Nastacia L Goodwin1,2, Simon R O Nilsson1, Sam A Golden3,4,5. 1. Department of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. 2. Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. 3. Department of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. sagolden@uw.edu. 4. Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. sagolden@uw.edu. 5. Center of Excellence in Neurobiology of Addiction, Pain, and Emotion (NAPE), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. sagolden@uw.edu.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Aggression, comorbid with neuropsychiatric disorders, exhibits with diverse clinical presentations and places a significant burden on patients, caregivers, and society. This diversity is observed because aggression is a complex behavior that can be ethologically demarcated as either appetitive (rewarding) or reactive (defensive), each with its own behavioral characteristics, functionality, and neural basis that may transition from adaptive to maladaptive depending on genetic and environmental factors. There has been a recent surge in the development of preclinical animal models for studying appetitive aggression-related behaviors and identifying the neural mechanisms guiding their progression and expression. However, adoption of these procedures is often impeded by the arduous task of manually scoring complex social interactions. Manual observations are generally susceptible to observer drift, long analysis times, and poor inter-rater reliability, and are further incompatible with the sampling frequencies required of modern neuroscience methods. OBJECTIVES: In this review, we discuss recent advances in the preclinical study of appetitive aggression in mice, paired with our perspective on the potential for machine learning techniques in producing automated, robust scoring of aggressive social behavior. We discuss critical considerations for implementing valid computer classifications within behavioral pharmacological studies. KEY RESULTS: Open-source automated classification platforms can match or exceed the performance of human observers while removing the confounds of observer drift, bias, and inter-rater reliability. Furthermore, unsupervised approaches can identify previously uncharacterized aggression-related behavioral repertoires in model species. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Advances in open-source computational approaches hold promise for overcoming current manual annotation caveats while also introducing and generalizing computational neuroethology to the greater behavioral neuroscience community. We propose that currently available open-source approaches are sufficient for overcoming the main limitations preventing wide adoption of machine learning within the context of preclinical aggression behavioral research.
RATIONALE: Aggression, comorbid with neuropsychiatric disorders, exhibits with diverse clinical presentations and places a significant burden on patients, caregivers, and society. This diversity is observed because aggression is a complex behavior that can be ethologically demarcated as either appetitive (rewarding) or reactive (defensive), each with its own behavioral characteristics, functionality, and neural basis that may transition from adaptive to maladaptive depending on genetic and environmental factors. There has been a recent surge in the development of preclinical animal models for studying appetitive aggression-related behaviors and identifying the neural mechanisms guiding their progression and expression. However, adoption of these procedures is often impeded by the arduous task of manually scoring complex social interactions. Manual observations are generally susceptible to observer drift, long analysis times, and poor inter-rater reliability, and are further incompatible with the sampling frequencies required of modern neuroscience methods. OBJECTIVES: In this review, we discuss recent advances in the preclinical study of appetitive aggression in mice, paired with our perspective on the potential for machine learning techniques in producing automated, robust scoring of aggressive social behavior. We discuss critical considerations for implementing valid computer classifications within behavioral pharmacological studies. KEY RESULTS: Open-source automated classification platforms can match or exceed the performance of human observers while removing the confounds of observer drift, bias, and inter-rater reliability. Furthermore, unsupervised approaches can identify previously uncharacterized aggression-related behavioral repertoires in model species. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Advances in open-source computational approaches hold promise for overcoming current manual annotation caveats while also introducing and generalizing computational neuroethology to the greater behavioral neuroscience community. We propose that currently available open-source approaches are sufficient for overcoming the main limitations preventing wide adoption of machine learning within the context of preclinical aggression behavioral research.
Authors: Alexander B Wiltschko; Matthew J Johnson; Giuliano Iurilli; Ralph E Peterson; Jesse M Katon; Stan L Pashkovski; Victoria E Abraira; Ryan P Adams; Sandeep Robert Datta Journal: Neuron Date: 2015-12-16 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: S A Golden; H Aleyasin; R Heins; M Flanigan; M Heshmati; A Takahashi; S J Russo; Y Shaham Journal: Genes Brain Behav Date: 2016-08-18 Impact factor: 3.449
Authors: Jacob M Graving; Daniel Chae; Hemal Naik; Liang Li; Benjamin Koger; Blair R Costelloe; Iain D Couzin Journal: Elife Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: Klaus A Miczek; Naz Akdilek; Vania M M Ferreira; Michael Z Leonard; Lillian R Marinelli; Herbert E Covington Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2022-08-11 Impact factor: 4.415
Authors: Leslie A Ramsey; Fernanda M Holloman; Bruce T Hope; Yavin Shaham; Marco Venniro Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2021-11-09 Impact factor: 12.810
Authors: Carmen Winters; Wim Gorssen; Victoria A Ossorio-Salazar; Simon Nilsson; Sam Golden; Rudi D'Hooge Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-01-31 Impact factor: 4.379