Haijing Deng1,2, Anna Kan1,3, Ning Lyu1,2, Luwen Mu4, Yi Han1, Longzhong Liu1,5, Yanyu Zhang1, Youfa Duan1, Shuangye Liao1, Shaolong Li1, Qiankun Xie1,6, Tianxiao Gao1,7, Yanrong Li1,2, Zhenfeng Zhang8, Ming Zhao1,2. 1. State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China. 2. Division of Minimally Invasive Interventional, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China. 3. Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China. 4. Department of Vascular Interventional Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. 5. Department of Ultrasonics, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China. 6. VIP Region, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China. 7. Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China. 8. Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Combining anti-angiogenic therapy with immune checkpoint blockade with anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) antibodies is a promising treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Tyrosine kinase inhibitors are well-known anti-angiogenic agents and offer potential for combination with anti-PD-1 antibodies. This study investigated the possible underlying immunomodulatory mechanisms of combined therapy. METHODS: HCC tissue samples for RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) were obtained from patients with differential prognoses following anti-PD-1 treatment. Recombinant basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) were used to stimulate T cells following lenvatinib or sorafenib treatment, respectively. T cell function was analyzed by flow cytometry and lactate dehydrogenase assay. In vivo experiments were conducted in murine H22 and Hepa 1-6 competent models of HCC. Local immune infiltration in the tumor microenvironment (TME) was assessed using multicolor flow cytometry. Gene regulation was evaluated by RNA-seq. Microvascular density was measured by immunohistochemistry, and PD-1 ligand (PD-L1) induction was quantified by western blot. RESULTS: The baseline expression of VEGF and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) in patients with progressive disease was significantly higher than in patients achieving stable disease following anti-PD-1 treatment. VEGFA and bFGF significantly upregulated the expression of PD-1, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4, and Tim-3 on T cells, while inhibiting the secretion of interferon gamma (IFNG) and granzyme B and suppressing T cell cytotoxicity. This immunosuppressive effect was reverted by lenvatinib but not sorafenib. Furthermore, dual lenvatinib/anti-PD-1 antibody therapy led to better antitumor effects than either sorafenib or fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor (BGJ398) in H22 murine models of HCC. Combined lenvatinib/anti-PD-1 treatment also led to long-term immune memory formation, while synergistically modulating the TME and enhancing the cytotoxic effect of T cells. Finally, lenvatinib inhibited PD-L1 expression on human umbilical vein endothelial cells, which improved the function of T cells. CONCLUSIONS: Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and FGFR augmented the efficacy of anti-PD-1 antibodies. Combined lenvatinib/anti-PD-1 treatment appears to exert antitumor activity by synergistically modulating effector T cell function in the TME and by mutually regulating tumor vessel normalization.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Combining anti-angiogenic therapy with immune checkpoint blockade with anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) antibodies is a promising treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Tyrosine kinase inhibitors are well-known anti-angiogenic agents and offer potential for combination with anti-PD-1 antibodies. This study investigated the possible underlying immunomodulatory mechanisms of combined therapy. METHODS: HCC tissue samples for RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) were obtained from patients with differential prognoses following anti-PD-1 treatment. Recombinant basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) were used to stimulate T cells following lenvatinib or sorafenib treatment, respectively. T cell function was analyzed by flow cytometry and lactate dehydrogenase assay. In vivo experiments were conducted in murine H22 and Hepa 1-6 competent models of HCC. Local immune infiltration in the tumor microenvironment (TME) was assessed using multicolor flow cytometry. Gene regulation was evaluated by RNA-seq. Microvascular density was measured by immunohistochemistry, and PD-1 ligand (PD-L1) induction was quantified by western blot. RESULTS: The baseline expression of VEGF and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) in patients with progressive disease was significantly higher than in patients achieving stable disease following anti-PD-1 treatment. VEGFA and bFGF significantly upregulated the expression of PD-1, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4, and Tim-3 on T cells, while inhibiting the secretion of interferon gamma (IFNG) and granzyme B and suppressing T cell cytotoxicity. This immunosuppressive effect was reverted by lenvatinib but not sorafenib. Furthermore, dual lenvatinib/anti-PD-1 antibody therapy led to better antitumor effects than either sorafenib or fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor (BGJ398) in H22 murine models of HCC. Combined lenvatinib/anti-PD-1 treatment also led to long-term immune memory formation, while synergistically modulating the TME and enhancing the cytotoxic effect of T cells. Finally, lenvatinib inhibited PD-L1 expression on human umbilical vein endothelial cells, which improved the function of T cells. CONCLUSIONS: Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and FGFR augmented the efficacy of anti-PD-1 antibodies. Combined lenvatinib/anti-PD-1 treatment appears to exert antitumor activity by synergistically modulating effector T cell function in the TME and by mutually regulating tumor vessel normalization.
Authors: Elizabeth Allen; Arnaud Jabouille; Lee B Rivera; Inge Lodewijckx; Rindert Missiaen; Veronica Steri; Kevin Feyen; Jaime Tawney; Douglas Hanahan; Iacovos P Michael; Gabriele Bergers Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2017-04-12 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Ghassan K Abou-Alfa; Tim Meyer; Ann-Lii Cheng; Anthony B El-Khoueiry; Lorenza Rimassa; Baek-Yeol Ryoo; Irfan Cicin; Philippe Merle; YenHsun Chen; Joong-Won Park; Jean-Frederic Blanc; Luigi Bolondi; Heinz-Josef Klümpen; Stephen L Chan; Vittorina Zagonel; Tiziana Pressiani; Min-Hee Ryu; Alan P Venook; Colin Hessel; Anne E Borgman-Hagey; Gisela Schwab; Robin K Kelley Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-07-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Suzanne L Topalian; F Stephen Hodi; Julie R Brahmer; Scott N Gettinger; David C Smith; David F McDermott; John D Powderly; Richard D Carvajal; Jeffrey A Sosman; Michael B Atkins; Philip D Leming; David R Spigel; Scott J Antonia; Leora Horn; Charles G Drake; Drew M Pardoll; Lieping Chen; William H Sharfman; Robert A Anders; Janis M Taube; Tracee L McMiller; Haiying Xu; Alan J Korman; Maria Jure-Kunkel; Shruti Agrawal; Daniel McDonald; Georgia D Kollia; Ashok Gupta; Jon M Wigginton; Mario Sznol Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-06-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Yuhui Huang; Jianping Yuan; Elda Righi; Walid S Kamoun; Marek Ancukiewicz; Jean Nezivar; Michael Santosuosso; John D Martin; Margaret R Martin; Fabrizio Vianello; Pierre Leblanc; Lance L Munn; Peigen Huang; Dan G Duda; Dai Fukumura; Rakesh K Jain; Mark C Poznansky Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-10-08 Impact factor: 11.205