Literature DB >> 32644881

Rhythm Complexity Modulates Behavioral and Neural Dynamics During Auditory-Motor Synchronization.

Brian Mathias1,2, Anna Zamm1,3, Pierre G Gianferrara1,4, Bernhard Ross5, Caroline Palmer1.   

Abstract

We addressed how rhythm complexity influences auditory-motor synchronization in musically trained individuals who perceived and produced complex rhythms while EEG was recorded. Participants first listened to two-part auditory sequences (Listen condition). Each part featured a single pitch presented at a fixed rate; the integer ratio formed between the two rates varied in rhythmic complexity from low (1:1) to moderate (1:2) to high (3:2). One of the two parts occurred at a constant rate across conditions. Then, participants heard the same rhythms as they synchronized their tapping at a fixed rate (Synchronize condition). Finally, they tapped at the same fixed rate (Motor condition). Auditory feedback from their taps was present in all conditions. Behavioral effects of rhythmic complexity were evidenced in all tasks; detection of missing beats (Listen) worsened in the most complex (3:2) rhythm condition, and tap durations (Synchronize) were most variable and least synchronous with stimulus onsets in the 3:2 condition. EEG power spectral density was lowest at the fixed rate during the 3:2 rhythm and greatest during the 1:1 rhythm (Listen and Synchronize). ERP amplitudes corresponding to an N1 time window were smallest for the 3:2 rhythm and greatest for the 1:1 rhythm (Listen). Finally, synchronization accuracy (Synchronize) decreased as amplitudes in the N1 time window became more positive during the high rhythmic complexity condition (3:2). Thus, measures of neural entrainment corresponded to synchronization accuracy, and rhythmic complexity modulated the behavioral and neural measures similarly.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32644881     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  6 in total

1.  Cross-frequency coupling explains the preference for simple ratios in rhythmic behaviour and the relative stability across non-synchronous patterns.

Authors:  Dobromir Dotov; Laurel J Trainor
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 6.671

2.  Correlation Analysis of Synchronization Type and Degree in Respiratory Neural Network.

Authors:  Jieqiong Xu; Quan Yuan; Huiying Chen
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-27

Review 3.  The Dopamine System and Automatization of Movement Sequences: A Review With Relevance for Speech and Stuttering.

Authors:  Per A Alm
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 4.  Breath Tools: A Synthesis of Evidence-Based Breathing Strategies to Enhance Human Running.

Authors:  Eric Harbour; Thomas Stöggl; Hermann Schwameder; Thomas Finkenzeller
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 5.  Sensorimotor Synchronization in Healthy Aging and Neurocognitive Disorders.

Authors:  Andres von Schnehen; Lise Hobeika; Dominique Huvent-Grelle; Séverine Samson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-17

6.  The Groove Enhancement Machine (GEM): A Multi-Person Adaptive Metronome to Manipulate Sensorimotor Synchronization and Subjective Enjoyment.

Authors:  Lauren K Fink; Prescott C Alexander; Petr Janata
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.473

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.