Literature DB >> 32646770

Clinical characteristics and predictors of survival in adults with coronavirus disease 2019 receiving tocilizumab.

Austin R Morrison1, Joseph M Johnson1, Kristin M Griebe1, Mathew C Jones1, John J Stine1, Laura N Hencken1, Long To1, Monica L Bianchini2, Amit T Vahia3, Jennifer Swiderek4, Mayur S Ramesh3, Michael A Peters1, Zachary R Smith5.   

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can progress to cytokine storm that is associated with organ dysfunction and death. The purpose of the present study is to determine clinical characteristics associated with 28 day in-hospital survival in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) that received tocilizumab. This was a retrospective observational cohort study conducted at a five hospital health system in Michigan, United States. Adult patients with confirmed COVID-19 that were admitted to the hospital and received tocilizumab for cytokine storm from March 1, 2020 through April 3, 2020 were included. Patients were grouped into survivors and non-survivors based on 28 day in-hospital mortality. Study day 0 was defined as the day tocilizumab was administered. Factors independently associated with in-hospital survival at 28 days after tocilizumab administration were assessed. Epidemiologic, demographic, laboratory, prognostic scores, treatment, and outcome data were collected and analyzed. Clinical response was collected and defined as a decline of two levels on a six-point ordinal scale of clinical status or discharged alive from the hospital. Of the 81 patients included, the median age was 64 (58-71) years and 56 (69.1%) were male. The 28 day in-hospital mortality was 43.2%. There were 46 (56.8%) patients in the survivors and 35 (43.2%) in the non-survivors group. On study day 0 no differences were noted in demographics, clinical characteristics, severity of illness scores, or treatments received between survivors and non-survivors. C-reactive protein was significantly higher in the non-survivors compared to survivors. Compared to non-survivors, recipients of tocilizumab within 12 days of symptom onset was independently associated with survival (adjusted OR: 0.296, 95% CI: 0.098-0.889). SOFA score ≥8 on day 0 was independently associated with mortality (adjusted OR: 2.842, 95% CI: 1.042-7.753). Clinical response occurred more commonly in survivors than non-survivors (80.4% vs. 5.7%; p < 0.001). Improvements in the six-point ordinal scale and SOFA score were observed in survivors after tocilizumab. Early receipt of tocilizumab in patients with severe COVID-19 was an independent predictor for in-hospital survival at 28 days.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Critical illness; Cytokine release syndrome; Interleukin-6; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; Tocilizumab

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32646770      PMCID: PMC7332925          DOI: 10.1016/j.jaut.2020.102512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Autoimmun        ISSN: 0896-8411            Impact factor:   7.094


Introduction

As of June 3, 2020 over 1.8 million cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been identified in the United States with over 105,000 deaths reported [1]. The severity of COVID-19 ranges from asymptomatic to severe disease [[2], [3], [4]]. Severe disease often requires admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) [[4], [5], [6]]. Mortality rates of critically ill patients with COVID-19 range from 16 to 78% [7]. Pharmacologic treatment options have been proposed for COVID-19, including antivirals and immunomodulators [8]. Antivirals have not demonstrated reductions in mortality to date [[9], [10], [11], [12]]. Immunomodulators remain a possible therapeutic option based on the pathophysiologic understanding of COVID-19 [[13], [14], [15]]. COVID-19 can progress in two overlapping phases described as an initial viral response followed by a host inflammatory response [16]. The host response includes an unregulated pro-inflammatory cytokine storm resulting in lung injury, development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and death [16,17]. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is theorized to play a significant role in the COVID-19 related cytokine storm [[13], [14], [15], [16]]. Tocilizumab, an IL-6 receptor antagonist, has garnered interest as a possible treatment option [8,14,18]. The use of IL-6 receptor antagonists is recommended in the setting of clinical trials [19,20]. Risks of immunomodulator use include propagation of COVID-19 progression by interfering with innate antiviral immunity, development of secondary infections, and adverse drug effects [[21], [22], [23], [24]]. Given the high mortality rates observed in severe COVID-19, clinicians have used off-label tocilizumab and other immunomodulatory agents in practice in select cases [[25], [26], [27], [28], [29]]. Literature to date on tocilizumab in COVID-19 has described outcomes at 14 days, predominately in those with less severe disease, and with limited descriptions of adverse effects. The factors associated with a beneficial response from tocilizumab are unknown. We report the clinical characteristics associated with in-hospital survival at 28 days in patients with COVID-19 receiving off-label tocilizumab.

Materials and methods

Study design and participants

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to a five-hospital health system in southeast and south-central Michigan. The study was approved by Henry Ford Health System's Institutional Review Board (IRB #13809) with waiver of consent. Patients hospitalized from March 1, 2020 through April 3, 2020 were eligible for inclusion if they were 18 years of age or older, had confirmed COVID-19 infection, and received tocilizumab. Patients were excluded if they were transferred from an out-of-system hospital, had a positive microbiologic culture 24 h prior to or 48 h after tocilizumab administration that was treated with an antimicrobial, were pregnant, or incarcerated. A confirmed case of COVID-19 was defined as a patient with positive reverse-transcriptase–polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) assay for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) in a nasopharyngeal sample tested by the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services or the health system's centralized clinical microbiology laboratory. Patients were risk stratified by symptoms prior to tocilizumab administration as mild, moderate, or severe COVID-19. Patients without hypoxia or exertional dyspnea were considered to have mild COVID-19. Patients who presented with infiltrates on chest radiography and required supplemental oxygen by nasal cannula or high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) were classified as having moderate COVID-19. Patients who had respiratory failure requiring invasive mechanical ventilation were classified as having severe COVID-19 [30]. All patients were followed for up to 28 days from the first dose of tocilizumab. Patient data was censored on April 30, 2020.

Study procedures

Hospitalized patients with COVID-19 received supportive care comprised of supplemental oxygen, HFNC, invasive mechanical ventilation, antibiotics, vasopressors, and renal-replacement therapy, as determined by the primary team. Patients who progressed to ARDS were managed with lung protective ventilation strategies [19]. An institutional treatment COVID-19 guideline was developed that included lopinavir-ritonavir with ribavirin or hydroxychloroquine monotherapy based on disease severity. Intravenous (IV) remdesivir was available for compassionate use or within a clinical trial. The institutional guidelines were developed by consensus, and based on the available literature, experience from Wuhan, China and other centers around the world affected by COVID-19 before Michigan. On March 17, 2020 lopinavir-ritonavir with ribavirin was removed [9]. A short course of corticosteroids was added to the institutional guideline for patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 on March 20, 2020 [19,30]. Tocilizumab was used on a case-by-case basis for patients exhibiting symptoms of cytokine storm, as described below, when assessed by the primary and infectious disease physician. Patients were eligible for tocilizumab if exhibiting persistent fevers (38.0 °C for greater than 6 h), had a partial pressure of oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio less than 200, and exhibited persistently rising inflammatory laboratory parameters (ferritin, D-dimer, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)) or an elevated inflammatory laboratory parameter defined as a ferritin ≥1000 μg/L, D-dimer ≥ 5 mg/mL, or LDH ≥ 500 U/L. An IL-6 level ≥ five times the upper limits of normal (≤5 pg/ml) was assessed in addition to the above parameters. Bacterial, fungal, and alternate viral infections were to be ruled out prior to tocilizumab administration. Tocilizumab was administered as an 8 mg/kg IV dose using actual body weight with a maximum dose of 800 mg. Doses were rounded to 400 mg, 600 mg, or 800 mg. Patients were eligible for a second dose if persistently febrile despite treatment. Due to medication shortages the tocilizumab dose was changed to a fixed 400 mg IV dose for all patients on March 30, 2020.

Data collection

Data was ascertained from the health system's electronic medical record and recorded in a standardized electronic case report form. Demographic data, information on clinical symptoms at presentation, vital signs, laboratory tests, chest radiograph results, COVID-19 treatments received prior to tocilizumab, length of stay, and discharge disposition were collected. Baseline data was defined as information collected within 24 h from emergency department presentation. Study day 0 was defined as the first day tocilizumab was administered. The comorbidity, age, lymphocyte, and LDH (CALL) score was calculated at baseline [31]. The score ranges from 4 to 13, with increased values predicting higher likelihood of progressing to severe COVID-19. The sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score and a six-point ordinal scale of clinical status (as recommended by the World Health Organization R&D Blueprint Group) were collected at baseline and after tocilizumab administration [10,32]. The six-category scale consists of the following categories: 1, not hospitalized; 2, hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen; 3, hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 4, hospitalized, requiring HFNC, non-invasive mechanical ventilation, or both; 5, hospitalized, requiring invasive mechanical ventilation, ECMO, or both; and 6, death. The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) consensus grading for cytokine release syndrome (CRS) used for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy was collected prior to tocilizumab [33]. The ASTCT grading ranges from 1 to 5 and has three features including temperature, blood pressure, and oxygenation support to denote CRS grade. ARDS was diagnosed and classified according to the Berlin Definition [34]. Adverse effects observed in practice and those known to be associated with chronic tocilizumab use were collected. Infection after tocilizumab was defined as a positive microbiologic assay that prompted antimicrobials for the identified pathogen.

Outcome measures

Characteristics of non-survivors, defined as in-hospital death within 28 days of tocilizumab administration, were compared to survivors. Comparisons included assessment of demographics, time from symptom onset to tocilizumab administration ≤12 days, laboratory parameters, alternative treatments received, and prognostic scores collected [9]. Other endpoints evaluated included clinical response to tocilizumab, defined as a decline of two levels on the six-category scale or discharged alive from the hospital [10]. A comparison of laboratory parameters, SOFA score, six-category scale, and severity of ARDS in survivors and non-survivors from days 0–15 was completed. The six-category scale was also assessed at study day 28.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were reported as median and interquartile range (IQR) and compared using the Mann-Whitney U test or student t-test, as appropriate. Categorical data was reported as number and percentage (no., %) and compared using the chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. No imputations were made for missing data points. The sample size was derived from all eligible consecutive hospitalized patients during the study period. A two-sided α < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were planned a-priori to identify independent predictors associated with 28 day in-hospital survival. Covariates in the bivariate analysis with a p-value <0.2 and clinical rationale were included in a multivariate regression model that was restricted to a subject-to-variable ratio of 10:1. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS version 25 (Chicago, IL) and SAS 9.4 (Cary, NC).

Results

A total of 92 patients with an order for tocilizumab were identified. Eleven were excluded, leaving 81 available for analysis in the study (Supplemental Fig. 1). The median age was 64 (58–71) years and 69.1% were male. The median time from COVID-19 symptom onset to hospital admission was 5 (3–7) days. The 28 day in-hospital mortality was 43.2%, leaving 46 patients in the survivors and 35 in the non-survivors group. On study day 0 patients were classified as having mild, moderate, or severe COVID-19 in 1 (1.2%), 10 (12.3%), and 70 (86.4%) of cases, respectively. The median SOFA score was 9 (6–11) on day 0, and the median increase in the SOFA score from baseline was 5 (2–8). The C-reactive protein was higher in non-survivors (13.8 [9.5–21.5] vs. 19 [14.4–32.7] mg/dL; p = 0.01). There were no differences observed in the prevalence of comorbidities, rate of obesity, median SOFA score on day 0, or median change in SOFA score from baseline to day 0 between survivors and non-survivors. No other differences were noted between the survivors and non-survivors at baseline or on day 0 (Table 1 and Supplemental Table 1). The median days from symptom onset to tocilizumab administration was 10 (8–13) days. There was a difference in time from symptom onset to tocilizumab administration between survivors and non-survivors (9 [7-11] vs. 11 [9-15]; p = 0.038). There were no differences noted in the COVID-19 treatment characteristics or prognostic scores of survivors and non-survivors (Table 1).
Table 1

Clinical characteristics and treatment prior to tocilizumab on day zero.

CharacteristicsTotal (n = 81)Survivor (n = 46)Non-Survivor (n = 35)p-value
Demographics
Median age (IQR) - yr64 (58–71)64 (59–70)67 (51–72)0.702
Male sex – no. (%)56 (69.1)29 (63.0)27 (77.1)0.174
Race – no. (%)0.616
 African American52 (64.2)29 (63.0)23 (65.7)
 Caucasian24 (29.6)13 (28.3)11 (31.4)
 Other5 (6.2)4 (8.7)1 (2.9)
Median weight (IQR) - kg102.1 (88.5–117.9)101.4 (89.1–117.9)104.3 (87- 119.8)0.853
Median body mass index (IQR) - kg/m233.2 (28.8–39.1)34.2 (29.2–39.3)31.4 (28.3–38.9)0.341



Comorbidities – no. (%)
Asthma11 (13.6)6 (13.0)5 (14.3)1.00
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease4 (4.9)4 (8.7)1 (2.9)0.383
Congestive heart failure8 (9.9)3 (6.5)5 (14.3)0.281
Coronary artery disease15 (18.5)9 (19.6)6 (17.1)0.781
Diabetes37 (45.7)23 (50.0)14 (40.0)0.371
End stage renal disease1 (1.2)1 (2.2)0 (0)1.00
Hypertension60 (74.1)35 (76.1)25 (71.4)0.636



Clinical characteristics
Inpatient disposition – no. (%)0.693
 General medical ward7 (8.6)5 (10.9)2 (5.7)
 Intensive care unit74 (91.4)41 (89.1)33 (94.3)
COVID-19 classification – no. (%)0.602
 Mild1 (1.2)1 (2.2)0 (0)
 Moderate10 (12.3)7 (15.2)3 (8.6)
 Severe70 (86.4)38 (82.6)32 (91.4)



Treatment prior to tocilizumab – no. (%)
Empiric antibiotics58 (71.6)35 (76.1)23 (65.7)0.305
Corticosteroids57 (70.4)31 (67.4)26 (74.3)0.501
Hydroxychloroquine74 (91.4)42 (91.3)32 (91.4)1.00
Lopinavir/ritonavir with ribavirin4 (4.9)2 (4.4)2 (5.7)1.00
Remdesivir2 (2.5)0 (0)2 (5.7)0.184
Prone mechanical ventilation22 (27.2)10 (21.7)12 (34.3)0.209
Neuromuscular blockade14 (17.3)6 (13.0)8 (22.9)0.247
Renal replacement therapy1 (1.2)1 (2.2)0 (0)1.00
Propofol sedation50 (61.7)27 (58.7)23 (65.7)0.520



Tocilizumab characteristics
Median days of symptoms to tocilizumab (IQR)10 (8–13)9 (7–11)11 (9–15)0.038
 ≤12 days – no. (%)60 (74.1)38 (82.6)22 (62.9)0.0445
Number of doses – no. (%)0.140
 One62 (76.5)38 (82.6)24 (68.6)
 Two19 (23.5)8 (17.4)11 (31.4)
First tocilizumab dose (mg)
 Median mg/kg dose (IQR)6.8 (5–7.8)7.4 (5.5–8.0)6.1 (4.6–7.6)0.074
 Median dose (IQR)800 (400–800)800 (600–800)800 (400–800)0.212
Second tocilizumab dose (mg)
 Median mg/kg dose (IQR)6.4 (4.4–7.8)7.6 (5.4–8.1)5.5 (4.4–6.9)0.104
 Median dose (IQR)600 (400–800)700 (500–800)400 (400–800)0.465
Median cumulative mg/kg dose (IQR)7.6 (5.9, 8.8)7.6 (6.2, 8.8)7.6 (5.1, 9.1)0.791
Median cumulative dose (IQR)800 (600–800)800 (600–800)800 (600–800)0.786



Laboratory results, median (IQR)
Interleukin-6 (pg/mL)22 (7.0–62)(n = 38)12 (5–32)(n = 22)47.5 (15.5–82)(n = 16)0.126
C-reactive protein (mg/dL)16.8 (11.2–27.2)(n = 67)13.8 (9.5–21.5)(n = 37)19.0 (14.4–32.7)(n = 30)0.010
Ferritin, serum (ng/mL)1470 (885–2543)(n = 71)1066 (668–2041)(n = 37)1923 (1332–3000)(n = 34)0.141
Lactate dehydrogenase, serum (units/L)462 (363.5–647.8)(n = 70)431 (359–534)(n = 37)485 (378–756)(n = 33)0.301
D-dimer (mg/mL)3.1 (1.9–10.9)(n = 58)2.9 (1.8–9.2)(n = 34)5.1 (2.3–20)(n = 24)0.211



Clinical scores
Median SOFA (IQR)9 (6–11)8 (5–10)9 (7–11)0.065
Median change in SOFA from baseline (IQR)5 (2–8)4 (1–8)5 (3–8)0.364
 Six-category scale – no. (%)0.755
 2–Hospital admission, no supplemental oxygen1 (1.2)1 (2.2)0 (0)
 3–Hospital admission, supplemental oxygen3 (3.7)2 (4.4)1 (2.9)
 4–Hospital admission, requiring high-flow nasal cannula or non-invasive mechanical ventilation7 (8.6)5 (10.9)2 (5.7)
 5–Hospital admission, requiring invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorpeal membrane oxygenation70 (86.4)38 (82.6)32 (91.4)
 6–Death0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
Acute respiratory distress syndrome – no. (%)67 (82.7)35 (76.1)32 (91.4)0.083
Acute respiratory distress syndrome severity – no. (%)0.062
 Mild9 (13.4)8 (22.9)1 (3.3)
 Moderate33 (49.3)15 (42.9)18 (56.3)
 Severe25 (37.3)12 (34.3)13 (40.6)
ASTCT cytokine release syndrome grading – no. (%)0.592
 Criteria not met12 (14.8)8 (17.4)4 (11.4)
 Grade 11 (1.2)1 (2.2)0 (0)
 Grade 22 (2.5)2 (4.4)0 (0)
 Grade 36 (7.4)4 (8.7)2 (5.7)
 Grade 460 (74.1)31 (67.4)29 (82.9)

*IQR denotes interquartile range, COVID-19 denotes coronavirus disease 2019, SOFA denotes sequential organ failure assessment, ASTCT denotes American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy.

Clinical characteristics and treatment prior to tocilizumab on day zero. *IQR denotes interquartile range, COVID-19 denotes coronavirus disease 2019, SOFA denotes sequential organ failure assessment, ASTCT denotes American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. The single independent predictor of 28 day in-hospital survival was receipt of tocilizumab within 12 days of symptom onset (adjusted OR: 0.296, 95% CI: 0.098–0.889). A SOFA score ≥8 was independently associated with 28 day in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR: 2.842, 95% CI: 1.042–7.753) (Table 2 ). Patients in the survivor group were more likely to have a clinical response to tocilizumab by day 28 (80.4% vs 5.7%; p = < 0.001). The hospital length of stay was longer in the survivors compared to non-survivors (27.5 [14-31] vs 14 [9-20]; p < 0.001). Fourteen (17.3%) patients remained hospitalized at the end of the study (Table 3 ). Numerical reductions in ferritin and CRP were observed in survivors and non-survivors after tocilizumab administration to study day 15. Lactate dehydrogenase declined in survivors from day 0–15. Significant differences were observed in CRP, LDH, D-Dimer, and ferritin levels when comparing survivors and non-survivors on select study days as depicted in Fig. 1 . Improvements were observed in the six-category scale, SOFA score, and ARDS severity when comparing the survivors to non-survivors from study day 0–15 (Fig. 2 ).
Table 2

Multivariate analysis of independent risk factors for in-hospital 28 day mortality.

VariableAdjusted Odds Ratio95% Confidence intervalp-value
Tocilizumab within ≤12 days of symptom onset0.2960.098–0.8890.030
Male sex2.3630.809–6.9030.116
SOFA score ≥82.8421.042–7.7530.041

The following variables were assessed for goodness of fit within the multivariate analysis and did not fit the model: age >60, presence of acute respiratory distress syndrome, use of prone mechanical ventilation, body mass index greater than 30, CALL score ≥7, African American, presence of infection.

*SOFA denotes sequential organ failure assessment.

Table 3

Clinical outcomes at the end of the study day 28.

Clinical endpointsTotal (n = 81)Survivor (n = 46)Non-Survivor (n = 35)p-value
Outcomes
Clinical improvement per six-category scale with tocilizumab – no. (%)39 (48.1)37 (80.4)2 (5.7)<0.001
Six-category scale by day 28 – no. (%)<0.001
1–Discharge (alive)32 (39.5)32 (65.6)0 (0)
2–Hospital admission, no supplemental oxygen2 (2.5)2 (4.4)0 (0)
3–Hospital admission, supplemental oxygen4 (4.9)4 (8.7)0 (0)
4–Hospital admission, requiring high-flow nasal cannula or non-invasive mechanical ventilation0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
5–Hospital admission, requiring invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorpeal membrane oxygenation8 (9.9)8 (17.4)0 (0)
6–Death35 (43.2)0 (0)35 (100)
Hospitalization and disposition characteristics
Mechanical ventilation at any time – no. (%)77 (95.1)43 (93.5)34 (97.1)0.630
Median days of mechanical ventilation (IQR)10 (6–16)10 (5–23)9 (7–15)0.157
Median days of intensive care unit (IQR)12 (7–20)12 (6–27)11 (8–18)0.181
Median days of hospitalization (IQR)18 (13–29)27.5 (14–31)14 (9–20)<0.001
Hospital discharge disposition – no. (%)
Still hospitalized14 (17.3)14 (30.4)0 (0)
Home18 (22.2)18 (39.1)0 (0)
Long term care facility14 (17.3)14 (30.4)0 (0)

*IQR denotes interquartile range.

Fig. 1

Temporal changes in laboratory parameters after tocilizumab administration. Fig. 1 shows temporal changes in C-reactive protein, serum ferritin, lactate dehydrogenase, and D-Dimer. The n values in parenthesis represents the evaluable population in the data, if not representative of the entire cohort. Median values are shown by the circles graphed on the line, interquartile range is denoted by the error bars above and below the circles. ap < 0.05 for non-survivors vs survivors on study day. CRP=C-reactive protein, LDH = lactate dehydrogenase.

Fig. 2

Temporal changes in clinical scores after tocilizumab administration. Fig. 2 shows temporal changes in six-category score, SOFA score, ARDS severity. Median values are shown by the circles graphed on the line, interquartile range is denoted by the error bars above and below the circles. The n values in parenthesis represents the evaluable population in the data, if not representative of the entire cohort. For ARDS: 4 = severe, 3 = moderate, 2 = mild, 1 = invasive mechanical ventilation without ARDS, 0 = not receiving invasive mechanical ventilation. ap < 0.05 for non-survivors vs survivors. SOFA = sequential organ failure assessment, ARDS = acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Multivariate analysis of independent risk factors for in-hospital 28 day mortality. The following variables were assessed for goodness of fit within the multivariate analysis and did not fit the model: age >60, presence of acute respiratory distress syndrome, use of prone mechanical ventilation, body mass index greater than 30, CALL score ≥7, African American, presence of infection. *SOFA denotes sequential organ failure assessment. Clinical outcomes at the end of the study day 28. *IQR denotes interquartile range. Temporal changes in laboratory parameters after tocilizumab administration. Fig. 1 shows temporal changes in C-reactive protein, serum ferritin, lactate dehydrogenase, and D-Dimer. The n values in parenthesis represents the evaluable population in the data, if not representative of the entire cohort. Median values are shown by the circles graphed on the line, interquartile range is denoted by the error bars above and below the circles. ap < 0.05 for non-survivors vs survivors on study day. CRP=C-reactive protein, LDH = lactate dehydrogenase. Temporal changes in clinical scores after tocilizumab administration. Fig. 2 shows temporal changes in six-category score, SOFA score, ARDS severity. Median values are shown by the circles graphed on the line, interquartile range is denoted by the error bars above and below the circles. The n values in parenthesis represents the evaluable population in the data, if not representative of the entire cohort. For ARDS: 4 = severe, 3 = moderate, 2 = mild, 1 = invasive mechanical ventilation without ARDS, 0 = not receiving invasive mechanical ventilation. ap < 0.05 for non-survivors vs survivors. SOFA = sequential organ failure assessment, ARDS = acute respiratory distress syndrome. Twenty-nine (35.8%) patients experienced hypertriglyceridemia with levels greater than 500 mg/dL. Of the patients that developed hypertriglyceridemia, eight did not receive propofol. All patients with elevated amylase and lipase levels received concurrent propofol. A total of 18 (22.2%) patients developed an infection. The median time to development of infection from tocilizumab was 9 (6–13) days. No difference was observed in the median time to development of infection between survivors and non-survivors. There was a total of seventeen (21.0%) bacterial infections and three (3.7%) fungal infections. No differences were noted in the occurrence of adverse effects between survivors and non-survivors (Supplemental Table 2).

Discussion

In this retrospective cohort study, the clinical characteristics, factors independently associated with survival, and 28 day outcomes in patients with COVID-19 after tocilizumab administration were described. Receipt of tocilizumab within 12 days of symptom onset in patients with COVID-19 was the only factor independently associated with in-hospital survival at 28 days. A clinical response was more likely to occur in those that survived. The association with improved survival remained intact when adjusting for SOFA score and male sex. COVID-19 progression has been characterized by a biphasic response with the latter phase consisting of an excessive hyper-inflammatory response [16]. Early intervention to mitigate the cytokine storm with an immunomodulator may optimize patient outcomes. This study further supports that intervention timing relative to disease onset is a key factor [27]. The study population had a high likelihood for severe COVID-19 and mortality based on presenting CALL and SOFA scores [31,35]. High rates of obesity, hypertension, and diabetes were observed in the present study relative to previous epidemiologic reports of COVID-19 [5,7]. Rates of mechanical ventilation and mortality were higher compared to previous reports of tocilizumab use in COVID-19. Reasons for this difference in mortality may be explained by a difference in severity of illness, high rates of co-morbidities associated with severe COVID-19, a longer duration of follow-up, a higher rate of invasive mechanical ventilation, and rates of ARDS [[25], [26], [27], [28]]. Mortality rates observed in the present study are similar to those reported for critically ill COVID-19 populations and the general ICU population with ARDS [7,36,37]. A SOFA score of ≥8 on day 0 was independently associated with mortality. A SOFA score of ≥3 on hospital presentation has been described as an independent predictor for mortality in the COVID-19 population [35]. An improvement was noted in survivors for SOFA scores and six-category scale. ARDS severity was also improved in survivors, a finding consistent with other immunomodulatory trials [29]. These findings are important to guide the use of off-label tocilizumab in those with cytokine storm associated with COVID-19 until results of randomized controlled trials are available. No standard definition for cytokine storm related to COVID-19 exists. Previous studies have defined cytokine storm associated with COVID-19 using various threshold values for vital signs, CRP, IL-6, ferritin, and LDH [[25], [26], [27],29]. CRP is the only common diagnostic marker amongst all published reports to date with values of 5–10 mg/dL (10–20 times the upper limits of normal) being used to define cytokine storm. Following tocilizumab administration in the present study, CRP was reduced in all patients, as seen in previous reports of tocilizumab and an IL-1 receptor antagonist, anakinra [[25], [26], [27], [28], [29]]. The ASTCT grading for CRS identified 85.2% of patients with cytokine storm, but this may be an imperfect diagnostic tool in the setting of COVID-19. Future research is needed to establish criteria to define cytokine storm associated with COVID-19 and identify progression of disease from the viral phase to the hyper-inflammatory phase [16]. Recent studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of antivirals in limiting disease severity [10,12]. A step-wise treatment approach using antiviral and immunomodulatory agents in succession for patients with disease progression appears to be a viable therapeutic approach that may warrant research. Hypertriglyceridemia occurred frequently in the present cohort, irrespective of propofol use. Clinicians should routinely monitor triglyceride levels, markers for pancreatitis, and secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (sHLH) if tocilizumab is administered. Due to the inflammatory markers associated with sHLH, an IL-6 antagonist may not prevent this complication, and continuous monitoring is paramount [23]. Secondary infections were noted in 22.2% of patients, which is higher than a previous report of 16%; however, rates in epidemiologic reports of critically ill COVID-19 populations describe a range of 4.7–32.5% [10,28,35,38,39]. If unable to enroll patients into a clinical trial, clinicians should consider a multidisciplinary approach to weigh the benefits and potential risks of off-label tocilizumab for COVID-19. This study has several limitations. The study population included is predominately one that is critically ill with severe COVID-19, and results may not be applicable to less severe populations. This study was conducted within a single health system, with a limited sample size, and with no placebo comparator group. The study follow-up period was 28 days after tocilizumab administration which limits the assessment of long term efficacy and adverse effects. However, the follow-up is longer than what has been reported for tocilizumab and is consistent with duration of follow-up for antiviral agents [9,10]. The health system's COVID-19 guideline were modified during the study period, but the treatments received in both survivors and non-survivors was consistent.

Conclusion

The receipt of tocilizumab within 12 days of symptom onset may be a key factor independently associated with 28-day survival in COVID-19. Research is needed to define diagnostic criteria for cytokine storm associated with COVID-19, establish the clinical efficacy of tocilizumab in placebo-controlled trials, and further describe which COVID-19 populations may derive clinical benefit from tocilizumab.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Austin R. Morrison: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing - review & editing. Joseph M. Johnson: Methodology, Investigation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Kristin M. Griebe: Methodology, Investigation, Writing - review & editing. Mathew C. Jones: Methodology, Investigation, Writing - review & editing. John J. Stine: Investigation, Writing - review & editing. Laura N. Hencken: Investigation, Writing - review & editing. Long To: Investigation, Writing - review & editing. Monica L. Bianchini: Formal analysis, Writing - review & editing. Amit T. Vahia: Formal analysis, Writing - review & editing. Jennifer Swiderek: Writing - review & editing. Mayur S. Ramesh: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - review & editing, Supervision. Michael A. Peters: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing - review & editing, Supervision. Zachary R. Smith: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing, Supervision.
  36 in total

1.  Presenting Characteristics, Comorbidities, and Outcomes Among 5700 Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 in the New York City Area.

Authors:  Safiya Richardson; Jamie S Hirsch; Mangala Narasimhan; James M Crawford; Thomas McGinn; Karina W Davidson; Douglas P Barnaby; Lance B Becker; John D Chelico; Stuart L Cohen; Jennifer Cookingham; Kevin Coppa; Michael A Diefenbach; Andrew J Dominello; Joan Duer-Hefele; Louise Falzon; Jordan Gitlin; Negin Hajizadeh; Tiffany G Harvin; David A Hirschwerk; Eun Ji Kim; Zachary M Kozel; Lyndonna M Marrast; Jazmin N Mogavero; Gabrielle A Osorio; Michael Qiu; Theodoros P Zanos
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Mild or Moderate Covid-19.

Authors:  Rajesh T Gandhi; John B Lynch; Carlos Del Rio
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Baseline Characteristics and Outcomes of 1591 Patients Infected With SARS-CoV-2 Admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy Region, Italy.

Authors:  Giacomo Grasselli; Alberto Zangrillo; Alberto Zanella; Massimo Antonelli; Luca Cabrini; Antonio Castelli; Danilo Cereda; Antonio Coluccello; Giuseppe Foti; Roberto Fumagalli; Giorgio Iotti; Nicola Latronico; Luca Lorini; Stefano Merler; Giuseppe Natalini; Alessandra Piatti; Marco Vito Ranieri; Anna Mara Scandroglio; Enrico Storti; Maurizio Cecconi; Antonio Pesenti
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition.

Authors:  V Marco Ranieri; Gordon D Rubenfeld; B Taylor Thompson; Niall D Ferguson; Ellen Caldwell; Eddy Fan; Luigi Camporota; Arthur S Slutsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Early Short-Course Corticosteroids in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19.

Authors:  Raef Fadel; Austin R Morrison; Amit Vahia; Zachary R Smith; Zohra Chaudhry; Pallavi Bhargava; Joseph Miller; Rachel M Kenney; George Alangaden; Mayur S Ramesh
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Tocilizumab treatment in COVID-19: A single center experience.

Authors:  Pan Luo; Yi Liu; Lin Qiu; Xiulan Liu; Dong Liu; Juan Li
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.327

7.  Use of Tocilizumab for COVID-19-Induced Cytokine Release Syndrome: A Cautionary Case Report.

Authors:  Jared Radbel; Navaneeth Narayanan; Pinki J Bhatt
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Effective treatment of severe COVID-19 patients with tocilizumab.

Authors:  Xiaoling Xu; Mingfeng Han; Tiantian Li; Wei Sun; Dongsheng Wang; Binqing Fu; Yonggang Zhou; Xiaohu Zheng; Yun Yang; Xiuyong Li; Xiaohua Zhang; Aijun Pan; Haiming Wei
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  A Trial of Lopinavir-Ritonavir in Adults Hospitalized with Severe Covid-19.

Authors:  Bin Cao; Yeming Wang; Danning Wen; Wen Liu; Jingli Wang; Guohui Fan; Lianguo Ruan; Bin Song; Yanping Cai; Ming Wei; Xingwang Li; Jiaan Xia; Nanshan Chen; Jie Xiang; Ting Yu; Tao Bai; Xuelei Xie; Li Zhang; Caihong Li; Ye Yuan; Hua Chen; Huadong Li; Hanping Huang; Shengjing Tu; Fengyun Gong; Ying Liu; Yuan Wei; Chongya Dong; Fei Zhou; Xiaoying Gu; Jiuyang Xu; Zhibo Liu; Yi Zhang; Hui Li; Lianhan Shang; Ke Wang; Kunxia Li; Xia Zhou; Xuan Dong; Zhaohui Qu; Sixia Lu; Xujuan Hu; Shunan Ruan; Shanshan Luo; Jing Wu; Lu Peng; Fang Cheng; Lihong Pan; Jun Zou; Chunmin Jia; Juan Wang; Xia Liu; Shuzhen Wang; Xudong Wu; Qin Ge; Jing He; Haiyan Zhan; Fang Qiu; Li Guo; Chaolin Huang; Thomas Jaki; Frederick G Hayden; Peter W Horby; Dingyu Zhang; Chen Wang
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Immunosuppression for hyperinflammation in COVID-19: a double-edged sword?

Authors:  Andrew I Ritchie; Aran Singanayagam
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  29 in total

Review 1.  Current Evidence of Interleukin-6 Signaling Inhibitors in Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Qi Han; Mingyue Guo; Yue Zheng; Ying Zhang; Yanshan De; Changchang Xu; Lin Zhang; Ruru Sun; Ying Lv; Yan Liang; Feng Xu; Jiaojiao Pang; Yuguo Chen
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 2.  Heterogeneity and Risk of Bias in Studies Examining Risk Factors for Severe Illness and Death in COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Abraham Degarege; Zaeema Naveed; Josiane Kabayundo; David Brett-Major
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2022-05-10

3.  The Safety of Continuous Infusion Propofol in Mechanically Ventilated Adults With Coronavirus Disease 2019.

Authors:  Corey J Witenko; Audrey J Littlefield; Sajjad Abedian; Anjile An; Philip S Barie; Karen Berger
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.154

4.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of tocilizumab in persons with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19).

Authors:  Chong-Xiang Chen; Fang Hu; Jin Wei; Le-Tao Yuan; Tian-Meng Wen; Robert Peter Gale; Yang Liang
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 11.528

5.  COVID-19 anosmia and gustatory symptoms as a prognosis factor: a subanalysis of the HOPE COVID-19 (Health Outcome Predictive Evaluation for COVID-19) registry.

Authors:  Jesús Porta-Etessam; Iván J Núñez-Gil; Nuria González García; Cristina Fernandez-Perez; María C Viana-Llamas; Charbel Maroun Eid; Rodolfo Romero; María Molina; Aitor Uribarri; Victor Manuel Becerra-Muñoz; Marcos García Aguado; Jia Huang; Elisa Rondano; Enrico Cerrato; Emilio Alfonso; Alex Fernando Castro Mejía; Francisco Marin; Sergio Raposeiras Roubin; Martino Pepe; Gisela Feltes; Paloma Maté; Bernardo Cortese; Luis Buzón; Jorge Játiva Mendez; Vicente Estrada
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 6.  Development of Evidence-Based COVID-19 Management Guidelines for Local Context: The Methodological Challenges.

Authors:  Sarah Nadeem; Salima Saleem Aamdani; Bushra Ayub; Nashia Ali Rizvi; Fatima Safi Arslan; Russell Seth Martins; Maria Khan; Syed Faisal Mahmood
Journal:  Glob Health Epidemiol Genom       Date:  2022-04-20

7.  Tocilizumab in Patients Hospitalized with Covid-19 Pneumonia.

Authors:  Carlos Salama; Jian Han; Linda Yau; William G Reiss; Benjamin Kramer; Jeffrey D Neidhart; Gerard J Criner; Emma Kaplan-Lewis; Rachel Baden; Lavannya Pandit; Miriam L Cameron; Julia Garcia-Diaz; Victoria Chávez; Martha Mekebeb-Reuter; Ferdinando Lima de Menezes; Reena Shah; Maria F González-Lara; Beverly Assman; Jamie Freedman; Shalini V Mohan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  COVID-19 preparedness: capacity to manufacture vaccines, therapeutics and diagnostics in sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Bisi Bright; Chinedum Peace Babalola; Nadia Adjoa Sam-Agudu; Augustine Anayochukwu Onyeaghala; Adebola Olatunji; Ufuoma Aduh; Patrick O Sobande; Trevor A Crowell; Yenew Kebede Tebeje; Sunny Phillip; Nicaise Ndembi; Morenike Oluwatoyin Folayan
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 4.185

9.  Tocilizumab in COVID-19: Factors Associated With Mortality Before and After Treatment.

Authors:  Luis Sarabia De Ardanaz; Jose M Andreu-Ubero; Miriam Navidad-Fuentes; Miguel Ángel Ferrer-González; Victor Ruíz Del Valle; Inmaculada Salcedo-Bellido; Rocío Barrios-Rodríguez; Rafael Cáliz-Cáliz; Pilar Requena
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 5.810

10.  Diabetes Mellitus is Associated with Severe Infection and Mortality in Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Luxiang Shang; Mengjiao Shao; Qilong Guo; Jia Shi; Yang Zhao; Jiasuoer Xiaokereti; Baopeng Tang
Journal:  Arch Med Res       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 2.235

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.