Cristian Lolli1, Amelia Altavilla2, Vincenza Conteduca2, Alberto Farolfi2, Chiara Casadei2, Giuseppe Schepisi2, Giuseppe Luigi Banna3, Ugo De Giorgi2. 1. Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy. Electronic address: cristian.lolli@irst.emr.it. 2. Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy. 3. Department of Medical Oncology, United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Lincoln, United Kingdom.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been revolutionizing the treatment landscape of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). The use of ICIs in elderly RCC patients has become a daily practice, although their real impact in elderly patients is nowadays not completely clarified. It has been hypothesized that ICIs might not perform as effectively in the elderly as in younger patients, likely because of the gradual deterioration of the immune system brought on by natural age advancement, namely immunosenescence. METHODS: We reviewed all clinical trials with ICIs in mRCC focusing on efficacy and toxicity of elderly patients. RESULTS: Among the 21 trials reviewed, only 5 of them provided data on elderly patients. With the limits of low accrual and events for elderly patients, the efficacy of ICIs in patients ≥ 65 years seems as relevant as for younger patients, but not reliable for patients ≥ 75 years, group with overall low number of events, both in pre- or previously untreated mRCC patients. These currently available data seem not to support the hypothesis of a lower efficacy of ICIs in elderly patients, at least for mRCC. These trials reported very few data about toxicities in the specific population of elderly patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although available data from clinical trials are poor, currently, they do not support the efficacy of ICIs is less in elderly mRCC patients.
BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been revolutionizing the treatment landscape of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). The use of ICIs in elderly RCCpatients has become a daily practice, although their real impact in elderly patients is nowadays not completely clarified. It has been hypothesized that ICIs might not perform as effectively in the elderly as in younger patients, likely because of the gradual deterioration of the immune system brought on by natural age advancement, namely immunosenescence. METHODS: We reviewed all clinical trials with ICIs in mRCC focusing on efficacy and toxicity of elderly patients. RESULTS: Among the 21 trials reviewed, only 5 of them provided data on elderly patients. With the limits of low accrual and events for elderly patients, the efficacy of ICIs in patients ≥ 65 years seems as relevant as for younger patients, but not reliable for patients ≥ 75 years, group with overall low number of events, both in pre- or previously untreated mRCC patients. These currently available data seem not to support the hypothesis of a lower efficacy of ICIs in elderly patients, at least for mRCC. These trials reported very few data about toxicities in the specific population of elderly patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although available data from clinical trials are poor, currently, they do not support the efficacy of ICIs is less in elderly mRCC patients.
Authors: Y Tomita; R J Motzer; T K Choueiri; B I Rini; H Miyake; H Uemura; L Albiges; Y Fujii; Y Umeyama; J Wang; M Mariani; M Schmidinger Journal: ESMO Open Date: 2022-04-06