Literature DB >> 32645244

Potential Future Use, Costs, and Value of Poliovirus Vaccines.

Kimberly M Thompson1, Dominika A Kalkowska1.   

Abstract

Countries face different poliovirus risks, which imply different benefits associated with continued and future use of oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) and/or inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV). With the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) continuing to extend its timeline for ending the transmission of all wild polioviruses and to introduce new poliovirus vaccines, the polio vaccine supply chain continues to expand in complexity. The increased complexity leads to significant uncertainty about supply and costs. Notably, the strategy of phased OPV cessation of all three serotypes to stop all future incidence of poliomyelitis depends on successfully stopping the transmission of all wild polioviruses. Countries also face challenges associated with responding to any outbreaks that occur after OPV cessation, because stopping transmission of such outbreaks requires reintroducing the use of the stopped OPV in most countries. National immunization program leaders will likely consider differences in their risks and willingness-to-pay for risk reduction as they evaluate their investments in current and future polio vaccination. Information about the costs and benefits of future poliovirus vaccines, and discussion of the complex situation that currently exists, should prove useful to national, regional, and global decisionmakers and support health economic modeling. Delays in achieving polio eradication combined with increasing costs of poliovirus vaccines continue to increase financial risks for the GPEI.
© 2020 The Authors. Risk Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Risk Analysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  financial risk; polio eradication; vaccine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32645244      PMCID: PMC7984393          DOI: 10.1111/risa.13557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  49 in total

1.  Early priming with inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) and intradermal fractional dose IPV administered by a microneedle device: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Abhijeet Anand; K Zaman; Concepción F Estívariz; Mohammad Yunus; Howard E Gary; William C Weldon; Tajul I Bari; M Steven Oberste; Steven G Wassilak; Stephen P Luby; James D Heffelfinger; Mark A Pallansch
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Costs of vaccine programs across 94 low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Allison Portnoy; Sachiko Ozawa; Simrun Grewal; Bryan A Norman; Jayant Rajgopal; Katrin M Gorham; Leila A Haidari; Shawn T Brown; Bruce Y Lee
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 3.  Eradication versus control for poliomyelitis: an economic analysis.

Authors:  Kimberly M Thompson; Radboud J Duintjer Tebbens
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-04-21       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  National choices related to inactivated poliovirus vaccine, innovation and the endgame of global polio eradication.

Authors:  Kimberly M Thompson; Radboud J Duintjer Tebbens
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 5.217

Review 5.  Vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis: a review of the epidemiology and estimation of the global burden.

Authors:  Lauren R Platt; Concepción F Estívariz; Roland W Sutter
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 5.226

6.  Updated modelling of the prevalence of immunodeficiency-associated long-term vaccine-derived poliovirus (iVDPV) excreters.

Authors:  D A Kalkowska; M A Pallansch; K M Thompson
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 2.451

7.  Insights From Modeling Preventive Supplemental Immunization Activities as a Strategy to Eliminate Wild Poliovirus Transmission in Pakistan and Afghanistan.

Authors:  Dominika A Kalkowska; Kimberly M Thompson
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 4.000

8.  Modeling the prevalence of immunodeficiency-associated long-term vaccine-derived poliovirus excretors and the potential benefits of antiviral drugs.

Authors:  Radboud J Duintjer Tebbens; Mark A Pallansch; Kimberly M Thompson
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.090

9.  The differential impact of oral poliovirus vaccine formulation choices on serotype-specific population immunity to poliovirus transmission.

Authors:  Kimberly M Thompson; Radboud J Duintjer Tebbens
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.090

10.  Estimating health opportunity costs in low-income and middle-income countries: a novel approach and evidence from cross-country data.

Authors:  Jessica Ochalek; James Lomas; Karl Claxton
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2018-11-05
View more
  4 in total

1.  Health and Economic Outcomes Associated with Polio Vaccine Policy Options: 2019-2029.

Authors:  Dominika A Kalkowska; Kimberly M Thompson
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  No Role for Reintroducing OPV into the United States with Respect to Controlling COVID-19 [Response to the letter to the Editor by Chumakov et al.].

Authors:  Kimberly M Thompson; Dominika A Kalkowska; Kamran Badizadegan
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 4.000

3.  Modeling Poliovirus Surveillance and Immunization Campaign Quality Monitoring Costs for Pakistan and Afghanistan for 2019-2023.

Authors:  Dominika A Kalkowska; Mark A Pallansch; Stephen L Cochi; Kimberly M Thompson
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2021-05-23       Impact factor: 3.835

Review 4.  A Health Economic Analysis for Oral Poliovirus Vaccine to Prevent COVID-19 in the United States.

Authors:  Kimberly M Thompson; Dominika A Kalkowska; Kamran Badizadegan
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.000

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.