David Baker1, Gareth Pryce2, Louisa K James2, Monica Marta3, Klaus Schmierer3. 1. Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 2AT, United Kingdom. Electronic address: david.baker@qmul.ac.uk. 2. Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 2AT, United Kingdom. 3. Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 2AT, United Kingdom; Clinical Board:Medicine (Neuroscience), The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1BB, United Kingdom.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Ocrelizumab inhibits relapsing multiple sclerosis when administered every six months. Based on potential similar memory B cell depletion mechanisms with cladribine and alemtuzumab, we hypothesised that CD20-depletion of B cells by ocrelizumab may exhibit a duration of response exceeding the current licenced treatment interval. METHODS: Internet-located information from regulatory submissions and meeting reports relating to the unpublished open-label, phase II ocrelizumab extension trial (NCT00676715) were reviewed. This followed people (54-55/arm) with MS, who switched from placebo or interferon-beta to ocrelizumab for three 600 mg treatment cycles (week 24, 48, 72) or people treated with ocrelizumab for four 600 mg treatment cycles (week 0-72), followed by an 18 month treatment-free period. RESULTS: CD19+ B cells were rapidly depleted within 2 weeks and slow CD19+ B cell repopulation began about 6 months after the last infusion with median-repletion of over 15 months. The reduced annualized relapse rate during the published efficacy study appeared to be maintained in the extension study and there were no new T1 gadolinium-enhancing or T2 lesions detected in the treatment-free period. Importantly, within these extension cohorts, there appeared to be fewer adverse events and infections events. CONCLUSIONS: Ocrelizumab appears to induce durable relapsing disease inhibition, within 3 treatment cycles Therefore, it may be possible to reduce the frequency of dosing to maintain efficacy, whilst limiting infection and other risks associated with continuous immunosuppression and could allow more effective vaccination against new pathogens. Further studies are now clearly required to determine whether this data is robust.
OBJECTIVE:Ocrelizumab inhibits relapsing multiple sclerosis when administered every six months. Based on potential similar memory B cell depletion mechanisms with cladribine and alemtuzumab, we hypothesised that CD20-depletion of B cells by ocrelizumab may exhibit a duration of response exceeding the current licenced treatment interval. METHODS: Internet-located information from regulatory submissions and meeting reports relating to the unpublished open-label, phase II ocrelizumab extension trial (NCT00676715) were reviewed. This followed people (54-55/arm) with MS, who switched from placebo or interferon-beta to ocrelizumab for three 600 mg treatment cycles (week 24, 48, 72) or people treated with ocrelizumab for four 600 mg treatment cycles (week 0-72), followed by an 18 month treatment-free period. RESULTS:CD19+ B cells were rapidly depleted within 2 weeks and slow CD19+ B cell repopulation began about 6 months after the last infusion with median-repletion of over 15 months. The reduced annualized relapse rate during the published efficacy study appeared to be maintained in the extension study and there were no new T1 gadolinium-enhancing or T2 lesions detected in the treatment-free period. Importantly, within these extension cohorts, there appeared to be fewer adverse events and infections events. CONCLUSIONS:Ocrelizumab appears to induce durable relapsing disease inhibition, within 3 treatment cycles Therefore, it may be possible to reduce the frequency of dosing to maintain efficacy, whilst limiting infection and other risks associated with continuous immunosuppression and could allow more effective vaccination against new pathogens. Further studies are now clearly required to determine whether this data is robust.
Authors: Carla Rodriguez-Mogeda; Sabela Rodríguez-Lorenzo; Jiji Attia; Jack van Horssen; Maarten E Witte; Helga E de Vries Journal: Biomolecules Date: 2022-06-07
Authors: Jennifer H Yang; Torge Rempe; Natalie Whitmire; Anastasie Dunn-Pirio; Jennifer S Graves Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-06-03 Impact factor: 4.086
Authors: Maria P Sormani; Nicola De Rossi; Irene Schiavetti; Luca Carmisciano; Cinzia Cordioli; Lucia Moiola; Marta Radaelli; Paolo Immovilli; Marco Capobianco; Maria Trojano; Paola Zaratin; Gioacchino Tedeschi; Giancarlo Comi; Mario A Battaglia; Francesco Patti; Marco Salvetti Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2021-02-09 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Tobias Moser; Ferdinand Otto; Ciara O'Sullivan; Wolfgang Hitzl; Georg Pilz; Andrea Harrer; Eugen Trinka; Peter Wipfler Journal: Mult Scler Relat Disord Date: 2022-01-24 Impact factor: 4.808
Authors: D Baker; C A K Roberts; G Pryce; A S Kang; M Marta; S Reyes; K Schmierer; G Giovannoni; S Amor Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 4.330