Literature DB >> 32648121

Effect of Age and Morphology on Live Birth Rate After Cleavage Stage Embryo Transfer.

Michael Awadalla1, Nicole Vestal2, Lynda McGinnis3, Ali Ahmady3.   

Abstract

Accurate knowledge of the live birth rate for cleavage stage embryos is essential to determine an appropriate number of embryos to transfer at once. Results from previous studies lack details needed for practical use. This is a mathematical analysis and model building study of day 3 cleavage stage embryo transfers. A total of 996 embryos were transferred in 274 fresh and 83 frozen embryo transfers. Embryo morphology was divided into 4 groups based on number of cells and fragmentation percentage. Each embryo transfer was modeled as an equation equating the sum of the live birth rates of the transferred embryos to the number of live births that resulted. The least squares solution to the system of embryo transfer equations was determined using linear algebra. This analysis was repeated for ages 35 to 42 years old at oocyte retrieval. The best fit live birth rates per embryo in the age group centered on 35 years old were 29%, 13%, 10%, and 9% for embryos in the 8-cell with ≤ 5% fragmentation, 8-cell with > 5% fragmentation, 9-12 cell, and 6-7 cell groups, respectively. Cleavage stage embryos with fewer than 6 cells on day 3 had very low best fit live birth rates close to 0% at age 39 years and were excluded from the primary analysis to prevent overfitting. These live birth rates can be used with a simple embryo transfer model to predict rates of single and multiple gestation prior to a planned cleavage stage embryo transfer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cleavage stage; Embryo transfer; In vitro fertilization; Live birth rate; Predictive model

Year:  2020        PMID: 32648121      PMCID: PMC7782445          DOI: 10.1007/s43032-020-00249-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Sci        ISSN: 1933-7191            Impact factor:   3.060


  13 in total

1.  Characterization of a top quality embryo, a step towards single-embryo transfer.

Authors:  E Van Royen; K Mangelschots; D De Neubourg; M Valkenburg; M Van de Meerssche; G Ryckaert; W Eestermans; J Gerris
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Multiple gestation associated with infertility therapy: an American Society for Reproductive Medicine Practice Committee opinion.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Construction of an evidence-based integrated morphology cleavage embryo score for implantation potential of embryos scored and transferred on day 2 after oocyte retrieval.

Authors:  J Holte; L Berglund; K Milton; C Garello; G Gennarelli; A Revelli; T Bergh
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Utility of the national embryo morphology data collection by the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies (SART): correlation between day-3 morphology grade and live-birth outcome.

Authors:  Michael Vernon; Judy E Stern; G David Ball; David Wininger; Jacob Mayer; Catherine Racowsky
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  National collection of embryo morphology data into Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System: associations among day 3 cell number, fragmentation and blastomere asymmetry, and live birth rate.

Authors:  Catherine Racowsky; Judy E Stern; William E Gibbons; Barry Behr; Kimball O Pomeroy; John D Biggers
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Cumulative live birth rate after two single frozen embryo transfers (eSFET) versus a double frozen embryo transfer (DFET) with cleavage stage embryos: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ma Luisa López Regalado; Ana Clavero; M Carmen Gonzalvo; María Serrano; Luis Martínez; Juan Mozas; Fernando Rodríguez-Serrano; Juan Fontes; Bárbara Romero; Jose A Castilla
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Analysis of the benefits and risks of multiple embryo transfer.

Authors:  A L Speirs; A Lopata; M J Gronow; G N Kellow; W I Johnston
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Beyond the American Society for Reproductive Medicine transfer guidelines: how many cleavage-stage embryos are safe to transfer in women ≥43 years old?

Authors:  Vinay Gunnala; David E Reichman; Laura Meyer; Owen K Davis; Zev Rosenwaks
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Ann Thurin; Jon Hausken; Torbjörn Hillensjö; Barbara Jablonowska; Anja Pinborg; Annika Strandell; Christina Bergh
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  Clinical effectiveness of elective single versus double embryo transfer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials.

Authors:  D J McLernon; K Harrild; C Bergh; M J Davies; D de Neubourg; J C M Dumoulin; J Gerris; J A M Kremer; H Martikainen; B W Mol; R J Norman; A Thurin-Kjellberg; A Tiitinen; A P A van Montfoort; A M van Peperstraten; E Van Royen; S Bhattacharya
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-12-21
View more
  3 in total

1.  Embryo morphology and live birth in the United States.

Authors:  Michael S Awadalla; Jacqueline R Ho; Lynda K McGinnis; Ali Ahmady; Victoria K Cortessis; Richard J Paulson
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2022-02-23

2.  A validated model for predicting live birth after embryo transfer.

Authors:  Michael S Awadalla; Kristin A Bendikson; Jacqueline R Ho; Lynda K McGinnis; Ali Ahmady
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Effect of Age and Embryo Morphology on Live Birth Rate After Transfer of Unbiopsied Blastocysts.

Authors:  Michael Awadalla; Ashley Kim; Nicole Vestal; Jacqueline Ho; Kristin Bendikson
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2021-07-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.