Literature DB >> 32648112

Plan complexity quantification of dual-layer multi-leaf collimator for volumetric modulated arc therapy with Halcyon linac.

Mikoto Tamura1, Kenji Matsumoto2, Masakazu Otsuka1,2, Hajime Monzen3.   

Abstract

This study characterized the plan complexity of the dual-layer multi-leaf collimator (MLC) performance for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in Halcyon. Plan complexity metrics were computed independently for each MLC layer (proximal and distal): modulation complexity score (MCS), plan averaged beam area, irregularity, and modulation (PA, PI, and PM) were obtained. These were investigated when weighted by proportions of the effective proximal MLC and distal MLC (MCSw, PAw, PIw, and PMw). Conventional plan complexity metrics for the effective 5.0 mm resolution MLC (MCS5, PA5, PI5, PM5), small aperture score (SAS), effective distal MLC score (EDS), and MU were also evaluated. Forty-five consecutive VMAT plans were analyzed retrospectively for treatment sites of the prostate, head and neck (HN), and other parts. The mean values of the metrics for proximal MLC and distal MLC were 0.310 and 0.245 (MCS), 71.09 cm2 and 55.92 cm2 (PA), 6.24 and 10.19 (PI), and 0.593 and 0.645 (PM), respectively. The degree of plan complexity in the distal MLC was larger than in the proximal MLC. The percentage of the effective distal MLC was higher than that of the proximal MLC (mean EDS = 0.555). The MCSw, PAw, PIw, and PMw showed significant differences between the prostate and HN groups like the PA5, PI5, and PM5; however, the MCS5 did not. Additionally, the MCS5 correlated with MU and PM5, while the MCSw correlated with SAS and PA5. The plan complexity for each MLC layer and subsequently combining these complexities might be useful to better understand the dual-layer MLC performance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dual-layer MLC; Halcyon; Plan complexity; VMAT

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32648112     DOI: 10.1007/s13246-020-00891-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med        ISSN: 2662-4729


  5 in total

1.  Effect of treatment planning system parameters on beam modulation complexity for treatment plans with single-layer multi-leaf collimator and dual-layer stacked multi-leaf collimator.

Authors:  Paulo Quintero; Yongqiang Cheng; David Benoit; Craig Moore; Andrew Beavis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.629

2.  Feasibility study of volumetric modulated arc therapy with Halcyon™ linac for total body irradiation.

Authors:  Takuya Uehara; Hajime Monzen; Mikoto Tamura; Masahiro Inada; Masakazu Otsuka; Hiroshi Doi; Kenji Matsumoto; Yasumasa Nishimura
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 3.481

3.  Investigation of Halcyon multi-leaf collimator model in Eclipse treatment planning system: A focus on the VMAT dose calculation with the Acuros XB algorithm.

Authors:  Ryohei Miyasaka; SangYong Cho; Takuya Hiraoka; Kohei Chiba; Toru Kawachi; Tetsurou Katayose; Yuhi Suda; Ryusuke Hara
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Application of the Halcyon(2.0) IMRT Technique in Long-Course Radiotherapy for Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Jiajun Zheng; Yuqing Xia; Li Sun
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec

5.  Feasibility of using ring-mounted Halcyon Linac for single-isocenter/two-lesion lung stereotactic body radiation therapy.

Authors:  Damodar Pokhrel; Aaron Webster; Richard Mallory; Justin Visak; Mark E Bernard; Ronald C McGarry; Mahesh Kudrimoti
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 2.243

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.