Literature DB >> 32648608

Gut Microbes Take It to the Next Level? First Insights Into Farnesoid X Receptor Agonists of Microbial Origin.

Martin Lenicek1,2, Steven W M Olde Damink2,3, Frank G Schaap2,3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32648608      PMCID: PMC7702049          DOI: 10.1002/hep.31455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatology        ISSN: 0270-9139            Impact factor:   17.425


× No keyword cloud information.
The intestinal microbiome and its metabolites contribute to host (patho)physiology through signaling via host bile salt receptors.( ) To assess the overall chemical effects of the microbiome at the level of an entire animal, Quinn et al. conducted untargeted metabolome analysis of 29 different organs of germ‐free and specific pathogen‐free (SPF) mice.( ) Unique microbial and metabolome profiles were evident along the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. An elegant mass spectrometry informatics approach led to the identification of three novel bile salt conjugates that were present along the entire intestinal length of SPF mice only, with highest levels observed in the small intestine. Specifically, N‐amidates of cholic acid (CA) and either leucine (LeuCA), phenylalanine (PheCA), or tyrosine (TyrCA) were identified and shown to be produced by specific strains of Clostridium bolteae. Administration of these new bile salt conjugates to mice resulted in changes in ileal and hepatic gene expression compatible with local activation of the bile salt receptor, farnesoid X receptor (FXR). Mining of public databases resulted in spectral matches to the novel bile salt conjugates in GI tract/fecal samples of patients with Crohn’s disease and in cystic fibrosis. Bile salts are synthesized in the liver. Before their release in bile, bile salts undergo conjugation (i.e., N‐amidation) with glycine or taurine to form molecules (glycocholic acid [GCA] and taurocholic acid, respectively) that are largely negatively charged at ambient pH in their enterohepatic trajectory.( ) Conjugation increases aqueous solubility of bile salts and limits passive uptake in the proximal small intestine before completion of their digestive function. Among naturally occurring amino acids, glycine and taurine serve as exclusive conjugation partners, likely relating to their overall resistance to cleavage by pancreatic carboxypeptidases.( ) A stable pool of bile salts is maintained in enterohepatic circulation with dedicated membrane transporters in the ileum and liver.( , ) Only a small portion of the bile salts that enter the duodenum after a meal spills over to the caecum and colon where the bulk of microbial bile salt transformation occurs. Reactions include deconjugation, a feature shared by a wide range of bacteria, and several modifications of the steroid nucleus, which are restricted to a number of bacteria including Clostridium species.( ) The study by Quinn et al. is the first demonstration of bile salt conjugation by nonhost enzymes. It is well established that bile salts are potent signaling molecules that interact with dedicated receptors at the plasma membrane (e.g., Takeda G‐protein‐coupled receptor 5 [TGR5]) or inside the cell (e.g., FXR), to control numerous metabolic processes.( ) Microbial metabolism of host bile salts results in diversification of the circulating bile salt pool and impacts on host signaling through bile salt receptors. The observation of bile salt conjugates of microbial origin is intriguing,( ) if only because the gut microbiota are primarily implicated in catabolic breakdown of dietary components rather than in anabolic conversions. The investigators convincingly demonstrate that the novel conjugates are not host‐derived, but formed by gut bacteria. Their abundance (PheCA > TyrCA > LeuCA) was highest in the jejunum and ileum. Possible bacterial producers include specific strains of C. bolteae, which were shown to conjugate free CA with the respective amino acid precursors. Note that >99% of the bile salts in bile are conjugated with glycine or taurine. Although luminal amino acids are abundant in the digestive phase, the source of free CA as substrate for microbial conjugation is unresolved. Free CA could originate from the small fraction of nonconjugated bile salts present in bile, limited deconjugation of GCA by pancreatic carboxypeptidases,( ) or deconjugation by abundantly present microbial bile salt hydrolases.( ) It remains to be determined whether additional amino acids, or different bile salt species, are (co)substrates for bacterial formation of bile salt conjugates. The investigators ruled out occurrence of atypical conjugates of muricholic acids, abundant bile salt species in mice that cannot be discriminated from CA by mass spectrometry only. Microbial deconjugation and further conversion of bile salts is proposed to reduce bactericidal action of bile salts by lowering solubility in fecal water. Why does C. bolteae, a member of a genus that is known to tolerate bile, form these new bile salt conjugates? Addition of the new conjugates to actively growing human fecal cultures had no effect on microbial community structure, suggesting that they do not act as a niche factor to suppress growth of bacteria sensitive to conjugated bile salts. Another possibility is that bacterial conjugation protects certain Clostridia species from growth‐inhibitory effects of free bile salts. Targeted analysis revealed that levels of the new conjugates were >10‐fold lower in colon or feces than in the small intestine. It is likely that bacterial deconjugation of the novel conjugates occurs in view of earlier observations.( ) Furthermore, bacterial conjugates, similar to their host counterparts, could be actively reclaimed in the ileum for return to the liver. All three bacterial conjugates apparently meet substrate preferences (i.e., single negatively charged bile salts) for uptake from the intestinal lumen (by apical sodium‐dependent bile acid transporter( )) and portal circulation (by sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide( )), with enterocyte release into the portal blood being conceivable given the substrate promiscuity of organic solute transporter α/β.( ) Yet, none of the novel conjugates were detected by a sensitive assay in portal blood, liver tissue, or gallbladder bile of experimental animals. This argues against these compounds having an enterohepatic circulation. Possible deconjugation to free CA may occur by intestinal or pancreatic (carboxy)peptidases.( ) Hence, it is currently unclear whether bacterial bile salt conjugates enter ileal cells and beyond in sufficient levels for local activation of intracellular bile salt receptors or have a restricted luminal action. The investigators examined the potential of the novel conjugates to activate FXR in a cell reporter assay and in mice. Although the choice for a kidney‐based cell system with uncertain expression of transporters engaged in uptake of bile salt ligands is less obvious, dose‐dependent activation of FXR was observed for PheCA and TyrCA, with the latter having the highest potency (half‐maximal effective concentration [EC50] = 0.14 µmol/L) that outranked the most potent endogenous bile salt (viz., chenodeoxycholic acid; EC50 = 9.7 µmol/L). Gavage of the microbial bile salt conjugates resulted in induction of FXR target genes in ileum and liver, along with anticipated repression of bile salt synthetic genes. Comparable effects were observed when administering an identical dose of CA. The lack of measurements in portal/systemic blood precludes a conclusion on absorption of the bacterial conjugates in intact form. Given the clinical interest in agonistic FXR activation for treatment of metabolic (nonalcoholic steatohepatitis) or cholestatic (primary biliary cholangitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis) liver diseases,( ) further investigation into the enterohepatic dynamics of these novel bile salt conjugates is warranted. Likewise, their interaction with plasma membrane receptors for generic (un)conjugated bile salts (i.e., TGR5) or particular conjugated bile salt species (e.g., sphingosine‐1‐phosphate receptor 2, muscarinic receptors) should be explored. Analysis of public metabolome data sets revealed spectral matches to the novel conjugates in fecal samples of healthy persons and patient populations. Their presence was more frequent in pediatric patients with cystic fibrosis and pancreatic insufficiency resulting in fat malabsorption. Likewise, increased abundance of each of the three bacterial conjugates was noted in Crohn’s disease, but not in ulcerative colitis, and this was associated with a dysbiotic state. It is conceivable that dysbiosis (e.g., through small intestinal bacterial overgrowth) could result in increased bacterial de‐ and reconjugation of bile salts. Feeding normal or atherosclerosis‐prone mice a high‐fat diet caused elevation of fecal levels of bacterial bile salt conjugates, underlining an apparent dysbiotic link, and providing a rationale for analyses in patients with obesity‐related disorders. It will be worthwhile to explore whether the microbial bile salt conjugates contribute to dysbiosis or are the consequence thereof and may serve as a biomarker. In conclusion, the elaborate study of Quinn et al. brings a new twist to the established modulation of host processes by microbial bile salt metabolites. The current discovery of CA conjugates of microbial origin is only the beginning, raising more questions than are being answered. It will be key to know whether the novel conjugates are actually absorbed in humans, to levels sufficient for eliciting bile salt receptor activation.
  8 in total

Review 1.  The continuing importance of bile acids in liver and intestinal disease.

Authors:  A F Hofmann
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1999 Dec 13-27

2.  Intestinal bile salt transport: structure-activity relationships and other properties.

Authors:  L Lack; I M Weiner
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1966-05

3.  Influence of side-chain charge on hepatic transport of bile acids and bile acid analogues.

Authors:  M S Anwer; E R O'Maille; A F Hofmann; R A DiPietro; E Michelotti
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1985-10

4.  Pancreatic carboxypeptidase hydrolysis of bile acid-amino conjugates: selective resistance of glycine and taurine amidates.

Authors:  S M Huijghebaert; A F Hofmann
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 5.  Consequences of bile salt biotransformations by intestinal bacteria.

Authors:  Jason M Ridlon; Spencer C Harris; Shiva Bhowmik; Dae-Joong Kang; Phillip B Hylemon
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2016

Review 6.  Intestinal transport and metabolism of bile acids.

Authors:  Paul A Dawson; Saul J Karpen
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 5.922

7.  Global chemical effects of the microbiome include new bile-acid conjugations.

Authors:  Robert A Quinn; Alexey V Melnik; Alison Vrbanac; Ting Fu; Kathryn A Patras; Mitchell P Christy; Zsolt Bodai; Pedro Belda-Ferre; Anupriya Tripathi; Lawton K Chung; Michael Downes; Ryan D Welch; Melissa Quinn; Greg Humphrey; Morgan Panitchpakdi; Kelly C Weldon; Alexander Aksenov; Ricardo da Silva; Julian Avila-Pacheco; Clary Clish; Sena Bae; Himel Mallick; Eric A Franzosa; Jason Lloyd-Price; Robert Bussell; Taren Thron; Andrew T Nelson; Mingxun Wang; Eric Leszczynski; Fernando Vargas; Julia M Gauglitz; Michael J Meehan; Emily Gentry; Timothy D Arthur; Alexis C Komor; Orit Poulsen; Brigid S Boland; John T Chang; William J Sandborn; Meerana Lim; Neha Garg; Julie C Lumeng; Ramnik J Xavier; Barbara I Kazmierczak; Ruchi Jain; Marie Egan; Kyung E Rhee; David Ferguson; Manuela Raffatellu; Hera Vlamakis; Gabriel G Haddad; Dionicio Siegel; Curtis Huttenhower; Sarkis K Mazmanian; Ronald M Evans; Victor Nizet; Rob Knight; Pieter C Dorrestein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Bile acid receptors as targets for drug development.

Authors:  Frank G Schaap; Michael Trauner; Peter L M Jansen
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 46.802

  8 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Effect of different bile acids on the intestine through enterohepatic circulation based on FXR.

Authors:  Junwei Xiang; Zhengyan Zhang; Hongyi Xie; Chengcheng Zhang; Yan Bai; Hua Cao; Qishi Che; Jiao Guo; Zhengquan Su
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.