Yan Zhang1, Jing-Lu Jin1, Ye-Xuan Cao1, Hui-Wen Zhang1, Yuan-Lin Guo1, Na-Qiong Wu1, Cheng-Gang Zhu1, Ying Gao1, Qi Hua2, Yan-Fang Li3, Rui-Xia Xu1, Jian-Jun Li4. 1. State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, FuWai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, BeiLiShi Road 167, Beijing, 100037, China. 2. Department of Cardiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. 3. Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. 4. State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, FuWai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, BeiLiShi Road 167, Beijing, 100037, China. 13901010368@163.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Merging studies have reported the association of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] with poor outcomes of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, the prognostic importance of Lp(a) for recurrent cardiovascular events (CVEs) is currently undetermined in patients with T2DM and prior CVEs. METHODS: From April 2011 to March 2017, we consecutively recruited 2284 T2DM patients with prior CVEs. Patients were categorized into low, medium, and high groups by Lp(a) levels and followed up for recurrent CVEs, including nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular mortality. Kaplan-Meier, Cox regression and C-statistic analyses were performed. RESULTS: During 7613 patient-years' follow-up, 153 recurrent CVEs occurred. Lp(a) levels were significantly higher in patients with recurrent CVEs than counterparts (20.44 vs. 14.71 mg/dL, p = 0.002). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the event-free survival rate was dramatically lower in high and medium Lp(a) groups than that in low group irrespective of HBA1c status (< 7.0%; ≥ 7.0%, both p < 0.05). Furthermore, multivariate Cox regression models indicated that Lp(a) was independently associated with high risk of recurrent CVEs [HR(95% CI): 2.049 (1.308-3.212)], such data remains in different HBA1c status (HR(95% CI): < 7.0%, 2.009 (1.051-3.840); ≥ 7.0%, 2.162 (1.148-4.073)). Moreover, the results of C-statistic were significantly improved by 0.029 when added Lp(a) to the Cox model. CONCLUSIONS: Our data, for the first time, confirmed that Lp(a) was an independent predictor for recurrent CVEs in T2DM patients with prior CVEs, suggesting that Lp(a) measurement may help to further risk stratification for T2DM patients after they suffered a first CVE.
BACKGROUND: Merging studies have reported the association of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] with poor outcomes of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, the prognostic importance of Lp(a) for recurrent cardiovascular events (CVEs) is currently undetermined in patients with T2DM and prior CVEs. METHODS: From April 2011 to March 2017, we consecutively recruited 2284 T2DM patients with prior CVEs. Patients were categorized into low, medium, and high groups by Lp(a) levels and followed up for recurrent CVEs, including nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular mortality. Kaplan-Meier, Cox regression and C-statistic analyses were performed. RESULTS: During 7613 patient-years' follow-up, 153 recurrent CVEs occurred. Lp(a) levels were significantly higher in patients with recurrent CVEs than counterparts (20.44 vs. 14.71 mg/dL, p = 0.002). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the event-free survival rate was dramatically lower in high and medium Lp(a) groups than that in low group irrespective of HBA1c status (< 7.0%; ≥ 7.0%, both p < 0.05). Furthermore, multivariate Cox regression models indicated that Lp(a) was independently associated with high risk of recurrent CVEs [HR(95% CI): 2.049 (1.308-3.212)], such data remains in different HBA1c status (HR(95% CI): < 7.0%, 2.009 (1.051-3.840); ≥ 7.0%, 2.162 (1.148-4.073)). Moreover, the results of C-statistic were significantly improved by 0.029 when added Lp(a) to the Cox model. CONCLUSIONS: Our data, for the first time, confirmed that Lp(a) was an independent predictor for recurrent CVEs in T2DM patients with prior CVEs, suggesting that Lp(a) measurement may help to further risk stratification for T2DM patients after they suffered a first CVE.
Authors: Ying Shen; Xiao Qun Wang; Yang Dai; Yi Xuan Wang; Rui Yan Zhang; Lin Lu; Feng Hua Ding; Wei Feng Shen Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-08-22
Authors: Angelo Silverio; Francesco Paolo Cancro; Marco Di Maio; Michele Bellino; Luca Esposito; Mario Centore; Albino Carrizzo; Paola Di Pietro; Anna Borrelli; Giuseppe De Luca; Carmine Vecchione; Gennaro Galasso Journal: J Thromb Thrombolysis Date: 2022-09-20 Impact factor: 5.221