Literature DB >> 32647047

How to fairly incentivise digital contact tracing.

Michele Loi1.   

Abstract

Digital apps using Bluetooth to log proximity events (henceforth, digital contact tracing) are increasingly supported by technologists and governments. By and large, the public debate on this matter focuses on privacy, with experts from both law and technology offering very concrete proposals and participating to a lively debate. Far less attention is paid to effective incentives and their fairness. This paper aims to fill this gap by offering a practical, workable solution for a promising incentive, justified by the ethical principles of non-maleficence, beneficence, autonomy and justice. This incentive is a free phone optimised for running such app. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  distributive justice; epidemiology; public health ethics; public policy; technology/risk assessment

Year:  2020        PMID: 32647047     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  9 in total

1.  The value of social interactions and incentives on the use of a digital contact tracing tool post COVID-19 lockdown in Singapore.

Authors:  Zhilian Huang; Huiling Guo; Hannah Yee-Fen Lim; Kia Nam Ho; Evonne Tay; Angela Chow
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 2.  Considerations for the Design and Implementation of COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Esli Osmanlliu; Edmond Rafie; Sylvain Bédard; Jesseca Paquette; Genevieve Gore; Marie-Pascale Pomey
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.773

3.  Ethics in the COVID-19 pandemic: myths, false dilemmas, and moral overload.

Authors:  Georgy Ishmaev; Matthew Dennis; M Jeroen van den Hoven
Journal:  Ethics Inf Technol       Date:  2021-03-12

4.  Privacy versus Public Health? A Reassessment of Centralised and Decentralised Digital Contact Tracing.

Authors:  Lucie White; Philippe van Basshuysen
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  [On the ethics of corona apps].

Authors:  Philippe van Basshuysen; Lucie White
Journal:  Ethik Med       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 0.729

6.  Early Perceptions of COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps in German-Speaking Countries: Comparative Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Stuart McLennan; Alena Buyx; Bettina Maria Zimmermann; Amelia Fiske; Barbara Prainsack; Nora Hangel
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Without a trace: Why did corona apps fail?

Authors:  Lucie White; Philippe van Basshuysen
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Determinants of the acceptance and adoption of a digital contact tracing tool during the COVID-19 pandemic in Singapore.

Authors:  Zhilian Huang; Huiling Guo; Hannah Yee-Fen Lim; Angela Chow
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.451

9.  Contact Tracing Apps: Lessons Learned on Privacy, Autonomy, and the Need for Detailed and Thoughtful Implementation.

Authors:  Katie Hogan; Briana Macedo; Venkata Macha; Arko Barman; Xiaoqian Jiang
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2021-07-19
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.