a solid angle coverage of 57%, with optimized detector switching and spot delivery times much smaller than the 12N half-life, an activity range measurement precision of 2.0 mm (1σ) and 1.3 mm (1σ) within 50 ms into an irradiation with 4 × 107 and 108 protons per pencil beam spot can be potentially realized. Aggregated imaging of neighboring spots or, if possible, increasing the number of protons for a few probe beam spots will enable the realization of higher precision range measurement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32650323     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aba504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  4 in total

1.  Data-driven, energy-based method for estimation of scattered events in positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Nikos Efthimiou; Joel S Karp; Suleman Surti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 4.174

2.  Radioactive Beams for Image-Guided Particle Therapy: The BARB Experiment at GSI.

Authors:  Daria Boscolo; Daria Kostyleva; Mohammad Javad Safari; Vasiliki Anagnostatou; Juha Äystö; Soumya Bagchi; Tim Binder; Georgios Dedes; Peter Dendooven; Timo Dickel; Vasyl Drozd; Bernhard Franczack; Hans Geissel; Chiara Gianoli; Christian Graeff; Tuomas Grahn; Florian Greiner; Emma Haettner; Roghieh Haghani; Muhsin N Harakeh; Felix Horst; Christine Hornung; Jan-Paul Hucka; Nasser Kalantar-Nayestanaki; Erika Kazantseva; Birgit Kindler; Ronja Knöbel; Natalia Kuzminchuk-Feuerstein; Bettina Lommel; Ivan Mukha; Chiara Nociforo; Shunki Ishikawa; Giulio Lovatti; Munetaka Nitta; Ikechi Ozoemelam; Stephane Pietri; Wolfgang R Plaß; Andrej Prochazka; Sivaji Purushothaman; Claire-Anne Reidel; Heidi Roesch; Fabio Schirru; Christoph Schuy; Olga Sokol; Timo Steinsberger; Yoshiki K Tanaka; Isao Tanihata; Peter Thirolf; Walter Tinganelli; Bernd Voss; Uli Weber; Helmut Weick; John S Winfield; Martin Winkler; Jianwei Zhao; Christoph Scheidenberger; Katia Parodi; Marco Durante
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Proton range verification with MACACO II Compton camera enhanced by a neural network for event selection.

Authors:  Enrique Muñoz; Ana Ros; Marina Borja-Lloret; John Barrio; Peter Dendooven; Josep F Oliver; Ikechi Ozoemelam; Jorge Roser; Gabriela Llosá
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  In vivo production of fluorine-18 in a chicken egg tumor model of breast cancer for proton therapy range verification.

Authors:  Samuel España; Daniel Sánchez-Parcerisa; Paloma Bragado; Álvaro Gutiérrez-Uzquiza; Almudena Porras; Carolina Gutiérrez-Neira; Andrea Espinosa; Víctor V Onecha; Paula Ibáñez; Víctor Sánchez-Tembleque; José M Udías; Luis M Fraile
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 4.996

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.