| Literature DB >> 32647783 |
Lucy Barnard-Brak1, David M Richman2, Laci Watkins1.
Abstract
Single-case experimental designs (SCED) evaluate treatment effects for each participant, but it is difficult to aggregate and quantify treatment effects across SCED participants receiving the same type of treatment. We applied Bayesian analytic procedures to SCED data aggregated across participants that have previously only been applied to large-N and group design studies of treatment effect sizes. For the current study, we defined transient elevated treatment data points as (1) above the range of the last five baseline sessions during the first three sessions of treatment (i.e., extinction burst); (2) within or above the range of baseline after the first three treatment sessions (i.e., recurrence burst); or (3) thinning phase data points above the last three prethinning treatment data points (i.e., thinning burst). Results indicated that the treatment effect sizes remained large regardless of controlling for transient elevated treatment data points. Finally, we examined the effects of reinforcer schedule thinning on estimates of treatment effect size. Results indicated a moderate negative impact of schedule thinning on treatment effect size with a 16% decrease in effect size. Recommendations for research and practice are provided, and the utility of using Bayesian analysis in single-case experimental designs is discussed. © Association for Behavior Analysis International 2020.Entities:
Keywords: Estimating effect size; Overlapping treatment data points; Single subject; Single-case experimental designs
Year: 2020 PMID: 32647783 PMCID: PMC7316931 DOI: 10.1007/s40614-020-00258-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Perspect Behav Sci ISSN: 2520-8969