Agnieszka Martyna1, Basma Bahsoun1, Jesper J Madsen2,3,4,5, Frederic St J S Jackson1, Matthew D Badham1, Gregory A Voth2,3,4, Jeremy S Rossman1. 1. School of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NJ, United Kingdom. 2. Department of Chemistry and Chicago Center for Theoretical Chemistry, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States. 3. James Franck Institute, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States. 4. Institute for Biophysical Dynamics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States. 5. Department of Global Health, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33612, United States.
Abstract
The influenza virus M2 amphipathic helix (M2AH) alters membrane curvature in a cholesterol-dependent manner, mediating viral membrane scission during influenza virus budding. Here, we have investigated the biophysical effects of cholesterol on the ability of an M2AH peptide to manipulate membrane properties. We see that the ability of the M2AH to interact with membranes and form an α-helix is independent of membrane cholesterol concentration; however, cholesterol affects the angle of the M2AH peptide within the membrane. This change in membrane orientation affects the ability of the M2AH to alter lipid order. In low-cholesterol membranes, the M2AH is inserted near the level of the lipid head groups, increasing lipid order, which may contribute to generation of the membrane curvature. As the cholesterol content increases, the M2AH insertion becomes flatter and slightly deeper in the membrane below the lipid headgroups, where the polar face can continue to interact with the headgroups while the hydrophobic face binds cholesterol. This changed orientation minimizes lipid packing defects and lipid order changes, likely reducing the generation of membrane curvature. Thus, cholesterol regulates M2 membrane scission by precisely modulating M2AH positioning within the membrane. This has implications for the understanding of many of amphipathic-helix-driven cellular budding processes that occur in specific lipid environments.
The influenza virus M2 amphipathic helix (M2AH) alters membrane curvature in a cholesterol-dependent manner, mediating viral membrane scission during influenza virus budding. Here, we have investigated the biophysical effects of cholesterol on the ability of an M2AH peptide to manipulate membrane properties. We see that the ability of the M2AH to interact with membranes and form an α-helix is independent of membrane cholesterol concentration; however, cholesterol affects the angle of the M2AH peptide within the membrane. This change in membrane orientation affects the ability of the M2AH to alter lipid order. In low-cholesterol membranes, the M2AH is inserted near the level of the lipid head groups, increasing lipid order, which may contribute to generation of the membrane curvature. As the cholesterol content increases, the M2AH insertion becomes flatter and slightly deeper in the membrane below the lipid headgroups, where the polar face can continue to interact with the headgroups while the hydrophobic face binds cholesterol. This changed orientation minimizes lipid packing defects and lipid order changes, likely reducing the generation of membrane curvature. Thus, cholesterol regulates M2 membrane scission by precisely modulating M2AH positioning within the membrane. This has implications for the understanding of many of amphipathic-helix-driven cellular budding processes that occur in specific lipid environments.
Influenza
A viruses (IAV) assemble at and bud from cholesterol-
and sphingolipid-enriched lipid microdomains on the apical plasma
membrane of infected cells.[1] The final
step of IAV budding is membrane scission, wherein the neck of the
budding virion is constricted to the point at which spontaneous fusion
of the opposing membranes can occur, resulting in the release of the
mature virion. The process of IAV-membrane scission is mediated by
the viral M2 protein,[2] which is a 97 amino
acid homotetrameric transmembrane protein that has ion channel activity
during virus entry.[3−7] During virus budding, M2 is recruited to assembly sites through
interactions with the viral M1 matrix and hemagglutinin (HA) proteins,
which recruit M2 to the periphery of the lipid microdomains of assembling
virus, placing M2 at the lipid phase boundary between the lipid ordered
virus budding domain and the surrounding lipid disordered phase.[8−11] The ability of the M2 protein to mediate membrane scission is dependent
on the membrane insertion of a membrane-proximal amphipathic helix
(AH) domain.[2,12,13] The M2AH is 16 amino acids long and forms an α-helix upon
association with the membrane.[2,14−17] Once formed, the AH contains many bulky hydrophobic residues on
one face and several highly polar K/R residues on the opposite face.
While these polar residues likely interact with the polar lipid headgroups,
the hydrophobic face of the domain drives membrane binding.[17] The insertion of the AH domain causes membrane
scission, likely by altering membrane curvature.[2,12,13] However, the M2AH also senses membrane curvature,
sorting to the most highly curved region of the membrane neck, where
it increases membrane order, placing the membrane neck under further
strain and enhancing scission efficiency.[11,18,19]Given that the M2 protein sorts to
the sites of virus assembly
early in the budding process, before membrane scission, regulatory
mechanisms must be in place to prevent the early induction of membrane
curvature and premature scission.[1,20] One regulatory
mechanism may be the weak nature of M2AH curvature induction,[18] such that the induction is only sufficient to
cause scission on a highly constricted membrane neck, ensuring scission
at the appropriate spatiotemporal location. Importantly, M2AH mediation
of membrane scission has been shown to be dependent on its lipid environment,
specifically on the amount of surrounding membrane cholesterol.[2] When the local membrane cholesterol concentration
is at 20–30 mol %, the ability of the M2AH to alter
membrane curvature is reduced and membrane scission is prevented.[2] This activity is restored when the cholesterol
concentration is reduced below 15%. Several reports have shown that
M2 can bind cholesterol, and multiple potential binding sites have
been proposed.[21] It was shown that the
M2AH contains a cholesterol recognition amino acid consensus (CRAC)
domain and mutation of the key Y52 residue reduced cholesterol association;
however, CRAC mutations did not affect M2 targeting to lipid raft
domains or virus budding.[22,23] Conversely, mutation
of the M2AH palmitoylated residue C50 affected M2 raft targeting but
did not reduce M2 cholesterol association, as has been shown for other
palmitoylated proteins.[22,24,25] In 2016, it was predicted by solid-state NMR (ssNMR) experiments
that the M2 protein binds cholesterol through an interhelical crevice
on the outside of the tetrameric transmembrane domain (TMD) and through
bulky hydrophobic residues on the AH including F54.[26] Further ssNMR experiments refined this model, showing that
each M2 tetramer binds two cholesterol molecules through hydrophobic
interactions along the TMD and through polar and aromatic interactions
with F47 of the AH and F57/R61 of the neighboring AH domain.[27] These experiments suggest that both the TMD
and an isolated AH domain have some capacity to interact with cholesterol
through specific interactions, although the interaction is likely
strongest in the context of the full-length protein. In the context
of the full-length protein, association with membrane cholesterol
appears to stabilize the AH and alter the orientation of the AH domain
in the membrane, although the effects of this change on M2AH activity
are not known.[28−30] In this study, we have sought to determine the biophysical
mechanisms by which membrane cholesterol concentrations modulate M2AH
activity. Given the myriad of AH domain-containing proteins that regulate
a range of essential cellular processes, understanding the regulatory
mechanisms of AH domains and their intricate interplay with membrane
composition is of broad importance.
Methods
All peptides
were synthesized by Biomatik (Wilmington, DE, USA)
at 98% purity, with TFA removed. Peptide sequences included N-terminal
acylation, C-terminal amidation, and a C50S mutation to prevent Cys
oxidation. Sequences were as follows: M2AH (47–62 of A/Udorn/72)
Ac-FFKSIYRFFEHGLKRG-Am; M2AH-F47W Ac-WFKSIYRFFEHGLKRG-Am;
M2AH-Y52W Ac-FFKSIWRFFEHGLKRG-Am; M2AH-F54W Ac-FFKSIYRWFEHGLKRG-Am. Fluorescent M2AH incorporates FITC conjugated
to K60, as previously reported.[17,18] Lipids were dissolved
in chloroform and include the following: cholesterol (Ch), 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-1-rac-glycerol (POPG), 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (POPC), 1-palmitoyl-2-(6,7-dibromo)
stearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (6,7Br-POPC),
and 1-palmitoyl-2-(11,12-dibromo) stearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine
(11,12Br-POPC) (Avanti Polar Lipids, Alabaster, AL, USA). Chloroform
and deuterium oxide (D2O) were obtained from Sigma–Aldrich
(Dorset, U.K.).
Large Unilamellar Vesicles
Large unilamellar vesicles
(LUVs) were made by extrusion. Lipid solutions containing 12.5 μmol
of lipids were made using a 4:1 molar ratio of POPC:POPG and incorporating
0.5, 1, 15, or 30 mol % Ch, as previously described.[17,18] In brief, the lipid solution was dried under a stream of argon gas,
and residual chloroform was then removed after storage for 1 h under
vacuum. Lipid films were then dissolved in 500 μL of potassium
buffer (10 mM K2HPO4, 50 mM K2SO4, 5 mM MOPS, pH 7.4), as previously used for M2 structure
and function studies,[17,18] and hydrated for 30 min at 5
°C above the phase transition temperature of the lipid mix, with
vortex mixing every 5 min. Lipid solutions were then freeze-thawed
15 times, transferring between a dry ice ethanol bath and a water
bath at hydration temperatures before extrusion using an Avanti Mini-Extruder,
26 times with membranes with a pore size of 100 nm (Whatman Nuclepore
Track-Etched Membranes, GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA,
USA) at hydration temperatures. LUVs were stored at 4 °C and
used within 1 week.
Fluorescence Polarization Anisotropy
100 nM of M2AH
FITC labeled peptide was mixed increasing concentrations of POPC:POPG
LUVs (0–50 μM) containing either 0.5, 15, or 30 mol %
cholesterol in Greiner Bio-One 96-well, black flat-bottomed plates.
Fluorescence polarization anisotropy was determined on the FLUOstart
Omega fluorescent plate reader (BMG Labtech, Bucks, U.K.), using a
482–16 nm excitation filter and a 530–40 nm band-pass
emission filter. All data were blank-corrected before processing,
and all experiments were performed with six repeats. Data was analyzed
with GraphPad Prism 6 with Kd values determined
by the least-squares regression model and significant differences
determined by Welch’s t-test of Kd.
Peptide Binding Assay
100 μM
of M2AH FITC labeled
peptide was mixed with 2.5 mM of the indicated lipid vesicles and
diluted with water to a final volume of 50 μL, as previously
described.[18] Controls were made with 100
μM of M2AH FITC-labeled peptide and water. Samples were incubated
for 1 h at room temperature in darkness to allow for peptide-membrane
binding. After incubation, unbound peptide was removed by washing
twice through 100 kDa Amicon Ultra centrifugal filters (Merck Millipore,
Watford, U.K.). Retained fluorescence was determined on the FLUOstart
Omega fluorescent plate reader, using a 492-nm excitation filter and
a 520-nm band-pass emission filter. All data were blank-corrected
before processing, and all experiments were performed in triplicate.
Tryptophan–Bromine Quenching Assay
50 μM
of F47W, Y52W, and F54W tryptophan-substituted M2AH peptides were
incubated for 1 h with 2.5 mM of LUVs containing 0.5, 15, and 30 mol %
cholesterol or with 2.5 mM of LUVs containing bromine-labeled POPC
at either the 6,7 or 11,12 positions and containing either 0.5, 15,
and 30 mol % cholesterol. The fluorescence emission spectra
of the LUV solutions were collected between 300 and 400 at 1 nm intervals
(λ excitation = 296 nm) in the presence and absence of M2AH-W
peptide and the background LUV-only fluorescence was subtracted from
the Typ fluorescence in the presence of peptide. The depth of insertion
of the Typ reside in the membrane was calculated using the modified
parallax method:[31]where ZCF is the
distance of Typ residue from the center of the bilayer, LC1 the distance between the 6,7 Br atom and the bilayer
center, and L21 the distance between the
6,7 Br atom and the 11,12 Br atom. F1 is the Typ fluorescence
intensity in the presence of the 6,7 Br atom (λ emission = 338
nm), and F2 is the Typ fluorescence intensity in the presence
of the 11,12 Br atom (λ emission = 338 nm). C is the two-dimension
(2D) concentration of Br atoms in the membrane plane (mole fraction
per unit area of Br-lipid/total lipid). Values for LC1 (10.8 Å), L21 (4.5
Å), and C (0.3/70 Å2) have been
previously determined from X-ray diffraction (XRD) experiments.[32,33]
Laurdan Assay
2.5 mM of LUVs were mixed with 25 μM
Laurdan dye (Life Technologies, Paisley, U.K.) and 200 μM of
peptide, where indicated, in a total volume of 50 μL, as previously
described.[17] Fluorescence was measured
on a Cary Eclipse fluorescence spectrophotometer (Agilent Technologies,
CA, USA) using a 355 nm excitation filter recording fluorescence emissions
at 440 and 490 nm. All experiments were performed in triplicate. The
Laurdan General Polarization (GP) value was calculated using the equation[34]
Molecular Dynamics Simulations
Peptide
Model
The three-dimensional (3D) structure
of the α-helical Udorn M2 amphipathic helix (M2AH) peptide is
taken from the NMR ensemble and converted to CHARMM residue types.
This involves reassigning atom labels and making protonation states
consistent with predictions (ProPKA is used[35]); in particular, lysines (residues 3 and 14) and arginines (residues
7 and 15) have positively charged side chains (standard LYS and ARG
types), the glutamic acid (residue 10) has a negatively charged side
chain (GLU type), histidine (residue 11) has a neutral side chain
(HSE type). Standard N-terminal (NTERM, −NH3+) and C-terminal (CTERM, −COO−) patches are
used. No further post-translational or chemical modifications are
applied.
System Setup
A single peptide per
simulation box was
positioned by placing it parallel to the membrane plane and translating
it by 10, 15, 20, 25, or 30 Å, relative to the membrane center
(z = 0) in an orientation consistent with the estimated
(using HELIQUEST[36]) helical hydrophobic
momentum vector, μ, which dictates the amphipathicity of the
helix.[37] Physiological salt (150 mM KCl)
is added to all simulations by replacing randomly chosen water molecules
with K+ or Cl– ions. Two types of model
lipid membranes are investigated. The first is a POPC/POPG (80/20
component ratio in both leaflets), and the second has cholesterol
(CHL) added, POPC/POPG/CHL (50/20/30 component ratio in both leaflets).
For more details, see the Supporting Information.
Simulation Protocol
We use a standard simulation protocol
dictated by best practices: NPT ensemble (Nosé–Hoover
thermostat set to 300 K,[38,39] semiisotropic Parrinello–Rahman
barostat set to 1 atm),[40] LINCS constraints
in H atoms,[41,42] 2 fs integration time steps,
particle-mesh Ewald summation for electrostatic interactions,[43] Force-switch starting at 1.0 nm to a cutoff
at 1.2 nm. The simulation time is ∼300–600 ns per trajectory.
We use the CHARMM-GUI[44] membrane builder[45,46] to initialize the geometries. GROMACS (version 5.0)[47] is used to perform the MD simulations, CHARMM36 force field
is used for the proteins[48] and lipids[49] with the TIP3P water model.[50] VMD[51] is used for analysis and
visualization. The recommended stepwise relaxation scheme, which consists
of minimization (step 6.0), equilibration (steps 6.1 through 6.6)
before the production run, is started. Note that the simulation temperature
was chosen to match previous biological experiments and, therefore,
is not performed at physiological temperature. However, the properties
of our model membranes are only weakly dependent on the temperature
within this range.[52]
Analysis
Details
The helix angle is calculated by projecting
the directional vector from the α-C atom of Lys3 to His11 (exactly
two helix turns away) onto the simulation box z-axis
vector. The penetration depth is monitored by following the z-coordinate of residue Phe8. The secondary structure in
the peptide is monitored using the STRIDE algorithm.[53] Salt bridges are determined based on an O–N geometric
bond distance cutoff criterion of 3.2 Å. Hydrogen bonds are determined
based on a geometric bond distance cutoff of 3.0 Å and a bond
angle cutoff of 20°. The packing analysis was performed as previously
described.[54,55] In short, the area of the lipid
head groups was projected down to the gridded x/y plane, and the points corresponding to hydrophobic defects
were clustered and measured to determine the size of the individual
clusters.
Results
Minimal Effect of Membrane
Cholesterol on M2AH Binding and Secondary
Structure
Previous results have shown that the M2AH forms
an helical structure upon membrane binding.[17] If cholesterol concentrations modulate M2AH binding, this could
directly impact domain formation and the ability to alter membrane
curvature. Thus, we first determined the association of a FITC-tagged
M2AH peptide with POPC:POPG LUVs with a range of membrane cholesterol
concentrations, using fluorescence polarization anisotropy. Liquid-disordered
POPC:POPG membranes and a nonpalmitoylated C50S M2AH peptide were
specifically chosen, because they represent a widely used model system
for evaluating the impact of cholesterol on M2AH structure and function.[2,17,18,26,27,30] We see that
the affinity of M2AH peptide binding to LUVs is slightly, but significantly,
inversely correlated with increasing cholesterol concentrations (Figure a), with calculated Kd values of 0.67 μM at 0.5% cholesterol,
1.51 μM at 15% cholesterol, and 3.87 μM at 30% cholesterol
(p-value, 0.5% vs 30%, is 0.0128). This is comparable
to previous work with other amphipathic peptides, where cholesterol
caused an overall increase in peptide binding but a decrease in overall
binding affinity.[56] We also assessed M2AH
membrane binding by incubating FITC-M2AH peptide with LUVs, removing
unbound peptide by spin filtration and quantifying the bound fluorescent
signal. We see comparable peptide binding to LUVs containing 5% and
30% cholesterol, although binding is slightly increased at 10% (see Figure b).
Figure 1
Minimal effect of membrane
cholesterol on M2AH binding and secondary
structure. (A) FITC-labeled M2AH peptide was incubated with increasing
concentrations of LUVs containing 0.5, 15, or 30 mol % cholesterol
and binding affinity was assessed by fluorescence polarization anisotropy. Kd values were determined by the least-squares
regression model (0.67 μM at 0.5% cholesterol, 1.51 μM
at 15% cholesterol, and 3.87 μM at 30% cholesterol) and the
significant difference in Kd between 0.5%
and 30% LUVs was determined by Welch’s t-test
of Kd (p = 0.0128). (B)
FITC-M2AH was incubated with LUVs for 1 h before fluorescence was
determined. Values represent the vesicle-bound fluorescence/background
fluorescence and are means ± the standard deviation of three
independent repeats. (C) MD simulation timeline of the helical secondary
structure for the POPC/POPG simulation M2AH_3. The color-coded letters
have the following meanings: T, Turn; E, Extended (β sheet);
B, Bridge; H, α helix; G, 310-helix; I, PI-helix; and C, coil
(none of the above). (D) Timeline of the helical secondary structure
for the POPC/POPG/CHLsimulation M2AH_CHL_3.
Minimal effect of membrane
cholesterol on M2AH binding and secondary
structure. (A) FITC-labeled M2AH peptide was incubated with increasing
concentrations of LUVs containing 0.5, 15, or 30 mol % cholesterol
and binding affinity was assessed by fluorescence polarization anisotropy. Kd values were determined by the least-squares
regression model (0.67 μM at 0.5% cholesterol, 1.51 μM
at 15% cholesterol, and 3.87 μM at 30% cholesterol) and the
significant difference in Kd between 0.5%
and 30% LUVs was determined by Welch’s t-test
of Kd (p = 0.0128). (B)
FITC-M2AH was incubated with LUVs for 1 h before fluorescence was
determined. Values represent the vesicle-bound fluorescence/background
fluorescence and are means ± the standard deviation of three
independent repeats. (C) MD simulation timeline of the helical secondary
structure for the POPC/POPG simulation M2AH_3. The color-coded letters
have the following meanings: T, Turn; E, Extended (β sheet);
B, Bridge; H, α helix; G, 310-helix; I, PI-helix; and C, coil
(none of the above). (D) Timeline of the helical secondary structure
for the POPC/POPG/CHLsimulation M2AH_CHL_3.To determine if cholesterol affects M2AH α-helix secondary
structure formation, we attempted to determine the NMR structure of
the M2AH bound to high- and low-cholesterol LUV membranes. Our previous
results have determined the low-cholesterol NMR structure of the M2AH;[17] however, when bound to 30% cholesterol LUVs,
the peptide-transferred NOE NMR signal is lost, suggesting possible
changes in M2AH Koff rates, although these
were not assessed in this study. Instead, we have used all-atom molecular
dynamics (MD) simulations to investigate modeled M2AH secondary structure
changes over time on POPC:POPG bilayers, compared to POPC:POPG bilayers
containing 30% cholesterol (see Figure S1 in the Supporting Information). Our results show that M2AH forms
a stable α-helix secondary structure under both membrane conditions,
in a manner similar to that observed in previously reported results
with other amphipathic peptides,[56] although
there seems to be more structural fluctuations and flexibility of
the M2 α-helix in the absence of cholesterol (Figure c and 1d). Together, these results suggest that the ability of cholesterol
to modulate M2AH activity is not strongly affected by differential
membrane binding or the induction of a secondary structure.
Membrane
Cholesterol Alters the Depth and Angle of M2AH-Membrane
Insertion
While cholesterol may not strongly impact M2AH-membrane
binding, cholesterol may modulate the orientation of the peptide within
the membrane, with subsequent effects on activity. In order to estimate
the depth of M2AH membrane insertion and the effect of membrane cholesterol,
we first performed MD simulations, examining the behavior of the modeled
peptide on POPC:POPG bilayers, compared to POPC:POPG bilayers containing
30% cholesterol. Analysis of multiple repeated simulations showed
that the M2AH peptide was more frequently found slightly deeper within
the membrane (toward the bilayer midplane) when 30% cholesterol was
present (see Figures a–e). These results were further examined by using tryptophan
(Typ) fluorescence quenching by bromine-labeled lipids to determine
the depth of peptide insertion in the membrane. The M2AH peptide was
substituted with Y52W to enable Typ fluorescence measurements. Typ
fluorescence is sensitive to the presence of bromine, thus lipids
with Br conjugated to the 6–7 lipid tail position, the 9–10
position, or the 11–12 position were used to estimate the depth
of M2AH insertion. For reference, Br-6,7 conjugated lipids will quench
Typ fluorescence when it is below the level of the lipid headgroups
but not when it is at the level of the headgroups or on the surface
of the membrane. The M2AH-Y52W peptide was added to LUVs containing
Br-6,7-PC or Br-11,12-PC with 1%, 15%, or 30% cholesterol, the Typ
fluorescence spectra were collected (see Figure S2 in the Supporting Information) and used to calculate the
distance of the Typ residue from the bilayer center, using the modified
parallax equation.[57] These results also
showed a slight, but nonstatistically significant, difference in membrane
penetration depth, suggesting that membrane cholesterol levels do
not significantly alter M2AH Z positioning in the membrane (see Figure f).
Figure 2
Cholesterol modulates
the M2AH depth of insertion. Molecular dynamics
(MD) simulations of the M2AH peptide and different lipid bilayers.
(A) Side view of initial configurations chosen for the M2AH/bilayer
simulations. Each starting position corresponds to a translation along
the z-axis, according to the values specified in
panel (C). The M2AH peptides are otherwise positioned in the same
orientation, with respect to the bilayer membrane. (B) Representative
penetration depth during simulation extracted from the peptide center
of mass, relative to the membrane center of mass. Trajectories M2AH_3
and M2AH_CHL_3 are shown, which are started at a z-axis offset of +2 nm. (C) Average peptide Z-location
from different starting configurations. Note that trajectories 4 and
5 did not bind consistently and are not used for analyses (indicated
by an asterisk (*)). (D) Representative snapshots of M2AH peptide
in POPC:POPC bilayer simulations (from M2AH_3) and (E) POPC:POPG:cholesterol
bilayers (from M2AH_CHL_3). (F) 50 μM Y25W tryptophan-substituted
M2AH peptide was incubated for 1 h with 2.5 mM LUVs containing 1,
15, and 30 mol % cholesterol and with cholesterol-varied LUVs
containing bromine-labeled POPC at either the 6,7 or 11,12 positions.
The tryptophan fluorescence spectra were collected (Figure S2) and used to calculate the distance from the center
of the membrane bilayer. Values are shown as means ± standard
deviation. No significant differences were observed between peptide
insertion depth in 1 mol % cholesterol membranes and 30 mol %
membranes, with a Student’s t-test value of p = 0.69.
Cholesterol modulates
the M2AH depth of insertion. Molecular dynamics
(MD) simulations of the M2AH peptide and different lipid bilayers.
(A) Side view of initial configurations chosen for the M2AH/bilayer
simulations. Each starting position corresponds to a translation along
the z-axis, according to the values specified in
panel (C). The M2AH peptides are otherwise positioned in the same
orientation, with respect to the bilayer membrane. (B) Representative
penetration depth during simulation extracted from the peptide center
of mass, relative to the membrane center of mass. Trajectories M2AH_3
and M2AH_CHL_3 are shown, which are started at a z-axis offset of +2 nm. (C) Average peptide Z-location
from different starting configurations. Note that trajectories 4 and
5 did not bind consistently and are not used for analyses (indicated
by an asterisk (*)). (D) Representative snapshots of M2AH peptide
in POPC:POPC bilayer simulations (from M2AH_3) and (E) POPC:POPG:cholesterol
bilayers (from M2AH_CHL_3). (F) 50 μM Y25W tryptophan-substituted
M2AH peptide was incubated for 1 h with 2.5 mM LUVs containing 1,
15, and 30 mol % cholesterol and with cholesterol-varied LUVs
containing bromine-labeled POPC at either the 6,7 or 11,12 positions.
The tryptophan fluorescence spectra were collected (Figure S2) and used to calculate the distance from the center
of the membrane bilayer. Values are shown as means ± standard
deviation. No significant differences were observed between peptide
insertion depth in 1 mol % cholesterol membranes and 30 mol %
membranes, with a Student’s t-test value of p = 0.69.To examine if cholesterol
affects the angle of the peptide within
the membrane, we expanded our Typ quenching experiments by using M2AH
peptides with Typ substitutions at different points along the length
of the helix. Using our previous saturation transfer difference NMR
experiments as a guide for peptide–membrane interactions, we
selected three bulky hydrophobic residues that would likely be compatible
with Typ substitutions without affecting membrane binding or secondary
structure.[17] The M2AH peptide was substituted
with either F47W, Y52W, or F54W, and each different M2AH-W peptide
was added to LUVs containing Br-6,7-PC or Br-11,12-PC with 1%, 15%,
or 30% cholesterol; the Typ fluorescence spectra were collected (Figure S2) and used to calculate the distance
of the Typ residue from the bilayer center. As with the Y52W substitution,
we did not detect a difference between the average depth of the W47
or W54 residues (see Figure a). However, N-terminal residues (e.g., W47) of the peptide
showed increased depth in the membrane at low-cholesterol concentrations,
compared to C-terminal residues, whereas at high cholesterol concentrations,
all residues showed comparable depths (Figure a). This suggests that cholesterol may affect
the orientation of M2AH in the membrane. These results are supported
by the MD simulations, which showed that M2AH was most frequently
found oriented at ∼92° from the bilayer normal (inclination
in the Z-axis) in the absence of cholesterol, but
at ∼98°, in the presence of cholesterol (see Figures b, 3d, and 3e). In addition, the presence
of cholesterol causes a ∼10° counterclockwise rotation
of the helix within the membrane (Figure c). Together, these results show that cholesterol
affects the positioning of the M2AH within the membrane. The key amino
acid residue of M2AH in most-frequent direct contact with cholesterol
was identified in the MD simulations as F54, which inserts deeply
into the membrane (see Figure S3a in the
Supporting Information). Because of the secondary helical structure
of the peptide, residues that are four positions upstream and downstream
(C50 and G58/L59, respectively) also showed increased contact with
cholesterol (see Figure S3a). No stereospecific
interactions between M2AH and cholesterol were observed. Furthermore,
the cholesterol hydroxyl group does not appear to form a stable hydrogen
bond to the peptide (including its backbone) and, as such, likely
has little influence on the peptide structure. Instead, the dominant
interaction between M2AH and cholesterol is found to be a hydrophobic
stacking interaction between F54 and the hydrocarbon rings of cholesterol
(see Figure S3b in the Supporting Information).
Per-residue contacts between M2AH and POPC/POPG lipids were quantified
in the presence and absence of cholesterol, with only minor differences
being observed (see Figures S3c and S3d in te Supporting Information). Interactions between counterions
and the phospholipids were also examined, with counterions coordinating
closer around the phospholipids in the presence of cholesterol, especially
with POPG (Figures S3e and S3f in the Supporting
Information). This suggests that cholesterol affects the positioning
of M2AH, which may then affect the positioning of the lipid headgroups.
Figure 3
Cholesterol-dependent
orientation of membrane-bound M2AH. (A) 50
μM F47W, Y52W, and F54W tryptophan-substituted M2AH peptides
were incubated for 1 h with 2.5 mM LUVs containing 0.5, 15, and 30
mol % cholesterol and with cholesterol-varied LUVs containing
bromine-labeled POPC at either the 6,7 or 11,12 positions. The tryptophan
fluorescence spectra were collected and used to calculate the distance
from the center of the membrane bilayer. (B) MD simulation showing
binned angles during the simulated trajectories (for trajectories
1–3). 90° corresponds to the horizontal starting positions.
(C) Binned roll angles during the simulated trajectories (for trajectories
1–3). (D) Peptide orientations are shown in representative
snapshots of the M2AH peptide in POPC:POPC bilayer simulations (M2AH_3)
and (E) POPC:POPG:cholesterol bilayers (M2AH_CHL_3).
Cholesterol-dependent
orientation of membrane-bound M2AH. (A) 50
μM F47W, Y52W, and F54W tryptophan-substituted M2AH peptides
were incubated for 1 h with 2.5 mM LUVs containing 0.5, 15, and 30
mol % cholesterol and with cholesterol-varied LUVs containing
bromine-labeled POPC at either the 6,7 or 11,12 positions. The tryptophan
fluorescence spectra were collected and used to calculate the distance
from the center of the membrane bilayer. (B) MD simulation showing
binned angles during the simulated trajectories (for trajectories
1–3). 90° corresponds to the horizontal starting positions.
(C) Binned roll angles during the simulated trajectories (for trajectories
1–3). (D) Peptide orientations are shown in representative
snapshots of the M2AH peptide in POPC:POPC bilayer simulations (M2AH_3)
and (E) POPC:POPG:cholesterol bilayers (M2AH_CHL_3).
Cholesterol Limits M2AH-Induced Lipid Headgroup Separation Required
for Curvature and Membrane Scission
Changes in AH domain
membrane insertion can have significant impacts on lipid headgroup
separation and affect the ability to alter membrane curvature and
cause scission. To assess the effects of cholesterol on M2AH’s
ability to alter lipid headgroup separation, we used MD simulation
to assess the likelihood of given distances of separation between
lipid headgroup P atoms (PC–PC, PC–PG, or PG–PG)
in the presence and absence of cholesterol. The results show that,
while M2AH induces minimal changes in the separation between PC–PC
and PC–PG headgroups, M2AH causes a decrease in PG–PG
P atom distances in the presence of 30% cholesterol, but no change
in distances in the absence of cholesterol (Figure a). The differential effect on PG instead
of PC may be attributed to the strong interaction of the cationic
surface of the M2AH with charged anionic lipids such as PG.[17] Interestingly, the presence of cholesterol itself
caused a separation of PG headgroups (Figure a), and it is possible that this separation
increases lipid phase separation while the ability of M2AH to cluster
PG headgroups mitigates this effect, slightly reducing the strain
on the membrane in the presence of 30% cholesterol and reducing M2AH
scission activity.
Figure 4
Cholesterol modulates the ability of M2AH to induce lipid
order.
(A) MD simulation RDFs of P atom pair distributions between POPC–POPC
(top), POPC–POPG (middle), and POPG–POPG (bottom). Results
are averaged over trajectories 1–3. (B) 2.5 mM LUVs containing
5, 10, 20, or 30 mol % cholesterol were incubated for 1 h with
25 μM Laurdan dye in the presence or absence of increasing amounts
of M2AH peptide. Laurdan fluorescence was then measured at 440 and
490 nm, and the ratio was used to calculate the Laurdan GP. Values
are shown as GP(M2AH-LUVs) – GP(LUVs) and are the mean ±
standard deviation of three independent repeats. Asterisk symbol (*)
indicates a statistically significant change in GP upon peptide insertion,
with a Student’s t test value of p < 0.05. No significant change in GP was seen with 30% cholesterol
LUVs, p = 0.996.
Cholesterol modulates the ability of M2AH to induce lipid
order.
(A) MD simulation RDFs of P atom pair distributions between POPC–POPC
(top), POPC–POPG (middle), and POPG–POPG (bottom). Results
are averaged over trajectories 1–3. (B) 2.5 mM LUVs containing
5, 10, 20, or 30 mol % cholesterol were incubated for 1 h with
25 μM Laurdan dye in the presence or absence of increasing amounts
of M2AH peptide. Laurdan fluorescence was then measured at 440 and
490 nm, and the ratio was used to calculate the Laurdan GP. Values
are shown as GP(M2AH-LUVs) – GP(LUVs) and are the mean ±
standard deviation of three independent repeats. Asterisk symbol (*)
indicates a statistically significant change in GP upon peptide insertion,
with a Student’s t test value of p < 0.05. No significant change in GP was seen with 30% cholesterol
LUVs, p = 0.996.M2AH-induced changes in lipid packing may further affect the ability
of the domain to induce lipid ordering. As lipid ordering has been
shown to affect line tension and membrane scission, alterations of
M2AH-induced lipid ordering could have significant impacts on virus
budding.[17] To investigate if cholesterol
alters M2AH induction of lipid ordering, we added M2AH peptide to
Laurdan-labeled LUVs and assessed changes in the GP function of the
dye. Laurdan is a hydrophobic dye that incorporates into the lipid
bilayer at the lipid tails and undergoes emission spectrum shifts
based on the exposure of the dye to polar media; therefore increases
in Laurdan GP indicate a decrease in exposure of the dye to the aqueous
environment caused by an increase in lipid order and lipid packing.
We see that the addition of the M2AH peptide to Laurdan-containing
LUVs causes a statistically significant increase in lipid order in
low-cholesterol LUV (Figure b). However, in the presence of 30% cholesterol, the M2AH
peptide is no longer able to alter lipid order, suggesting that orientation
of the peptide in the membrane may affect lipid packing and, thus,
modulate M2AH activity.
Discussion and Conclusions
The M2AH
is a membrane-active domain that has been shown to bind
membranes and alter curvature in a cholesterol-dependent process that
is essential for membrane scission and the release of budding influenza
virions.[2,12,13] Cholesterol
has been previously shown to bind to the M2 protein at multiple sites,[26] including residues F47, F54, and R61 of the
AH domain.[27] In high levels of membrane
cholesterol (>20%), M2AH loses its ability to alter membrane curvature
and cause scission in vesicle models,[2] although
the specific biological effect of cholesterol on M2AH activity remains
unclear. In this study, we have investigated the effect of cholesterol
on the ability of the M2AH to associate with and modify model membranes.The M2AH binds to a variety of biological membranes and is structured
into an α-helix only upon membrane binding.[17] Here we show that the presence of 30% cholesterol, in LUV
membranes, has minimal impact on M2AH membrane binding (Figures a and 1b) and slightly increases the speed of α-helix formation upon
membrane contact (Figures c and 1d). These results agree with
previous ssNMR experiments that showed comparable α-helix formation
and association of the AH domain with membranes of increasing cholesterol
concentration.[28,29] This suggests that cholesterol
does not strongly affect M2AH binding or secondary structure formation,
though the helix was found to be more stable[28] and more tightly packed in the presence of cholesterol.[29] It is possible this change in M2AH packing density
would affect protein clustering, increasing the “effective”
local concentration in the membrane and inducing membrane curvature,
as has been previously shown through ssNMR and MD simulations with
the full-length M2 protein,[11,58] although the direct
effects of cholesterol on M2 clustering have yet to be proven.While cholesterol does not affect membrane binding by M2AH, it
may slightly affect the depth of membrane insertion of the domain
and significantly alter its orientation within the membrane. MD modeling
and Typ bromine quenching experiments show that the M2AH is inserted
at a comparable or slightly deeper depth in the membrane in the presence
of cholesterol (see Figure ), this contrasts with previous ssNMR studies that showed
the AH domain is somewhat less buried in the membrane in the presence
of cholesterol.[29] However, the ssNMR experiments
were performed with a M2 TMD-AH construct and it is likely that the
presence of the TMD affects the depth of AH membrane insertion. The
study also found that cholesterol changed the angle and rotation of
the helix within the membrane.[29] Our results
confirm and expand these observations by demonstrating cholesterol-induced
changes in the angle and rotation of the helix, relative to the bilayer
normal. At high levels of membrane cholesterol, the AH is oriented
parallel to the membrane, whereas in low levels of cholesterol, the
M2AH undergoes a ∼6° tilt and is now angled in the membrane,
along with a ∼10° rotation of the helix that may change
the ability of the M2AH to modify membrane properties (Figure ). AH domains inserted in the
membrane are known to have different biological effects that are dependent
on the helix orientation in the membrane. Many cell-penetrating antimicrobial
peptides alter membrane curvature: at low concentrations, they bind
parallel to the membrane, and at high concentrations, these peptides
often change their orientation in the membrane, so that the helix
is now perpendicular to the membrane and can form pores.[59] While the effect of concentration on the M2AH
membrane orientation has never been assessed, the ∼6°
change in angle of the M2AH (Figure ) does not appear to be sufficient to form pores in
the membrane. However, the M2AH can cause membrane leakage in vesicles
and the range of biological activity of the M2AH, from leakage to
curvature and scission, may be dependent on peptide orientation in
the membrane.[2,29,58]Here, our results show that cholesterol alters the orientation
of the M2AH peptide, which then mediates different biophysical effects
on the membrane. In low-cholesterol membranes, insertion of the angled
M2AH peptide causes changes in lipid tail packing that result in increased
lipid order,[17] and likely increase membrane
line tension[11] (Figure b). In contrast, in high levels of cholesterol,
modeling suggests that there is increased separation of anionic lipid
headgroups. In this environment, the membrane-parallel insertion of
the M2AH peptide reduces headgroup separation and does not affect
lipid order (Figures a and 4b). It is possible that M2AH cannot
further increase lipid order beyond the contribution of 30% cholesterol,
which is known to increase lipid order.[60] High membrane cholesterol levels, and the associated lipid headgroup
separation,[60] may also enable peptide binding
without disruption of membrane structure, as has been shown for other
AH-containing antimicrobial peptides.[56]M2 has been shown to cluster and mediate membrane scission
at lipid
phase boundaries, acting as a linactant and likely using the line
tension energy between the lipid phases to drive membrane scission.[2,11,58,61] Recent results have validated these predictions by showing that
increasing membrane stress facilitates M2 induction of membrane curvature.[11] Thus, alteration of either lipid headgroup separation
or lipid order and membrane tension can be sufficient to alter membrane
curvature and cause scission, thus suggesting a mechanism action for
the M2AH.[62−64] However, given that cholesterol can be an organizing
factor in lipid raft formation, which would increase local membrane
tension, it is rather surprising that, in lipid vesicle systems, high
levels of membrane cholesterol inhibit scission activity, instead
of promoting activity.[2] It is possible
that this discrepancy is dependent on the activity of cholesterol
in different membrane model systems. In single lipid phases, cholesterol
increases lipid mixing and decreases the size of lipid nanodomains,
effectively reducing nanodomain line tension, whereas with lipid mixtures
that can phase separate, increasing cholesterol in the gel phase beyond
16% causes the formation of Lo phases.[65] Thus, cholesterol may both affect the orientation of the M2AH domain
in the membrane and affect membrane tension levels (which M2AH uses
to drive membrane scission), with differential effects of cholesterol
in single lipid phases, phase-separated lipids, and in biological
membranes with structured lipid domains. Further research is necessary
to determine the specific impact of cholesterol on M2AH orientation
and function in these different biological membranes.In the
context of the full-length M2 protein, the AH domain is
but one membrane-active region. It has been shown that the TMD also
possesses curvature-altering abilities and the AH domain is more effective
in the full-length protein,[12] possibly
because the native tetramer form of the protein enhances the effective
concentration of the AH domain, or because the anchoring of one end
of the AH affects the subsequent angle of membrane insertion and,
thus, biological activity. Further work is needed in order to determine
how the structure of the AH domain is affected by its N-terminal anchoring
to the TMD and how cholesterol modifies domain orientation and function
in the context of the full-length protein. All of these components
are inter-related, and a full understanding of M2-mediated scission
will be required to understand the sum of the parts. Here, our data
suggest that cholesterol modifies M2-mediated membrane scission by
altering the angle and depth of helix membrane insertion, affecting
the formation of lipid packing defects and the induction of line tension
between lipid phases. This may allow for spatial-temporal control
over the budding process, balancing M1 interactions during assembly
with the mediation of scission during virus release.[28]
Authors: Ralf W Glaser; Carsten Sachse; Ulrich H N Dürr; Parvesh Wadhwani; Sergii Afonin; Erik Strandberg; Anne S Ulrich Journal: Biophys J Date: 2005-02-04 Impact factor: 4.033
Authors: Laura C Watkins; Ruibin Liang; Jessica M J Swanson; William F DeGrado; Gregory A Voth Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2019-07-12 Impact factor: 15.419