| Literature DB >> 32647175 |
Francisco Marco-Jiménez1, José S Vicente2, Ximo Garcia-Dominguez1, David S Peñaranda1, Gianfranco Diretto3, Víctor García-Carpintero4, Joaquín Cañizares4.
Abstract
The advent of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in mammals involved an extraordinary change in the environment where the beginning of a new organism takes place. Under in vitro conditions, in which ART is currently being performed, it likely fails to mimic optimal in vivo conditions. This suboptimal environment could mediate in the natural developmental trajectory of the embryo, inducing lasting effects until later life stages that may be inherited by subsequent generations (transgenerational effects). Therefore, we evaluated the potential transgenerational effects of embryo exposure to the cryopreservation-transfer procedure in a rabbit model on the offspring phenotype, molecular physiology of the liver (transcriptome and metabolome) and reproductive performance during three generations (F1, F2 and F3). The results showed that, compared to naturally-conceived animals (NC group), progeny generated after embryo exposure to the cryopreservation-transfer procedure (VT group) exhibited lower body growth, which incurred lower adult body weight in the F1 (direct effects), F2 (intergenerational effects) and F3 (transgenerational effects) generations. Furthermore, VT animals showed intergenerational effects on heart weight and transgenerational effects on liver weight. The RNA-seq data of liver tissue revealed 642 differentially expressed transcripts (DETs) in VT animals from the F1 generation. Of those, 133 were inherited from the F2 and 120 from the F3 generation. Accordingly, 151, 190 and 159 differentially accumulated metabolites (DAMs) were detected from the F1, F2 and F3, respectively. Moreover, targeted metabolomics analysis demonstrated that transgenerational effects were mostly presented in the non-polar fraction. Functional analysis of molecular data suggests weakened zinc and fatty acid metabolism across the generations, associated with alterations in a complex molecular network affecting global hepatic metabolism that could be associated with the phenotype of VT animals. However, these VT animals showed proper reproductive performance, which verified a functional health status. In conclusion, our results establish the long-term transgenerational effects following a vitrified embryo transfer procedure. We showed that the VT phenotype could be the result of the manifestation of embryonic developmental plasticity in response to the stressful conditions during ART procedures.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32647175 PMCID: PMC7347584 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-68195-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Experimental design. The experimental progenies were compared in each generation to assess the transgenerational effects of embryo vitrification procedure on body weight across the rabbit development. At adulthood, the seminal and fertility traits were evaluated. After that, animals were euthanised and the organs were weighed. Then, liver samples were collected to perform a molecular (transcriptomic and metabolomic) study.
Efficiency in the establishment of the naturally conceived and vitrified-transferred progenies across three generations (F1, F2, F3).
| Experimental groups | F1 generation | F2 generation | F3 generation | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Founding parities | Litter size | Live births | Adult males | F1 parities | Litter size | Live births | Adult males | F2 parities | Litter size | Live births | Adult males | |
| Naturally conceived | 14 | 5.5 ± 0.62 | 77 | 35 | 10 | 6.1 ± 0.76 | 61 | 13 | 10 | 6.1 ± 0.89 | 61 | 24 |
| Vitrified-transferred | 13 | 5.3 ± 0.64 | 69 | 30 | 10 | 5.6 ± 0.76 | 56 | 9 | 10 | 6.4 ± 0.89 | 64 | 24 |
In F1 generation, naturally-conceived animals were generated from 14 pregnant females following natural conception, without embryo manipulation. Instead, vitrified-transferred animals were generated from vitrified-warmed embryos transferred in 13 foster mothers. F2 and F3 generations were produced selecting randomly one mature female and male from each parity of the previous generation. To reduce the inbreeding, mating between animals with common grandparents was avoided. Thereby, 10 F1 and 10 F2 parities generated F2 and F3 population, respectively.
Figure 2Differences in phenotypic traits between naturally-conceived (NC) and vitrified-transferred (VT) progenies during three generations (F1, F2, F3). Asterisks denote relevant differences between VT animals and their NC counterparts (Bayesian inference: |DNC-VT|> R and P0 > 0.8; Supplementary Table S2).
Ejaculates/sperm parameters and motility assessment of males from the vitrified-transferred progeny (VT) compared to those naturally conceived (NC).
| Generation | F1 | F2 | F3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental group | NC | VT | NC | VT | NC | VT |
| VOL (mL) | 0.69 ± 0.050 | 0.89 ± 0.033* | 0.60 ± 0.033 | 0.80 ± 0.036* | 0.51 ± 0.0211 | 0.44 ± 0.0202 |
| CON (106) | 238.5 ± 15.69 | 201.7 ± 10.40 | 181.5 ± 8.45 | 172.5 ± 9.11 | 305.6 ± 17.56 | 307.5 ± 16.79 |
| TSE (106 spz) | 156.8 ± 15.70 | 179.1 ± 10.40 | 92.1 ± 6.92 | 137.0 ± 7.31* | 145.8 ± 8.15 | 126.5 ± 7.57 |
| MOT (%) | 71.9 ± 1.93 | 76.9 ± 1.28 | 90.0 ± 0.67 | 88.5 ± 0.65 | 52.1 ± 2.61 | 53.7 ± 2.46 |
| PRO (%) | 40.5 ± 1.73 | 43.0 ± 1.16 | 55.9 ± 1.30 | 59.8 ± 1.42 | 27.5 ± 1.74 | 29.5 ± 1.64 |
| VIA (%) | 74.5 ± 1.13 | 74.1 ± 0.77 | 82.6 ± 0.69 | 83.0 ± 0.75 | 73.1 ± 1.22 | 73.2 ± 1.15 |
| NAR (%) | 90.3 ± 0.83 | 90.3 ± 0.55 | 88.4 ± 0.55 | 88.2 ± 0.61 | 92.9 ± 0.56 | 92.3 ± 0.53 |
| ABN (%) | 19.6 ± 0.98 | 20.7 ± 0.64 | 18.4 ± 0.60 | 14.9 ± 0.66* | 22.8 ± 0.97 | 23.1 ± 0.92 |
| VCL (μm s−1) | 86.6 ± 2.34 | 99.8 ± 1.55* | 99.8 ± 1.44 | 96.2 ± 1.53 | 104.5 ± 2.17 | 96.4 ± 2.05* |
| VSL (μm s−1) | 34.0 ± 1.47 | 40.4 ± 0.98* | 55.9 ± 1.18 | 55.0 ± 1.28 | 38.8 ± 1.22 | 38.3 ± 1.15 |
| VAP (μm s−1) | 50.0 ± 1.87 | 59.9 ± 1.23* | 74.1 ± 1.31 | 72.9 ± 1.42 | 58.3 ± 1.25 | 55.8 ± 1.40 |
| LIN (%) | 40.3 ± 2.15 | 42.0 ± 1.42 | 58.7 ± 0.94 | 57.0 ± 0.98 | 37.9 ± 1.03 | 39.9 ± 0.97 |
| STR (%) | 68.9 ± 1.07 | 67.2 ± 0.71 | 77.1 ± 0.44 | 75.4 ± 0.46 | 66.1 ± 0.94 | 67.6 ± 0.88 |
| WOB (%) | 57.2 ± 1.32 | 59.3 ± 0.87 | 74.9 ± 0.99 | 76.0 ± 1.05 | 56.3 ± 0.95 | 58.1 ± 0.89 |
| ALH (μm) | 2.7 ± 0.55 | 2.8 ± 0.37 | 2.7 ± 0.42 | 2.7 ± 0.44 | 3.2 ± 0.06 | 3.0 ± 0.06 |
| BCF (Hz) | 10.8 ± 0.18 | 11.2 ± 0.12 | 9.9 ± 0.20 | 9.8 ± 0.22 | 12.2 ± 0.20 | 11.8 ± 0.19 |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard error of means.
n number of ejaculates, VOL ejaculate volume, CON spermatic concentration, TSE total sperm per ejaculate, spz spermatozoa, MOT percentage of sperm motility, PRO percentage of progressive motility, VIA percentage of viable sperm, NAR percentage of normal apical ridge, ABN percentage of abnormal forms, VCL curvilinear velocity, VSL straight-line velocity, VAP average path velocity, LIN linearity coefficient (VSL/VCL × 100), STR straightness coefficient, WOB wobble coefficient (VSL/VAP × 100), ALH amplitude of lateral head displacement, BCF beat cross-frequency.
*Asterisks denote relevant differences between VT traits and their NC counterparts (Bayesian inference: |DNC-VT|> R and P0 > 0.8; Supplementary Table S3).
Figure 3Molecular analysis of the liver samples collected from adult males derived from vitrified-transferred embryos (VT) and naturally-conceived (NC), which was compared in each generation (F1, F2, F3). (A) Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of the transcriptome, semi-polar metabolome and non-polar metabolome. The representation of sample variability between the experimental groups was performed taking into account only the differentially expressed transcripts or differentially accumulated metabolites. (B) Venn diagram summarising differentially expressed transcripts and targeted metabolites between NC and VT progenies in F1, F2, F3, and those commonly present between generations.
Figure 4Scatterplots showing the phenotypic raw data distributions of naturally-conceived (NC) and vitrified-transferred (VT) progenies during three generations (F1, F2, F3).