| Literature DB >> 32646441 |
M Maynar1, F J Grijota2, J Siquier-Coll1, I Bartolome1, M C Robles1, D Muñoz3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to determine changes occurring in the erythrocyte concentrations of chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), manganese (Mn), molybdenum (Mo), selenium (Se) and zinc (Zn) in male subjects with different training levels living in the same region (Spain).Entities:
Keywords: Adaptations; Essential trace elements; Exercise; Red blood cells
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32646441 PMCID: PMC7346401 DOI: 10.1186/s12970-020-00367-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Int Soc Sports Nutr ISSN: 1550-2783 Impact factor: 5.150
Characteristics of the three groups in the study
| CG | MTG | HTG | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.75 ± 0.18 | 1.77 ± 0.05 | 1.73 ± 0.07 | |
| 75.34 ± 12.03 | 75.12 ± 8.16 | 65.61 ± 5.22†* | |
| 110.61 ± 34.29 | 87.78 ± 30.14 | 56.32 ± 16.65†* | |
| 38.90 ± 3.73 | 46.77 ± 6.72++ | 61.23 ± 3.00††** | |
| 89.33 ± 12.31 | 121.11 ± 21.40++ | 153.17 ± 15.84††** | |
| 72.58 ± 7.38 | 54.90 ± 10.85++ | 62.85 ± 7.57††** | |
| 184.32 ± 12.71 | 194.96 ± 8.3+ | 196.71 ± 6.21† |
ANOVA and Bonferroni tests
† Differences between the HTG and CG (†p < 0,05; ††p < 0,01; †††p < 0,001)
+ Differences between the MTG and CG (+p < 0,05; ++p < 0,01; +++p < 0,001)
* Differences between the HTG and MTG (*p < 0,05; **p < 0,01; ***p < 0,001)
Daily intake of Cr, Cu, Mn, Mo, Se and Zn in CG and sportsmen classified by the level of training
| CG | MTG | HTG | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 94.50 ± 52.72 | 97.23 ± 55.41 | 97.63 ± 60.55 | |
| 1843.5 ± 630.5 | 1799.2 ± 629.4 | 1785.3 ± 612.8 | |
| 3054.8 ± 1185.7 | 3115.4 ± 1275.3 | 3156.7 ± 1280.5 | |
| 223.31 ± 184.33 | 225.0 ± 165.4 | 232.24 ± 156.1 | |
| 101.8 ± 17.25 | 102.4 ± 18.54 | 98.31 ± 17.85 | |
| 14.23 ± 6.54 | 12.75 ± 6.48 | 12.85 ± 6.94 |
Concentration of hemoglobin and hematocrit in the control group and sportsmen classified by the level of training
| CG | MTG | HTG | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14.97 ± 1.01 | 15.46 ± 1.45 | 15.14 ± 0.84 | |
| 41.31 ± 1.18 | 42.89 ± 1.12 | 43.32 ± 1.17 |
ANOVA and Bonferroni tests
† Differences between the HTG and CG (†p < 0,05; ††p < 0,01; †††p < 0,001)
+ Differences between the MTG and CG (+p < 0,05; ++p < 0,01; +++p < 0,001)
* Differences between the HTG and MTG (*p < 0,05; **p < 0,01; ***p < 0,001)
Erythrocyte concentration of the elements in the control group and sportsmen classified by the level of training
| CG | MTG | HTG | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.32 ± 0.16 | 0.25 ± 0.14 | 0.12 ± 0.11 | |
| 38.8 ± 6.68 | 31.81 ± 7.47+ | 30.24 ± 4.81††† | |
| 1.45 ± 0.36 | 1.22 ± 0.17++ | 1.16 ± 0.29†† | |
| 0.3 ± 0.04 | 0.11 ± 0.16+ | 0.08 ± 0.02†* | |
| 8.63 ± 2.30 | 7.99 ± 2.16 | 7.55 ± 1.36† | |
| 0.65 ± 0.10 | 0.49 ± 0.14++ | 0.44 ± 0.06††† |
ANOVA and Bonferroni tests
† Differences between the HTG and CG (†p < 0,05; ††p < 0,01; †††p < 0,001)
+ Differences between the MTG and CG (+p < 0,05; ++p < 0,01; +++p < 0,001)
* Differences between the HTG and MTG (*p < 0,05; **p < 0,01; ***p < 0,001)
Correlations among the 76 subjects, represented by the r; statistical significance, between the essential trace elements and the level of training
| Element | Training status |
|---|---|
| −0.164; | |
| −0.790; | |
| −0.422; | |
| −0.081; | |
| −0.275; | |
| −0.678; |